Evaluation of Secondary Math Teachers from Two Highly Selective Routes to Alternative Certification

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
Pilot of Student Assessment	Form	New	Available
Parental Consent Form	Form	New	Available
Classroom Rosters/Rosters of Students Enrolled Late	Form	New	Available
Teacher Background Survey	Form	New	Available
Att_Appendix F (new).pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2009-02-19	Available
Att_Appendix E (new).pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2009-02-19	Available
Att_Appendix D.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2009-02-19	Available
Att_Appendix C (new).pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2009-02-19	Available
Att_Appendix B (new).pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2009-02-19	Available
Att_Appendix A.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2009-02-19	Available
Att_OMB Package 1 Part B_2-9-09-Final.doc	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2009-02-19	Available
OMB Package 1 Part A_5-22-09-Final.doc	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2009-05-26	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
188113	Pilot of Student Assessment	Form	New
188112	Parental Consent Form	Form	New
188111	Classroom Rosters/Rosters of Students Enrolled Late	Form	New
188110	Teacher Background Survey	Form	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1850-0865	ICR Reference No: 200902-1850-003
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: ED/IES	Agency Tracking No: 3921
Title: Evaluation of Secondary Math Teachers from Two Highly Selective Routes to Alternative Certification
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 06/05/2009
	Date Received in OIRA: 02/24/2009
Terms of Clearance: OMB approves the extraordinarily high school incentive of $1000 per school given special circumstances of this study. In particular, these circumstances include the limited number of schools available that meet criteria for study inclusion and the lack of a "treatment" or "delayed treatment" of commercial or other intrinsic value to the study schools. We recognize that these circumstances, along with the burden imposed on the schools, will make recruiting difficult. This study does not contain an incentive experiment, so will not provide information on the impact on the incentive that can be used as precedent for other studies. We strongly encourage IES to think about strategies, and experiments to test these strategies, to address the apparently pervasive problem of schools in NCES and NCEE studies being unwilling to participate given mandatory testing and other demands on their time.

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	06/30/2012	36 Months From Approved
Responses	5,270	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	1,185	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The Evaluation of Secondary Math Teachers from Two Highly Selective Routes to Alternative Certification will examine the relative effectiveness of secondary math achievement who obtain certification through the two largest highly selective routes to alternative This submission is for the recruitment of schools and districts, a teacher background form, the pilot of a test teacher math content knowledge This submission includes the justification and plan for the data collection of information and statistical methods for the evaluation. The package also provides an overview of the study, including its design and data collection procedures.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 107 - 110 9601 Name of Law: No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	73 FR 245	12/19/2008
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	74 FR 35	02/24/2009
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 4

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Classroom Rosters/Rosters of Students Enrolled Late	N/A	Classroom Roster
Teacher Background Survey	N/A	Teacher Background Form
Parental Consent Form	N/A	Parental Consent Form
Pilot of Student Assessment	N/A	Pilot of Student Assessment

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	5,270	0	0	5,270	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	1,185	0	0	1,185	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This is a new collection.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $2,021,950

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 02/24/2009

---