Resp - SS Impact Aid ARRA - OMB edits1

Resp - SS Impact Aid ARRA - OMB edits1.doc

Impact Aid Discretionary Construction Program-ARRA Stimulus Grant

OMB: 1810-0694

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION


     



A. Justification


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.


In FY 2009, Congress passed the American Recovery and Investment Act (ARRA), which authorized a supplemental appropriation for school construction. This law provided that $60 million be made available for emergency school construction and modernization projects for certain eligible local education agencies (LEAs).


The Impact Aid ARRA Discretionary Construction Program provides grants to eligible Impact Aid school districts to assist in addressing their school facility emergency and modernization needs. Qualified applicants were eligible to receive Impact Aid funds under either Section 8002 or Section 8003 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act for FY 2008. In addition, these LEAs have a total assessed value of real property of less than $100 million; or, have an average assessed value of real property per pupil less than the state average assessed value of real property. The fiscal year 2009 appropriation provides $60 million for this competitive construction grant program, available for obligation through FY 2010.


A copy of the authorizing language is attached for OMB’s review.


2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


The Department will use the information collected in the application to determine whether applicants meet the basic eligibility requirements of the program and to assign objective scores to the applications. Among the criteria the Secretary is required to consider are the applicant’s total assessed value of real property that may be taxed for school purposes, and the state average assessed value per pupil of real property that may be taxed for school purposes.



3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.


The Department of Education developed an electronic application for preparing and submitting the FY 2009 application. The software will populate certain data fields for applicants that submitted an eligible FY 2008 Section 8002 or Section 8003 Impact Aid application, and will have built-in checks for completion of all necessary items. This software will reduce the burden on applicants of organizing and entering data that were already submitted to the Impact Aid Program, will inform applicants whether their LEAs meet the program’s eligibility requirements, and will reduce the number of errors in submitted applications.



4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use of the purposes described in Item 2 above.

The Department developed an electronic application that will populate certain necessary data on the application from the Impact Aid Program’s database. These data items include the applicant’s identifying information and DUNS number. This will increase the accuracy of the information submitted in the applications and eliminate duplication of effort on the part of the applicants.


5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities (Item 5 of OMB Form 83-I), describe any methods used to minimize burden.


The respondents are LEAs and local officials. Small businesses or other small entities are not significantly impacted by this collection of information.


6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


Section 8007(b)(6) of the Impact Aid statute requires applicants to apply for funds. The Department would not be able to award these funds without the application to collect the required information.


7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:


  • requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;


  • requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;


  • requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;


  • requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;



  • in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study;


  • requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;


  • that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or


  • requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


There are no special circumstances that would require an applicant to provide information as described above.


  1. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency’s notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.


Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.


Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.



In creating the application package, the Impact Aid Program considered informal comments from school district officials that submitted applications under Section 8007(b), as well as observations of common errors applicants made in previous construction applications.


9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


No gifts or payments will be made to respondents other than the funds awarded under the statute.


10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


There is no assurance of confidentiality provided to the respondents concerning these collections of information.


11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


There are no questions of a sensitive nature in these collections of information.


12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:


  • Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.


  • If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.



  • Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should not be included in Item 14.



Burden data estimates

Collection

Number of

Respondents

Frequency

Number of Responses

Average

Hours

Total

ARRA Construction Application

300

1

300

5.50

1,650

Independent Local Official Certification

300

1

300

1.5

450

TOTAL

600

1

600

3.5

2,100



The annual number of responses for this collection totals 600. The average number of hours/response is 3.5, which results in a total of 2,100 annual burden hours.

Burden cost of collections: At an average cost of $25 per hour, the cost per response is estimated to be:

-- ARRA Construction application $ 137.50

-- Independent Local Official Certification $ 37.50

________

Total $ 175.00


13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)


  • The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.


  • If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.


  • Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.


Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost :      $0.00

Total Annual Costs (O&M) :       $0.00

____________________

Total Annualized Costs Requested :      $0.00


There are no start-up costs for this collection.


14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.


e-Application development:

41,000.00

Field Readers

55,500.00

Contractor Support

33,500.00

Travel

26,000.00

TOTAL

156,000.00


15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments to #16f of the IC Data Part 1 Form.


This is a new collection. As a result, this is the baseline year for comparison.


16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.


The information collected will not be published.


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


The expiration date will be displayed on the applications.


18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 20, “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions,” of OMB Form 83-I.


There are no exceptions to the certification statement.


B. Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods


The agency should be prepared to justify its decision not to use statistical methods in any case where such methods might reduce burden or improve accuracy of results. When Item 17 on Form 83-I is checked “Yes,” the following documentation should be included in the Supporting Statement to the extent that it applies to the methods proposed:


  1. Describe the potential respondent universe (including a numerical estimate) and any sampling or other respondent selection method to be used. Data on the number of entities (e.g., establishments, state and local government units, households, or persons) in the universe covered by the collection and in the corresponding sample are to be provided in tabular form for the universe as a whole and for each of the strata in the proposed sample. Indicate expected response rates for the proposed sample. Indicate expected response rates for the collection as a whole. If the collection had been conducted previously, include the actual response rate achieved during the last collection.


Not applicable to this collection.


  1. Describe the procedures for the collection of information, including:


  • Statistical methodology for stratification and sample selection.


  • Estimation procedure.


  • Degree of accuracy needed for the purpose described in the justification.


  • Unusual problems requiring specialized sampling procedures, and


  • Any use of periodic (less frequent than annual) data collection cycles to reduce burden.


Not applicable to this collection.



  1. Describe methods to maximize response and to deal with issues of non-response. The accuracy and reliability of information collected must be shown to be adequate for intended uses. For collections based on sampling, a special justification must be provided for any collection that will not yield “reliable” data that can be generalized to the universe studied.


Not applicable to this collection.


  1. Describe any tests of procedures or methods to be undertaken. Testing is encouraged as an effective means of refining collections of information to minimize burden and improve utility. Tests must be approved if they call for answers to identical questions from 10 or more respondents. A proposed test or set of tests may be submitted for approval separately or in combination with the main collection of information.

Not applicable to this collection.



  1. Provide the name and telephone number of individuals consulted on statistical aspects of the design and the name of the agency unit, contractor(s), grantee(s), or other persons who will actually collect and/or analyze the information for the agency.


Not applicable to this collection.




9


File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSUPPORTING STATEMENT
File Modified2009-08-07
File Created2009-08-07

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy