FAA ICR no 2120-0649 20091 - OMB comments

FAA ICR no 2120-0649 20091 - OMB comments (2).DOC

Financial Responsibility Requirements for Licensed Reentry Activities

FAA ICR no 2120-0649 20091 - OMB comments

OMB: 2120-0649

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Commercial Space Transportation Financial Responsibility
Requirements For Licensed Reentry Activities

14 CFR Part 450

Effective November 20, 2000


Paperwork Reduction Act Submission by FAA/AST to
Office of Management and Budget


December 2, 2008


This document outlines the information collection requirements associated with the commercial space transportation financial responsibility requirements for licensed reentry activities to be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval.


JUSTIFICATION


  1. Explain the circumstances that make collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. This collection is applicable upon concurrence of requests for conducting commercial reentry operations as prescribed in 14 CFR, Parts 400, et al, Commercial Space Transportation Reusable Launch Vehicle and Reentry Licensing Regulation. A commercial space launch services provider must complete the Reusable Launch Vehicle and Reentry Licensing Regulation in order to gain authorization for conducting reentry activities. The rule codifies the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation’s (FAA/AST) financial responsibility requirements.


These regulations are set forth under 49 U.S.C. Subtitle IX, 701—Commercial Space Launch Activities, 49 U.S.C. §§ 70101-70119 (1994). The information collected is needed in order to demonstrate to FAA/AST that the activity meets applicable public safety, national security, and foreign policy interests of the United States.


The information collection requirements described in this statement are necessary to support section 440.0 of the rule, in which the licensee must demonstrate compliance with financial responsibility and allocation of risk requirements that are among the activities carried out under a reentry license application issued by FAA/AST.


The rule establishes financial responsibility requirements as a condition of every reentry license issued by FAA/AST. Specifically, the licensee, in supporting FAA/AST’s determination of maximum probable loss, must submit information on mission description, pre-flight processing operations, flight operations, and post-flight processing operations. In addition, the licensee must submit evidence of financial responsibility and compliance with allocation of risk requirements. This evidence includes a three-party cross-waiver of claims agreement, evidence of insurance as well as financial responsibility in a form other than insurance, and proof of insurance, that is, liability insurance to pay claims of third parties for bodily injury and property damage resulting from licensed reentry activities. This ensures a more streamlined submission of required material and result in a more efficient license application evaluation process. This collection of information supports the Department of Transportation’s Strategic Goal on Safety. Specifically, the goal is to promote the public health and safety by working toward the elimination of transportation-related deaths, injuries, and property damage.


  1. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection. The information collection requirement enables FAA/AST to determine the amount of required liability insurance for a reentry operator after examining the risks associated with a reentry vehicle, its operational capabilities, and its designated reentry site. Data collected for the reentry case closely parallel information associated with financial responsibilities for licensed launch activities.


Demonstration of compliance, on the part of the licensee, provides meaningful, accurate, and comprehensive information. This information enables FAA/AST to preempt any conflicting or inconsistent requirements in any agreement the licensee may have previously entered into with other agencies of the United States concerning access to or use of United States launch property or launch services.


  1. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, and mechanical or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also, describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden. FAA/AST has implemented the following for improved information technology enhancements:


  • In accordance with the government Paperwork Reduction Act, a website is maintained to improve the ability of the public to access information pertaining to the collection of information.


However, while all of the information can be submitted electronically, due to the highly sensitive and proprietary nature of information collected, license applicants generally choose to submit their information through secure mail or couriers. Also, a small number of applicants are expected, and therefore the number of paperwork submissions will remain very low.


  1. Efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for the purposes described in Item 2 above. By preempting conflicting or inconsistent requirements in U.S. Government agreements entered into by the licensee, the financial responsibility and allocated risks requirements are designed to avoid imposing duplicative and inconsistent obligations on the licensee. Collected information needed to satisfy these requirements is unique. There are no other government agencies that collect such information as required for financial responsibility for licensed reentry activities.


  1. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden on small businesses or other small entities. Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), FAA/AST certifies that the rule does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Regulations were written to allow flexibility and innovation on the part of the private sector.


  1. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden. The frequency of record keeping or reporting is contingent upon the respondent submitting an application for a reentry license.


  1. Explain any special circumstances that would cause the requirement to be inconsistent with guidelines 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)(i)-(viii). This requirement follows the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)(i)-(viii).


  1. Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. A 60-day notice for public comments was published in the Federal Register on October 24, 2008, vol. 73, no. 207, page 63541. No comments were received and a copy of the notice is attached for your convenience. This regulation was effective as of November 20, 2000.


  1. Explain any decisions to provide any payment as gift to respondents, other than re-enumeration of contractors or grantees. No payments or special compensation will be provided to the respondents.


  1. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy. All information collected, including company proprietary information, is certified to comply with the Freedom of Information Act. 49 U.S. Code, Subtitle IX, Section 70114 covers disclosure of information. In addition, confidentiality of industry information is covered under Code of Federal Regulations Part 413.9.


  1. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature. No sensitive information is required.


  1. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The burden estimate for industry involves hours associated with financial responsibility aspects of each reentry license (i.e., data collection, maximum probable loss determination, documentation, and verification of insurance compliance, as well as the verification and maintenance of cross-waivers). Industry representatives were consulted about the amount of time required for the license applications activities listed above. It is estimated that the number of license applicants will range from two to three per year over a three-year period beginning in 2005.


The annual costs per year for the reentry licenses ($17,700) are calculated by multiplying the estimated cost per application ($17,700) by the total number of applications received on a yearly basis (1). As shown in Table 1, the estimated cost for application ($17,700) is calculated by multiplying the estimated hourly wage rate ($59) by the estimated average hours required for the application (300).


The total annual industry hours for submitting licensing applications (300) are calculated by multiplying industry hours to submit an application (300) by the total annual applications (1). The industry hourly rate ($59) is the unit labor cost for aerospace engineering personnel involved in gathering, reviewing, and formatting the information required in each license application. The industry hourly rate is based on aerospace personnel only; it does not include rates for executive or managerial personnel. The industry hourly rate includes a fringe benefit multiplier of about 32 percent, based on discussions with industry. The estimated cost to industry per application ($17,700) is calculated by multiplying the estimated unit labor cost by the estimated industry hours required to submit an application (300). The total estimated annualized costs ($17,700) are calculated by multiplying the cost to industry per application by the total annual applications (1).


Table 1: Estimated Burden Hours and Annual Costs to Industry for Financial Responsibility Regulations

Annual number of applicants

1

Annual number of applications per applicant

1

Total annual applications

1

Industry hours required for compliance

300

Total annual industry hours

300

Industry hourly rate

$59.00

Cost to industry for compliance per application

$17,700

Total estimated annualized costs

$17,700



  1. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. There is no additional cost for capital expenses other than that shown in item 12.


  1. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. The estimated annual cost to the FAA/AST to certify a reentry licensee's financial responsibility to conduct a reentry operation is approximately $33,600 (see Table 2). The cost to the government for processing the financial information is driven by procedures involving review and analysis of the information contained in the application. The cost per first reentry license includes additional costs related to data collection associated with the determination of maximum probable loss, as well as the verification and maintenance of cross waivers.


Based on the 2007 GS 13 Step 5 wage, the annual cost per federal worker is approximately $75,900. The government hourly rate ($36) is calculated by dividing the annual salary by the total yearly government working hours (2,080) per worker. A fringe benefit multiplier of 32.45% is used to increase the government hourly rate to $48.


The estimated cost to process the collected information is calculated by multiplying the average hourly wage rate ($48) by the estimated total hours (700). The total annual government hours to process the collected information (700) are calculated by multiplying government hours required to process each application (700) by the total number of new applications (1). The total estimated annualized costs ($33,600) are calculated by multiplying the cost to the government per application ($33,600) by the total annual applications (1).


Burden estimates for the government are based on those hours required for facilitating pre-application consultation; license application acceptance and review procedures; disposition of a license (i.e., approved or disapproved); and issuance of the license. The government estimates include environmental personnel.


Table 2: Estimated Burden Hours and Annual Costs to Government for Verifying Financial Responsibility Regulations

Annual number of applicants

1

Annual number of applications per applicant

1

Total annual applications

1

Government hours to verify compliance

700

Total annual Government hours

700

Government hourly rate

$48

Cost to Government to verify compliance per application

$ 33,600

Total estimated annualized costs

$33,600



  1. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments. Adjustments are a result of using 2007 labor rates for the calculation of government and industry burden costs. The government rate is based on the 2007 national average salary and hourly rate for GS-13, Step 5 employees. The industry rate is based on the 2007 Bureau of Labor Statistics average annual salary for aerospace engineers. Also, FAA has adjusted the estimate for the number of annual license applications to 1.


  1. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation, and publication. We do not intend to publish this information.


  1. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date of OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate. No approval is sought.


  1. Explain each exception to the certification. There are no exceptions.



File Typeapplication/msword
File TitlePAPERWORK REDUCTION STATEMENT:
AuthorRuben Van Mitchell
Last Modified Bypatricia.lawton
File Modified2009-04-03
File Created2009-04-03

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy