Request to Non-Agreement States for Information

ICR 200905-3150-002

OMB: 3150-0200

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2009-07-09
IC Document Collections
IC ID
Document
Title
Status
33507
Modified
ICR Details
3150-0200 200905-3150-002
Historical Active 200604-3150-002
NRC
Request to Non-Agreement States for Information
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved with change 08/03/2009
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 05/20/2009
Agency updated supporting statement.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
08/31/2012 36 Months From Approved 07/31/2009
128 0 108
1,162 0 891
0 0 0

Requests may be made of Non-Agreement States that are similar to those of Agreement States to provide a more complete overview of the national program for regulating radioactive materials. This information would be used in the decision-making of the Commission. With Agreement States and as part of the NRC cooperative post-agreement program with the States pursuant to Section 274(b), information on licensing and inspection practices, and/or incidents, and other technical and statistical information are exchanged. Agreement State comments are also solicited in the areas of proposed implementing procedures relative to NRC Agreement State program policies. With the enactment of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, specifically Section 651(e), NRC now has regulatory authority over use of accelerator-produced radioactive materials and discrete sources of radium-226 and other naturally occurring radioactive material as specified by the Commission.

PL: Pub.L. 109 - 58 119 Stat 594 Name of Law: Energy Policy Act of 2005
   PL: Pub.L. 83 - 703 1-311 Name of Law: Atomic Energy Act
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  74 FR 6922 02/11/2009
74 FR 20507 05/04/2009
No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
Requests to Non-Agreement States for Information

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 128 108 0 0 20 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 1,162 891 0 0 271 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
No
No
The estimated burden has increased by 271 hours from 891 to 1162 hours because NRC’s initial estimate from the issuing of 6 voluntary request annually to 18 Non-Agreement States in the last clearance package, to 8 request annually to 16 States (14 Non-Agreement States and 2 territories, the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico). Therefore, the number of responses increased by 20 from 108 to 128 since the last clearance renewal. NRC continues to have regulatory authority over the use of accelerator-produced radioactive materials and discrete sources of radium-226 and other naturally occurring radioactive material as specified by the Commission. NRC’s need for information from the Non-Agreement States' naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive materials (NARM) programs pertains, for example, to comments on draft rules, guidance, and program elements. Although the number of respondents decreased to 16, since the initial OMB clearance, Pennsylvania and Virginia became Agreement States.

$25,745
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
No
Uncollected
Kevin Hsueh 3014157256

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
05/20/2009


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy