Southeast Region Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) and Related Requirements

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
Southeast Region Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) Purchase, Installation and Certification Checklist for for Transfer of Vessel and/or Permit Form and Instruction	Modified
Power-down requests Form and Instruction	New
Certification and Activation Checklist for Transfers not involving purchase and installation of VMC Form and Instruction	New
0544 ss ren 051909rev.pdf Supporting Statement A	2009-05-27

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
4658	Southeast Region Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) Purchase, Installation and Certification Checklist for for Transfer of Vessel and/or Permit Form and Instruction	Modified
189198	Reports of fishing activity prior to departure plus annual maintenance burden and cost plus transmission cost	New
189197	Power-down requests Form and Instruction	New
189195	Certification and Activation Checklist for Transfers not involving purchase and installation of VMC Form and Instruction	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 0648-0544	ICR Reference No: 200905-0648-004
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200610-0648-003
Agency/Subagency: DOC/NOAA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Southeast Region Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) and Related Requirements
Type of Information Collection: Extension without change of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 10/02/2009
	Date Received in OIRA: 06/01/2009
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	10/31/2012	36 Months From Approved	10/31/2009
Responses	11,755	0	10,054,892
Time Burden (Hours)	2,348	0	8,393
Cost Burden (Dollars)	858,027	0	2,460,585

---

Abstract: Under Amendment 18A to the Fishery Management Plan for Reef Fish Fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico, owners of vessels with valid permits were required to install vessel monitoring systems (VMS) on their vessels. VMS units automatically send periodic reports on the position of the vessel. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) uses the reports to monitor the vessel's location and activities while enforcing area closures.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 194 - 265 303 Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Management and Conservation Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	74 FR 1177	01/12/2009
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	74 FR 26200	06/01/2009
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 4

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Power-down requests	NA	Power Down Exemption Request
Reports of fishing activity prior to departure plus annual maintenance burden and cost plus transmission cost
Certification and Activation Checklist for Transfers not involving purchase and installation of VMC	NA	Reef Fish VMS certification and checklist
Southeast Region Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) Purchase, Installation and Certification Checklist for for Transfer of Vessel and/or Permit	NA	Reef Fish VMS certification and checklist

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	11,755	10,054,892	0	0	-10,043,137	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	2,348	8,393	0	0	-6,045	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	858,027	2,460,585	0	0	-1,602,558	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: The changes in burden hours and costs are program changes resulting from attrition in the fishery, no longer counting the automatic VMS transmissions as responses and burden hours (only as costs) and the removal of start up costs except in the case of certain transfers. Responses would have decreased from 10,054, 892 to 7,737,995, based on the reduction of the number of affected vessels from 1,145 to 882. Based on the recent clarification from OMB that VMS automatic transmissions are not counted as responses and burden, they were further decreased to 11,755. Hours would have decreased to 4,144 based on fleet shrinkage but were further decreased to 2,348. Costs were reduced from $2,460,585 to $858,027. • Previous start-up costs were $2,229,418, now reduced to $93,333, due to VMS purchase now being required for only 80 transfer vessels per year, rather than 1,121 plus 318 transfers. • However, recordkeeping/reporting costs which would have decreased, based on fleet shrinkage, instead increased from $230,552 to $764,694, as, in the initial request: o The $250 annual maintenance cost was inadvertently omitted o The cost of VMS transmission, already an annual amount, was incorrectly divided by 3 (i.e. “re-annualized”) and o Only the 1,121 vessels still needing to install the VMS were counted for transmission costs, instead of all 1,145.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $361,900

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 06/01/2009

---