Download:
pdf |
pdfAppendix A
Federal Register Notice Soliciting
Comments on Information Collection
Requests
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Notices
Energy is authorized to issue securities
and assume obligations or liabilities as
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or
otherwise in respect of any security of
another person; provided that such
issuance or assumption is for some
lawful object within the corporate
purposes of Velocity American Energy,
compatible with the public interest, and
is reasonably necessary or appropriate
for such purposes.
The Commission reserves the right to
require a further showing that neither
public nor private interests will be
adversely affected by continued
approvals of Velocity American
Energy’s issuance of securities or
assumptions of liability.
Copies of the full text of the Director’s
Order are available from the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426. The Order may also be viewed
on the Commission’s Web site at
http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary
link. Enter the docket number excluding
the last three digits in the docket
number filed to access the document.
Comments, protests, and interventions
may be filed electronically via the
internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions
on the Commission’s Web site under the
‘‘e-Filing’’ link. The Commission
strongly encourages electronic filings.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–12660 Filed 6–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
[Docket No. RM98–1–000]
Records Governing Off-the-Record
Communications; Public Notice
April 18, 2008.
This constitutes notice, in accordance
with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of the receipt
of prohibited and exempt off-the-record
communications.
Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222,
September 22, 1999) requires
Commission decisional employees, who
make or receive a prohibited or exempt
off-the-record communication relevant
to the merits of a contested proceeding,
to deliver to the Secretary of the
Commission, a copy of the
communication, if written, or a
summary of the substance of any oral
communication.
Prohibited communications are
included in a public, non-decisional file
associated with, but not a part of, the
decisional record of the proceeding.
Unless the Commission determines that
the prohibited communication and any
responses thereto should become a part
of the decisional record, the prohibited
off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in
reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to
respond to any facts or contentions
made in a prohibited off-the-record
communication, and may request that
the Commission place the prohibited
communication and responses thereto
in the decisional record. The
Commission will grant such a request
only when it determines that fairness so
requires. Any person identified below as
having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the
document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable
proceeding in accordance with Rule
2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
Exempt off-the-record
communications are included in the
decisional record of the proceeding,
unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40
CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e) (1) (v).
The following is a list of off-therecord communications recently
received by the Secretary of the
Commission. The communications
listed are grouped by docket numbers in
ascending order. These filings are
available for review at the Commission
in the Public Reference Room or may be
viewed on the Commission’s Web site at
http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary
link. Enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits, in the
docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, please contact
FERC, Online Support at
[email protected] or toll
free at (866)208–3676, or for TTY,
contact (202)502–8659.
Exempt:
Docket No.
Date received
1. CP07–208–000 ................................................................................
5–5–08 ............................................................
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–12656 Filed 6–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2008–0438; FRL–8576–7]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Microbial Rules
(Renewal); EPA ICR No. 1895.04, OMB
Control No. 2040–0205
PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
announces that EPA is planning to
submit a request to renew an existing
approved Information Collection
Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). This
ICR is scheduled to expire on September
30, 2008. Before submitting the ICR to
OMB for review and approval, EPA is
soliciting comments on specific aspects
of the proposed information collection
as described below.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before August 5, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OW–2008–0438, by one of the following
methods:
• http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method): Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: [email protected].
• Mail: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32323
Presenter or requester
Hon. Charles A. Wilson.
(EPA/DC), Water Docket, MC: 2822T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center,
Public Reading Room, EPA
Headquarters West Building, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2008–
0438. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at http://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
32324
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Notices
PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
http://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through http://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at http://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Naylor, Drinking Water
Protection Division, Office of Ground
Water and Drinking Water, (MC:
4606M), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: 202–564–3847; fax number:
202–564–3755; e-mail address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
How Can I Access the Docket and/or
Submit Comments?
EPA has established a public docket
for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OW–2008–0438, which is available
for online viewing at http://
www.regulations.gov, or in person
viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room
is 202–566–1744, and the telephone
number for the Water Docket is 202–
566–2426.
Use http://www.regulations.gov to
obtain a copy of the draft collection of
information, submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of
the contents of the docket, and to access
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
those documents in the public docket
that are available electronically. Once in
the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in
the docket ID number identified in this
document.
What Information Is EPA Particularly
Interested In?
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA, EPA specifically solicits
comments and information to enable it
to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(ii) evaluate the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses. In
particular, EPA is requesting comments
from very small businesses (those that
employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA
could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses
affected by this collection.
What Should I Consider When I
Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following
suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as
possible and provide specific examples.
2. Describe any assumptions that you
used.
3. Provide copies of any technical
information and/or data you used that
support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or
costs, explain how you arrived at the
estimate that you provide.
5. Offer alternative ways to improve
the collection activity.
6. Make sure to submit your
comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
be sure to identify the docket ID number
assigned to this action in the subject
line on the first page of your response.
You may also provide the name, date,
and Federal Register citation.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
What Information Collection Activity or
ICR Does This Apply to?
Affected entities: New and existing
public water systems (PWS), primacy
agencies, and EPA.
Title: Microbial Rules (Renewal).
ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1895.04,
OMB Control No. 2040–0205.
ICR status: This ICR is currently
scheduled to expire on September 30,
2008. An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information,
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40
of the CFR, after appearing in the
Federal Register when approved, are
listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed
either by publication in the Federal
Register or by other appropriate means,
such as on the related collection
instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in
certain EPA regulations is consolidated
in 40 CFR part 9.
Abstract: The Microbial Rules
Renewal ICR examines public water
system, primacy agency and EPA
burden and costs for recordkeeping and
reporting requirements in support of the
microbial drinking water regulations.
These recordkeeping and reporting
requirements are mandatory for
compliance with 40 CFR parts 141 and
142. The following microbial
regulations are included: Surface Water
Treatment Rule (SWTR), Total Coliform
Rule (TCR), Interim Enhanced Surface
Water Treatment Rule (IESWTR), Filter
Backwash Recycling Rule (FBRR), Long
Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule (LT1ESWTR), Long
Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR), and
Ground Water Rule. Future microbialrelated rulemakings will be added to
this consolidated ICR after the
regulations are finalized and the initial,
rule-specific, ICRs are due to expire.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 0.79 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 110 / Friday, June 6, 2008 / Notices
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
The ICR provides a detailed
explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 161,274.
Frequency of response: Varies by
requirement (i.e., on occasion, monthly,
quarterly, semi-annually, and annually).
Estimated total average number of
responses for each respondent: 72.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
9,151,424 hours.
Estimated total annual costs:
$118,653,327. This includes an
estimated burden cost of $14,698,327
and an estimated cost of $22,793,000 for
capital investment and $81,162,000 for
maintenance and operational costs.
Are There Changes in the Estimates
From the Last Approval?
There is an increase of 526,559 hours
in the total estimated respondent
burden compared with that identified in
the ICR currently approved by OMB.
This increase is primarily due to
restructuring adjustments (i.e.,
incorporation of the approved burden
hours from the previously stand-alone
ICRs for the Long Term 2 Enhanced
Surface Water Treatment Rule, and
Ground Water Rule
What Is the Next Step in the Process for
This ICR?
PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
EPA will consider the comments
received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will
then be submitted to OMB for review
and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to
OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you
have any questions about this ICR or the
approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: June 2, 2008.
Cynthia C. Dougherty,
Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking
Water.
[FR Doc. E8–12708 Filed 6–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jun 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2008–0437; FRL–8576–8]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Public Water
System Supervision Program
(Renewal); EPA ICR No. 0270.43, OMB
Control No. 2040–0090
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document
announces that EPA is planning to
submit a request to renew an existing
approved Information Collection
Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). This
ICR is scheduled to expire on September
30, 2008. Before submitting the ICR to
OMB for review and approval, EPA is
soliciting comments on specific aspects
of the proposed information collection
as described below.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before August 5, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OW–2008–0437, by one of the following
methods:
• http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method): Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: OW–[email protected].
• Mail: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC), Water Docket, MC: 2822T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center,
Public Reading Room, EPA
Headquarters West Building, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2008–
0437. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at http://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through http://
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32325
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
http://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ’’anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through http://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at http://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Naylor, Drinking Water
Protection Division, Office of Ground
Water and Drinking Water, (MC:
4606M), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: 202–564–3847; fax number:
202–564–3755; e-mail address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
How Can I Access the Docket and/or
Submit Comments?
EPA has established a public docket
for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OW–2008–0437, which is available
for online viewing at http://
www.regulations.gov, or in person
viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room
is 202–566–1744, and the telephone
number for the Water Docket is 202–
566–2426.
Use http://www.regulations.gov to
obtain a copy of the draft collection of
information, submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of
the contents of the docket, and to access
those documents in the public docket
that are available electronically. Once in
the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in
E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM
06JNN1
Appendix B
Surface Water Treatment Rule
Spreadsheets
Exhibit B.1a - SWTR Unfiltered System Burden and Cost Summary
Annual
Avg. Annual
Annual
Annual Burden Annual O&M Annual Capital
Requirement
Respondents
Responses
Burden
(Labor) Cost
Cost
Cost
Raw Water
60
9,840
19,679
$604,488
$208,670
N/A
Coliforms
Sampling
On Site
Inspections &
60
60
137,605
$4,226,837
N/A
N/A
Watershed
Management
Raw Water
Turbidity
60
175,200
11,315
$347,566
$43,347
$22,189
Monitoring
Note: Disinfectant residual monitoring requirements under the SWTR are addressed in the DBP/Chems/Rads ICR.
Exhibit B.1b - SWTR Filtered System Burden and Cost Summary
Annual
Avg. Annual
Annual
Annual Burden Annual O&M Annual Capital
Requirement
Respondents
Responses
Burden
(Labor) Cost
Cost
Cost
Finished Water
1,767
5,158,761
608,125
$18,679,948
$1,055,715
$527,293
Turbidity
Monitoring
Note: Disinfectant residual monitoring requirements under the SWTR are addressed in the DBP/Chems/Rads ICR.
Exhibit B.1c - Total SWTR PWS (Filtered + Unfiltered System) Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
Annual
Respondents
Avg. Annual
Responses
Annual
Burden
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
Annual O&M
Cost
Totals for
1,827
5,343,860
776,724
$23,858,839
$1,307,732
Unfiltered and
Filtered Systems
Note: State activities associated with disinfectant residual monitoring requirements are addressed in the
DBP/Chems/Rads ICR.
Annual Capital
Cost
$549,482
Exhibit B.1d - SWTR State Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
Finished Water
Turbidity
Monitoring
Annual
Respondents
Avg. Annual
Responses
Annual
Burden
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
Annual O&M
Cost
Annual Capital
Cost
57
22,700
183,216
$7,841,486
N/A
N/A
Note: State activities associated with disinfectant residual monitoring requirements are addressed in the
DBP/Chems/Rads ICR.
Microbial ICR - SWTR
B-1
July 2008
Exhibit B.2 - SWTR System Inventory
Surface Water
and GWUDI
Non-Purchased Surface Water/GWUDI
Unfiltered Surface Water/GWUDI
Filtered Non-Purchased Surface Water/GWUDI
Population
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
Category
<100
1,179
259
1,238
438
129
636
1
0
0
437
101-500
2,093
236
475
659
148
375
4
0
0
655
501-1,000
1,167
88
82
365
60
62
3
0
0
362
1,001-3,300
2,458
68
56
944
33
44
15
0
0
929
3,301-10K
2,026
20
22
1,005
5
19
14
0
0
991
10,001-50K
1,828
6
3
962
2
2
14
0
0
948
50,001-100K
378
1
0
218
0
0
4
0
0
214
100,001-1M
306
1
1
230
0
1
4
0
0
226
>1M
16
0
1
15
0
0
1
0
0
14
Total
11,452
680
1,878
4,837
377
1,139
60
0
0
4,777
Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2007. Number of unfiltered systems from ICR done for final LT2ESWTR in 2006.
Note: Source was not specified for some systems. These PWSs were assigned to SW or GW categories based on the ratio of SW to GW systems within a given size category.
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
Total
Plants Per System
(SW/GWUDI)
CWS
NTNC
TNC
1.00
1.0
1.0
1.00
1.0
1.0
1.04
1.0
1.0
1.04
1.0
1.0
1.05
1.0
1.0
1.11
1.0
1.0
1.11
1.0
1.0
1.64
1.0
1.0
1.64
1.0
1.0
Total Filtered Non-Purchased Plants
(SW/GWUDI)
NTNC
TNC
437
129
636
655
148
375
377
60
62
967
33
44
1,041
5
19
1,052
2
2
238
0
0
371
0
1
23
0
0
5,160
377
1,139
CWS
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total Plants Monitoring Under IESWTR
(SW/GWUDI)
CWS
NTNC
TNC
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
985
2
198
0
334
0
9
0
1,525
2
2
0
1
0
3
NTNC
TNC
129
148
60
33
5
2
0
0
0
377
636
375
62
44
19
2
0
1
0
1,139
Total Filtered Plants Monitoring Under
Total Plants Monitoring Under LT1ESWTR
SWTR (SW/GWUDI)
(SW/GWUDI)
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
NTNC
TNC
207
61
302
230
68
335
328
74
187
328
74
188
328
52
54
49
8
8
783
27
36
184
6
8
920
4
17
120
1
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
68
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
40
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
37
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
14
0
0
2,565
219
596
1,069
157
541
Source: Entry pts for CWSs: From Exhibits 5.1 and 5.2 of the Draft Final Model Systems Report prepared for EPA by the Cadmus Group, Inc., in March 2005. The exhibits are an analysis of data from the 2000 Community
Water System Survey. Includes treated entry points. Excludes 2 outlier systems that had more than 100 entry points, as well as 27 systems that provided insufficient information on their treated entry points. Numbers of plants
monitoring under IESWTR and LT1ESWTR are from Appendix D and E system inventories and are based on percentage of plants using conventional or direct filtration.
Microbial ICR - SWTR
B-2
July 2008
Exhibit B.3 - Raw Water Coliforms Burden and Cost (Unfiltered Systems)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
Total
Hourly
Labor
Rate
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
Number of Unfiltered
Systems (SW and GWUDI)
CWS
NTNC
Labor Hours Per Sample
Yearly Sample
Freq.
TNC
1
4
3
15
14
9
5
4
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
0
0
52
52
104
104
156
208
260
260
260
260
Collect
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cost/Sample
O&M (materials)
Analysis
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Total
Samples/Ye
ar
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
1,716
Labor
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
CWS
52
208
312
1,560
2,184
1,826
1,358
1,040
1,040
260
9,840
Labor
Sample Collection
(hrs)
(cost)
52
$1,597
208
$6,389
312
$9,584
1560
$47,919
2184
$67,087
1826
$56,084
1358
$41,705
1040
$31,946
1040
$31,946
260
$7,986
9,840
$
302,244
O&M Costs
Analytical
Materials
Analysis
(hrs)
52
208
312
1,560
2,184
1,826
1,358
1,040
1,040
260
9840 $
(cost)
$1,597
$6,389
$9,584
$47,919
$67,087
$56,084
$41,705
$31,946
$31,946
$7,986
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,103
4,411
6,617
33,083
46,317
38,721
28,794
22,056
22,056
5,514
302,244
$
208,670
Sources: Cost per sample from ICR for proposed Aircraft Drinking Water Rule, updated from 2006 to 2007 dollars. Burden estimates incorporate results of February 2008 consultations with drinking water industry representatives.
Unfiltered systems must measure total or fecal coliform density of source water 1-5 times per week, depending on system size (40 CFR 141.74(b)).
Microbial ICR - SWTR
B-3
July 2008
Exhibit B.4 - On Site Inspections and Watershed Management Burden and Cost
(Unfiltered Systems)
Number of Unfiltered Systems (SW
and GWUDI)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
Total
Hourly
Labor
Rate
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
CWS
NTNC
Total Annual Burden and Cost
Hours/
System/
Year
TNC
1
4
3
15
14
9
5
3
1
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
0
0
48
115
221
418
826
1,411
2,160
2,947
4,070
7,392
15,792
48,456
(hrs)
(cost)
48
460
663
6,270
11,564
12,386
11,280
7,957
5,291
26,345
6,885
48,456
$1,474
$14,130
$20,366
$192,597
$355,215
$380,457
$346,476
$244,414
$162,525
$809,249
$211,498
$1,488,436
137,605
$4,226,837
Note: Burden estimates incorporate results of February 2008 consultations with drinking water industry representatives.
Microbial ICR - SWTR
B-4
July 2008
Exhibit B.5 - Raw Water Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs (Unfiltered Systems)
Labor Hours/System/Year
(Collection, Analysis, and Reporting)
Number of Unfiltered
Systems (SW and GWUDI)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
Total
Hourly
Labor
Rate
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
CWS
NTNC
% Cont.
Monitoring
TNC
1
4
3
15
14
9
5
4
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
0
0
Calibration
Continuous
Monitoring
Verification Grab
Samples
(15 min./day)*365
(1 min/reading)
*6 readings/day*365
(10 min/sample)*1
sample/day*365
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
Total Labor
Hours/Year
Total Labor
Cost/Year
189
754
566
2,829
2,640
1,655
985
754
754
189
$5,793
$23,171
$17,378
$86,891
$81,099
$50,849
$30,250
$23,171
$23,171
$5,793
11,315
$347,566
Note: Burden estimates incorporate results of February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
The SWTR requires systems using continuous monitoring to "validate the continuous measurement on a regular basis using a protocol approved by the State" (40
CFR 141.74(b)(3)). EPA assumes 1 verification sample per day.
Microbial ICR - SWTR
B-5
July 2008
Exhibit B.6 - Raw Water Turbidity Monitoring O&M and Capital Costs (Unfiltered Systems)
Number of Unfiltered
Systems (SW and
GWUDI)
Population
Category
CWS
NTNC
Activities/System/Year
% Cont.
Monitoring
TNC
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
1
4
3
15
14
9
5
4
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
60
0
0
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Annual O&M Unit Costs
Annual O&M Costs
Annual Capital Costs
Capital Unit Costs
Calibration
Verification
Grab Samples
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab
Sampling
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab Sampling
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab Sampling
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab Sampling
1 per day
1 per day
Materials
Materials
Unit O&M costs *
# Systems
Unit O&M costs *
# Systems
In-line turbidimeter
Bench-Top
Unit
1/7 of systems
replace per year
1/7 of systems
replace per year
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$1,445
$1,084
$5,418
$5,057
$3,171
$1,886
$1,445
$1,445
$361
$361
$1,445
$1,084
$5,418
$5,057
$3,171
$1,886
$1,445
$1,445
$361
$21,673
$21,673
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$206
$826
$619
$3,096
$2,890
$1,812
$1,078
$826
$826
$206
$163
$654
$490
$2,451
$2,288
$1,434
$853
$654
$654
$163
$12,385
$9,805
Note: O&M unit costs and capital unit costs have been updated from 2000 to 2007 dollars.
The SWTR requires systems using continuous monitoring to "validate the continuous measurement on a regular basis using a protocol approved by the State" (40 CFR 141.74(b)(3)). EPA assumes 1 verification sample per day.
Microbial ICR - SWTR
B-6
July 2008
Exhibit B.7 - Finished Water Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs (Filtered Systems)
Number of Filtered NonPurchased Plants (SW and
GWUDI)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
Total
Hourly
Labor
Rate
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
CWS
NTNC
TNC
230
328
49
184
120
42
25
40
37
14
68
74
8
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
335
188
8
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
1,069
157
541
Labor Hours/System/Year
(Collection, Analysis, and Reporting)
% Cont.
Monitoring
50%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Calibration
Continuous
Monitoring
Verification
Grab Samples
Grab Sample
Only
(15 min./day)*365
(1 min/reading)
*6 readings/day*365
(10 min/sample)*1
sample/day*365
(15 min/sample)*6
sample/day*365
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
547.5
547.5
547.5
547.5
547.5
547.5
547.5
547.5
547.5
547.5
Total Labor
Hours/Year
Total Labor
Cost/Year
261,578
243,745
12,213
37,431
23,236
7,999
4,759
7,535
6,997
2,633
$8,034,971
$7,487,178
$375,147
$1,149,775
$713,757
$245,715
$146,175
$231,445
$214,918
$80,867
608,125
$18,679,948
Note: The SWTR requirements for filtered systems apply only to those systems that do not use conventional or direct filtration. Systems using conventional or direct filtration monitor turbidity under the IESWTR
and LT1ESWTR. EPA assumes that 50 percent of systems serving 500 or fewer will monitor turbidity with grab samples rather than continuous monitoring. The burden estimates shown here incorporate the
results of February 2008 consultations with water industry representatives.
Microbial ICR - SWTR
B-7
July 2008
Exhibit B.8 - Finished Water Turbidity Monitoring O&M and Capital Costs (Filtered Systems)
Number of Filtered NonPurchased Plants (SW and
GWUDI)
Population
Category
CWS
NTNC
TNC
Activities/System/Year
% Cont.
Monitoring
Calibration
1 per day
1 per day
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
Total
230
328
49
184
120
42
25
40
37
14
68
74
8
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
335
188
8
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
1,069
157
541
50%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Verification
Grab Samples
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
Routine Grab
Samples
6 per day
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
Annual O&M Costs
Annual O&M Unit Costs
Continuous
Monitoring
Materials
2190
2190
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
Grab
Sampling
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab Sampling
Materials
Unit O&M costs *
# Systems
Unit O&M costs *
# Systems
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$361
$114,208
$106,422
$23,393
$71,697
$44,508
$15,322
$9,115
$14,432
$13,402
$5,043
$228,416
$212,843
$23,393
$71,697
$44,508
$15,322
$9,115
$14,432
$13,402
$5,043
$417,543
$638,172
Annual Capital Costs
Capital Unit Costs
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab Sampling
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab Sampling
In-line turbidimeter
Bench-Top
Unit
1/7 of systems
replace per year
1/7 of systems
replace per year
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,445
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$1,144
$65,262
$60,812
$13,368
$40,970
$25,433
$8,756
$5,209
$8,247
$7,658
$2,882
$103,331
$96,286
$10,583
$32,434
$20,135
$6,931
$4,124
$6,529
$6,063
$2,281
$238,596
$288,697
Note: The SWTR requirements for filtered systems apply only to those systems that do not use conventional or direct filtration. Systems using conventional or direct filtration monitor turbidity under the IESWTR and LT1ESWTR. EPA assumes that
50 percent of SWTR systems serving 500 or fewer take grab samples only; the other 50 percent monitor continuously. O&M unit costs and capital unit costs updated from 2000 to 2007 dollars.
Microbial ICR - SWTR
B-8
July 2008
Exhibit B.9
Surface Water Treatment Rule - Summary of Original and Revised Burden
Estimates
Raw Water Coliforms Burden Per Sample (Unfiltered Systems)
2004 Burden
0.08 hr (4.8 min.)
0.08 hr (4.8 min.)
Task
Sample Collection
Sample Analysis
Revised Burden
1 hr
1 hr
On Site Inspections and Watershed Management Burden per Year (Unfiltered Systems)
2004 Burden
30,912 hrs
Task
On Site Inspections and Watershed Management
System Size
>1M
Revised Burden
48,456 hrs
Raw Water Turbidity Monitoring Burden (Unfiltered Systems)
2004 Burden
5 min
5 min
Task
Calibration (Per Day)
Verification Grab Sample (Per Sample)
Revised Burden
15 min
10 min
Finished Water Turbidity Monitoring Burden (Filtered Systems)
2004 Burden
Task
Revised Burden
5 min
Calibration (Per Day)
15 min
5 min
Verification Grab Sample (Per Sample)
10 min
5 min
Grab Sample Only (Per Sample)
15 min
Assumes 50% of systems serving a population less than 500 monitor continuously.
Note: Disinfectant residual monitoring is covered in the DBP/Chem/Rads ICR.
Microbial ICR - SWTR
B-9
July 2008
Appendix C
Total Coliform Rule Spreadsheets
Exhibit C.1a - TCR PWS Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
System Monitoring
Annual
Respondents
Avg. Annual
Responses
Annual
Burden
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
Annual O&M
Cost
Annual
Capital Cost
155,693
973,454
3,464,341
$106,414,965
$77,457,439
N/A
Exhibit C.1b - TCR State Burden and Cost Summary
Annual
Respondents
Avg. Annual
Responses
Annual
Burden
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
Annual O&M
Cost
Annual
Capital Cost
57
1,868,316
467,079
$19,990,566
N/A
N/A
Sanitary Surveys
57
9,194
123,940
$5,304,522
N/A
N/A
Total
57
1,877,510
591,019
$25,295,088
N/A
N/A
Requirement
Monitoring Related
Activities
Note: Sanitary survey burden for surface water systems is included under IESWTR. Sanitary survey burden for ground water systems for year 1 of
this ICR period is included here. Sanitary survey burden for years 2 and 3 is included under the GWR (see App. G).
Number of responses for monitoring for states is based on number of PWS respondents and assumes 1 response per system per month.
State burden for monitoring assumes 15 minutes to review each system's data each month.
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
C-1
July 2008
Exhibit C.2 - Calculating Average Number of TCR Samples for 3 System Types, Combined
Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October, 2007
All PWSs
Population
Range
Minimum
Routine/
month
A
25-500
501-1k
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-4.9K
4,901-5.8K
5,801-6.7K
6,701-7.6K
7,601-8.5K
8,501-10k
10,001-12.9k
12,901-17.2K
17,201-21.5K
21,501-25K
25,001-33K
33,001-41K
41,001-50K
50,001-59K
59,001-70K
70,001-83K
83,001-96K
96,001-130K
130,001-220K
220,001-320K
320,001-450K
450,001-600K
600,001-780K
780,001-970K
970,001-1,230K
1,230,001-1,520K
1,520,001-1,850K
1,850,001-2,270K
2,270,001-3,020K
3,020,001-3,960K
Over 3,960K
Minimum
Repeat
B
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10
15
20
25
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360
390
420
450
480
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Addtnl
Routines
next mo
C
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
CWSs
Systems Samples
D
E=D*A
NTNCWSs
Systems Samples
F
G=F*A
TNCWSs
Systems
Samples
H
I=H*A
Total PWSs
Systems Samples
J=D+F+H K=E+G+I
29,282
5,678
6,496
1,732
1,184
821
761
590
446
416
604
667
763
455
303
447
336
204
178
151
102
77
126
145
57
31
14
14
6
8
5
5
2
2
0
2
29,282
5,678
12,992
5,196
4,736
4,105
4,566
4,130
3,568
3,744
6,040
6,670
11,445
9,100
7,575
13,410
13,440
10,200
10,680
10,570
8,160
6,930
12,600
17,400
8,550
5,580
2,940
3,360
1,620
2,400
1,650
1,800
780
840
0
960
16,034
1,829
749
84
46
15
20
12
13
4
10
7
5
1
0
4
1
3
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16,034
1,829
1,498
252
184
75
120
84
104
36
100
70
75
20
0
120
40
150
0
0
80
0
0
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
81,873
2,081
618
52
34
17
20
7
10
5
9
3
6
0
2
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
81,873
2,081
1,236
156
136
85
120
49
80
45
90
30
90
0
50
30
0
0
60
70
0
0
100
120
0
0
0
240
0
0
0
0
390
0
0
0
127,189
9,588
7,863
1,868
1,264
853
801
609
469
425
623
677
774
456
305
452
337
207
179
152
103
77
127
147
57
31
14
15
6
8
5
5
3
2
0
2
127,189
9,588
15,726
5,604
5,056
4,265
4,806
4,263
3,752
3,825
6,230
6,770
11,610
9,120
7,625
13,560
13,480
10,350
10,740
10,640
8,240
6,930
12,700
17,640
8,550
5,580
2,940
3,600
1,620
2,400
1,650
1,800
1,170
840
0
960
52,110
252,697
18,839
20,991
84,744
87,131
155,693
360,819
TCR Samples - combined GW+SW/GWUDI
Population
PopRange
Routine
A
25-500
501-1k
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25k
25,001-50k
Over 50K
Total
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.2
15.9
37.5
104.7
Addtnl
Routines
next mo
C
Repeat
B
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
CWSs
Sys
D
TNCWSs
NTNCWSs
Samples
E=D*A
Sys
G
Samples
H=G*A
Sys
J
Samples
K=J*A
Total PWSs
Sys
M=D+G+J
Samples
N=E+H+K
29,282
5,678
6,496
1,732
1,184
3,638
2,188
987
925
29,282
5,678
12,992
5,196
4,736
26,153
34,790
37,050
96,820
16,034
1,829
749
84
46
74
13
8
2
16,034
1,829
1,498
252
184
519
165
310
200
81,873
2,081
618
52
34
68
11
1
6
81873.00
2081.00
1236.00
156.00
136.00
469.00
170.00
30.00
980.00
127,189
9,588
7,863
1,868
1,264
3,780
2,212
996
933
127,189
9,588
15,726
5,604
5,056
27,141
35,125
37,390
98,000
52,110
252,697
18,839
20,991
84,744
87131.00
155,693
360,819
C-2
July 2008
Exhibit C.2 (Continued). Average Number of TCR Samples for Surface/GWUDI Systems
SURFACE/GWUDI
Population
Range
Routine
Repeat
A
B
25-500
501-1k
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-4.9K
4,901-5.8K
5,801-6.7K
6,701-7.6K
7,601-8.5K
8,501-10k
10,001-12.9k
12,901-17.2K
17,201-21.5K
21,501-25K
25,001-33K
33,001-41K
41,001-50K
50,001-59K
59,001-70K
70,001-83K
83,001-96K
96,001-130K
130,001-220K
220,001-320K
320,001-450K
450,001-600K
600,001-780K
780,001-970K
970,001-1,230K
1,230,001-1,520K
1,520,001-1,850K
1,850,001-2,270K
2,270,001-3,020K
3,020,001-3,960K
Over 3,960K
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10
15
20
25
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360
390
420
450
480
Addtnl
Routines
next mo
C
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Systems
D
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CWSs
Samples
E=D*A
3,272
1,167
1,841
617
447
332
306
273
192
184
292
352
425
265
169
270
215
132
119
104
73
65
94
116
52
27
12
12
5
7
4
5
1
2
3,272
1,167
3,681
1,852
1,788
1,660
1,838
1,911
1,536
1,656
2,920
3,520
6,375
5,300
4,225
8,100
8,600
6,600
7,140
7,280
5,840
5,850
9,400
13,920
7,800
4,860
2,520
2,880
1,350
2,100
1,320
1,800
390
840
0
960
495
88
57
11
4
2
6
2
3
0
3
2
2
0
142,252
680
2
11,452
NTNCWSs
Systems
Samples
F
G=F*A
TNCWSs
Systems Samples
H
I=H*A
495
88
114
33
16
10
36
14
24
0
30
20
30
0
0
30
0
75
0
0
80
0
0
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
1
1,713
82
45
11
6
3
5
4
0
0
4
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1,215
1,878
Total PWSs
Systems Samples
J=D+F+H K=E+G+I
1,713
82
90
33
24
15
32
28
0
0
40
10
15
0
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
390
0
0
0
5,480
1,337
1,943
639
457
337
318
279
195
184
299
355
428
265
169
272
215
134
119
104
74
65
94
118
52
27
12
12
5
7
4
5
2
2
0
2
5,480
1,337
3,885
1,918
1,828
1,685
1,906
1,953
1,560
1,656
2,990
3,550
6,420
5,300
4,225
8,160
8,600
6,675
7,140
7,280
5,920
5,850
9,400
14,160
7,800
4,860
2,520
2,880
1,350
2,100
1,320
1,800
780
840
0
960
2,622
14,009
146,089
TCR Sampling - SW/GWUDI
Population
PopRange
Routine
A
25-500
501-1k
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25k
25,001-50k
Over 50K
Total
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.3
16.0
37.8
108.9
Addtnl
Routines
next mo
C
Repeat
B
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
CWSs - SW
Sys
D
Samples
E=D*A
NTNCWSs - SW
TNCWSs - SW
Sys
G
Sys
J
Samples
H=G*A
Total PWSs - SW
Samples
Sys
Samples
K=J*A M=D+G+J N=E+H+K
3,272
1,167
1,841
617
447
1,579
1,211
617
700
3,272
1,167
3,681
1,852
1,788
11,521
19,420
23,300
76,250
495
88
57
11
4
16
4
3
2
495
88
114
33
16
114
50
105
200
1,713
82
45
11
6
16
2
1
2
1,713
82
90
33
24
115
25
30
510
5,480
1,337
1,943
639
457
1,612
1,217
621
704
5,480
1,337
3,885
1,918
1,828
11,750
19,495
23,435
76,960
11,452
142,252
680
1,215
1,878
2,622
14,009
146,089
C-3
July 2008
Exhibit C.2 (Continued). Average Number of TCR Samples for Ground Water Systems
Ground Water
Population
Range
25-500
501-1k
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-4.9K
4,901-5.8K
5,801-6.7K
6,701-7.6K
7,601-8.5K
8,501-10k
10,001-12.9k
12,901-17.2K
17,201-21.5K
21,501-25K
25,001-33K
33,001-41K
41,001-50K
50,001-59K
59,001-70K
70,001-83K
83,001-96K
96,001-130K
130,001-220K
220,001-320K
320,001-450K
450,001-600K
600,001-780K
780,001-970K
970,001-1,230K
1,230,001-1,520K
1,520,001-1,850K
1,850,001-2,270K
2,270,001-3,020K
3,020,001-3,960K
Over 3,960K
Routine
Repeat
A
B
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10
15
20
25
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360
390
420
450
480
Addtnl
Routines
next mo
Systems
D
C
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Total
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
26,010
4,511
4,655
1,115
737
489
455
317
254
232
312
315
338
190
134
177
121
72
59
47
29
12
32
29
5
4
2
2
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
40,658
TCR Sampling - Ground Water
Min
Population
Samp/
month
PopRange
A
25-500
501-1k
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25k
25,001-50k
Over 50K
CWSs
Samples
E=D*A
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.1
15.7
37.2
91.4
Min
Repeat
Addtnl
Routines
next mo
C
B
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
26,010
4,511
9,311
3,344
2,948
2,445
2,728
2,219
2,032
2,088
3,120
3,150
5,070
3,800
3,350
5,310
4,840
3,600
3,540
3,290
2,320
1,080
3,200
3,480
750
720
420
480
270
300
330
0
390
0
0
0
15,539
1,741
692
73
42
13
14
10
10
4
7
5
3
1
110,445
18,159
CWSs - GW
Sys
D
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
NTNCWSs
Systems
Samples
F
G=F*A
Samples
E=D*A
3
1
2
0
0
TNCWSs
Systems
Samples
H
I=H*A
15,539
1,741
1,384
219
168
65
84
70
80
36
70
50
45
20
0
90
40
75
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
80,160
1,999
573
41
28
14
15
3
10
5
5
2
5
19,776
82,866
2
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
NTNCWSs - GW
TNCWSs - GW
Sys
G
Sys
J
Samples
H=G*A
80,160
1,999
1,146
123
112
70
88
21
80
45
50
20
75
0
50
0
0
0
60
70
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
240
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
121,709
8,251
5,920
1,229
807
516
483
330
274
241
324
322
346
191
136
180
122
74
60
48
29
12
33
29
5
4
2
3
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
121,709
8,251
11,841
3,686
3,228
2,580
2,900
2,310
2,192
2,169
3,240
3,220
5,190
3,820
3,400
5,400
4,880
3,675
3,600
3,360
2,320
1,080
3,300
3,480
750
720
420
720
270
300
330
0
390
0
0
0
84,509
141,684
214,730
Total PWSs - GW
Samples
K=J*A
Sys
M=D+G+J
Samples
N=E+H+K
26,010
4,511
4,655
1,115
737
2,059
977
370
225
26,010
4,511
9,311
3,344
2,948
14,632
15,370
13,750
20,570
15,539
1,741
692
73
42
58
9
6
0
15,539
1,741
1,384
219
168
405
115
205
0
80,160
1,999
573
41
28
52
9
0
4
80,160
1,999
1,146
123
112
354
145
0
470
121,709
8,251
5,920
1,229
807
2,168
995
376
229
121,709
8,251
11,841
3,686
3,228
15,391
15,630
13,955
21,040
40,658
110,445
18,159
19,776
82,866
84,509
141,684
214,730
C-4
Total PWSs
Systems Samples
J=D+F+H K=E+G+I
July 2008
Exhibit C.3 - Inventory of Systems with Violations (for Routine and Repeat Monitoring)
Inventory
Population
Range
GW
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
26,010
4,511
4,655
1,115
737
2,059
977
370
225
Total
40,658
CWSs
SW/GUDI
3,272
1,167
1,841
617
447
1,579
1,211
617
700
11,452
NTNCWSs
SW/GUDI
Total
GW
29,282
5,678
6,496
1,732
1,184
3,638
2,188
987
925
15,539
1,741
692
73
42
58
9
6
0
52,110
18,159
495
88
57
11
4
16
4
3
2
680
Total
GW
16,034
1,829
749
84
46
74
13
8
2
80,160
1,999
573
41
28
52
9
0
4
18,839
82,866
TNCWSs
SW/GUDI
Total
1,713
82
45
11
6
16
2
1
2
1,878
GW
NCWSs
SW/GUDI
Total
Population
Range
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
81,873
2,081
618
52
34
68
11
1
6
95,699
3,740
1,265
114
70
110
18
6
4
2,208
170
102
22
10
32
6
4
4
97,907
3,910
1,367
136
80
142
24
9
8
84,744
101,025
2,558
103,583
Violation Rate
CWS
SW/GUDI
GW
5.37%
2.99%
3.51%
0.84%
1.39%
3.87%
3.93%
1.49%
2.22%
1.99%
1.71%
2.35%
0.79%
0.67%
2.38%
3.04%
1.55%
1.14%
Violation Rate
NCWS
SW/GUDI
GW
4.56%
3.77%
4.66%
0.42%
2.82%
2.82%
3.26%
1.00%
0.00%
1.86%
3.53%
4.64%
1.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Source: Violation rates based on SDWIS data on the number of
systems w/monthly TCR violations from the FY07Q03 frozen
database
Source: TCR Inventory, pages C-1 through C-9
CWSs with MCL Violations, TC+ Samples, No TC+ Samples
Population
Range
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
CWS Inventory
(from TCR Inventory)
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
A
B
C
26,010
3,272
29,282
4,511
1,167
5,678
4,655
1,841
6,496
1,115
617
1,732
737
447
1,184
2,059
1,579
3,638
977
1,211
2,188
370
617
987
225
700
925
40,658
11,452
52,110
CWSs with MCL Vios (# of Samples)
5.10% = Vio Rate
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
D
E
F
1,398
65
1,463
135
20
155
163
43
207
9
5
14
10
3
13
80
38
117
38
37
75
6
10
15
5
8
13
1,845
228
2,073
CWSs with TC+ Samples
3 x # of Vios
SW/GUDI
Total
H=E*3
I=F*3
195
4,389
60
465
130
620
15
43
9
40
113
352
111
226
29
45
24
39
GW
G=D*3
4,194
405
490
28
31
239
115
17
15
5,534
684
6,218
CWSs with "Clean" Samples
( =Inventory-Sys w/TC+ )
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
J=A-G
K=B-H L=C-I
21,816
3,077
24,893
4,106
1,107
5,213
4,165
1,711
5,876
1,087
603
1,689
706
438
1,144
1,819
1,466
3,286
862
1,100
1,962
353
588
942
210
676
886
35,125
10,767
45,892
Source: Number of systems with violations from SDWIS FY2007. Assumes that for every system with a violation, there are 3 systems with TC+ samples that trigger repeat
sampling and in some cases additional routine monitoring.
Inventory of Systems with Violations (for Routine and Repeat Monitoring) continued
NCWSs with MCL Violations, TC+ Samples, No TC+ Samples
NCWS Inventory
NCWSs with MCL Vios
Population
(from TCR Inventory)
4.46% = Vio Rate
Range
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
GW
SW/GUDI Total
A
B
C
D
E
F
25-500
95,699
2,208
97,907
4,360
41
4,401
501-1K
3,740
170
3,910
141
6
147
1,001-2.5K
1,265
102
1,367
59
5
64
2,501-3.3K
114
22
136
0
0
1
3,301-4.1K
70
10
80
2
0
2
4,101-10K
110
32
142
3
0
3
10,001-25K
18
6
24
1
0
1
25,001-50K
6
4
9
0
0
0
Over 50K
4
4
8
0
0
0
Total
101,025
2,558
103,583
4,566
52
4618
NCWSs with TC+ Samples
3 x # of Vios
SW/GUDI
Total
H=E*3
I=F*3
123
13,203
18
441
14
191
1
2
0
6
0
9
0
2
0
0
0
0
GW
G=D*3
13,080
423
177
1
6
9
2
0
0
13,698
156
13,854
NCWSs with "Clean" Samples
( =Inventory-Sys w/TC+ )
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
J=A-G
K=B-H L=C-I
82,619
2,085
84,704
3,317
152
3,469
1,088
88
1,176
113
21
134
64
10
74
100
32
133
16
6
22
5
4
9
4
4
8
87,327
2,402
89,729
Source: Number of systems with violations from SDWIS FY2007. Assumes that for every system with a violation, there are 3 systems with TC+ samples that trigger repeat
sampling and in some cases additional routine monitoring.
All Systems with MCL Violations, TC+ Samples, No TC+ Samples
Population
Range
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
Population
Range
25-500 - TC+*
25-500 - rest
501-1K - TC+*
501-1K - rest
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
Total PWS Inventory
(CWS + NCWS)
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
A
B
C
121,709
5,480 127,189
8,251
1,337
9,588
5,920
1,943
7,863
1,229
639
1,868
807
457
1,264
2,168
1,612
3,780
995
1,217
2,212
376
621
996
229
704
933
141,684
14,009
155,693
PWSs with MCL Vios
(CWS + NCWS)
SW/GUDI
Total
E
F
106
5864
26
302
48
270
5
15
3
15
38
120
37
76
10
15
8
13
GW
D
5,758
276
222
10
12
83
39
6
5
6,411
280
6690.79232
Inventory for Calculating
Routine Monitoring
GW*
SW/GUDI
Total
M
N
O
17,274
318
17,592
104,435
5,162 109,597
828
78
906
7,423
1,259
8,682
5,920
1,943
7,863
1,229
639
1,868
807
457
1,264
2,168
1,612
3,780
995
1,217
2,212
376
621
996
229
704
933
Inventory for Calculating
Repeat/Addtl Routine Mon
GW
SW/GUDI Total
P
Q
R
17,274
318
17,592
0
0
0
828
78
906
0
0
0
667
144
811
30
15
45
37
9
46
248
113
361
117
111
228
17
29
45
15
24
39
141,684
19,232
14,009
155,693
840
PWSs with TC+ Samples
(CWS + NCWS)
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
G=D*3
H=E*3
I=F*3
17,274
318
17,592
828
78
906
667
144
811
30
15
45
37
9
46
248
113
361
117
111
228
17
29
45
15
24
39
19,232
840
20,072
PWSs with "Clean" Samples
( =Inventory-Sys w/TC+ )
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
J=A-G
K=B-H L=C-I
104,435
5,162 109,597
7,423
1,259
8,682
5,253
1,799
7,052
1,199
624
1,823
770
448
1,218
1,920
1,499
3,419
878
1,106
1,984
359
592
951
214
680
894
122,452
13,169
135,621
20,072
* GW CWSs (serving 1,000 or less) with TC+ results sample monthly rather than quarterly.
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
C-5
July 2008
Exhibit C.4 - Sampling - Burden, Cost, and Frequencies of Monitoring
GW
Size
Category
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Labor Labor Hours Required
Rates Collection Analysis
($/hr) (hrs/sample) (hrs/sample)
A
B
C
$30.72
0.5 0.166667
$30.72
0.5 0.166667
$30.72
0.5 0.166667
$30.72
0.5 0.166667
$30.72
0.5 0.166667
$30.72
0.5 0.166667
$30.72
1.0 0.166667
$30.72
1.0 0.166667
$30.72
1.0 0.166667
Analytical Cost/Sample
Samples for Total Coliforms
PurchServ
D
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
O&M-matrl O&M-labor
E
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
F=C*A
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
Samples for Fecal/E.coli
PurchServ
O&M-matrl O&M-labor
G
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
H
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
I=C*A
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
Monitoring
Frequency per Year
Most
Other*
J
K
4
4
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
Number of
Routine
Smp/Sys
L
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.1
15.7
37.2
91.4
Minimum
Addtl
Repeat
Routines
Samples next mo
M
N
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
3
1
3
0
3
0
3
0
3
0
For Systems that are TC+,
Routine
Percentage of Routine
Samples
Samples Assumed to Be TC+ that=TC+
O
P=L*O
100%
1.0
100%
1.0
50%
1.0
50%
1.5
50%
2.0
25%
1.8
25%
3.9
10%
3.7
10%
9.1
Sliding
TC+
Repeat scale- TC+ Repeat
Repeats
Q=P*M
R
S=Q*R
4.0
50%
2.0
4.0
50%
2.0
3.0
50%
1.5
4.5
25%
1.1
6.0
25%
1.5
5.4
25%
1.4
11.7
25%
2.9
11.1
25%
2.8
27.3
10%
2.7
* GW CWSs serving <=1,000 with TC-positive samples monitor monthly rather than quarterly.
Note: Number of routine samples per system from TCR Inventory page. Number is a weighted average based on number of systems in
each size category.
SW/GWUDI
Size
Category
Labor
Rates
($/hr)
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Labor Hours Required
Collection Analysis
(hrs/sample)
A
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
B
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
(hrs/sample)
C
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
Analytical Cost/Sample
Samples for Total Coliforms
PurchServ
D
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
O&M-matrl O&M-labor
E
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
F
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
Samples for Fecal/E.coli
PurchServ
G
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
O&M-matrl O&M-labor
H
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
$21.21
I
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
$5.12
Monitoring
Frequency
per Year
J
K
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
Number of
Routine
Smp/Sys
L
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.3
16.0
37.8
108.9
Minimum
Addtl
Repeat
Routines
Samples next mo
M
N
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
3
1
3
0
3
0
3
0
3
0
For Systems that are TC+,
Routine
Percentage of Routine
Samples
Samples Assumed to Be TC+ that=TC+
O
P=L*O
100%
1.0
100%
1.0
50%
1.0
50%
1.5
50%
2.0
25%
1.8
25%
4.0
10%
3.8
10%
10.9
Repeat
Q=P*M
4.0
4.0
3.0
4.5
6.0
5.4
12.0
11.4
32.7
Sliding
TC+
scale-TC+ Repeat
Repeat
R
S=Q*R
50%
2.0
50%
2.0
50%
1.5
25%
1.1
25%
1.5
25%
1.4
25%
3.0
25%
2.9
10%
3.3
Note: Number of routine samples per system from TCR Inventory page. Number is a weighted average based on number of systems in
each size category.
Notes: Labor estimates take into account the results of February 2008 consultations with water industry
representatives. Overall sample costs are conservative estimates. Many systems now use a method allowing for
both total coliforms and fecal/E.coli to be tested at one time. Average sample cost based on research conducted
for the Aircraft Drinking Water Rule in Nov. 2006.
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
C-6
July 2008
Exhibit C.5 - Routine Monitoring - Burden and Cost
a. Routine-GW
Size
Category
25-500 - TC+*
25-500 - rest
501-1K - TC+*
501-1K - rest
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
Number of
PWSs
A (from
"Systems
with
Violations")
17,274
104,435
828
7,423
5,920
1,229
807
2,168
995
376
229
Monitoring
Frequency
per Year
B = J or K
from
"Sampling"
Routine
Samples/
Sys
C=L
from
"Sampling"
12
4
12
4
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.1
15.7
37.2
91.4
141,684
Total
Samples/
Sys/Yr
D=B*C
Sample Collection
Labor (per System per Year)
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Total Burden
Analytical Costs per System
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
Materials
(hrs)
E = D*
B from
"Sampling"
F = E*
A from
"Sampling"
G = D*
C from
"Sampling"
H= G*
A from
"Sampling"
I = D*
E from
"Sampling"
J = E+G
Cost (per System per Year)
O&M
Labor
K=I
L = F+ H
Total Cost
per System
per Year
M=K+L
Total Annual
Burden - Hours
N=A*J
GW Routine Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
O=A*M
P=A*K
Labor Cost
Q=A*L
12.0
4.0
12.0
4.0
24.0
36.0
48.0
85.3
188.8
445.9
1,097.1
6.0
2.0
6.0
2.0
12.0
18.0
24.0
42.6
188.8
445.9
1097.1
$184.30
$61.43
$184.30
$61.43
$368.61
$552.91
$737.21
$1,308.56
$5,799.42
$13,696.83
$33,699.92
2.0
0.7
2.0
0.7
4.0
6.0
8.0
14.2
31.5
74.3
182.8
$61.43
$21.50
$61.43
$21.50
$122.87
$184.30
$245.74
$436.19
$967.59
$2,282.29
$5,615.12
$254.49
$84.83
$254.49
$84.83
$508.98
$763.46
$1,017.95
$1,808.78
$4,003.56
$9,457.31
$23,265.82
8.0
2.7
8.0
2.7
16.0
24.0
32.0
56.8
220.3
520.2
1279.9
$254.49
$84.83
$254.49
$84.83
$508.98
$763.46
$1,017.95
$1,808.78
$4,003.56
$9,457.31
$23,265.82
$245.74
$82.94
$245.74
$82.94
$491.48
$737.21
$982.95
$1,744.74
$6,767.02
$15,979.13
$39,315.04
$500.23
$167.77
$500.23
$167.77
$1,000.45
$1,500.68
$2,000.90
$3,553.52
$10,770.57
$25,436.44
$62,580.86
138,192.0
281,974.5
6,624.0
20,041.5
94,725.7
29,487.4
25,824.0
123,161.4
219,198.5
195,335.1
293,097.1
$8,640,900.50
$17,520,625.82
$414,186.96
$1,245,291.37
$5,923,030.77
$1,843,797.63
$1,614,728.89
$7,705,229.03
$10,716,718.83
$9,551,381.51
$14,331,017.17
$4,396,019.17
$8,859,138.25
$210,715.75
$629,669.77
$3,013,315.20
$938,023.73
$821,486.04
$3,922,047.26
$3,983,538.76
$3,551,220.00
$5,327,873.67
$4,244,881.33
$8,661,487.57
$203,471.21
$615,621.60
$2,909,715.57
$905,773.90
$793,242.85
$3,783,181.77
$6,733,180.07
$6,000,161.50
$9,003,143.50
1,957.1
1,844.4
$56,654.94
326.2
$10,019.97
$41,504.50
2,170.6
$41,504.50
$66,674.91
$108,179.41
1,427,661.3
$79,506,908.47
$35,653,047.60
$43,853,860.87
*GW CWSs serving 1000 or fewer with TC-positive samples.
b. Routine-SW
Size
Category
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Number of
PWSs
A (from
"Systems
with
Violations")
5,480
1,337
1,943
639
457
1,612
1,217
621
704
Total
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
14,009
Monitoring
Frequency
per Year
B = J or K
from
"Sampling"
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
Routine
Samples/
Sys
C=L
from
"Sampling"
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.3
16.0
37.8
108.9
Total
Samples/
Sys/Yr
D=B*C
Sample Collection
Labor (per System per Year)
Analysis (in-house
O&M
Total Burden
Analytical Costs per System
Cost (per System per Year)
O&M
Labor
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
Materials
(hrs)
(F+H)
(I+J)
E = D*
B from
"Sampling"
F = E*
A from
"Sampling"
G = D*
C from
"Sampling"
H= G*
A from
"Sampling"
I = D*
E from
"Sampling"
J = E+G
K=I
L = F+ H
Total Cost
per System
per Year
M=K+L
Total Annua
Burden
N=A*J
SW Routine Monitoring
Total Annua
O&M Cost
Cost
O=A*M
P=A*K
Labor Cost
Q=A*L
12.0
12.0
24.0
36.0
48.0
87.5
192.4
453.2
1,307.1
6.0
6.0
12.0
18.0
24.0
43.8
192.4
453.2
1307.1
$184.30
$184.30
$368.61
$552.91
$737.21
$1,345.42
$5,910.00
$13,921.07
$40,150.55
2.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
14.6
32.1
75.5
217.9
$61.43
$61.43
$122.87
$184.30
$245.74
$448.47
$986.02
$2,319.15
$6,693.29
$254.49
$254.49
$508.98
$763.46
$1,017.95
$1,856.43
$4,081.05
$9,610.31
$27,720.97
8.0
8.0
16.0
24.0
32.0
58.4
224.5
528.7
1525.0
$254.49
$254.49
$508.98
$763.46
$1,017.95
$1,856.43
$4,081.05
$9,610.31
$27,720.97
$245.74
$245.74
$491.48
$737.21
$982.95
$1,793.89
$6,896.03
$16,240.22
$46,843.84
$500.23
$500.23
$1,000.45
$1,500.68
$2,000.90
$3,650.32
$10,977.08
$25,850.53
$74,564.81
43,840.0
10,697.6
31,082.3
15,344.6
14,624.0
94,121.3
273,216.5
328,058.4
1,073,600.0
$2,741,237.39
$668,904.73
$1,943,520.18
$959,467.77
$914,412.77
$5,883,101.22
$13,359,101.59
$16,040,255.41
$52,493,628.83
$1,394,592.17
$340,302.26
$988,757.13
$488,124.90
$465,203.37
$2,991,952.14
$4,966,635.90
$5,963,197.67
$19,515,565.03
$1,346,645.23
$328,602.46
$954,763.05
$471,342.87
$449,209.39
$2,891,149.07
$8,392,465.69
$10,077,057.75
$32,978,063.81
2,172.3
2,062.5
$63,354.37
362.1
$11,122.72
$46,068.13
2,424.6
$46,068.13
$74,477.10
$120,545.23
1,884,584.6
$95,003,629.89
$37,114,330.57
$57,889,299.32
C-7
July 2008
Exhibit C.6 - Repeat Monitoring - Burden and Cost
a. Repeat-GW
Size
Category
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
PWSs
A (from
"Systems
with
Violations)
17,274
828
667
30
37
248
117
17
15
Repeat
Samples/
System
B = Q from
"Sampling"
4
4
3
4.5
6
5.4
11.7
11.1
27.3
19,232
Labor (per System per Year)
Sample Collection
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Analytical Costs
Total Burden Cost (per System Per Year)
(per System
O&M
Labor
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
Materials
per Year) (hrs)
C = B*
B from
"Sampling"
D = C*
A from
"Sampling"
E=B*
C from
"Sampling"
F = E*
A from
"Sampling"
G = B*
E from
"Sampling"
H=C+E
J=G
K=D+F
Total Cost
(per System
per Year)
L=J+K
Total Number
of Samples
M=A*B
69096
3312
2001
133
219
1341
1369
185
410
2.0
2.0
1.5
2.3
3.0
2.7
11.7
11.1
27.3
$61.43
$61.43
$46.08
$70.65
$92.15
$82.94
$359.39
$340.96
$838.58
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.8
1.0
0.9
2.0
1.9
4.6
$21.50
$21.50
$15.36
$24.57
$30.72
$27.65
$61.43
$58.36
$141.30
$84.83
$84.83
$63.62
$95.43
$127.24
$114.52
$248.13
$235.40
$578.96
2.7
2.7
2.0
3.1
4.0
3.6
13.7
13.0
31.9
$84.83
$84.83
$63.62
$95.43
$127.24
$114.52
$248.13
$235.40
$578.96
$82.93
$82.93
$61.44
$95.22
$122.87
$110.59
$420.82
$399.32
$979.88
$167.76
$167.76
$125.06
$190.65
$250.11
$225.11
$668.95
$634.72
$1,558.84
63.6
$1,953.61
13.1
$402.39
$1,632.96
76.7
$1,632.96
$2,356.00
$3,988.96
78,066
Total Annual
Burden
N=A*H
GW Repeat Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
O=A*L
P=A*J
Labor Cost
Q=A*K
46,639.8 $2,897,886.24
2,235.6
$138,905.28
1,333.8
$83,401.08
91.6
$5,630.88
146.3
$9,145.27
894.2
$55,917.86
1,602.5
$78,248.53
216.9
$10,592.35
478.5
$23,382.60
$1,465,353.42
$70,239.24
$42,427.45
$2,818.54
$4,652.53
$28,447.04
$29,024.30
$3,928.41
$8,684.40
$1,432,532.82
$68,666.04
$40,973.63
$2,812.34
$4,492.74
$27,470.82
$49,224.22
$6,663.94
$14,698.20
53,639.2 $3,303,110.09
$1,655,575.33
$1,647,534.75
Note: Systems with TC-positive samples are required to take 4 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample if they serve 1,000 people or fewer. Larger systems must take 3 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample.
b. Repeat-SW
Size
Category
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
PWSs
A (from
"Systems
with
Violations)
318
78
144
15
9
113
111
29
24
840
Repeat
Samples/
System
B = Q from
"Sampling"
4
4
3
4.5
6
5.4
12
11.4
32.7
Labor (per System per Year)
Sample Collection
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Analytical Costs
Total Burden Cost (per System Per Year)
(per System
O&M
Labor
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
Materials
per Year) (hrs)
C = B*
B from
"Sampling"
D = C*
A from
"Sampling"
E=B*
C from
"Sampling"
F = E*
A from
"Sampling"
G = B*
E from
"Sampling"
H=C+E
J=G
K=D+F
Total Cost
(per System
per Year)
L=J+K
Total Number
of Samples
M=A*B
1272
312
431
69
54
610
1327
327
785
2.0
2.0
1.5
2.3
3.0
2.7
12.0
11.4
32.7
$61.43
$61.43
$46.08
$70.65
$92.15
$82.94
$368.61
$350.18
$1,004.45
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.8
1.0
0.9
2.0
1.9
5.5
$21.50
$21.50
$15.36
$24.57
$30.72
$27.65
$61.43
$58.36
$168.94
$84.83
$84.83
$63.62
$95.43
$127.24
$114.52
$254.49
$241.76
$693.48
2.7
2.7
2.0
3.1
4.0
3.6
14.0
13.3
38.2
$84.83
$84.83
$63.62
$95.43
$127.24
$114.52
$254.49
$241.76
$693.48
$82.93
$82.93
$61.44
$95.22
$122.87
$110.59
$430.04
$408.54
$1,173.39
$167.76
$167.76
$125.06
$190.65
$250.11
$225.11
$684.53
$650.30
$1,866.87
69.6
$2,137.92
14.0
$430.03
$1,760.20
83.6
$1,760.20
$2,567.95
$4,328.15
5,187
Total Annual
Burden
N=A*H
SW Repeat Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
(C x R)
O=A*L
P=A*J
Labor Cost
(C x S)
Q=A*K
858.6
210.6
287.5
47.2
36.2
406.8
1,548.3
381.8
916.8
$53,347.68
$13,085.28
$17,976.83
$2,904.20
$2,263.64
$25,435.60
$75,705.76
$18,669.48
$44,804.88
$26,975.94
$6,616.74
$9,145.10
$1,453.70
$1,151.60
$12,939.83
$28,145.38
$6,940.69
$16,643.52
$26,371.74
$6,468.54
$8,831.73
$1,450.50
$1,112.05
$12,495.77
$47,560.38
$11,728.79
$28,161.36
4,693.8
$254,193.35
$110,012.50
$144,180.86
Note: Systems with TC-positive samples are required to take 4 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample if they serve 1,000 people or fewer. Larger systems must take 3 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample.
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
C-8
July 2008
Exhibit C.7 - Fecal / E.coli Monitoring - Burden and Cost
a. Fecal/E. Coli - GW
Size
Category
PWSs
A (from
"Systems with
Violations")
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
17,274
828
667
30
37
248
117
17
15
Total
19,232
TC+
Samples/
System
B=P+S
(both from
"Sampling")
3.0
3.0
2.5
2.6
3.5
3.2
6.8
6.5
11.8
Labor (per System per Year)
Sample Collection
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Total Burden Cost (per System per Year) Total Cost
Analytical Costs (per System
O&M
Labor
(per System
Materials
per Year) (hrs)
per Year)
G=B*
H=C+E
I=G
J=D+F
K=I+J
H (from
"Sampling")
Total Annual
Burden
L=A*H
GW Fecal/E. coli Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
M=A*K
N=A*I
Labor Cost
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
C=B*
B (from
"Sampling")
D=C*
A (from
"Sampling")
E=B*
C (from
"Sampling")
F=E*
A (from
"Sampling")
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.8
1.6
6.8
6.5
11.8
$46.08
$46.08
$39.93
$39.93
$55.29
$49.15
$208.88
$199.66
$362.46
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.5
1.1
1.1
2.0
$15.36
$15.36
$12.29
$12.29
$18.43
$15.36
$33.79
$33.79
$61.43
$63.62
$63.62
$53.02
$55.14
$74.23
$67.86
$144.21
$137.85
$250.25
2.0
2.0
1.7
1.7
2.4
2.1
7.9
7.6
13.8
$63.62
$63.62
$53.02
$55.14
$74.23
$67.86
$144.21
$137.85
$250.25
$61.44
$61.44
$52.22
$52.22
$73.72
$64.51
$242.67
$233.45
$423.89
$125.06
$125.06
$105.24
$107.36
$147.95
$132.37
$386.88
$371.30
$674.14
34,548.0
1,656.0
1,133.7
50.2
87.8
521.6
924.1
126.8
207.0
$2,160,286.44
$103,549.68
$70,183.35
$3,170.89
$5,409.79
$32,881.03
$45,254.19
$6,196.34
$10,112.10
$1,098,971.88 $1,061,314.56
$52,677.36
$50,872.32
$35,358.43
$34,824.92
$1,628.57
$1,542.33
$2,714.22
$2,695.57
$16,856.59
$16,024.44
$16,868.56
$28,385.63
$2,300.47
$3,895.87
$3,753.75
$6,358.35
34.1
$1,047.46
7.1
$218.10
$909.80
41.2
$909.80
$1,265.56
$2,175.36
39,255.2
$2,437,043.81
$1,231,129.83 $1,205,913.99
O=A*J
Each system with a TC-positive sample must check that sample for fecal coliform or E. coli.
b. Fecal/E. Coli - SW
Size
Category
PWSs
A (from
"Systems with
Violations")
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
318
78
144
15
9
113
111
29
24
Total
840
TC+
Samples/
System
B=P+S
(both from
"Sampling")
3.0
3.0
2.5
2.6
3.5
3.2
7.0
6.7
14.2
Labor (per System per Year)
Sample Collection
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Total
Cost (per System per Year) Total Cost
Analytical Costs (per System
O&M
Labor
(per System
Materials
per Year) (hrs)
per Year)
G=B*
H=C+E
I=G
J=D+F
K=I+J
H (from
"Sampling")
Total Annual
Burden
L=A*H
SW Fecal/E. coli Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
M=A*K
N=A*I
Labor Cost
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
C=B*
B (from
"Sampling")
D=C*
A (from
"Sampling")
E=B*
C (from
"Sampling")
F=E*
A (from
"Sampling")
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.8
1.6
7.0
6.7
14.2
$46.08
$46.08
$39.93
$39.93
$55.29
$49.15
$215.02
$205.81
$436.19
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.5
1.2
1.1
2.4
$15.36
$15.36
$12.29
$12.29
$18.43
$15.36
$36.86
$33.79
$73.72
$63.62
$63.62
$53.02
$55.14
$74.23
$67.86
$148.45
$142.09
$301.14
2.0
2.0
1.7
1.7
2.4
2.1
8.2
7.8
16.6
$63.62
$63.62
$53.02
$55.14
$74.23
$67.86
$148.45
$142.09
$301.14
$61.44
$61.44
$52.22
$52.22
$73.72
$64.51
$251.88
$239.60
$509.91
$125.06
$125.06
$105.24
$107.36
$147.95
$132.37
$400.33
$381.69
$811.05
636.0
156.0
244.4
25.9
21.7
237.3
906.9
223.9
398.4
$39,769.08
$9,754.68
$15,127.79
$1,635.43
$1,339.03
$14,956.73
$44,274.59
$10,957.95
$19,465.20
$20,231.16
$4,962.36
$7,621.39
$839.96
$671.82
$7,667.63
$16,417.86
$4,079.27
$7,227.36
$19,537.92
$4,792.32
$7,506.40
$795.48
$667.21
$7,289.11
$27,856.73
$6,878.68
$12,237.84
36.9
$1,133.48
7.6
$233.46
$969.17
44.5
$969.17
$1,366.94
$2,336.11
2,850.5
$157,280.48
$69,718.81
$87,561.69
O=A*J
Each system with a TC-positive sample must check that sample for fecal coliform or E. coli.
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
C-9
July 2008
Exhibit C.8 - Additional Routine Monitoring - Burden and Cost
a. Additional Routines - GW
Size
Category
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
PWSs
A (from
"Systems
with
Violations")
17,274
828
667
30
37
248
117
17
15
Total
19,232
TC+
Samples/
System
B = N (from
"Sampling")
Labor (per System per Year)
Sample Collection
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Analytical Costs
Total Burden Cost (per System per Year) Total Cost
(per System
O&M
Labor
(per System
per Year) (hrs)
per Year)
H=C+E
I=G
J=D+F
K=I+J
Total Annual
Burden
L=A*H
GW Addtl Routine Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
M=A*K
N=A*I
Labor Cost
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
Materials
C=B*
B (from
"Sampling")
D=C*
A (from
"Sampling")
E=B*
C (from
"Sampling")
F=E*
A (from
"Sampling")
G=B*
E (from
"Sampling")
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$61.43
$61.43
$46.08
$30.72
$15.36
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$21.50
$21.50
$15.36
$9.22
$6.14
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$84.83
$84.83
$63.62
$42.41
$21.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2.7
2.7
2.0
1.3
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$84.83
$84.83
$63.62
$42.41
$21.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$82.93
$82.93
$61.44
$39.94
$21.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$167.76
$167.76
$125.06
$82.35
$42.71
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
46,639.8 ###########
2,235.6 $138,905.28
1,333.8
$83,401.08
38.4
$2,432.22
25.6
$1,561.69
0.0
$0.00
0.0
$0.00
0.0
$0.00
0.0
$0.00
$1,465,353.42
$70,239.24
$42,427.45
$1,252.59
$775.54
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,432,532.82
$68,666.04
$40,973.63
$1,179.63
$786.15
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
7.0
$215.02
2.4
$73.72
$296.90
9.4
$296.90
$288.74
$585.64
50,273.2 ###########
$1,580,048.24
$1,544,138.27
4.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O=A*J
Systems that collect fewer than 5 routine samples per month must collect 5 routine samples the month following a TC-positive sample. Depending on system size, systems will be required to take 1-4 additional routine samples to bring the total to 5 samples.
b. Additional Routines - SW
Size
Category
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
PWSs
A (from
"Systems
with
Violations")
318
78
144
15
9
113
111
29
24
840
TC+
Samples/
System
B = N (from
"Sampling")
4.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Labor (per System per Year)
Sample Collection
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Analytical Costs
Total Burden Cost (per System per Year) Total Cost
(per System
O&M
Labor
(per System
per Year) (hrs)
per Year)
H=C+E
I=G
J=D+F
K=I+J
Total Annual
Burden
L=A*H
SW Addtl Routine Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
M=A*K
N=A*I
Labor Cost
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
Materials
C=B*
B (from
"Sampling")
D=C*
A (from
"Sampling")
E=B*
C (from
"Sampling")
F=E*
A (from
"Sampling")
G=B*
E (from
"Sampling")
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$61.43
$61.43
$46.08
$30.72
$15.36
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$21.50
$21.50
$15.36
$9.22
$6.14
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$84.83
$84.83
$63.62
$42.41
$21.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2.7
2.7
2.0
1.3
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$84.83
$84.83
$63.62
$42.41
$21.21
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$82.93
$82.93
$61.44
$39.94
$21.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$167.76
$167.76
$125.06
$82.35
$42.71
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
858.6
210.6
287.5
19.8
6.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$53,347.68
$13,085.28
$17,976.83
$1,254.45
$386.55
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$26,975.94
$6,616.74
$9,145.10
$646.04
$191.96
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$26,371.74
$6,468.54
$8,831.73
$608.41
$194.59
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
7.0
$215.02
2.4
$73.72
$296.90
9.4
$296.90
$288.74
$585.64
1,382.8
$86,050.79
$43,575.78
$42,475.01
O=A*J
Systems that collect fewer than 5 routine samples per month must collect 5 routine samples the month following a TC-positive sample. Depending on system size, systems will be required to take 1-4 additional routine samples to bring the total to 5 samples.
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
C - 10
July 2008
Exhibit C.9 - System Responses - Monitoring Events
Population
Range
Inventory of
Public Water Systems
GW*
SW/GUDI
Total
A
B
C=A+B
(from M of
(from N of
"Systems with "Systems with
Violations")
Violations")
25-500 - TC+*
25-500 - rest
501-1K - TC+*
501-1K - rest
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
17,274
104,435
828
7,423
5,920
1,229
807
2,168
995
376
229
318
5,162
78
1,259
1,943
639
457
1,612
1,217
621
704
17,592
109,597
906
8,682
7,863
1,868
1,264
3,780
2,212
996
933
141,684
14,009
155,693
Frequency of
Monitoring per Year
GW
SW/GUDI
D
E
(from J or K of (from J or K of
"Sampling")
"Sampling")
12
4
12
4
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
Number of Responses
Monitoring Events per Year
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
F=A*D
G=B*E
H=F+G
207,288
417,740
9,936
29,691
71,044
14,744
9,684
26,020
11,940
4,506
2,748
3,816
61,944
936
15,110
23,312
7,672
5,484
19,340
14,604
7,446
8,448
211,104
479,684
10,872
44,802
94,356
22,416
15,168
45,360
26,544
11,952
11,196
805,341
168,112
973,454
* GW CWSs with TC+ results sample monthly.
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
C - 11
July 2008
Exhibit C.10 - Total Burden and Cost for TCR
System TCR Totals
Monitoring
GW
Total Burden in Hours
SW
Total
GW
Total Cost
SW
Total
GW
O&M Cost
SW
Total
GW
Labor Cost
SW
Routine
1,427,661.3
1,884,584.6
3,312,245.9
$79,506,908.47
$95,003,629.89
$174,510,538.37
$35,653,047.60
$37,114,330.57
$72,767,378.17
$43,853,860.87
$57,889,299.32
Total
$101,743,160.19
Repeat
53,639.2
4,693.8
58,333.0
$3,303,110.09
$254,193.35
$3,557,303.44
$1,655,575.33
$110,012.50
$1,765,587.83
$1,647,534.75
$144,180.86
$1,791,715.61
Fecal/E. coli
39,255.2
2,850.5
42,105.7
$2,437,043.81
$157,280.48
$2,594,324.29
$1,231,129.83
$69,718.81
$1,300,848.64
$1,205,913.99
$87,561.69
$1,293,475.68
Addtl Routine
50,273.2
1,382.8
51,656.0
$3,124,186.51
$86,050.79
$3,210,237.30
$1,580,048.24
$43,575.78
$1,623,624.02
$1,544,138.27
$42,475.01
$1,586,613.28
1,570,828.9
1,893,511.7
3,464,340.6
$88,371,248.88
$95,501,154.51
$183,872,403.40
$40,119,801.00
$37,337,637.66
$77,457,438.66
$48,251,447.88
$58,163,516.88
$106,414,964.76
Total
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
C - 12
July 2008
Exhibit C.11 - Sanitary Surveys - State Burden and Cost
A. Community Water Systems
Inventory
Size
Category
Hrs/
SSurvey
B
GW
A
(from "Inventory
of Systems with
Violations")
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
26,010
4,511
4,655
1,115
737
Total
37,028
GW CWSs
Systems w SSurveys
Annual %
D
Labor
Cost
C=B*
$42.80
12
24
24
24
36
$513.59
$1,027.18
$1,027.18
$1,027.18
$1,540.77
Sys
E=A*D
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
GW CWS Total
Annual
Annual
Burden
Cost
F=B*E
G=C*E
5,202
902
931
223
147
62,424
21,648
22,344
5,352
5,292
$2,671,691.71
$926,515.16
$956,303.34
$229,060.84
$226,492.90
7,405
117,060
$5,010,063.95
Note: Burden estimates incorporate results of February 2008 consultations with water industry representatives.
B. Nontransient Noncommunity Systems
Size
Category
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
Total
Hrs/
SSurvey
B
GW
A
(from "Inventory
of Systems with
Violations")
15,539
1,741
692
73
42
Unit
Cost
C=B*
$42.80
12
24
24
24
36
GW NTNCWSs
Systems w SSurveys
Annual %
D
$513.59
$1,027.18
$1,027.18
$1,027.18
$1,540.77
Sys
E=A*D
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
18,087
GW NTNC Total
Annual
Annual
Burden
Cost
F=B*E
G=C*E
3,108
348
138
15
8
37,296
8,352
3,312
360
288
$1,596,235.65
$357,458.18
$141,750.66
$15,407.68
$12,326.14
3,617
49,608
$2,123,178.30
Note: Burden estimates incorporate results of February 2008 consultations with water industry representatives.
Sanitary Surveys - Burden and Cost (Continued)
C. Transient Noncommunity Systems
Size
Category
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
Total
Hrs/
SSurvey
B
GW
A
(from "Inventory
of Systems with
Violations")
80,160
1,999
573
41
28
Unit
Cost
C=B*
$42.80
12
24
24
24
36
GW TNCWSs
Systems w SSurveys
Annual %
D
$513.59
$1,027.18
$1,027.18
$1,027.18
$1,540.77
Sys
E=A*D
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
82,801
GW TNC Total
Annual
Annual
Burden
Cost
F=B*E
G=C*E
16,032
400
115
8
6
192,384
9,600
2,760
192
216
$8,233,864.19
$410,871.47
$118,125.55
$8,217.43
$9,244.61
16,561
205,152
$ 8,780,323.24
Note: Burden estimates incorporate results of February 2008 consultations with water industry representatives.
D. Totals
Size
Category
25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
Total
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
Total
Annual
Burden
H
292,104
39,600
28,416
5,904
5,796
371,820
$
Total
Annual
Cost
I
$12,501,792
$1,694,845
$1,216,180
$252,686
$248,064
Total
Annual
Responses
J
24,342
1,650
1,184
246
161
15,913,565.49
27,583
C - 13
July 2008
Exhibit C.12 - Total Coliform Rule - Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates
Sampling Burden
2004 Burden
0.33 hr
0.83 hr
0.083 hr
Task
Collection Per Sample
Collection Per Sample
Analysis Per Sample
System Size
25-10,000
>10,000
>100,000
Revised Burden
.5 hr
1 hr
10 min
State Burden for Monitoring Related Activities and Sanitary Surveys
2004 Burden
Task
System Size
Revised Burden
8 hrs
Sanitary Survey (Per Survey)*
25-500
12 hrs
20 hrs
Sanitary Survey (Per Survey)*
501-3,300
24 hrs
3,301-4,100
36 hrs
32 hrs
Sanitary Survey (Per Survey)*
*Applies to systems that take <5 samples/mo. Burden of SW systems addressed under Interim Enhanced Surface
Water Treatment Rule.
Microbial ICR - Total Coliform Rule
C - 14
July 2008
Appendix D
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment
Rule Spreadsheets
Exhibit D.1a - IESWTR PWS Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
Turbidity Monitoring
Exception Reports and
IFAs
Totals
Annual
Respondents
Avg. Annual
Responses
Annual
Burden
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
Annual O&M
Cost
Annual Capital Cost
1,530
3,417,352
3,871,990
$118,936,964
$13,766,446
$83,297,959
154
154
3,858
$118,494
N/A
N/A
1,530
3,417,506
3,875,847
$119,055,458
$13,766,446
$83,297,959
Exhibit D.1b - IESWTR State Burden and Cost Summary
Annual
Respondents
Avg. Annual
Responses
Annual
Burden
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
Annual O&M
Cost
Annual Capital Cost
Turbidity Monitoring
57
61,721
416,616
$17,830,813
N/A
N/A
Exception Reports and
CPEs
57
141
6,686
$286,174
N/A
N/A
Sanitary Surveys
57
4,349
474,153
$20,293,326
N/A
N/A
57
66,211
897,456
$38,410,313
N/A
N/A
Requirement
Total
Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
D-1
July 2008
Exhibit D.2 - IESWTR System Inventory
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
Total
Surface Water
and GWUDI
CWS
NTNC
TNC
1,179
2,093
1,167
2,458
2,026
1,828
378
306
16
11,452
259
236
88
68
20
6
1
1
0
680
1,238
475
82
56
22
3
0
1
1
1,878
Non-Purchased Surface
Water/GWUDI
CWS
NTNC
TNC
A
B
C
438
129
636
659
148
375
365
60
62
944
33
44
1,005
5
19
962
2
2
218
0
0
230
0
1
15
0
0
4,837
377
1,139
Unfiltered Surface
Water/GWUDI
CWS
NTNC
TNC
D
E
F
1
0
4
0
3
0
15
0
14
0
14
0
4
0
4
0
1
0
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Filtered Non-Purchased
Surface Water/GWUDI
CWS
NTNC
TNC
G=A-D
H=B-E
I=C-F
437
129
636
655
148
375
362
60
62
929
33
44
991
5
19
948
2
2
214
0
0
226
0
1
14
0
0
4,777
377
1,139
Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2007. Number of unfiltered systems from ICR done for final LT2ESWTR in 2006.
Note: Source was not specified for some systems. These PWSs were assigned to SW or GW categories based on the ratio of SW to GW systems within a given size
category.
Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
D-2
July 2008
Exhibit D.3 - Systems and Plants Subject to IESWTR Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Requirements
(Practicing Conventional or Direct Filtration)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
Total
Filtered Non-Purchased
Surface Water/GWUDI
CWS
NTNC
TNC
A
B
C
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
594
1
1
354
1
1
144
0
0
70
0
0
201
0
1
25
0
0
14
0
0
1,402
2
% Using Conventional or
Direct Filtration
CWS
NTNC
TNC
D
E
F
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
93.6%
93.6%
93.6%
93.6%
93.6%
93.6%
83.2%
83.2%
83.2%
83.2%
83.2%
83.2%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
3
Total Systems Subject to
IESWTR Individual Filter
Turbidity Monitoring
CWS
NTNC
TNC
G=A*D
H=B*E
I=C*F
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
556
1
1
331
1
1
120
0
0
58
0
0
181
0
1
22
0
0
13
0
0
1,281
2
3
Plants Per System
CWS
NTNC
TNC
J
K
L
1.00
N/A
N/A
1.00
N/A
N/A
1.04
N/A
N/A
1.04
N/A
N/A
1.05
N/A
N/A
1.11
1.0
1.0
1.11
1.0
1.0
1.11
1.0
1.0
1.11
1.0
1.0
1.64
1.0
1.0
1.64
1.0
1.0
1.64
1.0
1.0
Total Plants Subject to
IESWTR Individual Filter
Turbidity Monitoring
CWS
NTNC
TNC
M=G*J
N=H*K
O=I*L
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
617
1
1
367
1
1
133
0
0
64
0
0
297
0
1
36
0
0
9
0
0
1,525
2
3
Sources: Number of plants per system (for CWSs) and percentage of plants using conventional or direct filtration are from 2000 CWSS.
Note: IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people. Percentage of systems using conventional or direct filtration was
not available. Percentage of plants was used as a proxy. Percentage of plants using conventional or direct filtration was assumed to apply to NTNCWSs and TNCWSs.
Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
D-3
July 2008
Exhibit D.4 - Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs - PWSs
Number of Conv. & Dir.
Systems (SW and GWUDI)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
Total
Hourly
Labor
Rate
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
CWS
NTNC
Number of Conv. & Dir.
Plants (SW and GWUDI)
TNC
CWS
NTNC
TNC
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
556
331
120
58
181
22
13
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
617
367
133
64
297
36
9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1,281
2
3
1,525
2
3
Plant Level Labor Hours/System/Year
Data Collection
Data Review
Data Reporting
Recordkeeping
3 collections/day*1
hr/collection*365
3 reviews/day*1
hr/review*365
1 report/month*10
hrs/report*12
5 hrs/month*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1095
1095
1095
1095
1095
1095
1095
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1095
1095
1095
1095
1095
1095
1095
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
System Level Labor
Hours/System/Year
Develop
Summary
Data Review
Report
8 hrs/month*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
Total Labor
Hours/Year**
Total Labor
Cost/Year***
8 hrs/month*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1,576,243
937,701
339,157
163,298
741,171
90,671
23,749
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$48,417,882
$28,803,620
$10,417,988
$5,016,068
$22,766,739
$2,785,157
$729,511
3,871,990
$118,936,964
Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives. IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people.
**Total labor hours per year is calculated from the number of plants times the sum of the data collection, review, and reporting hours, plus the number of systems times the sum of data review and summary development hours.
***Total labor cost per year is calculated from the product of the hourly labor rate and the total labor hours/year
Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
D-4
July 2008
Exhibit D.5 - Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring O&M and Capital Costs - PWSs
Number of Conv. & Dir.
Systems (SW and GWUDI)
Population
Category
CWS
NTNC
TNC
Flows (MGD)
Avg Daily
Peak Daily
O&M Unit Costs Annual O&M Costs for
for Continuous
Continuous
Monitoring
Monitoring
(cents/kgal)
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
556
331
120
58
181
22
13
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.1
5.0
8.8
13.0
27.0
120.0
270.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.8
11.0
18.0
26.0
51.0
210.0
518.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.282
0.237
0.239
0.236
0.241
0.112
0.096
# Systems*Unit Cost*Avg
Daily Flow*1,000*Inflation
Factor*1/100*365
Capital Unit
Costs for
Continuous
Monitoring
Annual Capital Costs for
Continuous Monitoring
(7% Cost of Capital)
(cents/kgal)
# Systems*Unit Cost*Peak Daily
Flow*1,000*Inflation
Factor*1/100*365
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$1,536,002
$1,828,450
$1,173,301
$824,070
$5,498,841
$1,389,436
$1,516,345
Total
1,281
2
3
$13,766,446
Source: All cost data from the IESWTR RIA (1998), Appendix C. Updated to 2007$.
Note: IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people.
Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
D-5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.968
0.813
0.693
0.626
0.602
0.576
0.253
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$12,051,472
$13,799,014
$6,958,806
$4,371,760
$25,945,200
$12,504,920
$7,666,787
$83,297,959
July 2008
Exhibit D.6 - Exceptions Reporting and Individual Filter Assessment Burden and Costs - PWSs
Percent of Systems
Number of Conv. & Dir.
Systems (SW and GWUDI) Performing Each Year
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
Hourly
Labor
Rate
A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
$30.72
CWS NTNC
B
C
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
556
1
331
1
120
0
58
0
181
0
22
0
13
0
TNC
D
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
Exception
Reports
E
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
Number of Systems
Performing Each Year
Labor Hours/Report
Exception
Exception
IFAs
Reports
IFAs
Reports
F
G=(B+C+D)*E H=(B+C+D)*F
I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2%
56
11
20
2%
33
7
20
2%
12
2
20
2%
6
1
20
2%
18
4
20
2%
2
0
20
2%
1
0
20
Total Labor
Hours/Year
IFAs
J
K=(G*I)+(J*H)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
50
1,676
50
997
50
360
50
174
50
546
50
67
50
38
Total Labor
Cost/Year
L=K*A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$51,480
$30,625
$11,072
$5,331
$16,773
$2,052
$1,161
Total
1,281
2
3
129
26
3,858
$118,494
Note: Exception reports are required when systems exceed turbidity levels of 0.5 or 1 NTU in consecutive measurements in individual filters (absent such exceedances,
systems need only report that they have completed monitoring). Individual filter assessments are required when systems exceed turbidity levels of 1 NTU during 3
consecutive months.
Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives. Assumptions regarding percent of systems
performing exception reports and IFAs from 1998 IESWTR ICR. IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than
10,000 people.
Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
D-6
July 2008
Exhibit D.7 - Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs - States
Number of Conv. & Dir.
Systems (SW and GWUDI)
Population
Category
Hourly
Labor
Rate
CWS
NTNC
TNC
Compliance
Tracking
8 hrs/month/
system*12
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
556
331
120
58
181
22
13
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
State Level Labor Hours/System/Year
Make
Determinations (As
Analyze/Review Data
Required)
9 hrs/month/
system*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
8 hr/month/
system*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
Recordkeeping
Total Labor
Hours/Year**
Total Labor
Cost/Year***
2 hrs/month/
system*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
180,999
107,676
38,930
18,744
58,972
7,214
4,082
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$7,746,593
$4,608,420
$1,666,158
$802,224
$2,523,932
$308,764
$174,723
Total
1,281
2
3
416,616
$17,830,813
Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives (including states).
**Total labor hours per year are calculated from the number of systems for which states must review data times the sum of the compliance tracking, data review, determinations,
and recordkeeping burden the state incurs per system.
***Total labor cost per year is calculated from the product of the hourly labor rate and the total labor hours per year
Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
D-7
July 2008
Exhibit D.8 - Exceptions Reporting and Comprehensive Performance Evaluation Burden and Costs - States
Number of Conv. & Dir.
Systems (SW and
GWUDI)
Population
Category
Hourly
Labor
Rate
A
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
CWS
B
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
556
331
120
58
181
22
13
NTNC
C
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
TNC
Percent of Systems
Requiring Activity Each Number of Systems Requiring
Activity Each Year
Year
Exception
Reports
CPEs
E
F
D
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
Exception
Reports
CPEs
G=(B+C+D)*E H=(B+C+D)*F
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
56
6
33
3
12
1
6
1
18
2
2
0
1
0
Labor Hours/Activity
Exception
Reports
CPEs
I
J
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
Total Labor
Hours/Year
Total Labor
Cost/Year
K=(G*I)+(J*H)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2,905
1,728
625
301
946
116
66
L=K*A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$124,328
$73,962
$26,741
$12,875
$40,508
$4,955
$2,804
Total
1,281
2
3
129
13
6,686
$286,174
Source: Percentages of systems for which states must review exception reports and conduct CPEs carried forward from the 1998 IESWTR ICR.
Note: Exception reports are required when systems exceed turbidity levels of 0.5 or 1 NTU in consecutive measurements in individual filters (absent such exceedances,
systems need only report that they have completed monitoring). Comprehensive performance evaluations are performed by states when a system exceeds 2 NTU in two
consecutive measurements in an individual filter in each of two consecutive months.
Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives (including states).
Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
D-8
July 2008
Exhibit D.9 - Sanitary Surveys - State Burden and Costs
Number Filtered Systems
(SW and GWUDI)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-4,400
4,401-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
Hourly
Labor
Rate
A
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
$42.80
CWS
NTNC
B
C
1,179
259
2,093
236
1,167
88
2,458
68
448
4
1,579
16
1,146
4
682
2
255
1
123
0
273
1
33
0
16
0
TNC
D
1,238
475
82
56
5
17
2
1
0
0
1
0
1
Number of Unfiltered
Systems (SW and
GWUDI)
CWS NTNC
E
F
1
0
4
0
3
0
15
0
3
0
11
0
9
0
5
0
3
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
1
0
TNC
G
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Percent of Surveys
Performed Annually
Total Surveys Annually
CWS
All NCWSs
I
H
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
20.0%
System Level Labor
Hours/Sanitary Survey
Unfiltered
Filtered
Filtered Systems
Systems
Systems
J=(B*H)+((C+D)*I) K=(E*H)+((F+G)*I)
L
693
0
16
840
1
16
423
1
28
844
5
28
151
1
40
533
4
65
383
3
65
228
2
391
85
1
705
41
0
1,034
91
1
1,364
11
0
1,689
6
0
2,008
Unfiltered
Systems
M
16
16
28
28
40
40
40
194
334
485
638
786
1004
Total Labor
Hours/Year
N=L*J+M*K
11,088
13,457
11,874
23,775
6,087
34,776
25,026
89,476
60,356
42,620
125,207
18,966
11,446
Total Labor
Cost/Year
O=N*A
$474,538
$575,966
$508,193
$1,017,558
$260,521
$1,488,362
$1,071,095
$3,829,474
$2,583,184
$1,824,084
$5,358,754
$811,735
$489,862
Total
11,452
680
1,878
60
0
0
4,329
20
474,153
$20,293,326
Source: Percentage of systems undergoing surveys annually is based on IESWTR requirements.
Note: All SW/GWUDI systems must undergo surveys (other requirements of the IESWTR are assumed to apply to non-purchased SW/GWUDI systems). Burden estimates take into account the results of the February
2008 consultation with water industry representatives (including states).
Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule
D-9
July 2008
Exhibit D.10 - Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates
Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Burden - PWSs
Revised Estimate
2004 Burden
Task
Plant Level Burden
4 hrs
Data reporting (Per Report)
System Level Burden
4 hrs
Data Review (Per Month)
10 hrs.
8 hrs.
Exceptions Reporting and Individual Filter Assessment Burden Per Report-PWSs
2004 Burden
8 hrs
Revised Estimate
20 hrs.
Task
Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Burden Per System--States
2004 Burden
4 hrs
4 hrs
1 hr
2 hrs
Task
Compliance Tracking (Per Month)
Analyze and Review Data (Per Month)
Make Determination, As Required (Per Month)
Recordkeeping (Per month)
Revised Estimate
8 hrs
9 hrs
8 hrs
2 hrs
Exceptions Reporting and Comprehensive Performance Evaluation Burden Per
Report--States
2004 Burden
16 hrs
250 hrs
Revised Estimate
36 hrs
160 hrs
Task
Exceptions reporting
CPEs
Microbial ICR - Interim Enhanced
Surface Water Treatment Rule
D - 10
July 2008
Appendix E
Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule Spreadsheets
Exhibit E1
LT1ESWTR Burden and Cost Summary by Activity
Exhibit E1a
LT1ESWTR PWS Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions
Reporting
Individual Filter
Assessments
Total
Annual
Respondents
3,293
Avg. Annual
Responses
3,293
Annual
Burden
150,961
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
$4,637,096
Annual O&M
Cost
$3,270,462
Annual Capital Cost
$2,629,442
593
593
4,742
$145,673
N/A
N/A
132
132
6,587
$202,323
N/A
N/A
3,293
4,018
162,290
$4,985,092
$3,270,462
$2,629,442
Exhibit E1b
LT1ESWTR State Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions
Reporting
Total
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
Annual
Respondents
57
Avg. Annual
Responses
3,293
Annual
Burden
118,552
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
$5,073,932
Annual O&M
Cost
N/A
Annual Capital Cost
N/A
57
725
23,179
$992,062
N/A
N/A
57
4,018
141,732
$6,065,993
N/A
N/A
E-1
July 2008
Exhibit E2
Summary of the LT1 Burden, Respondents, Responses, and
Costs for the ICR Approval Period by Year and Annual Averages
PWSs
Source
(Exhibit)*
Burden (hours)
F5.4
Year 1
Year 2
Annual Average
Year 3
Three Year Total
162,290
162,290
162,290
162,290
486,869
Respondents (number)**
F7
3,293
3,293
3,293
3,293
3,293
Responses (number)
F8
4,018
4,018
4,018
4,018
12,053
Costs (labor)
F3.4
$4,985,092
$4,985,092
$4,985,092
$4,985,092
$14,955,276
Costs (Turbidimeter Capital)
F3.4
$2,629,442
$2,629,442
$2,629,442
$2,629,442
$7,888,325
Costs (Turbidimeter O&M)
F3.4
$3,270,462 $3,270,462
$3,270,462
$3,270,462
$9,811,387
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
** Some respondents will respond to the rule over the course of more than one year. Therefore the three year total is not the sum
of the three years.
States
Source
(Exhibit)*
Year 1
Year 2
Annual Average
Year 3
Three Year Total
Burden (hours)
E6
141,732
141,732
141,732
141,732
425,195
Respondents (number)**
E7
57
57
57
57
57
Responses (number)
E8
4,018
4,018
4,018
4,018
12,053
Costs
E4
$6,065,993 $6,065,993
$6,065,993
$6,065,993
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
** Some respondents will respond to the rule in more than one year. Therefore the three year total is not the sum
of the three years.
$18,197,979
Annual Average
304,021
3,350
$16,950,989
Three Year Total
912,064
3,350
$50,852,967
Total Burden (hours)
Total Respondents (number)
Total Cost for All Activities
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E-2
July 2008
Exhibit E3.1
Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year
for Systems Serving Fewer than 1,000 People
PWSs
Source
(Exhibit)*
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
$2,006,342
$69,898
$97,080
$2,173,319
$2,006,342
$69,898
$97,080
$2,173,319
$2,006,342
$69,898
$97,080
$2,173,319
$2,006,342
$69,898
$97,080
$2,173,319
Yearly Labor Total
$2,173,319
$2,173,319
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
$2,173,319
$2,173,319
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessments
Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total
E10.1a
E10.1b
E10.1b
Annual Average
PWS Capital and O&M
Source
(Exhibit)**
Annual
Turbidimeter Capital Cost*
Turbidimeter Annual O&M *
Year 1
Year 3
$815,222
$815,222
$815,222
$1,569,430
$1,569,430
$1,569,430
Yearly Total
$2,384,651
$2,384,651
$2,384,651
* Used a weighted value based upon the three size categories of 25-100, 101-500, and 501-1,000.
** The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E10.1c
E10.1c
Year 2
E-3
Annual Average
$815,222
$1,569,430
$2,384,651
July 2008
Exhibit E3.2
Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year
for Systems Serving between 1,000 and 3,300 People
PWSs
Source
(Exhibit)*
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
$1,251,682
$36,051
$50,070
$1,337,803
$1,251,682
$36,051
$50,070
$1,337,803
$1,251,682
$36,051
$50,070
$1,337,803
$1,251,682
$36,051
$50,070
$1,337,803
$1,337,803
Yearly Labor Total
$1,337,803
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
$1,337,803
$1,337,803
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessments
Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total
E10.2a
E10.2b
E10.2b
Annual Average
PWS Capital and O&M
Source
(Exhibit)*
Annual
Turbidimeter Capital Cost
Turbidimeter Annual O&M
Year 1
$710,911
$710,911
$809,331
$809,331
Yearly Total
$1,520,243
$1,520,243
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E10.2c
E10.2c
Year 2
E-4
Year 3
$710,911
$809,331
$1,520,243
Annual Average
$710,911
$809,331
$1,520,243
July 2008
Exhibit E3.3
Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year
for Systems Serving between 3,300 and 9,999 People
PWSs
Source
(Exhibit)*
Annual
Average
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
$1,379,073
$39,724
$55,173
$1,473,969
$1,379,073
$39,724
$55,173
$1,473,969
$1,379,073
$39,724
$55,173
$1,473,969
$1,379,073
$39,724
$55,173
$1,473,969
Yearly Labor Total
$1,473,969
$1,473,969
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
$1,473,969
$1,473,969
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessments
Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total
E10.3a
E10.3b
E10.3b
PWS Capital and O&M
Source
(Exhibit)*
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Annual
Average
Annual
Turbidimeter Capital Cost
Turbidimeter Annual O&M
$1,103,309
$1,103,309
$891,701
$891,701
Yearly Total
$1,995,010
$1,995,010
*The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E10.3c
E10.3c
E-5
$1,103,309
$891,701
$1,995,010
$1,103,309
$891,701
$1,995,010
July 2008
Exhibit E3.4
Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year
for All System Sizes
PWSs
Source
(Exhibit)*
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessments
Annual Activity Yearly Total
E3.1-E3.3
E3.1-E3.3
E3.1-E3.3
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
$4,637,096
$145,673
$202,323
$4,985,092
$4,637,096
$145,673
$202,323
$4,985,092
$4,637,096
$145,673
$202,323
$4,985,092
$4,637,096
$145,673
$202,323
$4,985,092
$13,911,289
$437,018
$606,969
$14,955,276
$4,985,092
$4,985,092
$4,985,092
$14,955,276
Year 2
Year 3
$2,629,442
$3,270,462
$5,899,904
$2,629,442
$3,270,462
$5,899,904
Yearly Labor Total
$4,985,092
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Annual Average
3 Year Total
PWS Capital and O&M
Source
(Exhibit)*
Annual
Turbidimeter Capital Cost
Turbidimeter Annual O&M
Year 1
$2,629,442
$3,270,462
Yearly Total
$5,899,904
*The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E3.1-E3.3
E3.1-E3.3
E-6
Annual Average
$2,629,442
$3,270,462
$5,899,904
3 Year Total
$7,888,325
$9,811,387
$17,699,711
July 2008
Exhibit E4
Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year for States
Summary Cost Estimates for States and Systems
States
Source
(Exhibit)*
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Annual Activity Yearly Total
Annual Average
3 Year Total
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
$5,073,932
$992,062
$6,065,993
$5,073,932
$992,062
$6,065,993
$5,073,932
$992,062
$6,065,993
$5,073,932
$992,062
$6,065,993
$15,221,795
$2,976,185
$18,197,979
$6,065,993
$6,065,993
$6,065,993
$18,197,979
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
E3.1
E3.2
E3.3
$2,173,319
$1,337,803
$1,473,969
$4,985,092
$2,173,319
$1,337,803
$1,473,969
$4,985,092
$2,173,319
$1,337,803
$1,473,969
$4,985,092
$2,173,319
$1,337,803
$1,473,969
$4,985,092
$6,519,958
$4,013,410
$4,421,908
$14,955,276
E4
$6,065,993
$11,051,085
$6,065,993
$11,051,085
$6,065,993
$11,051,085
$6,065,993
$11,051,085
$18,197,979
$33,153,255
E12a
E12b
Yearly Total
$6,065,993
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Summary of Total Year by Year Costs for PWSs and States*
Source
(Exhibit)**
Start-Up Summary
PWSs Serving < 1,000 People
PWSs Serving 1,000 - 3,300 People
PWSs Serving 3,300 - 9,999 People
PWS Total
States and Territories
Yearly Total
Annual Average
3 Year Total
* Include Capital and O&M costs.
**The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E-7
July 2008
Exhibit E5.1
Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity
for Systems Serving Fewer than 1,000 People
PWSs Labor
Source
(Exhibit)*
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessment
Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total
Year 2
Year 3
Annual
Average
65,316
2,276
3,160
70,752
65,316
2,276
3,160
70,752
65,316
2,276
3,160
70,752
65,316
2,276
3,160
70,752
Yearly Labor Total
70,752
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
70,752
70,752
70,752
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E10.1a
E10.1b
E10.1b
Year 1
E-8
July 2008
Exhibit E5.2
Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity
for Systems Serving between 1,000 and 3,300 People
PWSs
Source
(Exhibit)*
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessment
Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total
Year 3
40,748
1,174
1,630
43,552
40,748
1,174
1,630
43,552
Yearly Labor Total
43,552
43,552
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
43,552
43,552
E-9
40,748
1,174
1,630
43,552
Year 2
40,748
1,174
1,630
43,552
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E10.2a
E10.2b
E10.2b
Year 1
Annual
Average
July 2008
Exhibit E5.3
Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity
for Systems Serving between 3,300 and 9,999 People
PWSs
Source
(Exhibit)*
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessment
E10.3a
E10.3b
E10.3b
Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total
Year 1
Year 2
44,896
1,293
1,796
44,896
1,293
1,796
47,985
47,985
Yearly Total
47,985
47,985
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 10
Year 3
44,896
1,293
1,796
47,985
47,985
Annual
Average
44,896
1,293
1,796
47,985
47,985
July 2008
Exhibit E5.4
Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity
for All System Sizes
PWSs
Source
(Exhibit)*
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Monitoring
Annual Activity Yearly Tota
E5.1-E5.3
E5.1-E5.3
E5.1-E5.3
Year 1
150,961
4,742
6,587
162,290
Year 2
150,961
4,742
6,587
162,290
Yearly Total
162,290
162,290
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 11
Year 3
150,961
4,742
6,587
162,290
162,290
Annual
Average
150,961
4,742
6,587
162,290
162,290
3 Year Total
452,882
14,227
19,760
486,869
486,869
July 2008
Exhibit E6
Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity for States
Summary Burden for States and Systems
States
Source
(Exhibit)*
Start-Up Activities
Profiling & Benchmark Dev./Compl. Tracking**
Start-Up Activity Yearly Total
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Annual Activity Yearly Tota
Year 1
Year 2
Annual
Average
Year 3
3 Year Total
E11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E12a
E12b
118,552
23,179
141,732
118,552
23,179
141,732
118,552
23,179
141,732
118,552
23,179
141,732
355,657
69,538
425,195
Yearly Total
141,732
141,732
141,732
141,732
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
** Includes tracking for applicability monitoring or profiling, as well as data review, determinations, and consultations with PWSs.
425,195
Summary of Total Year by Year Burden for PWSs and States
Source
(Exhibit)*
Start-Up Summary
PWSs Serving < 1,000 People
PWSs Serving 1,000 - 3,300 People
PWSs Serving 3,300 - 9,999 People
PWS Total
States and Territories
Year 3
Annual
Average
3 Year Total
70,752
43,552
47,985
162,290
141,732
70,752
43,552
47,985
162,290
141,732
212,257
130,656
143,955
486,869
425,195
304,021
304,021
Yearly Total
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
304,021
304,021
912,064
E6
70,752
43,552
47,985
162,290
141,732
Year 2
70,752
43,552
47,985
162,290
141,732
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E5.1
E5.2
E5.3
Year 1
E - 12
July 2008
Exhibit E7
Respondents for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity
PWSs [1]
Respondents
Includes systems performing:
Annual Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assesment
Year 1
3,293
Year 2
3,293
Year 3
3,293
Annual
Average
3,293
3,293
593
132
3,293
593
132
3,293
593
132
3,293
593
132
Year 1
57
Year 2
57
Year 3
57
Annual
Average
57
States [2]
Respondents
Includes States performing:
Annual Turbidity Monitoring
57
57
57
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
57
57
57
Comprehensive Performance Evaluation
57
57
57
* Includes tracking for applicability monitoring or profiling, as well as data review, determinations, and
consultations with PWSs.
57
57
57
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
Year 1
3,293
57
3,350
Year 2
3,293
57
3,350
Year 3
3,293
57
3,350
Annual
Average
3,293
57
3,350
[1] Each PWS is one respondent. One respondent may be involved in more than one activity; however, in
order to avoid double-counting, the maximum number of respondents expected to be involved in the rule
activities annually is assumed to be the number of respondents for that year.
[2] Each State is one respondent.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 13
July 2008
Exhibit E8
Responses for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity
PWSs [1]
Year 1
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessments
Yearly Total
Year 2
Year 3
3,293
593
132
3,293
593
132
3,293
593
132
4,018
4,018
4,018
Annual
Average
3,293
593
132
4,018
States [2]
Year 1
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Comprehensive Performance Evaluation
Yearly Total
Year 2
Year 3
3,293
593
132
3,293
593
132
3,293
593
132
4,018
4,018
4,018
Annual
Average
3,293
593
132
4,018
Sum for PWSs and States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
PWSs
4,018
4,018
4,018
States and Territories
4,018
4,018
4,018
Yearly Total
8,035
8,035
8,035
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
[1] Each PWS is one respondent. Each activity detailed in Exhibits E2-E5 is a response.
[2] Each State is one respondent. Each activity detailed in Exhibits E2-E5 is a response.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 14
Annual
Average
4,018
4,018
8,035
July 2008
Exhibit E9
PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Start-up Activities
for Systems Serving Fewer than 1,000 People
Disinfection Benchmark Labor for Systems Serving 500 or Less (Filtered & Unfiltered Systems)
Activity
Submit Profiling Notification to State
Data Entry and Spreadsheet Development
Data Review
Generate Report for State and In-House Review
Meet and Review with State
Supplemental Viral Profile and Benchmark
Totals
Systems
(Respondents)
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
Hours per
Task
B
1.0
8.7
4.3
40.0
8.0
53.0
115.0
Cost per Total Burden
Task
(hrs.)
C
A*B
$31
$266
$133
$1,229
$246
$1,628
$3,532
-
Total Initial
Cost ($)
A*C
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Cost
($)
$0
Total Costs for All Start-Up Activities
Notes: Baseline number systems performing rule activities from all filtered systems. Percentages requiring report and viral
benchmark from original LT1ESTWTR analysis.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 15
July 2008
Exhibit E10.1
PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities
by Systems Serving Fewer than 1,000 People
Exhibit E10.1a
Monitoring Requirements for Plants (Monitoring at Individual Filters)
Activity
Data Analysis
Data Review
Record Keeping
Systems
Frequency per
(Respondents)*
Year
A
B
1,580
52
1,580
52
1,580
12
Hours per
Task**
C
0.17
0.17
2.00
Cost per
Task
D
$5
$5
$61
$72
Burden (hrs.)
A*B*C
13,695
13,695
37,926
65,316
Cost ($)
A*B*D
$420,685
$420,685
$1,164,972
$2,006,342
Hours per
Task**
C
8.0
50.0
Cost per
Task
D
$246
$1,536
$1,782
Burden (hrs.)
A*B*C
2,276
3,160
5,436
Cost ($)
A*B*D
$69,898
$97,080
$166,978
Burden (hrs.)
70,752
Cost
$2,173,319
Cost
$5,231,432
$1,569,430
$6,800,862
Annualized
Cost
$815,222
$1,569,430
$2,384,651
Exhibit E10.1b
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting for Systems
Activity
Annual Reporting Exceptions
Annual IFA
Total
Systems
Frequency per
(Respondents)
Year
A
B
284
1
63
1
Total for All PWS Labor Burdens and Costs
Exhibit E10.1c
Turbidimeter Installation, Operation, and Maintenance
Activities
Turbidimeter Installation***
Operation and Maintenance
Total
Cost per
Task
$3,311
$993
Systems
1,580
1,580
Burden (hrs.)
70,752
Total for All PWS Activities
Cost
$4,557,971
*Systems performing monitoring include direct and conventional filtration CWSs and NTNCWSs from system baseline. Percentage
performing exceptions reporting and IFA from LT1ESWTR EA.
**Burden estimates incorporate the results of EPA's February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
***The capitalization factor used for turbidimeter installation annualizes costs over 7 years using a 3% cost-of-capital as the discount rate.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 16
July 2008
Exhibit E10.2
PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities
by Systems Serving 1,000 - 3,300 People
Exhibit E10.2a
Monitoring Requirements for Plants (Monitoring at Individual Filters)
Activity
Data Analysis
Data Review
Record Keeping
Totals
Systems
(Respondents)*
A
815
815
815
Frequency
per Year
B
52
52
12
Hours per Cost per
Task**
Task
C
D
0.250
$8
0.250
$8
2.0
$61
$77
Burden (hrs.)
A*B*C
10,595
10,595
19,559
40,748
Cost ($)
A*B*D
$325,437
$325,437
$600,807
$1,251,682
Frequency
per Year
B
Hours per Cost per
Task
Task
C
D
8.0
$246
50.0
$1,536
$1,782
Burden (hrs.)
A*B*C
1,174
1,630
2,804
Cost ($)
A*B*D
$36,051
$50,070
$86,121
Burden (hrs.)
43,552
Cost ($)
$1,337,803
Exhibit E10.2b
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting for Systems
Activity
Annual Reporting Exceptions
Annual IFA
Total
Systems
(Respondents)
A
147
33
1
1
Total for All PWS Activities
Exhibit E10.2c
Turbidimeter Installation, Operation, and Maintenance
Activity
Turbidimeter Installation***
Operation and Maintenance
Total
Cost per
Task
$5,598
$993
Systems
815
815
Cost
$4,562,055
$809,331
$5,371,386
Burden (hrs.)
43,552
Total for All PWS Activities
Annualized
Cost
$710,911
$809,331
$1,520,243
Cost
$2,858,046
*Systems performing monitoring include direct and conventional filtration CWSs and NTNCWSs from system baseline. Percentage
performing exceptions reporting and IFA from LT1ESWTR EA.
**Burden estimates incorporate results of EPA's February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
*** The capitalization factor used for turbidimeter installation annualizes costs over 7 years using a 3% cost-of-capital as the discount rate.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 17
July 2008
Exhibit E10.3
PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities
by Systems Serving 3,300 - 9,999 People
Exhibit E10.3a
Monitoring Requirements for Plants (Monitoring at Individual Filters)
Activity
Data Analysis
Data Review
Record Keeping
Totals
Systems
(Respondents)*
A
898
898
898
Frequency Hours per Cost per
per Year
Task**
Task
B
C
D
52
0.250
$8
52
0.250
$8
12
2.0
$61
$77
Burden (hrs.)
A*B*C
11,673
11,673
21,550
44,896
Cost ($)
A*B*D
$358,559
$358,559
$661,955
$1,379,073
Burden (hrs.)
A*B*C
1293
1796
3,089
Cost ($)
A*B*D
$39,724
$55,173
$94,897
Burden (hrs.)
47,985
Cost
$1,473,969
Exhibit E10.3b
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting for Systems
Activity
Annual Reporting Exceptions
Annual IFA
Total
Systems
(Respondents)
A
Frequency
per Year
B
162
36
Hours per Cost per
Task**
Task
C
D
1
8.0
$246
1
50.0
$1,536
$1,782
Total Labor Burdens and Costs
Exhibit E10.3c
Turbidimeter Installation, Operation, and Maintenance
Activity
Turbidimeter Installation***
Operation and Maintenance
Total
Cost per
Task
$7,885
$993
Systems
898
898
Cost
$7,080,142
$891,701
$7,971,843
Burden (hrs.)
47,985
Total for All PWS Activities
Annualized
Cost
$1,103,309
$891,701
$1,995,010
Cost
$3,468,979
*Systems performing monitoring include direct and convention CWS and NTNCWS from system baseline. Percentage performing
exceptions reporting and IFA from LT1ESWTR EA.
** Burden estimates incorporate the results of EPA's February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
*** The capitalization factor used for turbidimeter installation annualizes costs over 7 years using a 3% cost-of-capital as the discount
rate.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 18
July 2008
Exhibit E11
State Cost and Burden Estimates for Start-up Activities by Activity
Profiling & Benchmark Dev./Compl. Tracking Labor
Activity
Compliance Tracking*
Analyze and Review Profiling Data
Make Determinations
Meet and Review with PWSs
Review Viral Benchmark
Recordkeeping
Total
Responses
A
-
Hours per
Task
B
4.0
8.0
8.0
16.0
16.0
4.0
56.0
Total for All Start-Up Activities
Cost per Total Burden
Task
(hrs.)
C
A*B
$171
$342
$342
$685
$685
$171
2,397
-
Total Initial
Cost ($)
A*C
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Burden
(hrs.)
-
Total Cost
($)
$0
* Includes tracking for applicability monitoring or profiling, as well as data review, determinations, and consultations
with PWSs. Profiling and benchmarking were completed during previous ICR periods.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 19
July 2008
Exhibit E12
State Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities
Exhibit E12a
Turbidity Monitoring
Activity
Compliance Tracking
Recordkeeping
Total
Responses
A
3,293
3,293
Frequency
per Year
Hours per Task Cost per Task
B
C
D
12
1.0
$43
12
2.0
$86
Burden (hrs.)
A*B*C
39,517
79,035
118,552
Cost ($)
A*B*D
$1,691,311
$3,382,621
$5,073,932
Burden (hrs.)
A*B*C
2,075
12,368
8,736
23,179
Cost ($)
A*B*D
$88,799
$529,359
$373,903
$992,062
Exhibit E12b
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Activity
Annual Exceptions Reports
Annual CPE (serving 1,000 or less)
Annual CPE (serving 1,000 - 9,999)
Total
Responses
A
593
31
35
Frequency
per Year
Hours per Task Cost per Task
B
C
D
1
3.5
$150
1
400.0
$17,120
1
250.0
$10,700
Number of systems requiring CPE calculated using percentage from LT1ESTWR 2004 ICR.
Burden estimates incorporate the results of EPA's February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives (including states).
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 20
July 2008
Exhibit E13
Summary of Start-up and Annual Costs
Annual Activities
Source
Exhibit
Total Annual
Cost
PWS Cost Estimates for Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting and IFAs
Turbidimeter Capital Cost*
Turbidimeter O&M Cost
Subtotal
E3.4
E3.4
E3.4
E3.4
$4,637,096
$347,996
$2,629,442
$3,270,462
$10,884,996
State Cost Estimates for Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting and CPEs
Subtotal
E4
E4
$5,073,932
$992,062
$6,065,993
Total Cost Estimates for Annual Activities
$16,950,989
*Annualization of turbidimeter costs: 3% cost-of-capital, annualized over 7 years.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 21
July 2008
Exhibit E14
Occupational Cost and Burden per Start-up Activity
Total Burden
Activity*
Hours**
Rate/Hr
Cost
States
Profiling and Benchmark Dev./Compl. Tracking
56.0
$42.80 $2,397
* The activities listed in the first column correspond to Exhibit E11.
** Each occupation's hourly burdens are the sum of the hours devoted to each of the line items listed
in Exhibit E11.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 22
July 2008
Exhibit E15
Occupational Cost and Burden per Activity per Year
Total Burden
Activity*
Hours**
Rate/Hr
Cost***
PWSs Serving 0 -500
Turbidity Monitoring
41.3
$30.72
$1,270
Exception Reporting
8.0
$30.72
$246
Individual Filter Assessment
50.0
$30.72
$1,536
PWSs Serving 500-1,000
Turbidity Monitoring
41.3
$30.72
$1,270
Exception Reporting
8.0
$30.72
$246
Individual Filter Assessment
50.0
$30.72
$1,536
PWSs Serving 1,000-3,300
Turbidity Monitoring
50.0
$30.72
$1,536
Exception Reporting
8.0
$30.72
$246
Individual Filter Assessment
50.0
$30.72
$1,536
PWSs Serving 3,300-9,999
Turbidity Monitoring
50.0
$30.72
$1,536
Exception Reporting
8.0
$30.72
$246
Individual Filter Assessment
50.0
$30.72
$1,536
States
Turbidity Monitoring State
36.0
$42.80
$1,541
Exceptions Reporting****
403.5
$42.80
$17,269
* The activities listed in the first column correspond to tables a-c in Exhibits
E10.1, E10.2, and E10.3.
** Each occupation's hourly burdens are the sum of the hours devoted to each
of the line items listed in tables a-c in Exhibits E10.1, E10.2, and E10.3,
multiplied by the frequency of the activity.
*** All labor rates include a 1.6 load factor.
****Exceptions reporting for states includes CPEs, which are assumed to take
400 hours for a system serving < 1000 and 250 hours for a system serving
1,000-9,999.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 23
July 2008
Exhibit E16
LT1 Universe of Respondents Performing
Information Collection and Record Keeping Activities
Turbidity
Monitoring
System Types
Community
Transient Non-Community
Non-Transient Non-Community
Total
Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2007.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
Three Year
Total
2,479
596
219
3,293
E - 24
2,479
596
219
3,293
July 2008
Exhibit E17
LT1 Activity Schedule
Year 1
Start date: Jan. 2002Dec. 2002
Year 2
Jan. 2003Dec. 2003
Year 3
Jan. 2004Dec. 2004
Year 4
Jan. 2005Dec. 2005
Year 5
Jan. 2006Dec. 2006
Year 6
Jan. 2007Dec. 2007
Year 7
Jan. 2008Dec. 2008
Year 8
Jan. 2009Dec. 2009
Year 9
Jan. 2010Dec. 2010
Year 10
Jan. 2011Dec. 2011
Year 11
Jan. 2012Dec. 2012
Year 12
Jan. 2013Dec. 2013
Year 13
Jan. 2014Dec. 2014
Year 14
Jan. 2015Dec. 2015
Year 15
Jan. 2016Dec. 2016
Activity
Turbidity Monitoring Start-up - Systems
17%
33%
Turbidity Monitoring Annual - Systems
0%
0%
Turbidity Monitoring Start-up - States
17%
33%
Turbidity Monitoring Annual - States
0%
0%
Turbidity Monitoring Capital
0%
20%
Turbidity Monitoring O&M
0%
20%
Benchmarking Start-up - Systems <=500
0%
100%
Benchmarking Start-up - Systems <=501-9,999
0%
100%
Benchmarking Start-up - States
70%
30%
Disinifection Profiling - Systems <=500
0%
0%
Disinifection Profiling - Systems 501-9,999
0%
50%
Disinfection Profiling - States
0%
0%
Benchmarking - Systems <=500
0%
0%
Benchmarking - Systems 501-9,999
0%
0%
Benchmarking State - State
0%
0%
Covered Finished Water*
5%
5%
* This rule activity is not associated with information collection or recordkeeping.
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
50%
0%
50%
0%
80%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
50%
60%
0%
100%
60%
5%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
100%
0%
40%
5%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
E - 25
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
100%
0%
100%
20%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
100%
0%
100%
80%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
July 2008
Exhibit E18
System Baseline
Surface Water
and GWUDI
Non-Purchased Surface
Water/GWUDI
Unfiltered Surface
Water/GWUDI
Filtered Non-Purchased
Surface Water/GWUDI
Percent Conventional
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
NTNC
TNC
or Direct Filtration
Population Category
<100
1,179
259
1,238
438
129
636
1
0
0
437
129
636
47.41
101-500
2,093
236
475
659
148
375
4
0
0
655
148
375
49.99
501-1,000
1,167
88
82
365
60
62
3
0
0
362
60
62
87.01
1,001-3,300
2,458
68
56
944
33
44
15
0
0
929
33
44
80.98
3,301-10K
2,026
20
22
1,005
5
19
14
0
0
991
5
19
88.43
Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2007. Number of unfiltered systems from ICR done for final LT2ESWTR in 2006.
Note: Source was not specified for some systems. These PWSs were assigned to SW or GW categories based on the ratio of SW to GW systems within a given size category.
Conventional or Direct
Surface Water/GWUDI
Systems
CWS
207
328
315
753
877
NTNC
61
74
52
27
4
TNC
302
187
54
36
17
Number of unfiltered systems from the ICR developed for the final LT2ESWTR in 2006).
Percent of plants that use conventional or direct filtration from 2000 CWSS survey
Conventional or Direct
CWS
NTNC
TNC
Total
< 1,000
850
187
543
1,580
1,001 - 3,300
753
27
36
815
3,301 - 10,000
877
4
17
898
Total
2,479
219
596
3,293
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 26
July 2008
Exhibit E19
Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting Burden Per System
2004 Burden
1 hr
10 hrs
Revised Burden
8 hrs
50 hrs
Task
Annual Reporting Exceptions
Annual IFA
State Burden Estimates for Annual Activities
2004 Burden Task
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
60 hrs
Annual CPE (System Size 1,000-9,999)
Annual CPE (System Size ≤1,000)
120 hrs
Microbial ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 27
Revised Burden
250 hrs
400 hrs
July 2008
Appendix F
Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule Spreadsheets
Exhibit F-A.1 Summary of Burden, Respondents, Responses, and Costs for the ICR Approval Period
Source
(Exhibit)
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
October-08
September-09
October-09
September-10
October-10
September-11
Annual
Average
Total
PWSs
Burden (hours)
F-A.2
125,024
36,612
37,583
199,218
66,406
Respondents (number)
F-A.3
5,956
1,736
1,736
5,956
3,142
Responses (number)
F-A.4
137,217
57,006
57,045
251,268
83,756
Costs (dollars)
Labor
O&M
Capital
F-A.5
$
$
$
$
18,050,858
3,916,716
14,134,142
-
$
$
$
$
15,989,594
1,141,596
14,847,998
-
$
$
$
$
16,024,927
1,176,929
14,847,998
-
$
$
$
$
50,065,379
6,235,241
43,830,139
-
$
$
$
$
16,688,460
2,078,414
14,610,046
-
33.5
Burden per respondent
$
8,407
Cost per respondent
States
Burden (hours)
F-A.2
51,015
39,949
40,570
131,533
43,844
Respondents (number)
F-A.3
57
57
57
57
57
Responses (number)
F-A.4
210
260
298
768
256
Costs (dollars)
Labor
O&M
Capital
F-A.5
$
$
$
$
2,183,376
2,183,376
-
$
$
$
$
1,709,770
1,709,770
-
$
$
$
$
1,736,363
1,736,363
-
$
$
$
$
5,629,510
5,629,510
-
$
$
$
$
1,876,503
1,876,503
-
2,307.6
Burden per respondent
$
98,763
Cost per respondent
Total - PWS and States
Burden (hours)
F-A.2
176,038
76,561
78,153
330,751
110,250
Respondents (number)
F-A.3
6,013
1,793
1,793
6,013
3,199
Responses (number)
F-A.4
137,427
57,266
57,343
252,037
84,012
Cost (dollars)
Labor
O&M
Capital
F-A.5
$
$
$
$
20,234,234
6,100,092
14,134,142
-
$
$
$
$
17,699,364
2,851,366
14,847,998
-
$
$
$
$
17,761,290
2,913,292
14,847,998
-
$
$
$
$
55,694,889
11,864,750
43,830,139
-
$
$
$
$
18,564,963
3,954,917
14,610,046
-
55.0
Burden per respondent
$
Cost per respondent
9,263
Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.
The number of respondents is not added; rather the maximum number of respondents for the 3 years for a given activity is used to
avoid double-counting.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-A-1
July 2008
Exhibit F-A.2 Burden for the ICR Approval Period (Hours)
Source
(Exhibit)
PWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting
Disinfection Benchmarking [4]
Assessment for Bin Reclassification
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
PWSs - Total
States and Territories
Start-up [5]
Bin Determination and Reviewing Monitoring
Data [6]
Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule [7]
Technology Reporting
Disinfection Benchmarking [8]
States and Territories - Total
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
October-08
September-09
October-09
September-10
October-10
September-11
Annual
Average
Total
F-B.2
-
-
-
-
-
F-B.4
F-B.5
F-B.6
F-B.8
F-B.11
F-B.12
79,873
19,091
25,080
979
125,024
30,850
3,548
2,214
36,612
30,850
3,548
3,184
37,583
79,873
80,792
32,176
6,377
199,218
26,624
26,931
10,725
-
66,406
F-B.3
-
-
-
-
-
F-B.7
F-B.9
F-B.10
F-B.13
50,388
627
51,015
38,532
1,417
39,949
38,532
2,038
40,570
127,452
4,081
131,533
42,484
1,360
42,484
176,038
76,561
78,153
330,751
108,890
F-B.14
F-B.15
F-B.16
Total
2,126
Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.
Sources:
See Exhibit F-C.1 for breakdown of burden by year and system type.
(1) Start-up burden is assumed to have been completed in Year 3.
(2) Half of E. coli monitoring by systems serving up to 49,999 people will be completed in Year 4 (the other half was completed in Year 3). Half of
Cryptosporidium monitoring by systems serving 10,000-49,999 people will be completed in Year 4 (the other half was completed in Year 3). Cryptosporidium
monitoring for systems serving <10,000 people will be completed in Years 5 and 6.
(3) Reporting requirements associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Year 3.
(4) Disinfection profiling and benchmarking are assumed to occur before systems begin installing treatment.
(5) State rule start-up activities will parallel system activities.
(6) Bin determination and monitoring review are assumed to parallel system monitoring and reporting activities.
(7) State activities related to uncovered finished water reservoirs parallel system activities.
(8) Disinfection profiling and benchmarking activities will parallel system activities.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-A-2
July 2008
Exhibit F-A.3 Respondents for the ICR Approval Period
Source
(Exhibit)
PWSs
Start-up [1,2]
Assessment for binning [3, 4]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [5]
Technology Reporting
Disinfection Benchmarking [6]
Assessment for Bin Reclassification
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Year 5
Year 6
October-09
September-10
October-10
September-11
Annual
Average
Total [11]
F-B.2
-
-
-
-
-
F-B.4
F-B.5
F-B.6
F-B.8
F-B.11
F-B.12
5,902
1,068
5,956
249
863
1,736
637
863
1,736
637
5,902
1,068
5,956
637
-
1,967
931
3,142
507
-
5,956
1,736
1,736
5,956
3,142
F-B.3
-
-
-
-
-
F-B.7
F-B.9
F-B.10
F-B.13
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
6,013
1,793
1,793
6,013
3,199
F-B.14
F-B.15
F-B.16
PWSs - Total
States and Territories
Start-up [7]
Bin Determination and Reviewing Monitoring
Data [8]
Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule [9]
Technology Reporting
Disinfection Benchmarking [10]
Year 4
October-08
September-09
States and Territories - Total
Total
Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.
Sources
(1) Each PWS is assumed to be a respondent.
(2) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(3) Each plant is assumed to be a respondent.
(4) Systems serving up to 49,999 people will conduct half of their E. coli monitoring in Year 4. Systems serving 10,000-49,999 people will conduct half of their
Cryptosporidium monitoring in Year 4. Systems serving <10,000 people will conduct Cryptosporidium monitoring in Years 5 and 6.
(5) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(6) Systems are assumed to conduct disinfection profiling and benchmarking prior to installing treatment.
(7) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(8) Each State will be a respondent associated with reviewing monitoring data.
(9) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(10) State activities for reviewing disinfection benchmarks are assumed to parallel system activities for profiling and benchmarking.
(11) To avoid double-counting the number of respondents for assessment for binning and for State activities, the highest number of respondents for an activity
for each year is used for the total number of respondents.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-A-3
July 2008
Exhibit F-A.4 Responses for the ICR Approval Period
Year 4
Source
(Exhibit)
PWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting
Disinfection Benchmarking [4]
Assessment for Bin Reclassification
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
PWSs - Total
States and Territories
Start-up [5]
Bin Determination and Reviewing
Monitoring Data [6]
Reviewing/approving UCFWR schedule [7]
Technology Reporting
Disinfection Benchmarking [8]
States and Territories - Total
Total
Year 5
Year 6
October-08
October-09
October-10
September-09 September-10 September-11
Annual
Average
Total
F-B.2
-
-
-
-
-
F-B.4
F-B.5
F-B.6
F-B.8
F-B.11
F-B.12
75,668
13,885
47,626
39
22,436
34,481
89
22436
34,481
127
25,223
12,107
38,863
-
F-B.14
F-B.15
F-B.16
137,217
57,006
57,045
75,668
58,758
116,588
255
251,268
F-B.3
-
-
-
-
-
F-B.7
F-B.9
F-B.10
F-B.13
171
39
210
171
89
260
171
127
298
513
-
171
-
255
768
85
256
137,427
57,266
57,343
252,037
76,448
76,192
Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.
Sources
(1) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(2) For monitoring, each sample taken is considered to be a response, and two additional responses are added (one for sample schedule/location and one for
bin classification). Systems serving up to 49,999 people will conduct half of their E. coli monitoring in Year 4. Systems serving 10,000-49,999 people will
conduct half of their Cryptosporidium monitoring in Year 4. Systems serving <10,000 people will conduct Cryptosporidium monitoring in Years 5 and 6.
(3) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(4) Disinfection profiling and benchmarking are considered 1 response. Profiling is assumed to be conducted prior to treatment installation.
(5) State start-up activities are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(6) Each State will have 3 responses associated with binning and reviewing monitoring data (see Exhibit F-B.7). The number of responses from States and
Territories equals three times the number of small systems performing E. coli monitoring in a given year.
(7) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(8) State reviews of disinfection benchmarks will parallel system activities. One response per system conducting benchmarking is assumed.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-A-4
July 2008
Exhibit F-A.5 Cost for the ICR Approval Period
Source
(Exhibit)
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
October-08 to September-09
October-09 to September-10
October-10 to September-11
Labor
O&M
Capital
Labor
O&M
Capital
Labor
Total
O&M
October-08 to September-11
Capital
Labor
O&M
Annual
Capital
Total
Average
PWSs
Start-up [1]
F-B.2
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$ 14,847,998
$
-
$
947,633
$
-
$
-
$
$
-
$
-
$
$ 14,847,998
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
2,453,478
$
4,945,544
$
-
$
7,399,022
$
2,466,341
2,481,703
$ 38,884,595
$
-
$
41,366,298
$
13,788,766
355,991
Assessment for binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
F-B.4
$ 2,453,478
$ 4,945,544
$
-
$
-
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
F-B.5
$
586,437
$ 9,188,598
$
-
$
947,633
F-B.6
$
841,173
$
-
$
-
$
113,401
$
-
$
-
$
113,401
$
-
$
-
$
1,067,974
$
-
$
-
$
1,067,974
$
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Reporting
F-B.8
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Technology Reporting
F-B.11
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Disinfection Benchmarking [4]
F-B.12
$
35,628
$
-
$
-
$
80,562
$
-
$
-
$
115,895
$
-
$
-
$
232,085
$
-
$
-
$
232,085
$
77,362
Assessment for Bin Reclassification
E. coli Monitoring
F-B.14
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
F-B.15
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Reporting
F-B.16
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$ 14,134,142
$
-
$ 1,141,596
$ 14,847,998
$
-
$ 1,176,929
$ 14,847,998
$
-
$
6,235,241
$ 43,830,139
$
-
$
50,065,379
$
16,688,460
PWSs - Total
$ 3,916,716
States and Territories
Start-up [5]
F-B.3
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Reporting and bin determination
F-B.7
$ 2,156,562
$
-
$
-
$ 1,649,135
$
-
$
-
$ 1,649,135
$
-
$
-
$
5,454,832
$
-
$
-
$
5,454,832
$
1,818,277
Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule [6]
F-B.9
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Technology Reporting
F-B.10
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Disinfection Benchmarking [7]
F-B.13
$
26,815
$
-
$
-
$
60,635
$
-
$
-
$
87,228
$
-
$
-
$
174,677
$
-
$
-
$
174,677
$
58,226
States and Territories - Total
$ 2,183,376
$
-
$
-
$ 1,709,770
$
-
$
-
$ 1,736,363
$
-
$
-
$
5,629,510
$
-
$
-
$
5,629,510
$
1,876,503
Total
$ 6,100,092
$ 14,134,142
$
-
$ 2,851,366
$ 14,847,998
$
-
$ 2,913,292
$ 14,847,998
$
-
$
11,864,750
$ 43,830,139
$
-
$
55,694,889
$
18,564,963
Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.
Sources
See Exhibit F-C.2 for a breakdown of cost by year and system type.
(1) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(2) 1/2 of E. coli and Cryptosporidium monitoring by systems serving 10K-49,999 will take place in Year 4 (the remainder was completed in Year 3).
1/2 of E. coli monitoring by systems serving < 10K will take place in Year 4 (the remainder was completed in Year 3).
1/2 of Cryptosporidium monitoring by systems serving <10K will take place in Year 5 and 1/2 will take place in Year 6.
(3) Systems are assumed to have incurred costs associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs during Years 1-3.
(4) Costs associated with disinfection profiling and benchmarking are assumed to be incurred prior to treatment installation.
(5) State rule start-up activities will parallel system activities.
(6) Costs associated with reviewing reports on uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been incurred during Years 1-3.
(7) State costs associated with reviewing disinfection benchmarks are assumed to parallel system costs.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-A-5
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.1a Baseline Number of Plants for Rule Start-up and Monitoring Activities
Implementation
System Size
(Population Served)
Number of Number of
Filtered
Unfiltered Baseline #
Systems
Systems
PWSs
A
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
B
C=A+B
Monitoring for Initial Bin Classification
Percent of
Plants with >
5.5 Log
Treatment
Prior to Rule
Promulgation
D
Baseline # of
Plants
Plants
Per
Conducting E.
System coli Monitoring
E
F = A*E*(1-D)
Percent of
Plants
Triggered to
Monitor for
Cryptosporidium
G
Future Monitoring for Re-Binning
Percent of
Percent of
Plants with > Plants with > Baseline # of
Baseline # of
5.5 Log
5.5 Log
Plants
Plants
Treatment for Treatment for Conducting
Conducting
LT2
Stage 2
E. coli
Cryptosporidium Monitoring Compliance Compliance
Monitoring
H=F*G+B*E
I
J
K = F*(1-I-J)
Baseline # of
Plants
Conducting
Cryptosporidium
Monitoring
L = G*K
437
655
362
929
991
948
214
226
14
4,777
1
4
3
15
14
14
4
4
1
60
438
659
365
944
1,005
962
218
230
15
4,837
3.6%
3.6%
3.6%
3.6%
3.6%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.6
1.6
421
632
363
932
1,003
1,048
237
369
23
5,028
35%
35%
35%
35%
35%
148
224
129
340
364
1,064
241
376
25
2,910
5.3%
5.3%
5.3%
9.7%
9.5%
30.4%
30.3%
29.7%
29.7%
15.0%
6.3%
6.3%
1.8%
1.8%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
336
558
321
824
890
715
161
254
16
4,075
117
194
112
287
310
715
161
254
16
2,165
129
148
60
33
5
2
377
-
129
148
60
33
5
2
0
0
0
377
3.6%
3.6%
3.6%
3.6%
3.6%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
124
143
58
32
5
2
364
35%
35%
35%
35%
35%
43
50
20
11
2
2
0
0
0
128
5.3%
5.3%
5.3%
9.7%
9.5%
30.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15.0%
6.3%
6.3%
1.8%
1.8%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
99
126
51
28
4
1
310
35
44
18
10
1
1
0
0
0
109
636
375
62
44
19
2
1
1,139
6,294
60
636
375
62
44
19
2
0
1
0
1,139
6,354
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
636
375
62
44
19
2
1
1,139
6,531
35%
35%
35%
35%
35%
221
131
22
15
7
2
0
1
0
398
3,436
5.3%
5.3%
5.3%
9.7%
9.5%
30.4%
0.0%
14.8%
58.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
603
355
59
40
17
1
1
1,076
5,462
210
124
20
14
6
1
0
1
0
376
2,650
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.
Sources:
(C) Number of systems from SDWIS/FED Data from October 2007.
(D) EPA assumes only membrane filtration plants will have > 5.5 log Cryptosporidium treatment prior to rule promulgation. Plants estimated to have membrane filtration as a result of Stage 1 DBPR compliance
are from the Economic Analysis for the Stage 2 DBPR.
(E) For CWSs, from Exhibit 5.1 of the Draft Final Model Systems Report prepared for EPA by the Cadmus Group, Inc., in March 2005. The exhibit is an analysis of data from the 2000 Community Water System
Survey. Includes treated entry points. Excludes 2 outlier systems that had more than 100 entry points, as well as 27 systems that provided insufficient information on their treated entry points. For NCWSs,
assumed to be 1.0.
(G) Percentage of plants triggered into Cryptosporidium monitoring is estimated from the modelled Information Collection Rule Occurrence Distribution.
(I) Derived from Appendix G of the LT2ESWTR Economic Analysis; this number is calculated by dividing the number of plants achieving 5.5 log treatment for the LT2ESWTR by the total number of plants for the
size category.
(J) EPA assumes only membrane plants will have > 5.5 log Cryptosporidium treatment as a result of the Stage 2 DBPR. Estimates from the Economic Analysis for the Stage 2 DBPR.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-1
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.1b Labor Rates
Cost Assumptions: Labor Rate Components
Base Hourly
Labor Cost
ECI in Year of
Data
ECI 2007
2007 Labor
Cost
A
B
C
D=A*(C/B)
Cost Element
State Employee
$
39.87
100.8
108.2 $
Sources: (A) State employee wage (2006$) from BLS SOC Code 19-2041, "State Government - Environmental Scientists and
Specialists, Including Health" Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for benefits.
42.80
(B)ECI for state employee from BLS (2008) from 2006 (State and local government; Total compensation; All workers, not seasonally
adjusted). www.bls.gov.
(C) ECI for state employee from BLS (2008) from 2007 (State and local government; Total compensation; All workers, not seasonally
adjusted). www.bls.gov.
Technical Wage Rates by System Size
Rate
Base Wage Rate ($2006)
Loaded Wage Rate ($2006)
Loaded Wage Rate ($2007)
25-100
$ 17.87
$ 28.59
$ 30.72
101-500
$
17.87
$
28.59
$
30.72
System size
500-3.3k
3.3k-10k
$
17.87 $
17.87
$
28.59 $
28.59
$
30.72 $
30.72
25-100
$
30.77
$
40.00
$
51.21
$
10.61
$
13.79
$
17.95
System size
101-500
$
30.77 $
$
43.08 $
$
55.16 $
$
10.61 $
$
14.85 $
$
19.33 $
$
$
$
10k-100k
17.87
28.59
30.72
>100k
$ 17.87
$ 28.59
$ 30.72
Source: BLS 2007
Managerial and Clerical Wage Rates by System Size
Rate
Base Manager Wage Rate ($2000)
Loaded Manager Wage Rate ($2000)
Loaded Manager Wage Rate ($2007)
Base Clerical Wage Rate ($2000)
Loaded Clerical Wage Rate ($2000)
Loaded Clerical Wage Rate ($2007)
>500
30.77
46.16
59.10
10.61
15.92
20.72
Source: 2000 Base rates: Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003). Adjusted to 2007
values using ECI recalculated to base of June 1989 = 100. For managerial rate used White Collar, Professional
specialty and technical, not seasonally adjusted. For clerical used Administrative support, including clerical.
Cost Assumptions: Estimated System Labor Costs per Hour by System Size
Population Category
25-100
Cost Component
Labor cost (per hour)
$
101-500
30.72
$
30.72
500-3.3k
$
30.72
3.3-10k
$
36.39
10k-100k
$
36.39
>100k
$
36.39
Notes:
EPA estimates that systems with population greater than 3,300 use a combination of operators (technical) and engineers (managerial), with an 80/20 ratio
between the two, respectively.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-2
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.1b (continued) Labor Rates
Laboratory Cost Per Sample [1]
Range [2]
Total Laboratory
Min
Max
Average
Cost per Plant
$
662 $
486 $
891
$17,206
Analyte
Cryptosporidium [3]
E. Coli
(1) Utility Analysis
26
15
47
682
(2) Commercial Lab [4]
87
75
106
2,275
Note: Lab costs per sample updated to $2007, from BLS, using PPI (all
commodities).
[1] Lab costs based on EPA subcontractor (DynCorp) survey of laboratories.
Cryptosporidium costs assume all plants must send samples to commercial
laboratories and that 27 percent of samples will require multiple subsamples
analysis at additional cost (based on Supplemental Survey results). E. Coli costs
are provided for utility analysis (no shipping) and commercial analysis, which
includes overnight shipping charges.
[2] Minimum costs are estimated from DynCorp for the minimum analytical cost
and the mean cost for shipping a 37.6 pound package (average weight of
sample as observed during the Supplemental Survey, estimated by Kevin
Connell) overnight (FedEx). Maximum costs are estimated from DynCorp for the
maximum analytical costs, the mean cost for shipping a 37.6 pound package
(average weight of sample as observed during the Supplemental Survey,
estimated by Kevin connell) overnight (FedEx), and the maximum cost of an
additional subsample analysis, also estimated by DynCorp.
[3] Assumes monthly Cryptosporidium monitoring, plus two matrix spike samples
to be analyzed at the beginning of monitoring and bi-weekly E. Coli monitoring.
These are conservative estimates, therefore laboratory costs could be lower.
Costs
Crypto Analytical
E. coli Analytical
Commercial
Utility
Shipping (lbs)
7
25
50
Mean - 37.6
Subsample
Crypto Total
E. coli commercial
Total
Average Minimum Maximum
$
504 $
375 $
605
$
$
44
26
$
44
87
136
111
47
662
$
87
$
$
31
15
$
$
62
47
$
59
0
486
$
152
175
891
$
75
$
106
26 $
15 $
47
E. coli analytical Total $
Note: Lab costs per sample and shipping costs updated to
$2007, from BLS, using PPI (all commodities).
E. coli commercial shipping costs were estimated by
assuming that two 125-mL sample containers would be
shipped to the laboratory in a 10-quart polyethylene cooler
packed with approximately 4 lb of UTEK gel paks.
The approximate weight of the shipment, given these
assumptions, is 7 lb. Using this weight, we estimated shipping
costs for standard overnight service for shipments to 12
locations using the Fed Ex web site.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-3
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.2 Burden and Cost to PWSs Associated with Rule Start-Up Activities (Completed in Years
1-3)
System Size
(Population
Served)
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
Baseline #
of Systems
Read
Train
Total
Conducting
Hours per Hours per Hours per Cost per ImplementaPWS
PWS
Labor Hour
PWS
tion
A
B
C=A+B
D
E
Total Cost
F = C*D*E
Total Burden
(Hours)
G = C*E
Total Burden
(FTEs)
H = G/2080
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
15
15
15
15
15
15
30
30
30
50
50
50
50
50
50
65
65
65
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
438
659
365
944
1,005
962
218
230
15
4,837
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
672,962
1,012,450
560,689
1,450,384
1,829,158
1,750,533
515,697
544,084
35,484
8,371,441
21,908
32,960
18,253
47,217
50,260
48,100
14,170
14,950
975
248,794
10.5
15.8
8.8
22.7
24.2
23.1
6.8
7.2
0.5
119.6
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
15
15
15
15
15
15
30
30
30
50
50
50
50
50
50
65
65
65
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
129
148
60
33
5
2
377
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
198,278
227,308
92,152
50,744
9,098
3,813
581,393
6,455
7,400
3,000
1,652
250
105
18,862
3.1
3.6
1.4
0.8
0.1
0.1
9.1
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
15
15
15
15
15
15
30
30
30
50
50
50
50
50
50
65
65
65
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
636
375
62
44
19
2
1
1,139
6,354
$
977,014
$
575,978
$
95,224
$
67,578
$
34,913
$
3,639
$
$
2,366
$
$ 1,756,711
$ 10,709,546
31,807
18,751
3,100
2,200
959
100
65
56,982
324,638
15.3
9.0
1.5
1.1
0.5
0.0
0.0
27.4
156.1
Notes:
Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shown for
informational purposes only.
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.
Sources:
(A & B) Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
(D) For systems serving up to 3,300 people, the full technical rate was applied. For systems serving more than 3,300 people, costs are based on
an 80%/20% split between technical and managerial rates. Technical rates are from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007. Managerial rates are based on
Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003), inflated to $2007.
(E) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1, column A.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-4
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.3 Burden and Cost to States and Primacy Agencies Associated
with Rule Start-up Activities (Completed in Years 1-3)
Cost per
Labor Hour FTEs per State Hours per State
Cost Per State
Implementation Activities
A
B
C = B*2080
D = A*C
Regulation Adoption and Program Development $
42.80
1.00
2,080 $
89,022
Training State Staff
$
42.80
0.50
1,040 $
44,511
Training PWS Staff and Technical Assistants
$
42.80
1.00
2,080 $
89,022
Updating Data Management System
$
42.80
0.25
520 $
22,256
Public Notification
$
42.80
0.10
208 $
8,902
Totals per State
2.85
5,928 $
253,713
National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)
162.45
337,896 $
14,461,648
Notes:
Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shown
for informational purposes only.
Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.
All States/Primacy Agencies are assumed to incur some costs for each activity.
1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)
Sources:
(A) State labor rates based on the State Workload Model, updated to current dollar values.
(B) FTEs per State/Primacy Agency take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-5
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.4 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with E. coli Monitoring for Bin Determination
Sampling
System Size
(Population
Served)
Baseline # of
Plants
# of E.
Conducting
coli
E. coli
Monitoring Samples
A
B
Hours
per
Sample
C
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
421
632
363
932
1,003
1,048
237
369
23
5,028
26
26
26
26
26
24
24
24
24
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
124
143
58
32
5
2
364
26
26
26
26
26
24
24
24
24
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
636
375
62
44
19
2
1
1,139
6,531
26
26
26
26
26
24
24
24
24
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Cost
per
Labor
Hour
Sample Analysis
Total Sampling
Labor Cost
D
Commercial
Analysis
(Includes
Shipping)
E = A*B*C*D
F
Utility
Utility
Utility
Percent
Analysis Analysis Analysis Utilities with
Hours per Cost per Cost per
E. coli
Analysis
Sample
Sample
Sample
Capabilities
(Total)
(O&M)
(Labor)
G
H = I-G*D
I
J
Total
Laboratory Total Laboratory
Analysis Cost Analysis Cost
(O&M)
(Labor)
Total Cost
L = F*A*B*(1J)+H*A*B*J
K = D*G*J*A*B
M = E+K+L
Total Burden
(Hours)
Total
Burden
(FTEs)
O=
N = A*B*C+A*B*G*J N/2,080
Responses
Respondents
P = A*B
Q
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
336,572
504,441
289,903
744,120
801,286
772,915
174,476
272,240
16,864
3,912,818
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
75%
75%
100%
100%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
14,024
21,018
12,079
31,005
33,387
96,614
21,810
45,373
2,811
278,121
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
776,828
1,164,279
669,111
1,717,470
1,849,411
949,039
214,234
187,241
11,599
7,539,211
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,127,424
1,689,738
971,093
2,492,595
2,684,084
1,818,567
410,521
504,854
31,274
11,730,151
11,414
17,106
9,831
25,234
27,173
28,307
6,390
10,340
641
136,436
5.5
8.2
4.7
12.1
13.1
13.6
3.1
5.0
0.3
65.6
10,957
16,422
9,438
24,225
26,086
25,162
5,680
8,863
549
127,382
421
632
363
932
1,003
1,048
237
369
23
5,028
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
99,393
113,945
46,194
25,437
3,849
1,539
290,357
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
75%
75%
100%
100%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,141
4,748
1,925
1,060
160
192
12,226
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
229,404
262,991
106,618
58,710
8,885
1,890
668,498
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
332,939
381,684
154,737
85,207
12,895
3,621
971,082
3,371
3,864
1,567
863
131
56
9,851
1.6
1.9
0.8
0.4
0.1
0.0
4.7
3,236
3,709
1,504
828
125
50
9,453
124
143
58
32
5
2
364
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
508,047
299,509
49,516
35,141
15,323
1,474
737
909,747
5,112,922
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
75%
75%
100%
100%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
21,169
12,480
2,063
1,464
638
184
123
38,121
328,469
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,172,601
691,282
114,286
81,106
35,367
1,810
507
2,096,960
10,304,669
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,701,817
1,003,270
165,866
117,711
51,328
3,469
1,367
3,044,828
15,746,061
17,229
10,157
1,679
1,192
520
54
28
30,858
177,144
8.3
4.9
0.8
0.6
0.2
0.0
0.0
14.8
85.2
16,539
9,750
1,612
1,144
499
48
24
29,617
166,451
636
375
62
44
19
2
1
1,139
6,531
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1, column D.
(B) Bi-weekly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems.
(C) Estimate of labor for collecting sample and shipping, based on the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives and expert opinion.
(D) All size categories were assumed to use a technical rate from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007.
(F) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, June 2002 (updated to $2007).
(G) Based on professional judgment and results of 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
(H) The amount left after labor is subtracted from the amount in column I.
(I) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, December 2000 (updated to $2007).
(J) Estimate based on Third Edition Baseline Handbook data.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-6
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.5 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Cryptosporidium Monitoring for Bin Determination
System Size
(Population
Served)
Sampling
Baseline #
of Plants
Cost
Conducting
per
# of Crypto- Hours
CryptoLabor
per
sporidium
sporidium
Sample Hour
Samples
Monitoring
A
B
C
D
Sample Analysis
Total
Sampling
Labor Cost
Cost per
Sample
Total Laboratory
Analysis Cost
(O&M)
E = A*B*C*D
F
G = A*B*F
Total Cost
H = E+G
Total
Burden
(Hours)
I = A*B*C
Total
Burden
(FTEs)
J = I/2080
Responses
K = A*B
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
148
224
129
340
364
1,064
241
376
25
2,910
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
162,148
245,768
142,145
373,192
399,558
1,168,386
264,773
412,728
26,922
3,195,620
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,540,618
3,850,815
2,227,194
5,847,370
6,260,476
18,306,865
4,148,599
6,466,840
421,827
50,070,604
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,702,766
4,096,583
2,369,339
6,220,562
6,660,034
19,475,250
4,413,372
6,879,569
448,749
53,266,224
5,279
8,001
4,628
12,149
13,008
38,037
8,620
13,436
876
104,033
2.5
3.8
2.2
5.8
6.3
18.3
4.1
6.5
0.4
50.0
3,839
5,819
3,365
8,836
9,460
27,663
6,269
9,772
637
75,661
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
43
50
20
11
2
2
128
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
47,560
54,523
22,104
12,172
1,842
2,292
140,492
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
745,187
854,288
346,333
190,712
28,861
35,919
2,201,300
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
792,746
908,811
368,437
202,884
30,703
38,212
2,341,792
1,548
1,775
720
396
60
75
4,574
0.7
0.9
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
2.2
1,126
1,291
523
288
44
54
3,326
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
221
131
22
15
7
2
1
398
3,436
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$ 30.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
243,101
143,315
23,694
16,815
7,332
2,196
1,098
437,550
3,773,662
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,809,025
2,245,530
371,242
263,462
114,883
34,413
17,206
6,855,761
59,127,665
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,052,125
2,388,845
394,936
280,277
122,215
36,609
18,304
7,293,311
62,901,327
7,914
4,666
771
547
239
72
36
14,244
122,851
3.8
2.2
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
6.8
59.1
5,756
3,393
561
398
174
52
26
10,360
89,347
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1a, column F.
(B) Semimonthly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems, plus two
matrix spike samples.
(C) Estimate of labor for collecting sample and shipping, based on the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives and expert opinion.
(D) All size categories were assumed to use a technical rate from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007.
(F) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1b.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-7
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.6 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Reporting for Source Water Sampling Plan and Initial Bin
Classification Monitoring
System Size
(Population Served)
Source Water
Sampling Plan
hours per plant
A
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3 300 9 999
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
Total
Cost per
Bin Classification
hours
Labor
hours per plant per plant
Hour
B
C=A+B
D
Baseline #
of Plants
Reporting
Total Cost
Total Burden
(Hours)
Total Burden
(FTEs)
E
F = C*D*E
G = C*E
H = G/2080
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
16
16
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
17
17
26
26
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
421
632
363
932
1,003
1,048
237
369
23
5,028
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
103,561
155,213
89,201
228,960
292,110
648,652
146,426
349,427
21,646
2,035,195
3,371
5,053
2,904
7,454
8,026
17,823
4,023
9,601
595
58,851
1.6
2.4
1.4
3.6
3.9
8.6
1.9
4.6
0.3
28.3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
16
16
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
17
17
26
26
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36 39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
124
143
58
32
5
2
0
0
0
364
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30,582
35,060
14,213
7,827
1 403
1,403
1,292
90,378
996
1,141
463
255
39
35
2,929
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.1
00
0.0
0.0
1.4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
16
16
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
17
17
26
26
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
636
375
62
44
19
2
0
1
0
1,139
6,531
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
156,322
92,156
15,236
10,812
5,586
1,237
946
282,297
2,407,869
5,089
3,000
496
352
153
34
26
9,151
70,930
2.4
1.4
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
4.4
34.1
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Burden estimates take into account results of February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
(B) Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
(C) Although small systems will not report E. coli and Cryptosporidium results at the same time, the additional reporting burden is assumed to be negligible.
The decrease in burden for small plants that report E. coli but are exempt from Cryptosporidium monitoring is also assumed to be negligible.
(D) For systems serving up to 3,300 people, the full technical rate was applied. For systems serving more than 3,300 people, costs are based on an
80%/20% split between technical and managerial rates. Technical rates are from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007. Managerial rates are based on Labor Costs
for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003), inflated to $2007.
(E) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1, column D.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-8
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.7 Burden and Cost to States Associated with E. coli and Cryptosporidium Monitoring and Bin Determination
(Initial and Future Rounds)
Initial Monitoring for Small Systems
State Activity
FTEs per State
Total
for E. coli
Hours for
Monitoring
E. coli
A
B = A*2080
FTEs Per State
for Cryptosporidium
Monitoring
Total Hours for
Cryptosporidium
Total FTEs
Per State
Total Hours
Cost per
Labor Hour
C
D = C*2080
E = A+C
F = B+D
G
Analyze PWS Reports and
Make Bin Classifications
Respond to PWS
Recordkeeping
Totals per State
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.9
624
624
520
1,768
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.7
416
416
520
1,352
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
National Totals (57
States/Primacy Agencies)
48.5
100,776
37.1
77,064
85.5
1040 $
1040 $
1040 $
3,120
Total Cost
H = F*G
42.80
42.80
42.80
177,840
$ 44,511.08
$ 44,511.08
$ 44,511.08
$ 133,533.23
$
7,611,394
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
All States/Primacy Agencies are assumed to incur some costs for each activity.
1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)
Sources
(A), (C) EPA estimated FTEs based on experience with similar regulations.
(G) Based on 2006 BLS rates for state employees, adjusted to $2007.
Future Monitoring
State Activity
Total
FTEs per State Hours for
E. coli in
for E. coli
Small
Monitoring in
Small Systems Systems
A
B = A*2080
FTEs Per State
for Cryptosporidium
Monitoring in
Small Systems
Total Hours for
Cryptosporidium in
Small Systems
C
D = C*2080
FTEs Per
State for
Cryptosporidium
Monitoring in Total Hours for
Cryptosporidium
Medium &
in Medium &
Total FTEs
Large
Large Systems
Per State
Systems
E
F = E*2080
G = A+C+E
Analyze PWS Report and
Make Bin Classifications
Respond to PWS
Recordkeeping
Totals per State
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.7
416
416
520
1,352
0.1
0.1
0.25
0.5
208
208
520
936
0.1
0.1
0.25
0.5
208
208
520
936
0.4
0.4
0.75
1.6
National Totals (57
States/Primacy Agencies)
37.1
77,064
25.7
53,352
25.7
53,352
88.4
Total Hours
Cost per
Labor
Hour
H = B+D+F
I
832 $ 42.80
832 $ 42.80
1560 $ 42.80
3,224
183,768
Total Cost
J = H*I
$
$
$
$
35,608.86
35,608.86
66,766.61
137,984
$
7,865,107
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
All States/Primacy Agencies are assumed to incur some costs for each activity.
1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)
Sources
(A), (C), (E) EPA estimated FTEs based on experience with similar regulations.
(I) Based on 2006 BLS rates for state employees, adjusted to $2007.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-9
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.8 Burden and Cost to PWSs Associated with UCFWR Reporting (Completed in Years 1-3)
System Size
(Population
Served)
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Reporting
Use of
UCFWR
A
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
Reporting Schedule for
Covering UCFWR or
Disinfecting UCFWR Effluent
B
Total Hours
per PWS
C=A+B
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8.25
8.25
8.25
8.25
8.25
8.25
8.25
8.25
8.25
Cost per
Labor Hour
D
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
Baseline # of
Systems with
UCFWRs
E
3
9
26
5
37
1
81
Total Cost
F = C*D*E
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
760
2,702
7,806
1,501
11,109
300
24,180
Total Burden
(Hours)
G = C*E
25
74
215
41
305
8
668
Total Burden
(FTEs)
H = G/2080
0.01
0.04
0.10
0.02
0.15
0.00
0.3
Notes:
Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shown for informational purposes only.
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.
NTNCWS and TNCWS do not have UCFWRs
Sources:
(A & B) Burden estimates for each activity are based on EPA experience with similar rules.
(D) For systems serving up to 3,300 people, the full technical rate was applied. For systems serving more than 3,300 people, costs are based on an 80%/20% split between technical
and managerial rates. Technical rates are from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007. Managerial rates are based on Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003), inflated to
$2007.
(E) Exhibit 4.23, Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-10
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.9 Burden and Cost to States and Primacy Agencies Associated
with Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule (Completed in Years 1-3)
State/Primacy Agency Activity
Recording Use of UCFWR
Approving State Schedule
Baseline # of Systems with Cost per Labor
UCFWRs
Hour
B
A
81 $
42.80
81
42.80
Totals per UCFWR
Burden and Cost per State/Primacy Agency
FTEs per
UCFWR
C
0.0001
0.0005
0.0006
0.01
Hours per
UCFWR
D
0.25
1
1.25
14.46
$
$
$
$
Cost Per
UCFWR
E = B*D
10.7
42.8
53.5
619.1
Notes:
Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shown for informational purposes only.
Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.
Only the seven States/Primacy Agencies with UCFWRs are assumed to incur burden and costs for these activities.
1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)
Sources:
(A) Carried forward from January 2006 ICR (expert estimates).
(B) State labor rates 2006 BLS rates for state employees, adjusted to $2007.
(C) FTEs per State/Primacy Agency based on EPA experience with previous regulations.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-11
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.10 Burden and Cost to States Associated with Reviewing Plants' Reports on Technology Compliance (Beginning Year 7)
Number Number
System Size
of Plants of Plants
(Population
Installing Installing
Served)
UV
MF/UF
A
B
<100
85
88
100-499
79
68
500-999
32
37
1,000-3,299
125
27
3,300-9,999
116
23
10,000-49,999
366
22
50,000-99,999
100
5
100,000-999,999
115
6
1,000,000+
21
1
National Totals
1,038
277
Number of
Plants
Installing
Bank
Filtration
C
Number of
Unfiltered
Plants
Installing
Ozone
D
4
1
1
0
6
0
1
1
1
0
0
4
Total Plants
E = A+B+C+D
173
147
69
154
140
392
107
122
22
1,326
Annual
Labor
Hours per
Plant
F
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
Labor
Rate
G
$ 42.80
$ 42.80
$ 42.80
$ 42.80
$ 42.80
$ 42.80
$ 42.80
$ 42.80
$ 42.80
Total
Annual
Labor
Hours
H = E*F
6,914
5,896
2,763
6,145
5,598
15,687
4,263
4,891
883
53,040
Total Annual
Costs
I = G*H
$
295,927
$
252,328
$
118,259
$
263,011
$
239,604
$
671,403
$
182,445
$
209,334
$
37,774
$ 2,270,085
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.
Sources:
(A)-(D) Taken from Appendix G of the Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR.
(F) Burden estimates take into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
(G) Based 2006 BLS rates for state employees, adjusted to $2007.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-12
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.11 Filtered and Unfiltered Plant Burden and Cost for Preparing Reports Demonstrating Technology Compliance (Beginning Year 7)
System Size
(Population
Served)
CWS
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWS
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWS
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
Number
Plants
Installing
UV
A
Annual
Number of
Number
Labor
Unfiltered
Number of
of Plants
Hours per
Installing Plants Installing Plants Installing
Plant
Ozone
Total Plants
Bank Filtration
MF/UF
B
C
D
E=A+B+C+D
F
Labor
Rate
G
Total
Annual
Labor
Hours
H=E*F
Total Annual
Costs
I=G*H
16
37
23
111
112
361
100
114
20
893
54
48
31
25
23
21
5
6
1
214
4
1
1
0
6
0
1
1
1
0
0
4
69
85
53
138
136
387
107
122
21
1,118
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
4,143
5,112
3,197
8,260
8,141
23,219
6,394
7,301
1,288
67,055
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
127,262
157,034
98,209
253,736
296,276
845,007
232,710
265,707
46,876
2,322,818
9
13
5
8
2
1
0
38
28
17
6
2
0
0
0
52
0
0
0
-
37
30
10
9
2
2
0
91
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
2,205
1,803
609
569
149
91
18
5,445
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
67,744
55,396
18,717
17,471
5,410
3,323
643
168,706
60
29
5
6
2
4
0
1
107
1,038
7
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
277
0
0
0
0
6
4
67
32
6
6
2
4
0
1
118
1,326
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
4,023
1,928
338
389
108
221
18
36
7,061
79,561
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
123,578
59,217
10,386
11,940
3,929
8,046
655
1,305
219,056
2,710,580
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
Some unfiltered plants may install ozone treatment, but no new burden is expected to be incurred because ozone will replace the currently used
disinfectant.
UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.
Sources:
(A), (B), (C), (D) Taken from Appendix G of the LT2ESWTR Economic Analysis.
(F) Burden estimate takes into account the results of the February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
(G) For systems serving up to 3,300 people, the full technical rate was applied. For systems serving more than 3,300 people, costs
are based on an 80%/20% split between technical and managerial rates. Technical rates are from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007.
Managerial rates are based on Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003), inflated to $2007.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-13
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.12 Plant Burden and Cost for Disinfection Benchmarking Reports
System Size
(Population
Served)
CWS
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWS
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWS
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
Number of
Total
Number Number of Unfiltered Number of
of Plants
Plants
Plants
Plants
Annual
Installing Installing Installing Changing Labor Hours
UV
MF/UF
Ozone Disinfection per Plant
A
B
C
D = A+B+C
E
Labor Rate
F
Total
Annual
Labor
Hours
G = D*E
Total Annual
Costs
H = F*G
16
37
23
111
112
361
100
114
20
893
54
48
31
25
23
21
5
6
1
214
0
1
1
1
0
0
4
69
85
53
138
136
383
106
120
21
1,111
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
225
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
1,726
2,130
1,332
3,442
3,392
9,580
2,638
3,012
534
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
53,025.65
65,430.99
40,920.59
105,723.39
123,448.47
348,642.16
96,017.83
109,631.45
19,421.67
962,262.22
9
13
5
8
2
1
0
38
28
17
6
2
0
0
0
52
-
37
30
10
9
2
2
0
91
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
225
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
919
751
254
237
62
38
7
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
28,226.86
23,081.80
7,798.94
7,279.72
2,254.27
1,370.08
265.26
70,276.95
60
29
5
6
2
4
0
1
107
1,038
7
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
277
4
67
32
6
6
2
4
0
1
118
1,320
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
225
675
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
1,676
803
141
162
45
91
7
15
$ 51,490.95
$ 24,673.59
$
4,327.70
$
4,975.03
$
1,636.89
$
3,316.95
$
$
270.21
$
540.04
$ 91,231.35
$ 1,123,770.51
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
This ICR only characterizes burden and costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and
profiling burden and costs associated with systems changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they fall
outside of the clearance period and will be added in future ICRs.
UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.
Sources:
(A) - (C) From Appendix G of the Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR.
(E) Burden estimates take into account the results of February 2008 consultations with water industry representatives.
(G) For systems serving up to 3,300 people, the full technical rate was applied. For systems serving more than 3,300 people, costs
are based on an 80%/20% split between technical and managerial rates. Technical rates are from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007.
Managerial rates are based on Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003), inflated to $2007.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-14
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.13 State Burden and Cost for Disinfection Benchmarking Reports
System Size
(Population
Served)
Number Number of
of Plants
Plants
Installing Installing
UV
MF/UF
A
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
85
79
32
125
116
366
100
115
21
1,038
B
Number of
Plants
Installing
Ozone
C
88
68
37
27
23
22
5
6
1
277
0
1
1
1
0
0
4
Total
Number of
Plants
Changing Labor Hours
Disinfection
per Plant
D=A+B+
C
E
173
16
147
16
69
16
154
16
140
16
388
16
106
16
121
16
22
16
1,320
144
Labor Rate
F
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
42.80
42.80
42.80
42.80
42.80
42.80
42.80
42.80
42.80
385.19
Total Labor
Hours
G = D*E
$ 2,765.73
$ 2,358.26
$ 1,105.25
$ 2,458.10
$ 2,239.33
$ 6,213.47
$ 1,688.52
$ 1,937.34
$
351.04
Total Costs
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
H = F*G
118,370.97
100,931.39
47,303.67
105,204.33
95,841.41
265,931.09
72,267.25
82,916.48
15,024.06
903,790.64
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
This ICR only characterizes burden and costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and profiling
burden and costs associated with systems changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they fall outside of the
clearance period and will be added in future ICRs.
UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.
Sources:
(A) - (C) From Appendix G of the Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR.
(E) Burden estimates take into account the results of February 2008 consultations with water industry representatives.
(F) Based on 2006 BLS rates for state employees, updated to $2007.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-15
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.14 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with E. coli Monitoring for Bin Reclassification
Sampling
System Size
(Population
Served)
Baseline #
of Plants
Conducting # of E.
coli
E. coli
Monitoring Samples
A
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
B
Sample Analysis
Hours
per
Sample
Cost per
Labor
Hour
Total
Sampling
Labor Cost
C
D
E = A*B*C*D
Utility
Commercial Analysis
Hours per
Analysis
Sample
(Includes
(Labor)
Shipping)
F
G
H=I-G*D
Utility
Percent
Analysis Utilities with
Total Laboratory Total Laboratory
E. coli
Cost per
Analysis Cost
Analysis Cost
Analysis
Sample
(O&M)
(Labor)
Capabilities
(Total)
L = F*A*B*(1I
J
K = D*G*J*A*B
J)+H*A*B*J
Utility
Analysis
Cost per
Sample
(O&M)
Total Cost
M = E+K+L
Total
Total
Burden
Burden
(Hours)
(FTEs)
Responses
N = A*B*C+
A*B*G*J
O = N/2,080
P = A*B
336
558
321
824
890
715
161
254
16
4,075
26
26
26
26
26
24
24
24
24
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
$ 268,224
$ 445,940
$ 256,283
$ 658,477
$ 710,669
$ 526,776
$ 118,991
$ 187,399
$
11,612
$ 3,184,370
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
75%
75%
100%
100%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
11,176.00
18,580.85
10,678.46
27,436.52
29,611.20
65,846.97
14,873.83
31,233.15
1,935.39
211,372
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
619,076
1,029,255
591,515
1,519,800
1,640,263
646,812
146,105
128,889
7,987
6,329,702
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
898,476
1,493,776
858,477
2,205,713
2,380,543
1,239,435
279,970
347,521
21,534
9,725,444
9,096
15,122
8,691
22,330
24,100
19,293
4,358
7,118
441
110,548
4.4
7.3
4.2
10.7
11.6
9.3
2.1
3.4
0.2
53.1
8,732
14,518
8,343
21,437
23,136
17,149
3,874
6,101
378
103,667
99
126
51
28
4
1
310
26
26
26
26
26
24
24
24
24
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
79,209
100,730
40,837
22,509
3,414
1,049
247,749
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
75%
75%
100%
100%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,300.38
4,197.10
1,701.53
937.89
142.26
131.11
10,410
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
182,819
232,491
94,254
51,953
7,880
1,288
570,685
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
265,328
337,419
136,792
75,400
11,436
2,468
828,844
2,686
3,416
1,385
763
116
38
8,404
1.3
1.6
0.7
0.4
0.1
0.0
4.0
2,579
3,279
1,329
733
111
34
8,065
603
355
59
40
17
1
1
1,076
5,462
26
26
26
26
26
24
24
24
24
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
$ 481,287
$ 283,733
$
46,908
$
31,743
$
13,872
$
1,026
$
$
628
$
$ 859,198
$ 4,291,317
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
87.49
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
21.13
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
26.25
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
75%
75%
100%
100%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
20,053.64
11,822.20
1,954.51
1,322.61
578.01
128.31
104.62
35,964
257,747
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,110,838
654,871
108,267
73,264
32,018
1,260
432
1,980,949
8,881,336
$ 1,612,179
$
950,426
$
157,130
$
106,329
$
46,468
$
2,415
$
$
1,164
$
$ 2,876,111
$ 13,430,399
16,321
9,622
1,591
1,076
470
38
24
29,142
148,095
7.8
4.6
0.8
0.5
0.2
0.0
0.0
14.0
71.2
15,668
9,237
1,527
1,033
452
33
20
27,971
139,704
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1, column I.
(B) Bi-weekly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems.
(C) Estimate of labor for collecting sample and shipping; estimate takes into account the results of February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
(D) All size categories were assumed to use a technical rate from 2006 BLS rates for operators, adjusted to $2007.
(F) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, June 2002.
(G) Estimate takes into account results of February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
(H) The amount left over after the cost of labor is subtracted from the cost of utility analysis provided in Column I.
(I) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, December 2000.
(J) Estimate based on Third Edition Baseline Handbook data.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-16
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.15 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Cryptosporidium Monitoring for Bin Reclassification
System Size
(Population
Served)
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
Sampling
Baseline # of
Plants
Conducting
Cryptosporidium
Monitoring
# of Cryptosporidium
Samples
A
B
Sample Analysis
Hours per Cost per
Sample Labor Hour
C
D
Total
Sampling
Labor Cost
Cost per
Sample
Total Laboratory
Analysis Cost
(O&M)
Total Cost
E = A*B*C*D
F
G = A*B*F
H = E+G
Total
Burden
(FTEs) Responses
J=
I = A*B*C I/2080
K = A*B
Total
Burden
(Hours)
117
194
112
287
310
715
161
254
16
2,165
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
128,345
213,382
122,631
315,081
340,055
784,676
177,246
279,146
17,298
2,377,862
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
662
3,343,385
1,921,452
4,936,850
5,328,156
12,294,711
2,777,188
4,373,806
271,027
35,247,238
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
129,007
3,556,768
2,044,083
5,251,931
5,668,211
13,079,387
2,954,435
4,652,952
288,325
37,625,100
4,178
6,947
3,992
10,257
11,070
25,545
5,770
9,088
563
77,411
2.0
3.3
1.9
4.9
5.3
12.3
2.8
4.4
0.3
37.2
3,039
5,052
2,903
7,460
8,051
18,578
4,197
6,609
410
56,299
35
44
18
10
1
1
109
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
37,902
48,200
19,540
10,771
1,634
1,562
119,608
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
593,860
755,215
306,169
168,762
25,597
24,481
1,874,084
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
631,762
803,414
325,710
179,533
27,231
26,043
1,993,693
1,234
1,569
636
351
53
51
3,894
0.6
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
1.9
897
1,141
463
255
39
37
2,832
210
124
20
14
6
1
1
376
2,650
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
230,296
135,766
22,446
15,189
6,638
1,529
935
412,799
2,910,269
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
661.78
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,608,396
2,127,253
351,689
237,987
104,005
23,958
14,651
6,467,940
43,589,262
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,838,692
2,263,019
374,135
253,176
110,643
25,487
15,586
6,880,738
46,499,531
7,497
4,420
731
494
216
50
30
13,439
94,744
3.6
2.1
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
6.5
45.5
5,453
3,214
531
360
157
36
22
9,774
68,905
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
(A) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1a, column J.
(B) Semimonthly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems, plus two matrix spike
samples.
Assume unfiltered plants achieve 3 log removal due to treatment installed following initialCryptosporidium
monitoring, and are therefore exempt from future Cryptosporidium monitoring.
(C) Estimate of labor for collecting sample and shipping; estimate takes into account the results of February 2008 consultation with water industry representatives.
(D) All size categories were assumed to use a technical rate from 2006 BLS rates for operators, adjusted to $2007.
(F) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1b.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-17
July 2008
Exhibit F-B.16 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Reporting for Source Water Sampling Schedule and Bin Re-Classification
Monitoring
System Size
(Population Served)
Source Water
Sampling Plan
hours per plant
Bin ReHours
Classification hours
per
per plant
Plant
A
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
B
Cost per
Labor Hour
Baseline # of
Plants
Reporting
Total Cost
Total Burden
(Hours)
Total Burden
(FTEs)
D
E
F = C*D*E
G = C*E
H = G/2080
C=A+B
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
16
16
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
17
17
26
26
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
336
558
321
824
890
715
161
254
16
4,075
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
82,530
137,212
78,856
202,608
259,076
442,085
99,860
240,531
14,905
1,557,664
2,687
4,467
2,567
6,596
7,119
12,147
2,744
6,609
410
45,345
1.3
2.1
1.2
3.2
3.4
5.8
1.3
3.2
0.2
21.8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
16
16
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
17
17
26
26
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
99
126
51
28
4
1
310
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
24,372
30,994
12,565
6,926
1,245
880
76,982
793
1,009
409
225
34
24
2,495
0.4
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
1.2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
16
16
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
17
17
26
26
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30.72
30.72
30.72
30.72
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
36.39
603
355
59
40
17
1
1
1,076
5,462
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
148,088
87,302
14,433
9,767
5,057
861
806
266,315
1,900,962
4,821
2,842
470
318
139
24
22
8,636
56,477
2.3
1.4
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
4.2
27.2
Sources
(A), (B) Based on the results of February 2008 consultation with water system industry representatives.
(D) For systems serving up to 3,300 people, the full technical rate was applied. For systems serving more than 3,300 people, costs are based on an 80%/20%
split between technical and managerial rates. Technical rates are from BLS (2006), adjusted to $2007. Managerial rates are based on Labor Costs for National
Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003), inflated to $2007.
(E) Taken from Exhibit F-B.1, column I.
Assume unfiltered plants achieve 3 log removal due to treatment installed following initial Cryptosporidium monitoring, and are therefore exempt from future
Cryptosporidium monitoring.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-B-18
July 2008
Exhibit F-C.1 12-Year Summary of Burden Associated with Implementing the LT2ESWTR (Hours)
Activity
CWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin
Reclassification [6]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Yearly Total
NTNCWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin
Reclassification [6]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Yearly Totals
TNCWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin
Reclassification [6]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Yearly Totals
States and Territories
Source
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Exhibit F-B.2, Column G
15,925
14,170
218,699
Exhibit F-B.4, Column N
Exhibit F-B.5, Column I
Exhibit F-B.6, Column G
Exhibit F-B.8, Column G
2,745
3,578
2,602
334
8,685
11,466
7,254
334
65,473
26,906
24,754
Exhibit F-B.11, Column H
Exhibit F-B.12, Column G
Year 4
59,533
19,018
20,102
973
Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
Year 8
Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12
21,532 21,532
2,499 2,499
2,195
3,153
8,031
5,798
21,795 42,138
5,798
4,825
50,307
3,603
61,285
1,322
27,593 46,963
4,869
6,268
4,195
69,242
10,781 50,405
14,097 14,215
7,918 18,477
95,404 147,268
Exhibit F-B.14, Column N
Exhibit F-B.15, Column I
Exhibit F-B.16, Column G
25,185
41,910
335,833
Exhibit F-B.2, Column G
-
-
18,862
Exhibit F-B.4, Column N
Exhibit F-B.5, Column I
Exhibit F-B.6, Column G
Exhibit F-B.8, Column G
Exhibit F-B.11, Column H
Exhibit F-B.12, Column G
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,925
37
1,211
99,626
26,226 27,184
4,925
37
1,211
2,250
253
2,250
253
1
5
9
13,829
11
498
55
498
2,216
497
2,768
493
4,377
245
4,911
10
13
6
4,650
4,202
25
1,248
10,386
Exhibit F-B.14, Column N
Exhibit F-B.15, Column I
Exhibit F-B.16, Column G
Exhibit F-B.2, Column G
Exhibit F-B.4, Column N
Exhibit F-B.5, Column I
Exhibit F-B.6, Column G
Exhibit F-B.8, Column G
Exhibit F-B.11, Column H
Exhibit F-B.12, Column G
0
0
25,035
65
-
56,917
7
9
7
14
18
13
15,422
45
3,773
6,175
2,508
2,512
15,415
36
3,767
7,069
795
7,069
795
4
14
23
509
553
2,712
0
0
0
3,261
32
645
143
645
2,923
640
3,646
631
5,703
311
6,382
3,563
12
15
11
4,315
21
28
17
6,080
14,559
25
4,307
25,273
11,273
25,364
77,078
Exhibit F-B.14, Column N
Exhibit F-B.15, Column I
Exhibit F-B.16, Column G
Exhibit F-B.2, Column E,
and Exhibit F-B.3, Column
C
Exhibit F-B.7, Column B,
Column D
Start-up [7]
Bin Determination and
Reviewing Monitoring Data[8]
Reviewing/Approving UCFWR
Schedule [9]
Exhibit F-B.9, Column C
Technology Reporting [10]
Exhibit F-B.10, Column H
Disinfection Benchmarking [11] Exhibit F-B.13, Column G
Yearly Totals
Grand Totals
87
45
76,157
13,083
11,594
313,219
50,388
51
13,083
38,355
11,644
53,599
19,222
50,388
7,878
7,887
64,170
677
38,532 38,532
787
51
627
363,658 51,015
800,683 176,038
1417 2038
39,949 40,570
76,561 78,153
5,382
4442
9,824
24,839
14,662 31,518 37,813 47,577 50,309
4442
3815
3025
1202
19,104 35,333 52,112 74,143 127,386
48,038 88,572 128,929 180,278 310,314
Notes:
This ICR only characterizes burden associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and profiling burden associated with systems changing
treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they fall outside of the clearance period and will be added in future ICRs.
[1] Start-up burden is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
[2] Half of E. coli monitoring by systems serving up to 49,999 people will be completed in Year 4 (the other half was completed in Year 3). Half of Cryptosporidium monitoring
by systems serving 10,000-49,999 people will be completed in Year 4 (the other half was completed in Year 3). Cryptosporidium monitoring for systems serving <10,000
people will be completed in Years 5 and 6 (for those systems that are triggered into Cryptosporidium monitoring based on E. coli results).
[3] Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
[4] Systems must begin to demonstrate compliance with technologies 42 months following the completion of Cryptosporidium monitoring.
[5] Disinfection profiling must be completed prior to changing the disinfection process. Thus, the schedule reflects treatment installation.
[6] Assessments for re-binning: A second round of E. coli and Cryptosporidium monitoring for re-binning will take place starting 6.5 years after the completion of initial
[7] State rule start-up activities will parallel system activities.
[8] In the first round of monitoring, States will perform these activities for small systems only; States will perform these activities for all systems during
future monitoring.
[9] State activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed during Years 2-3.
[10] State activities will parallel system activities.
[11] State activities will parallel system activities.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-C-1
July 2008
Exhibit F-C.2 12-Year Summary of Cost Associated with Implementing the LT2ESWTR
Activity
CWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin
Reclassification [6]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Yearly Total
NTNCWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin
Reclassification [6]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Yearly Totals
TNCWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin
Reclassification [6]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Yearly Totals
States and Territories
Start-up [7]
Bin Determination and
Reviewing Monitoring Data [8]
Source
Year 1
Exhibit F-B.2, Column F
Exhibit F-B.4, Column M
Exhibit F-B.5, Column H
Exhibit F-B.6, Column F
Exhibit F-B.8, Column F
Exhibit F-B.11, Column I
Exhibit F-B.12, Column H
Year 2
Year 3
579,568
515,697
7,276,176
134,032
1,832,079
94,708
12,090
473,325
5,870,845
264,003
12,090
5,731,043
13,776,390
856,908
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
5,391,751
9,737,625
687,614
11,024,642
81,096
11,024,642
81,096
35,412
79,878
114,743
Year 7
Year 8
292,269
200,223
Year 9
793,217
200,223
1,486,534
164,811
Exhibit F-B.14, Column M
Exhibit F-B.15, Column H
Exhibit F-B.16, Column F
$ 2,652,478
$ 7,135,959
$ 27,640,517
Exhibit F-B.2, Column F
-
-
581,393
Exhibit F-B.4, Column M
Exhibit F-B.5, Column H
Exhibit F-B.6, Column F
Exhibit F-B.8, Column F
Exhibit F-B.11, Column I
Exhibit F-B.12, Column H
0
0
0
0
0
0
485,541
19,106
37,394
$ 15,852,402
$ 11,185,616
$ 11,220,480
485,541
19,106
37,394
1,151,790
7,795
1,151,790
7,795
53
190
327
$ 492,493
$
386
15,428
993,440
Year 10
$ 1,651,345
2,010
15,428
1,772,058
120,345
$
-
$
-
$ 1,123,434
2,366
-
1,754,346
Exhibit F-B.4, Column M
Exhibit F-B.5, Column H
Exhibit F-B.6, Column F
Exhibit F-B.8, Column F
Exhibit F-B.11, Column I
Exhibit F-B.12, Column H
342
4,576
237
684
9,152
473
1,522,072
22,881
116,402
$
542,094
$ 1,159,775
$ 1,159,912
1,521,731
18,304
116,165
3,619,199
24,510
3,619,199
24,510
162
494
825
$ 15,814
$
1,176
19,988
17,438
68,866
15,375
$
5,189
19,988
84,241
$
Exhibit F-B.7, Column G,
Column I
Reviewing/Approving UCFWR
Schedule [9]
Exhibit F-B.9, Column D
Technology Reporting [10]
Exhibit F-B.10, Column I
Disinfection Benchmarking [11] Exhibit F-B.13, Column H
Yearly Totals
Grand Totals
7,520
$
559,933
$
-
$ 559,933
$ 3,219,930
10,309
$ 3,415,700
496,200
$
-
$
2,167
$ 498,367
$ 7,644,635
$
1,656,362
$ 3,644,203
$ 3,644,534
$ 21,164
$
25,177
$
2,156,562
$ 1,649,135
$ 1,649,135
$
$
-
2,136,314
42,740
86,004
15,238
$
91,212
19,826
2,229,566
135,758
7,551
0
0
0
101,242 $
113,726
19,495
Exhibit F-B.14, Column M
Exhibit F-B.15, Column H
Exhibit F-B.16, Column F
Exhibit F-B.2, Column E,
Exhibit F-B.3, Column D
Year 12
254,520
634,371
4,608,202
3,209,247
7,217,703
7,278,302
152,683
288,169
626,149
$ 5,508,854 $ 10,319,298 $ 14,742,220
Exhibit F-B.14, Column M
Exhibit F-B.15, Column H
Exhibit F-B.16, Column F
Exhibit F-B.2, Column F
Year 11
617
6,511
220
150,657 $
177,246
9,581
$ 111,038
$
582
7,793
403
141,999 $
$
$
482,475
152,232
414,422
13,021
38,491
618,167
198,151
1,186
1,437,473
14,165
12,743
618
132,755
202,796 $ 1,781,123
13,405,515
$ 2,156,562
$
-
-
$ 1,085,575
$ 3,298,852
2,167
$ 15,564,244
$ 47,743,895
26,815
$ 2,183,376
$ 20,234,234
230,365
627,529
1,348,942
1,618,380
2,036,259
2,153,172
60635
87228
190111
190111
163296
129476
51442
$ 1,709,770 $ 1,736,363 $ 420,476 $ 817,640 $ 1,512,238 $ 2,230,332 $ 3,173,276 $ 5,452,024
$ 17,699,364 $ 17,761,290 $ 949,947 $ 1,853,695 $ 3,358,863 $ 7,982,427 $ 13,846,027 $ 22,593,534
Notes:
This ICR only characterizes costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and profiling costs associated with systems changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they fall
outside of the clearance period and will be added in future ICRs.
[1] Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
[2] Assessments for binning: half of E. coli monitoring by systems serving up to 49,999 people will be completed in Year 4 (the other half was completed in Year 3). Half of Cryptosporidium monitoring by systems serving 10,000-49,999
people will be completed in Year 4 (the other half was completed in Year 3). Cryptosporidium monitoring for systems serving <10,000 people will be completed in Years 5 and 6 (for those systems that are triggered into Cryptosporidium
monitoring based on E. coli results).
[3] Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
[4] Systems must begin to demonstrate compliance with technologies 42 months following the completion of Cryptosporidium monitoring.
[5] Disinfection profiling must be completed prior to changing the disinfection process. Thus, the schedule reflects treatment installation.
[6] Assessments for re-binning: A second round of E. coli and Cryptosporidium monitoring for re-binning will take place starting 6.5 years after the completion of initial monitoring.
[7] State rule start-up activities will parallel system activities.
[8] In the first round of monitoring, States will perform these activities for small systems only; States will perform these activities for all systems during future monitoring.
[9] States are assumed to have completed review of uncovered finished water reservoir reports during Years 2-3.
[10] State activities will parallel system activities.
[11] State activities will parallel system activities.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-C-2
July 2008
Exhibit F-C.3 Implementation Timeline for the LT2ESWTR
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Year 11
Year 12
Year 13
Systems Serving ≥ 100,000 People
Crypto Monitoring
Treatment Installation
2nd Round Crypto Mon.
Possible Extension
Systems Serving 50,000-99,999 People
Crypto Monitoring
Treatment Installation
2nd Round Crypto Mon.
Possible Extension
Systems Serving 10,000-49,999 People
Crypto Monitoring
Treatment Installation
2nd Round Crypto Mon.
Possible Extension
Systems Serving < 10,000 People
Filtered Only
E. coli Mon.
Filtered Only
Crypto Mon.
Treatment Installation
(Opt)
Possible Extension
2nd Round E. coli Mon.
Year 1
Year 2
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
F-C-3
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Year 11
Year 12
Year 13
July 2008
Exhibit F-D.1
Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2) - Summary of Original and
Revised Burden Estimates
Burden to PWSs Associated with Rule Start-Up Activities (Per PWS)
2004 Burden
4 hrs
4 hrs
5 hrs
Task
Read
Train
Train
Compliance planning - eval of treatment
alternatives (task added by commenter)
System Size
≤49,999
≥50,000
Revised Burden
35 hrs
15 hrs
30 hrs
>50000
Burden to State Associated with Rule Start-up
2004 Burden
0.5 FTE
0.25 FTE
0.10 FTE
Task
Regulation Adoption and Program
Development
Training State Staff
Updating Data Management Systems
Revised Burden
1 FTE
0.5 FTE
0.25 FTE
E. coli Monitoring Burden (Per Sample)
2004 Burden
Task
Revised Burden
0.25 hr
Sampling
1 hr
0.5 hr
Sample Analysis
10 min
Assumes 25% of systems <10K, 75% of systems 10K-100K, and all system
>100K will have lab capabilities.
Cryptosporidium Monitoring Burden
2004 Burden
0.5 hr
Task
Sampling
Revised Burden
1.375 hrs
Burden Associated with Reporting for Source Water Sampling Plan and Initial Bin
Classification Monitoring
2004 Burden
Task
System Size
Revised Burden
1.0 hr
5.5 hrs
5 hrs
Source Water Sampling Plan (Per Plant)
Bin Classification
Bin Classification
>100,000
≤9,999
≥10,000
10 hrs
7 hrs
16 hrs
Burden to States Associated with E. coli and Cryptosporidium
Monitoring
2004 Burden
6 hrs
Task
Reviewing (Per Plant)
Revised Burden
40 hrs
Burden for Preparing Reports Demonstrating Technology
Compliance
2004 Burden
36 hrs
Task
Preparing Reports (Per Plant)
Revised Burden
60 hrs
Burden for Disinfection Benchmarking Reports
2004 Burden
4 hrs
Task
Preparing Reports (Per Plant)
Revised Burden
25 hrs
State Burden for Disinfection Benchmarking Reports
2004 Burden
2 hrs
Task
Reviewing Reports (Per Plant)
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
Revised Burden
16 hrs
F-D-1
July 2008
Appendix G
Ground Water Rule Spreadsheets
Exhibit G.1 Labor Rates
Cost Assumptions: Labor Rate Components
Base Hourly
Labor Cost
ECI in Year of
Data
ECI 2007
2007 Labor
Cost
A
B
C
D=A*(C/B)
Cost Element
Field Engineer
$
31.00
139.8
192.3 $
42.64
State Employee
$
39.87
100.8
108.2 $
42.80
Sources: (A) Wage rates for Field Engineer (1998$) from R.S. Means, 1998. State wage (2006$) from BLS SOC Code 19-2041,
"State Government - Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health." Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for
benefits.
(B) ECI for Field Engineer from BLS (2008) for 1998 (Civilian; Total compensation; Professional, specialty, and technical occupations,
not seasonally adjusted). ECI for state employee from BLS (2008) from 2006 (State and local government; Total compensation; All
workers, not seasonally adjusted). www.bls.gov.
(C) ECI for Field Engineer from BLS (2008) for 2007 recalculated to base of 1989 = 100 (Civilian; Total compensation; Professional,
specialty, and technical occupations). ECI for state employee from BLS (2008) from 2007 (State and local government; Total
compensation; All workers, not seasonally adjusted). www.bls.gov.
Technical Wage Rates by System Size
Rate
Base Wage Rate ($2006)
Loaded Wage Rate ($2006)
Loaded Wage Rate ($2007)
25-100
$ 17.87
$ 28.59
$ 30.72
101-500
$
17.87
$
28.59
$
30.72
System size
500-3.3k
3.3k-10k
$
17.87 $
17.87
$
28.59 $
28.59
$
30.72 $
30.72
$
$
$
10k-100k
17.87
28.59
30.72
>100k
$ 17.87
$ 28.59
$ 30.72
Source: 2006 Base Rates. Adjusted to 2007 values using ECI from www.bls.gov.
Managerial and Clerical Wage Rates by System Size
Rate
Base Manager Wage Rate ($2000)
Loaded Manager Wage Rate ($2000)
Loaded Manager Wage Rate ($2007)
Base Clerical Wage Rate ($2000)
Loaded Clerical Wage Rate ($2000)
Loaded Clerical Wage Rate ($2007)
25-100
$
30.77
$
40.00
$
51.21
$
10.61
$
13.79
$
17.95
System size
101-500
$
30.77 $
$
43.08 $
$
55.16 $
$
10.61 $
$
14.85 $
$
19.33 $
>500
30.77
46.16
59.10
10.61
15.92
20.72
Source: 2000 Base rates: Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules (USEPA, 2003). Adjusted to 2007 values
using ECI recalculated to base of June 1989 = 100. For managerial rate used White Collar, Professional specialty
and technical, not seasonally adjusted. For clerical used Administrative support, including clerical.
Cost Assumptions: Estimated System Labor Costs per Hour by System Size
25-100
Cost Component
Labor cost (per hour)
$
Population Category
500-3.3k
3.3-10k
101-500
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
36.39
10k-100k
$
36.39
>100k
$
36.39
Notes:
EPA estimates that systems with population greater than 3,300 use a combination of operators (technical) and engineers (managerial), with an 80/20 ratio between
the two, respectively.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G-1
July 2008
Exhibit G.2 Number of Systems Subject to Sanitary Surveys
Systems
Disinfecting;
4-log
C
Systems
Not
Disinfecting
D=A-B
Systems
Performing
Sanitary
Survey
E
Systems
Systems
Disinfecting
A
B
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
<100
12,134
6,407
2,877
5,727
12,134
101-500
14,120
10,999
5,353
3,121
14,120
501-1,000
4,511
3,789
1,762
722
4,511
1,001-3,300
5,915
4,714
2,218
1,201
5,915
3,301-10K
3,039
2,638
1,161
401
3,039
10,001-50K
1,530
1,476
727
54
1,530
50,001-100K
183
158
56
25
183
100,001-1 Million
116
112
50
4
116
> 1 Million
3
3
3
3
Totals
41,549
30,296
14,206
11,254
41,549
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
<100
8,873
2,573
798
6,300
8,873
101-500
6,666
1,933
599
4,733
6,666
501-1,000
1,741
505
157
1,236
1,741
1,001-3,300
765
222
69
543
765
3,301-10K
100
29
9
71
100
10,001-50K
15
4
1
11
15
50,001-100K
100,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
Totals
18,160
5,266
1,633
12,894
18,160
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
<100
60,800
10,944
1,094
49,856
60,800
101-500
19,360
3,485
348
15,875
19,360
501-1,000
1,999
360
36
1,639
1,999
1,001-3,300
614
111
11
503
614
3,301-10K
80
14
1
66
80
10,001-50K
9
2
0
7
9
50,001-100K
3
1
0
2
3
100,001-1 Million
1
0
0
1
1
> 1 Million
Totals
82,866
14,916
1,492
67,950
82,866
Total All Systems
142,575
50,478
17,330
92,098
142,575
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Number of systems from SDWIS (USEPA, 2007).
(B) column (A) times percent disinfecting. Percent disinfecting from Third Edition of the Baseline Handbook,
Table B1.3.3, except for systems serving >1 million people. The three ground water systems serving >1
million people all perform disinfection.
System Size
(Population Served)
(C) Percentage of systems disinfecting to 4-log taken from Chapter 4, Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3 of the GWR EA,
respectively. Systems disinfecting to 4-log based on 4-log percentages for entry points -- system level data
on 4-log disinfection is not available.
(E) Based on rule requirements, all systems are subject to sanitary surveys.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G-2
July 2008
Exhibit G.3 Number of Systems Subject to Triggered Monitoring
Entry Points
Triggered
Monitoring
A
Mean
Number
of Samples
per EP per Year
B
Triggered
Monitoring
Samples/year
C=A*B
Average Positive
Triggered
Monitoring
Entry Points/year
D
System Size
(Population Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
<100
12,090
0.38
4,575
101-500
14,573
0.41
5,975
501-1,000
5,412
0.49
2,678
1,001-3,300
8,918
0.22
1,976
3,301-10K
5,940
0.58
3,442
10,001-50K
4,615
2.21
10,179
50,001-100K
1,412
6.56
9,262
100,001-1 Million
843
10.63
8,955
> 1 Million
10.63
Totals
53,804
47,043
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
<100
8,078
0.22
1,770
101-500
6,065
0.23
1,365
501-1,000
1,585
0.28
446
1,001-3,300
696
0.70
489
3,301-10K
91
1.84
167
10,001-50K
14
6.99
95
50,001-100K
20.78
100,001-1 Million
33.67
> 1 Million
33.67
Totals
16,528
4,332
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
<100
59,712
0.47
27,929
101-500
19,008
0.48
9,128
501-1,000
1,963
0.60
1,179
1,001-3,300
603
1.10
664
3,301-10K
79
2.88
226
10,001-50K
9
10.97
97
50,001-100K
3
32.60
96
100,001-1 Million
1
52.83
52
> 1 Million
52.83
Totals
81,377
39,371
Grand Total
151,709
90,747
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
- (no PWSs of this size category).
Costs of repeat samples are not included. See Chapter 6, Section 6.6 of the GWR EA for discussion.
Source:
54
73
27
32
30
32
11
7
265
29
24
6
4
1
0
64
297
94
10
4
1
0
0
0
404
734
(A) Number of entry points from Chapter 6, Exhibit 6.5b of the GWR EA, updated to current values by multiplying
by proportion of 2007 systems to original systems.
(B) Mean triggered samples per system calculated from Chapter 6, Exhibit 6.15 of the GWR EA.
(D) Values in Column D, Total systems divided by 22 years to obtain postive triggered monitoring EPs/year.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G-3
July 2008
Exhibit G.4 Number of Systems Subject to Compliance Monitoring
Systems
Subject to
Compliance
System Size
Monitoring
(Population
A
Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
Entry Points
Subject to
Compliance
Monitoring
B=C+D+E
Entry Points
Achieving
4-log Prior
to GWR
C
<100
3,373
4,921
101-500
5,681
10,163
501-1,000
1,830
4,113
1,001-3,300
2,256
6,035
3,301-10K
1,166
4,367
10,001-50K
728
4,765
50,001-100K
56
883
100,001-1 Million
50
767
> 1 Million
3
34
Totals
15,143
36,049
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
<100
1,442
1,442
101-500
1,125
1,125
501-1,000
294
294
1,001-3,300
160
160
3,301-10K
23
23
10,001-50K
4
4
50,001-100K
100,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
Totals
3,048
3,048
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
<100
7,618
7,618
101-500
2,414
2,414
501-1,000
250
250
1,001-3,300
90
90
3,301-10K
14
14
10,001-50K
2
2
50,001-100K
1
1
100,001-1 Million
0
0
> 1 Million
Totals
10,389
10,389
Grand Total
28,580
49,487
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
Source:
(A) Exhibit G17a, Column I
Entry Points
Corrected
to 4-log;
partially
disinfected
D
Entry Points
Corrected
to 4-log;
previously
nondisinfected
E
3,740
8,564
3,523
5,322
3,716
4,072
636
614
34
30,223
338
902
349
396
372
580
102
106
3,145
842
697
241
317
278
114
145
48
2,682
798
599
157
69
9
1
1,633
141
117
30
20
3
1
312
504
409
107
71
11
2
1,104
1,094
348
36
11
1
0
0
0
1,492
33,347
1,078
344
36
13
2
0
0
0
1,473
4,930
5,445
1,722
179
66
10
1
0
0
7,425
11,210
(C) Number of entry points from Chapter 4, Exhibit 4.3 of the GWR EA updated to current year using ratios of
2007 systems to original systems.
(D) Chapter 6 GWR EA, Exhibit 6.5b, Column E updated using ratio of 2007 systems to original systems.
(E) Chapter 6 GWR EA, Exhibit 6.5b, Column F updated using ratio of 2007 systems to original systems.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G-4
July 2008
Exhibit G.5 Estimated System Burden and Costs for Start-Up Activities
Exhibit G.5a Microbial Source Water Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up (CWSs)
Cost Component
Read and Understand Rule
Planning and Mobilization
Total hours 1
2
Labor cost (per hour)
Total cost per system
Number of Systems
Total labor burden
Total cost
<100
Service Population Category
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10,000
10,001-50,000
50,001-100,000
100,001-1,000,000
>1,000,000
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
48
48
48
48
30.72 $
30.72 $
30.72 $
36.39 $
36.39 $
36.39 $
36.39 $
36.39
983 $
983 $
983 $
1,165 $
1,747 $
1,747 $
1,747 $
1,747
14,120
4,511
5,915
3,039
1,530
183
116
3
451,840
144,345
189,282
97,240
73,430
8,767
5,560
144
13,879,294 $ 4,433,870 $
5,814,222 $
3,538,900 $
2,672,397 $
319,056 $
202,360 $
5,241
101-500
16
16
32
$
30.72 $
$
983 $
12,134
388,276
$ 11,926,777 $
Exhibit G.5b Microbial Source Water Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up (NCWSs)
<100
101-500
Cost Component
Read and Understand Rule
Planning and Mobilization
1
Total hours
2
Labor cost (per hour)
Total cost per system
$
$
Number of Systems
Total labor burden
Total cost
69,673
1,672,152
$ 51,363,949
8
16
24
30.72 $
737 $
$
501-1,000
8
16
24
30.72 $
737 $
26,026
624,624
19,186,746
Service Population Category
3,301-10,000
10,001-50,000
50,001-100,000
100,001-1,000,000
>1,000,000
8
8
8
8
8
8
16
16
16
16
16
16
24
24
24
24
24
24
30.72 $
36.39 $
36.39 $
36.39 $
36.39 $
36.39
737 $
873 $
873 $
873 $
873 $
873
1,001-3,300
8
16
24
30.72 $
737 $
3,740
89,760
$ 2,757,182
$
1,379
33,096
1,016,619
180
4,320
157,220
$
$
24
576
20,963
$
3
72
2,620
$
1
24
873
-
$
Exhibit G.5c Sanitary Survey Start-Up
Service Population Category
<100
Cost Component
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10,000
10,001-50,000
50,001-100,000
100,001-1,000,000
>1,000,000
Read and Understand Rule
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Planning and Mobilization
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Total hours 1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
Labor cost (per hour)
Total cost per system
Number of Systems
Total labor burden
Total cost
Notes:
$
$
$
30.72
92
81,807
245,420
7,538,629
$
$
$
30.72
92
40,146
120,438
3,699,527
$
$
$
30.72
92
8,251
24,752
760,323
$
$
$
30.72
92
7,294
21,882
672,161
$
$
$
36.39
109
3,219
9,656
351,424
$
$
$
36.39
109
1,554
4,661
169,645
$
$
$
36.39
109
186
557
20,269
$
$
$
36.39
109
117
351
12,757
3
$
$
$
1) Labor hours for start-up activities reflect EPA estimate.
2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G-5
July 2008
36.39
109
3
9
328
Exhibit G.6 Estimated State Burden and Costs for Start-Up Activities
Exhibit G.6a Microbial Source & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up
Labor Cost
(per hour)
A
42.80
42.80
42.80
42.80
42.80
42.80
Hours
FTEs
Cost
B
C=B/2,080
D=A*B
Compliance Activity
Read and Understand Rule
$
60
0.03 $
2,568
Regulation Adoption and Program Development
$
1,040
0.50 $
44,511
Initial Laboratory Certification
$
800
0.38 $
34,239
Modify Data Management Systems
$
2,080
1.00 $
89,022
System Training and Technical Assistance
$
2,080
1.00 $
89,022
Staff Training
$
520
0.25 $
22,256
Per State Total
6,580
$
281,618
National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)
375,060
$ 16,052,235
Notes:
Detail may not add due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1
(B) Labor hours for start-up activities reflect EPA estimate.
(C) Full-time equivalent (FTE) assumes individual working 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.
Exhibit G.6b Annual Administrative Activities
Labor Cost
(per hour)
Hours
FTEs
Cost
A
B
C=B/2,080
D=A*B
Compliance Activity
Coordination with EPA
$
42.80
1,040
0.50 $
44,511
Lab Certification
$
42.80
1,040
0.50 $
44,511
Ongoing Technical Assistance
$
42.80
1,040
0.50 $
44,511
SDWIS Reporting
$
42.80
1,040
0.50 $
44,511
Recordkeeping
$
42.80
880
0.42 $
37,663
Staff Training
$
42.80
104
0.05 $
4,451
Per State Total
5,144
$
220,159
National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)
293,208
$ 12,549,042
Notes:
Detail may not add due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1
(B) Labor hours for start-up activities reflect EPA estimate.
(C) Full-time equivalent (FTE) assumes individual working 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G-6
July 2008
Exhibit G.7a PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and Incremental Sanitary
Surveys (Treatment)
Labor
Review/
Cost
Inspect
System Size
(per hour)
Wells
(Population
A
B
Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
Review/
Inspect
Treatment
C
Review/
Inspect
Distribution
System
D
Report
Review and
Discussion
w/ State
E
Total
Unit Burden
(hours)
F=sum(B-E)
Unit Cost
(Full Survey)
G=A*F
Weighted
Unit Cost
(Incremental Survey)
H=0.05*G
<100
$
30.72
1.1
0.8
1.2
1.1
4.3
$
132
$
7
101-500
$
30.72
1.2
0.8
1.2
1.1
4.3
$
132
$
7
501-1,000
$
30.72
1.5
1.1
1.7
1.2
5.4
$
167
$
8
1,001-3,300
$
30.72
2.2
1.3
2.9
1.4
7.7
$
237
$
12
3,301-10K
$
30.72
2.7
1.6
3.6
1.8
9.6
$
293
$
15
10,001-50K
$
30.72
3.7
2.0
4.3
1.9
11.8
$
363
$
18
50,001-100K
$
30.72
9.0
3.0
12.0
3.0
27.0
$
829
$
41
100,000-1M
$
30.72
15.0
8.0
24.0
3.0
50.0
$
1,536
$
77
>1,000,000
$
30.72
24.0
10.0
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
36.0
4.0
74.0
$
1,536
$
77
<100
$
30.72
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.3
4.0
$
124
$
6
101-500
$
30.72
1.0
0.8
1.1
1.3
4.2
$
128
$
6
501-1,000
$
30.72
1.1
0.9
1.3
1.2
4.5
$
137
$
7
1,001-3,300
$
30.72
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.3
4.7
$
144
$
7
3,301-10K
$
30.72
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.5
6.2
$
189
$
9
10,001-50K
$
30.72
1.3
0.8
1.8
1.3
5.0
$
154
$
8
50,001-100K
$
30.72
1.5
0.8
2.3
1.3
5.8
$
177
$
9
100,000-1M
$
30.72
8.0
$
630
$
1.0
10.0
1.5
20.5
>1,000,000
$
30.72
NA
NA
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
NA
NA
NA
<100
$
30.72
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.9
2.7
101-500
$
30.72
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.9
2.7
501-1,000
$
30.72
1.0
0.8
1.0
0.9
3.7
1,001-3,300
$
30.72
0.9
1.0
0.9
1.1
3.9
3,301-10K
$
30.72
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.2
10,001-50K
$
30.72
0.8
0.5
1.3
0.8
50,001-100K
$
30.72
1.3
0.5
1.3
100,000-1M
$
30.72
8.0
1.0
$
30.72
NA
NA
>1,000,000
Note:
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
NA
$
31
NA
84
$
$
84
$
4
$
115
$
6
$
120
$
6
4.8
$
148
$
7
3.3
$
100
$
5
0.8
3.8
$
115
$
6
10.0
1.0
20.0
$
614
$
31
NA
NA
NA
NA
4
NA
Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10% of systems that do not
already comply with rule requirements (see Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).
(D) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.
G-7
July 2008
Exhibit G.7b PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and Incremental
Sanitary Surveys (No Treatment)
Labor
Review/
Cost
Inspect
System Size
(per hour)
Wells
(Population
A
B
Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
Report
Review and
Discussion
w/ State
D
Total
Unit Burden
(hours)
E=sum(B-D)
Weighted
Unit Cost
(Incremental Survey)
G=0.05*F
Unit Cost
(Full Survey)
F=A*E
<100
$
30.72
1.1
1.2
1.1
3.5
$
107
$
5
101-500
$
30.72
1.2
1.2
1.1
3.5
$
107
$
5
501-1,000
$
30.72
1.5
1.7
1.2
4.4
$
134
$
7
1,001-3,300
$
30.72
2.2
2.9
1.4
6.4
$
198
$
10
3,301-10K
$
30.72
2.7
3.6
1.8
8.0
$
245
$
12
10,001-50K
$
30.72
3.7
4.3
1.9
9.8
$
302
$
15
50,001-100K
$
30.72
9.0
12.0
3.0
24.0
$
737
$
37
100,000-1M
$
30.72
15.0
24.0
3.0
42.0
$
1,290
$
65
>1,000,000
$
30.72
24.0
36.0
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
4.0
64.0
$
1,290
$
65
<100
$
30.72
1.0
1.0
1.3
3.3
$
101
$
5
101-500
$
30.72
1.0
1.1
1.3
3.4
$
105
$
5
501-1,000
$
30.72
1.1
1.3
1.2
3.6
$
110
$
6
1,001-3,300
$
30.72
1.1
1.2
1.3
3.6
$
111
$
6
3,301-10K
$
30.72
1.5
1.7
1.5
4.7
$
143
$
7
10,001-50K
$
30.72
1.3
1.8
1.3
4.3
$
131
$
7
50,001-100K
$
30.72
1.5
2.3
1.3
5.0
$
154
$
8
100,000-1M
$
30.72
8.0
10.0
1.5
19.5
$
599
$
30
>1,000,000
$
30.72
NA
NA
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
NA
NA
<100
$
30.72
0.7
0.6
0.9
2.2
$
66
$
3
101-500
$
30.72
0.7
0.6
0.9
2.2
$
66
$
3
501-1,000
$
30.72
1.0
1.0
0.9
2.9
$
89
$
4
1,001-3,300
$
30.72
0.9
0.9
1.1
2.9
$
89
$
4
3,301-10K
$
30.72
1.2
1.2
1.2
3.5
$
108
$
5
10,001-50K
$
30.72
0.8
1.3
0.8
2.8
$
84
$
4
50,001-100K
$
30.72
1.3
1.3
0.8
3.3
$
100
$
5
100,000-1M
$
30.72
8.0
10.0
1.0
19.0
$
584
$
29
>1,000,000
Note:
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
Review/
Inspect
Distribution
System
C
NA
NA
$
30.72
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10% of systems
that do not already comply with rule requirements (see Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).
(C) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.
G-8
July 2008
Exhibit G.7c State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and Incremental Sanitary Surveys (Treatment)
Labor
Review/
Cost
Inspect
System Size
(per hour)
Wells
(Population
A
B
Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
Review/
Inspect
Treatment
C
Review/
Report
Inspect
Document Report
Distribution
ation/
Develop
System
File Review
ment
D
E
F
Data Entry
G
Report
Review and
Discussion
w/ PWS
H
Travel
I
Total
Unit Burden
(hours)
J=sum(B-I)
Unit Cost
(Full Survey)
K=A*J
Weighted Unit Cost
(Incremental Survey)
L=0.05*K
<100
$
42.64
1.1
0.8
1.2
2.3
5.7
0.8
1.1
1.8
14.8
$
629
$
31
101-500
$
42.64
1.2
0.8
1.2
2.3
5.8
0.8
1.1
1.8
14.9
$
636
$
32
501-1,000
$
42.64
1.5
1.1
1.7
2.6
7.4
0.8
1.2
1.8
18.0
$
766
$
38
1,001-3,300
$
42.64
2.2
1.3
2.9
3.4
8.8
1.2
1.4
1.8
22.8
$
971
$
49
3,301-10K
$
42.64
2.7
1.6
3.6
3.7
9.6
1.3
1.8
1.8
25.9
$
1,105
$
55
10,001-50K
$
42.64
3.7
2.0
4.3
5.3
10.1
1.4
1.9
1.8
30.3
$
1,293
$
65
50,001-100K
$
42.64
9.0
3.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
2.0
3.0
1.8
54.8
$
2,335
$
117
100,000-1M
$
42.64
15.0
8.0
24.0
18.0
18.0
3.0
3.0
1.8
90.8
$
3,870
$
193
>1,000,000
$
42.64
24.0
10.0
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
36.0
18.0
18.0
4.0
4.0
1.8
115.8
$
3,870
$
193
<100
$
42.64
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.9
5.1
1.0
1.3
1.8
13.8
$
588
$
29
101-500
$
42.64
1.0
0.8
1.1
2.0
5.3
1.0
1.3
1.8
14.2
$
607
$
30
501-1,000
$
42.64
1.1
0.9
1.3
2.1
6.5
0.8
1.2
1.8
15.6
$
666
$
33
1,001-3,300
$
42.64
1.1
1.1
1.2
2.1
6.2
0.8
1.3
1.8
15.6
$
663
$
33
3,301-10K
$
42.64
1.5
1.5
1.7
2.2
6.7
0.8
1.5
1.8
17.6
$
750
$
37
10,001-50K
$
42.64
1.3
0.8
1.8
2.5
5.0
0.8
1.3
1.8
15.0
$
640
$
32
50,001-100K
$
42.64
1.5
0.8
2.3
2.5
5.0
0.8
1.3
1.8
15.8
$
672
$
34
100,000-1M
$
42.64
8.0
1.0
10.0
8.0
10.0
1.0
1.5
1.8
41.3
$
1,759
$
88
>1,000,000
NA
NA
NA
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.8
NA
<100
$
42.64
0.7
0.6
0.6
1.5
5.1
0.8
0.9
1.8
11.9
$
506
$
25
101-500
$
42.64
0.7
0.6
0.6
1.5
5.3
0.8
0.9
1.8
12.1
$
517
$
26
501-1,000
$
42.64
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.8
5.8
0.8
0.9
1.8
13.9
$
591
$
30
1,001-3,300
$
42.64
0.9
1.0
0.9
1.7
4.7
0.8
1.1
1.8
12.9
$
548
$
27
3,301-10K
$
42.64
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.5
5.2
0.8
1.2
1.8
14.1
$
601
$
30
10,001-50K
$
42.64
0.8
0.5
1.3
1.3
3.8
0.8
0.8
1.8
10.8
$
458
$
23
50,001-100K
$
42.64
1.3
0.5
1.3
1.3
3.8
0.8
0.8
1.8
11.3
$
480
$
24
100,000-1M
$
42.64
8.0
1.0
10.0
3.0
8.0
0.5
1.0
1.8
33.3
$
1,418
$
71
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.8
NA
>1,000,000
Note:
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10% of systems that do not already comply with rule requirements (see
Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).
(D) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G-9
July 2008
Exhibit G.7d State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and Incremental Sanitary Surveys (No Treatment)
Labor
Review/
Cost
Inspect
System Size
(per hour)
Wells
(Population
A
B
Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
Review/
Report
Inspect
Document Report
Distribution
ation/
Develop
System
File Review
ment
C
D
E
Data Entry
F
Report
Review and
Discussion
w/ PWS
G
Travel
H
Total
Unit Burden
(hours)
I=sum(B-H)
Unit Cost
(Full Survey)
J=A*I
Weighted Unit Cost
(Incremental Survey)
K=0.05*J
<100
$
42.64
1.1
1.2
2.3
5.7
0.8
1.1
1.8
13.9
$
595
$
30
101-500
$
42.64
1.2
1.2
2.3
5.8
0.8
1.1
1.8
14.1
$
601
$
30
501-1,000
$
42.64
1.5
1.7
2.6
7.4
0.8
1.2
1.8
16.9
$
720
$
36
1,001-3,300
$
42.64
2.2
2.9
3.4
8.8
1.2
1.4
1.8
21.5
$
916
$
46
3,301-10K
$
42.64
2.7
3.6
3.7
9.6
1.3
1.8
1.8
24.3
$
1,038
$
52
10,001-50K
$
42.64
3.7
4.3
5.3
10.1
1.4
1.9
1.8
28.3
$
1,208
$
60
50,001-100K
$
42.64
9.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
2.0
3.0
1.8
51.8
$
2,207
$
110
100,000-1M
$
42.64
15.0
24.0
18.0
18.0
3.0
3.0
1.8
82.8
$
3,529
$
176
>1,000,000
$
42.64
24.0
36.0
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
18.0
18.0
4.0
4.0
1.8
105.8
$
3,529
$
176
<100
$
42.64
1.0
1.0
1.9
5.1
1.0
1.3
1.8
13.0
$
556
$
28
101-500
$
42.64
1.0
1.1
2.0
5.3
1.0
1.3
1.8
13.5
$
575
$
29
501-1,000
$
42.64
1.1
1.3
2.1
6.5
0.8
1.2
1.8
14.8
$
629
$
31
1,001-3,300
$
42.64
1.1
1.2
2.1
6.2
0.8
1.3
1.8
14.5
$
616
$
31
3,301-10K
$
42.64
1.5
1.7
2.2
6.7
0.8
1.5
1.8
16.1
$
686
$
34
10,001-50K
$
42.64
1.3
1.8
2.5
5.0
0.8
1.3
1.8
14.3
$
608
$
30
50,001-100K
$
42.64
1.5
2.3
2.5
5.0
0.8
1.3
1.8
15.0
$
640
$
32
100,000-1M
$
42.64
8.0
10.0
8.0
10.0
1.0
1.5
1.8
40.3
$
1,716
$
86
>1,000,000
NA
NA
NA
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<100
$
42.64
0.7
0.6
1.5
5.1
0.8
0.9
1.8
11.3
$
481
$
24
101-500
$
42.64
0.7
0.6
1.5
5.3
0.8
0.9
1.8
11.5
$
492
$
25
501-1,000
$
42.64
1.0
1.0
1.8
5.8
0.8
0.9
1.8
13.0
$
556
$
28
1,001-3,300
$
42.64
0.9
0.9
1.7
4.7
0.8
1.1
1.8
11.9
$
505
$
25
3,301-10K
$
42.64
1.2
1.2
1.5
5.2
0.8
1.2
1.8
12.8
$
544
$
27
10,001-50K
$
42.64
0.8
1.3
1.3
3.8
0.8
0.8
1.8
10.3
$
437
$
22
50,001-100K
$
42.64
1.3
1.3
1.3
3.8
0.8
0.8
1.8
10.8
$
458
$
23
100,000-1M
$
42.64
8.0
10.0
3.0
8.0
0.5
1.0
1.8
32.3
$
1,375
$
69
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
>1,000,000
Note:
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10% of systems that do not already comply with rule requirements
(see Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).
(C) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G - 10
July 2008
Exhibit G.8 Estimated Burden and Costs for Performing Triggered Monitoring
Exhibit G.8a Estimated System Burden and Costs for Performing Triggered Monitoring
<100
Cost Component
Sampling
Sampling labor (hours)
Labor cost1 (per hour)
Total sampling cost
Laboratory Analysis2
Commercial analysis cost
In-house labor (hours)
Labor cost (per hour)
In-house materials cost
Total analysis cost
$
$
$
$
$
$
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
Service Population Category
3,301-10,000
10,001-50,000
50,001-100,000
100,001-1,000,000
>1,000,000
0.5
30.72 $
15.36 $
0.5
30.72 $
15.36 $
0.5
30.72 $
15.36 $
0.5
30.72 $
15.36 $
0.5
30.72 $
15.36 $
0.5
30.72 $
15.36 $
0.5
30.72 $
15.36 $
0.5
30.72 $
15.36 $
0.5
30.72
15.36
71.99
0.5
30.72
8.61
59.98
71.99
0.5
30.72
8.61
59.98
71.99
0.5
30.72
8.61
59.98
71.99
0.5
30.72
8.61
59.98
71.99
0.5
30.72
8.61
59.98
71.99
0.5
30.72
8.61
35.97
71.99
0.5
30.72
8.61
23.97
71.99
0.5
30.72
8.61
23.97
71.99
0.5
30.72
8.61
23.97
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Reporting
Monitoring report labor (hours)
Labor cost3 (per hour)
Total reporting cost
Total cost
Notes:
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
$
30.72 $
30.72 $
30.72 $
30.72 $
36.39 $
36.39 $
36.39 $
36.39 $
36.39
$
76.79 $
76.79 $
76.79 $
76.79 $
90.98 $
90.98 $
90.98 $
90.98 $
90.98
$ 152.14 $ 152.14 $ 152.14 $
152.14 $
166.33 $
142.32 $
130.31 $
130.31 $
130.31
1) Labor rates from Exhibit A.1. EPA assumes all sampling conducted by system operator.
2) EPA assumes that 25 percent of CWSs serving less than 10,000 individuals, 75 percent of systems serving 10,000 to 50,000 individuals, and all CWSs serving
more than 50,000 conduct in-house analysis; the remaining CWSs contract a commercial laboratory. EPA assumes all NCWSs contract a commercial laboratory.
Therefore, EPA uses the following ratios to determine total cost of analysis:
a) Total cost to system serving <10,000=.75*(Commercial analysis cost)+.25*(In-house labor*Labor cost+In-house materials cost)
b) Total cost to system serving 10,001-50,000=.25(Commercial analysis cost)+.75*(In-house labor*Labor cost+In-house materials cost)
c) Total cost to system serving >50,000=In-house labor*Labor cost+In-house materials cost
3) Labor rates from Exhibit A.1.
Exhibit G.8b Estimated State Burden and Costs for Reviewing Triggered Monitoring Report
Service Population Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000
10,001-50,000
50,001-100,000
100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,000
Cost Component
Triggered Monitoring Review and
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
Processing1 (hours)
Labor cost2 (per hour)
$
42.80 $
42.80 $
42.80 $
42.80 $
42.80 $
42.80 $
42.80 $
42.80 $
42.80
Total cost
$ 149.80 $ 149.80 $ 149.80 $
149.80 $
149.80 $
149.80 $
149.80 $
149.80 $
149.80
Notes:
1) Labor hours for triggered monitoring report review reflect EPA estimate.
2) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit A.1.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G - 11
July 2008
Exhibit G.9 Estimated Burden & Costs for Corrective Action Plans
Exhibit G.9a Estimated System Burden and Costs for Corrective Action Plans
Service Population Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,000
Cost Component
Plan Development and
Submission1 (hours)
12
13
19
29
58
60
70
74
74
Labor cost2 (per hour)
$ 30.72 $ 30.72 $
30.72 $
30.72 $
36.39 $
36.39 $
36.39 $
36.39 $
36.39
Unit Plan Cost
$ 368.61 $ 399.32 $ 583.63 $
890.80 $
2,110.83 $
2,183.62 $
2,547.55 $
2,693.13 $ 2,693.13
Notes:
1) Labor hours for development and submission of corrective action plan for providing 4-log disinfection reflect EPA estimate.
2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.
Exhibit G.9b Estimated State Burden and Costs for Reviewing Corrective Action Plans
Service Population Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000
Cost Component
Plan Review and Processing1
(hours)
12
13
19
29
58
30
$ 42.64 $ 42.64 $
42.64 $
42.64 $
42.64 $
42.64 $
Labor cost2 (per hour)
$ 511.70 $ 554.34 $ 810.19 $ 1,236.61 $
2,473.21 $
1,279.25 $
Unit Plan Review Cost
Notes:
1) Labor hours for reviewing corrective action plan for providing 4-log disinfection reflect EPA estimate.
2) Labor rates for field engineer from Exhibit G.1.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G - 12
100,001-1,000,000
35
42.64 $
1,492.46 $
>1,000,000
37
37
42.64 $
42.64
1,577.74 $ 1,577.74
July 2008
Exhibit G.10a PWS Compliance Monitoring Costs for Systems Serving 3,300 or Fewer People
Component
Unit
Cost
(1998)
PPI
(1998)
PPI
(2007)
Unit
Cost
(2003)
Labor
burden
(per day)
Annual
Cost
Frequency
Annual
Labor
Burden
Annual
Total
Cost
A
B
C
D=A*(C/B)
E
F
G=E*F
H=D*E*F
Compliance Monitoring Labor
25-100
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
30.72
0.50
365
183
$
5,606
101-500
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
30.72
0.50
365
183
$
5,606
500-3.3k
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
30.72
0.50
365
183
$
5,606
Chlorine Test Kits
25-100
$
34.00
143.7
161.7
$
38.26
N/A
3.65
N/A
$
140
101-500
$
34.00
143.7
161.7
$
38.26
N/A
3.65
N/A
$
140
500-3.3k
$
34.00
143.7
161.7
$
38.26
N/A
3.65
N/A
$
140
25-100
183 $
5,746
101-500
183 $
5,746
500-3.3k
183 $
5,746
Totals
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Unit cost for test kit from Products for Analysis, 1998 Hach Co. Model 2231-02. Unit cost derivation for system operator
in Chapter 6, Section 6.2.1 of the GWR EA.
(B & C) Producer Price Index (PPI) Commodity Code 3500 (Finished goods less food and energy) from BLS (www.bls.gov).
(D) Labor rate from Exhibit A.1.
(E) Labor hours for compliance monitoring reflect EPA estimate.
(F) Monitoring performed daily. New test kit needed every 100 days.
Exhibit G.10b PWS Compliance Monitoring Costs for Systems Serving More than 3,300 People
Component
Unit
Cost
(1998)
PPI
(1998)
PPI
(2007)
Unit
Cost
(2001)
Quantity
Purchased
(units;
hours)
Total
Cost
A
B
C
D=A*(C/B)
E
F=D*E
Capital Costs
Chlorine analyzer (Hach CL17)
$
Power cord
$
10
121.0
113.7 $
9
1
$
9
Chart recorder (Honeywell 10" round)
$
2,375
665
121.0
121.0
113.7 $
113.7 $
2,232
625
1
1
$
$
2,232
625
Installation labor (System Operator)
3.3k-10k
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
30.72
8
$
246
10k-100k
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
30.72
8
$
246
>100k
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
30.72
8
$
246
3.3k-10k
$
3,112
10k-100k
$
3,112
>100k
$
3,112
Total Capital Cost
Annual Operation and Maintenance
Compliance monitoring (hours/year)
3.3k-10k
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
30.72
80
$
2,457
10k-100k
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
30.72
80
$
2,457
>100k
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
30.72
80
$
2,457
Maintenance kit
$
140
143.7
161.7 $
158
1
$
158
Monthly reagents
$
18
143.7
161.7 $
20
12
$
243
Charts
$
15
143.7
161.7 $
17
1
$
17
Recorder pens
$
52
143.7
161.7 $
59
1
$
59
3.3k-10k
$
2,933
10k-100k
$
2,933
>100k
$
2,933
Total Annual Operation and Maintenance Costs
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to indpendent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Unit costs for equipment (both capital and O&M) from Products for Analysis, 1998 Hach Co.
(B & C) Producer Price Index Commodity Code 117 (Electrical machinery and equipment) for Capital Costs and Commodity Code
3500 (Finished goods less food and energy) for Annual O&M, BLS (www.bls.gov). December values.
(D) Labor rate from Exhibit G.1.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G - 13
July 2008
Exhibit G.11 Estimated Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring
Exhibit G.11a Estimated System Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring Initial Notification
Service Population Category
<100
Cost Component
1
Notification labor (hours)
101-500
0.5
501-1,000
0.5
1,001-3,300
0.5
3,301-10,000
0.5
10,001-50,000
0.5
50,001-100,000
0.5
100,001-1,000,000
0.5
>1,000,000
0.5
0.5
Labor cost2 (per hour)
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
Total cost
$
15.36
$
15.36
$
15.36
$
15.36
$
15.36
$
15.36
$
15.36
$
15.36
$
15.36
Notes:
1) Labor hours for compliance monitoring initial notification reflect EPA estimate.
2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.
Exhibit G.11b Estimated State Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring Notification Documentation
Service Population Category
<100
Cost Component
Document notification1
(hours)
101-500
0.5
501-1,000
0.5
1,001-3,300
0.5
3,301-10,000
0.5
10,001-50,000
0.5
50,001-100,000
0.5
100,001-1,000,000
0.5
>1,000,000
0.5
0.5
Labor cost2 (per hour)
$
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
Total cost
$
21.40
$
21.40
$
21.40
$
21.40
$
21.40
$
21.40
$
21.40
$
21.40
$
21.40
Notes:
1) Labor hours for documenting compliance monitoring reflect EPA estimate.
2) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1.
Exhibit G.11c Estimated System Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring Reporting (Disinfection Failure)
Service Population Category
<100
Cost Component
1
101-500
2.5
501-1,000
2.5
1,001-3,300
2.5
3,301-10,000
2.5
10,001-50,000
2.5
50,001-100,000
2.5
100,001-1,000,000
2.5
>1,000,000
2.5
2.5
Report labor (hours)
Labor cost2 (per hour)
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
$
30.72
Total cost
$
76.79
$
76.79
$
76.79
$
76.79
$
76.79
$
76.79
$
76.79
$
76.79
$
76.79
Notes:
1) Labor hours for compliance monitoring reporting reflect EPA estimate.
2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.
Exhibit G.11d Estimated State Burden and Costs for Reviewing Compliance Monitoring Report (Disinfection Failure)
Service Population Category
<100
Cost Component
Review report1 (hours)
101-500
3.5
Labor cost2 (per hour)
$
42.80
Total cost
$
149.80
Notes:
501-1,000
3.5
$
1,001-3,300
3.5
3,301-10,000
3.5
10,001-50,000
3.5
50,001-100,000
3.5
100,001-1,000,000
3.5
>1,000,000
3.5
3.5
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
$
42.80
$ 149.80
$
149.80
$
149.80
$
149.80
$
149.80
$
149.80
$
149.80
$
149.80
1) Labor hours for compliance monitoring report review reflect EPA estimate.
2) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G - 14
July 2008
Exhibit G.12
Respondents for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by Activity
PWSs
Respondents
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Microbial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up
47,525
47,525
47,525
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sanitary Survey Start-Up
47,525
47,525
47,525
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sanitary Survey
-
-
-
30,338
30,338
30,338
30,338
30,338
30,338
30,338
Triggered Monitoring (EPs)
-
-
-
6,896
6,896
6,896
6,896
6,896
6,896
6,896
Triggered Monitoring Reporting
-
-
-
734
734
734
734
734
734
734
Corrective Action Plans (systems) - from significant
deficiences and TM
-
-
-
1,702
1,702
1,702
1,702
1,702
1,702
1,702
Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification (systems)
-
-
-
17,330
Compliance Monitoring (EPs)
-
-
-
482
964
1,446
1,927
2,409
2,891
3,373
Compliance Monitoring Reporting (Disinfection Failure
Reports) (EPs)
-
-
-
2,278
2,302
2,326
2,350
2,374
2,398
2,422
47,525
47,525
47,525
7,378
7,860
8,341
8,823
9,305
9,787
10,269
Annual Activities
PWSs with one/more Respondent Activities
States
Respondents
Start-Up Activities
Year 1
Start-Up
Year 2
Year 3
57
57
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
-
-
-
57
Year 7
Year 8
-
-
Year 9
Year 10
-
-
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Triggered Monitoring - Review Report
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Correction Action - Review Plans
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Compliance Monitoring Report Review (Disinfection
Failure)
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Annual Administration
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
Year 1
47,525
57
Year 2
47,525
57
Year 3
47,525
57
Year 4
7,378
57
Year 5
7,860
57
Year 6
8,341
57
Year 7
8,823
57
Year 8
9,305
57
Year 9
9,787
57
Year 10
10,269
57
47,582
47,582
47,582
7,435
7,917
8,398
8,880
9,362
9,844
10,326
G - 15
July 2008
Exhibit G.13
Responses for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by Activity
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Microbial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up
47,525
47,525
47,525
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sanitary Survey Start-Up
47,525
47,525
47,525
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Activities
30,338
30,338
30,338
30,338
30,338
30,338
30,338
Triggered Monitoring (samples)
Sanitary Survey
-
-
-
-
90,747
90,747
90,747
90,747
90,747
90,747
90,747
Triggered Monitoring Reporting
-
-
-
734
734
734
734
734
734
734
Corrective Action Plans - from significant deficiences
and TM
-
-
-
1,702
1,702
1,702
1,702
1,702
1,702
1,702
Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification
-
-
-
45,076
-
-
-
-
-
-
Compliance Monitoring (samples)
-
-
-
175,873
Compliance Monitoring Reporting (Disinfection
Failure)
Yearly Total
-
-
-
95,050
95,050
95,050
351,746
527,619
703,492
879,365
1,055,238
1,231,112
2,278
2,302
2,326
2,350
2,374
2,398
2,422
346,748
477,569
653,466
829,363
1,005,260
1,181,157
1,357,054
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Start-Up Activities
Start-Up
57
57
57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
30,338
30,338
30,338
30,338
30,338
30,338
30,338
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
-
-
-
Triggered Monitoring - Review Report
-
-
-
734
734
734
734
734
734
734
Corrective Action - Review Plans
-
-
-
1,702
1,702
1,702
1,702
1,702
1,702
1,702
Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation
-
-
-
45,076
-
-
-
-
-
-
Compliance Monitoring Report Review (Disinfection
Failure)
-
-
-
2,278
2,302
2,326
2,350
2,374
2,398
2,422
Annual Administration
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Yearly Total
57
57
57
80,185
35,133
35,157
35,181
35,205
35,229
35,253
Year 1
95,050
57
Year 2
95,050
57
Year 3
95,050
57
Year 4
346,748
80,185
Year 5
477,569
35,133
Year 6
653,466
35,157
Year 7
829,363
35,181
Year 8
1,005,260
35,205
Year 9
1,181,157
35,229
Year 10
1,357,054
35,253
95,107
95,107
95,107
426,933
512,701
688,622
864,544
1,040,465
1,216,386
1,392,308
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G - 16
July 2008
Exhibit G.14
Burden for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by Activity
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Microbial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up
Sanitary Survey Start-Up
1,261,169
1,261,169
1,261,169
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
142,575
142,575
142,575
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
-
-
-
27,653
27,653
27,653
27,653
27,653
27,653
27,653
Triggered Monitoring
-
-
-
60,630
60,630
60,630
60,630
60,630
60,630
60,630
Triggered Monitoring Reporting
-
-
-
1,834
1,834
1,834
1,834
1,834
1,834
1,834
Corrective Action Plans
-
-
-
25,582
25,582
25,582
25,582
25,582
25,582
25,582
Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification
-
-
-
22,538
-
-
-
-
-
-
Compliance Monitoring
-
-
-
87,937
175,873
263,810
351,746
439,683
527,619
615,556
Compliance Monitoring Report (Disinfection Failure)
-
-
-
5,695
5,755
5,815
5,875
5,936
5,996
6,056
231,869
297,328
385,324
473,321
561,318
649,315
737,311
Yearly Total
1,403,745
1,403,745
1,403,745
States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Start-Up
125,020
125,020
125,020
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
-
-
-
95,996
95,996
95,996
95,996
95,996
95,996
95,996
Triggered Monitoring - Review Report
-
-
-
2,568
2,568
2,568
2,568
2,568
2,568
2,568
Correction Action - Review Plans
-
-
-
24,908
24,908
24,908
24,908
24,908
24,908
24,908
Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation
-
-
-
22,538
Compliance Monitoring Report Review (Disinfection
Failure)
-
-
-
7,973
8,057
8,141
8,226
8,310
8,394
8,479
Annual Administration
-
-
-
293,208
293,208
293,208
293,208
293,208
293,208
293,208
447,190
424,737
424,821
424,905
424,990
425,074
425,158
Yearly Total
125,020
125,020
125,020
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
Year 1
1,403,745
125,020
Year 2
1,403,745
125,020
Year 3
1,403,745
125,020
Year 4
231,869
447,190
Year 5
297,328
424,737
Year 6
385,324
424,821
Year 7
473,321
424,905
Year 8
561,318
424,990
Year 9
649,315
425,074
Year 10
737,311
425,158
1,528,765
1,528,765
1,528,765
679,059
722,064
810,145
898,226
986,307
1,074,389
1,162,470
G - 17
July 2008
Exhibit G.15
Costs for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by Activity
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Microbial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up
Sanitary Survey Start-Up
$39,099,430
$39,099,430
$39,099,430 $
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$4,408,354
$4,408,354
$4,408,354 $
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
849,417
$
849,417
$
849,417
$
849,417
$
849,417
$
849,417
$
849,417
Triggered Monitoring
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
468,643
$
468,643
$
468,643
$
468,643
$
468,643
$
468,643
$
468,643
Triggered Monitoring Reporting
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
465
$
465
$
465
$
465
$
465
$
465
$
465
Triggered Monitoring O&M
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
5,753,522.31
$ 5,753,522.31
$ 5,753,522.31
$ 5,753,522.31
$ 5,753,522.31
$ 5,753,522.31
$ 5,753,522.31
Corrective Action Plans
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
805,109
$
$
$
$
$
$
Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
692,312
$
Compliance Monitoring
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
2,701,171
$
5,402,341
$
8,103,512
$
10,804,683
$
13,505,853
$
16,207,024
$
18,908,195
Compliance Monitoring Report (Disinfection Failure)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
174,928
$
176,778
$
178,628
$
180,478
$
182,329
$
184,179
$
186,029
Chlorimeter Installation (Capital + O&M)
$
Capital Cost $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
$
-
$
$
$
-
$
$
$
302,080.81
153,512
148,569
$
$
$
517,937
220,799
297,138
$
$
$
733,793
288,086
445,708
$
$
$
949,650
355,373
594,277
$
$
$
1,165,506
422,660
742,846
$
$
$
1,381,362
489,947
891,415
$
$
$
1,597,219
557,234
1,039,985
$
11,747,647
$
13,974,212
$
16,893,089
$
19,811,966
$
22,730,844
$
25,649,721
$
28,568,598
Yearly Total $
43,507,785
$
43,507,785
$ 43,507,785
805,109
-
805,109
$
-
805,109
$
-
805,109
$
-
805,109
$
-
805,109
$
-
States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
$5,350,745
$5,350,745 $
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Start-Up
$5,350,745
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
4,093,394
$
4,093,394
$
4,093,394
$
4,093,394
$
4,093,394
$
4,093,394
$
4,093,394
Triggered Monitoring - Review Report
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
109,897
$
109,897
$
109,897
$
109,897
$
109,897
$
109,897
$
109,897
Correction Action - Review Plans
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
1,062,111
$
1,062,111
$
1,062,111
$
1,062,111
$
1,062,111
$
1,062,111
$
1,062,111
Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
964,615
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Compliance Monitoring Report Review (Disinfection
Failure)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
341,224
$
344,833
$
348,442
$
352,051
$
355,660
$
359,269
$
362,878
Annual Administration
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
12,549,042
$
12,549,042
$
12,549,042
$
12,549,042
$
12,549,042
$
12,549,042
$
Yearly Total
$5,350,745
$5,350,745
$5,350,745
$19,120,284
$18,159,278
$18,162,887
$18,166,496
$18,170,104
$18,173,713
12,549,042
$18,177,322
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
$
$
Year 1
43,507,785
5,350,745
$
$
Year 2
43,507,785
5,350,745
Year 3
$ 43,507,785
$ 5,350,745
$
$
Year 4
11,747,647
19,120,284
$
$
Year 5
13,974,212
18,159,278
$
$
Year 6
16,893,089
18,162,887
$
$
Year 7
19,811,966
18,166,496
$
$
Year 8
22,730,844
18,170,104
$
$
Year 9
25,649,721
18,173,713
$
$
Year 10
28,568,598
18,177,322
Yearly Total $
48,858,529
$
48,858,529
$ 48,858,529
$
30,867,931
$
32,133,490
$
35,055,976
$
37,978,462
$
40,900,948
$
43,823,434
$
46,745,920
G - 18
July 2008
Exhibit G.16
Average Annual Burden per Repsonse and per Respondent and Average
Annual Responses per Respondent
Burden
O&M
Capital
Total Annual
Responses Hours
Labor Costs Costs
Costs
Costs
PWSs
274,772
176,399
8,573,953
148,569
124,770
8,573,953
States and Territories
38,439
290,642 12,426,520
0
0 12,426,520
Total
313,211
467,041 21,000,474
148,569
124,770 21,000,474
Note: Annual average burden and costs represent burden and costs for years 4 and 5 divided over
the 3 year evaluation period. Year 3, which corresponds to the first year of the renewal ICR
evaluation period, is covered under the stand-alone GWR ICR.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G - 19
July 2008
Exhibit G.17a - Number of Systems and Entry Points Subject to GWR Requirements
Systems
Disinfecting
B
Systems
Disinfecting;
4 log
C
Systems
Receiving a
Sanitary
Survey
D=A
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
<100
12,134
101-500
14,120
501-1,000
4,511
1,001-3,300
5,915
3,301-10K
3,039
10,001-50K
1,530
50,001-100K
183
100,001-1 Million
116
> 1 Million
3
6,407
10,999
3,789
4,714
2,638
1,476
158
112
3
2,877
5,353
1,762
2,218
1,161
727
56
50
3
12,134
14,120
4,511
5,915
3,039
1,530
183
116
3
Totals
30,296
14,206
41,549
798
599
157
69
9
1
1,633
8,873
6,666
1,741
765
100
15
18,160
System Size
(Population
Served)
Systems
Performing
Implementation
Activities
A
41,549
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
<100
8,873
2,573
101-500
6,666
1,933
501-1,000
1,741
505
1,001-3,300
765
222
3,301-10K
100
29
10,001-50K
15
4
50,001-100K
100,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
Totals
18,160
5,266
Systems
Performing
Triggered
Monitoring
F=A-C
Systems
Subject
to
HSAs
E=0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
Systems
Performing
Assessment
Monitoring
G
Systems
Performing
Corrective
Action
H
9,256
8,767
2,749
3,697
1,877
803
126
66
-
-
2,969
3,402
1,061
1,299
722
383
53
32
0
27,343
-
9,921
8,075
6,067
1,584
696
91
14
16,527
-
2,154
1,658
433
221
31
5
0
0
0
4,502
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
<100
60,800
10,944
1,094
60,800
0
59,706
16,892
101-500
19,360
3,485
348
19,360
0
19,012
5,362
501-1,000
1,999
360
36
1,999
0
1,963
554
1,001-3,300
614
111
11
614
0
603
183
3,301-10K
80
14
1
80
0
79
26
10,001-50K
9
2
0
9
0
9
3
50,001-100K
3
1
0
3
0
3
1
100,001-1 Million
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
> 1 Million
0
0
Totals
82,866
14,916
1,492
82,866
81,374
23,022
Grand Total
142,575
50,478
17,330
142,575
125,245
37,445
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Ground water system inventories for CWSs, NTNCWSs, and TNCWSs: SDWIS/FED Data, October 2007 (USEPA, 2007).
(B) Systems peforming implementation activities multiplied by percent of systems disinfecting.
(C) Systems disinfecting to 4-log based on 4-log percentages for entry points -- system level data on 4-log disinfection is not available.
(D) Based on rule requirements, all systems are subject to sanitary surveys.
Systems
Performing
Compliance
Monitoring
I
3,373
5,681
1,830
2,256
1,166
728
56
50
3
Entry
Points
Performing
HSAs
J
Entry Points
Performing
Triggered
Monitoring
K
Entry Points
Performing
Assessment
Monitoring
Entry Points
Performing
Compliance
Monitoring
L
M
-
12,090
14,573
5,412
8,918
5,940
4,615
1,412
843
-
-
4,385
9,090
3,660
5,414
3,730
4,074
636
614
34
-
53,804
-
31,639
1,442
1,125
294
160
23
4
0
0
0
3,048
-
8,078
6,065
1,585
696
91
14
16,528
-
1,442
1,125
294
160
23
4
3,048
7,618
2,414
250
90
14
2
1
0
0
10,389
28,580
-
59,712
19,008
1,963
603
79
9
3
1
81,377
151,709
-
7,618
2,414
250
90
14
2
1
0
10,389
45,076
15,143
(E) Based on rule requirements, systems not required to perform HSAs
(F) Based on rule requirements, systems that do not achieve 4-log disinfection are subject to triggered source water monitoring.
(G) Based on rule requirements, assessment monitoring is not required.
(H) Based rule requirements, systems found to have significant deficiencies during a sanitary survey, or those that detect source water contamination, must undergo corrective action. Number of systems undergoing corrective
action from model output.
(I) Systems treating to 4-log inactivation or removal of viruses must undergo compliance monitoring. Number of systems subject to compliance monitoring is converted from entry points subject to compliance monitoring
(column M), using entry points/system.
(J) Number of entry points subject to HSAs from column O, Exhibit 4.3
(K) Number of entry points subject to triggered monitoring is equal to number of systems subject to HSAs (column J).
(L) Based on rule requirements, assessment monitoring is not required.
(M) (Exhibit G.17b, Columns E+F) + (Number of Ground Water Entry Points Disinfecting to 4-Log)
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G - 20
July 2008
Exhibit G.17b - Summary of Rule Implications
System Size
Systems with
Corrective
Actions for
Systems
Significant
Receiving
Sanitary Survey Deficiencies
A
Entry Points
with
Corrective
Actions for Entry Points with Viral
Previously NonTriggered
Disinfection Increased from disinfecting Entry Points
Monitoring less than 4 logs to 4 logs
Taking Corrective Action
Entry Points with
Triggered
Monitoring
B
C
D
E
Entry Points with
Incremental
Compliance Monitoring
F
G
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
<100
12,134
2,061
12,090
1,180
338
842
234
101-500
14,120
2,403
14,573
1,599
902
697
287
501-1,000
4,511
766
5,412
590
349
241
102
1,001-3,300
5,915
1,002
8,918
713
396
317
130
116
3,301-10K
3,039
518
5,940
650
372
278
10,001-50K
1,530
259
4,615
694
580
114
57
50,001-100K
183
31
1,412
247
102
145
50
100,001-1 Million
116
20
843
153
106
-
-
-
> 1 Million
3
-
48
23
-
-
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
<100
8,873
1,509
8,078
645
141
504
140
101-500
6,666
1,132
6,065
526
117
409
168
501-1,000
1,741
296
1,585
137
30
107
46
1,001-3,300
765
130
696
92
20
71
29
3,301-10K
100
17
91
14
3
11
4
10,001-50K
15
3
14
2
1
2
50,001-100K
-
-
-
-
100,001-1 Million
-
-
-
-
> 1 Million
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
<100
60,800
10,368
59,712
6,524
1,078
5,445
1,512
101-500
19,360
3,297
19,008
2,066
344
1,722
710
1,999
339
1,963
214
36
179
76
614
104
603
79
13
66
27
3,301-10K
80
14
79
13
2
10
4
10,001-50K
9
2
9
2
0
1
1
50,001-100K
3
1
3
1
0
0
0
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
100,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
1
-
0
-
1
-
0
-
0
-
0
0
-
-
Sources:
(A) Ground water system inventories for CWSs, NTNCWSs, and TNCWSs: SDWIS/FED Data, October 2007 (USEPA, 2007).
(B) - (G): Baseline information from the Final GWR EA was updated by multiplying the percentage of systems or entry points performing each rule component by column A.
Notes:
(G) indicates number of entry points with treatment corrective actions.
(F) - (G) indicates non treatment corrective actions.
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
G - 21
July 2008
Exhibit G.18
Ground Water Rule - Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates
Estimated System Burden for Start-up Activities
2004 Burden
Task
System Size
Microbial Source Water Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up (CWSs)
1 hr
Read and Understand Rule
2 hrs
Planning and Mobilization
≤10,000
3 hrs
Planning and Mobilization
>10,000
Microbial Source Water Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up (NCWSs)
1 hr
Read and Understand Rule
1 hr
Planning and Mobilization
Microbial ICR - Ground Water Rule
Revised Burden
16 hrs
16 hrs
32 hrs
8 hrs
16 hrs
G - 22
July 2008
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Title | Microsoft Word - Appendix A Title Page |
| Author | kpalanjian |
| File Modified | 2008-09-11 |
| File Created | 2008-07-25 |