Comparision of Proposed haz Liquid Accident Form with the Currently Approved Form

ComparisonCurrenttoProposedHazLiquidAccidentForm.pdf

Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline: Recordkeeping and Accident Reporting

Comparision of Proposed haz Liquid Accident Form with the Currently Approved Form

OMB: 2137-0047

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
NOTICE: This report is required by 49 CFR Part 195. Failure to report can result in a civil penalty not to exceed
$100,000 for each violation for each day that such violation persists except that the maximum civil penalty shall not
exceed $1,000,000 as provided in 49 USC 60122.

OMB NO: XXXX-XXXX
EXPIRATION DATE: mm/dd/yyyy 

Report Date

ACCIDENT REPORT – HAZARDOUS LIQUID
PIPELINE SYSTEMS

U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration

No.
(DOT Use Only)

A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is XXXX-XXXX. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately (X) minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering
the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are mandatory.
Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this
burden to: Information Collection Clearance Officer, PHMSA, Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP-30) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington,
D.C. 20590.
INSTRUCTIONS

Important:
Please read the separate instructions for completing this form before you begin. They clarify the
information requested and provide specific examples. If you do not have a copy of the instructions, you can obtain
one from the PHMSA Pipeline Safety Community Web Page at http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline.
 Original

Report Type: (select all that apply)

PART A – KEY REPORT INFORMATION

1. Operator’s OPS-issued Operator Identification Number (OPID):

/

/

/

/

/

 Supplemental

 Final

/

2. Name of Operator: ______________________________________________________________________________________
3. Address of Operator:
3.a _______________________________________________________________________
(Street Address)

3.b ___________________________________________________

Moved physical address questions
for the incident to Part B, items 2-4.

(City)

3.c State: /

/

/

3.d Zip Code: /

/

/

/

/

/ - /

/

/

/

/

4. Local time (24-hr clock) and date of the Accident:
/

/

/

/

/

/

Hour

/

/

/

Month

5. Location of Accident:
Latitude:
/ / / . / /
Longitude: - / / / / . /

/
/

/

/

Day

/
/

/
/

/
/

6. National Response Center Report Number (if applicable):
/

/

/

Year

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

7. Local time (24-hr clock) and date of initial telephonic report to the
National Response Center (if applicable):

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Hour

8. Commodity released: (select only one, based on predominant volume released)




/

/

/
Day

/

/

/

/

Year

Existing item but
expanded to
provide clarity.

Crude Oil
Refined and/or Petroleum Product (non-HVL) which is a Liquid at Ambient Conditions

 Gasoline (non-Ethanol)
 Diesel, Fuel Oil, Kerosene, Jet Fuel
 Mixture of Refined Products (transmix or other mixture)
 Other  Name: __________________________________


/
Month

HVL or Other Flammable or Toxic Fluid which is a Gas at Ambient Conditions

 Anhydrous Ammonia
 LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) / NGL (Natural Gas Liquid)
 Other HVL  Name: _______________________________



CO2 (Carbon Dioxide)
Biofuel / Alternative Fuel (including ethanol blends)

 Ethanol Blend  % Ethanol: /___/___/
 Other  Name: _______________________

 Fuel Grade Ethanol
 Biodiesel  Blend (e.g. B2, B20, B100): B/___/___/___/
9.

Estimated volume of commodity released unintentionally:

/

/

/

/,/

/

/___/ . /___/___/ Barrels

10. Estimated volume of intentional and/or controlled release/blowdown:

/

/

/

/,/

/

/___/ . /___/___/ Barrels

11. Estimated volume of commodity recovered:

/

/

/

/,/

/

/___/ . /___/___/ Barrels

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 1 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

12. Were there fatalities?  Yes  No
If Yes, specify the number in each category:

 Yes  No

13. Were there injuries requiring inpatient hospitalization?
If Yes, specify the number in each category:

12.a Operator employees

/

/

/

/

/

13.a Operator employees

/

/

/

/

/

12.b Contractor employees
working for the Operator

/

/

/

/

/

13.b Contractor employees
working for the Operator

/

/

/

/

/

12.c Non-Operator
emergency responders

/

/

/

/

/

13.c Non-Operator
emergency responders

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

12.d Workers working on the
right-of-way, but NOT
associated with this Operator

/

/

/

/

/

13.d Workers working on the
right-of-way, but NOT
associated with this Operator

12.e General public

/

/

/

/

/

13.e General public

/

/

/

/

/

12.f Total fatalities (sum of above)

/

/

/

/

/

13.f Total injuries (sum of above)

/

/

/

/

/

14. Was the pipeline/facility shut down due to the Accident?
 Yes  No  Explain: ______________________________________________________________________________
If Yes, complete Questions 14.a and 14.b: (use local time, 24-hr clock)
14.a Local time and date of shutdown

/

/

/

/

/

/

Hour

14.b Local time pipeline/facility restarted

/

/

/

/

/

/

Hour

15. Did the commodity ignite?

 Yes

 No

16. Did the commodity explode?

 Yes

 No

17. Number of general public evacuated: /

/

/

/
/
Month

/,/

/

/

/

Month

/

/

Day

/

/

/

/

Year

/

/

/

Day

/

 Still shut down*

/

Year

(*Supplemental Report required)

/___/___/

18. Time sequence: (use local time, 24-hour clock)
18.a Local time Operator identified Accident

/

/

/

/

/

/

Hour

18.b Local time Operator resources arrived on site

/

/

/
Hour

/

/

/

Month

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Day

/

Month

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

/

/
Day

/

/

Year

/

/

/

/

Year

Page 2 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART B – ADDITIONAL LOCATION INFORMATION
1. Was the origin of the Accident onshore?
 Yes (Complete Questions 2-12)

 No

(Complete Questions 13-15)

If Onshore:
2. State: /

If Offshore:
/

/

13. Approximate water depth (ft.) at the point of the Accident:

3. Zip Code: /___/___/___/___/___/ - / _ / _ / _
4. _______________________

/_

/

5.________________________

City

County or Parish

6. Operator-designated location: (select only one)
 Milepost/Valve Station (specify in shaded area below)

 Survey Station No.

/ _ /___/,/ _



(specify in shaded area below)

8. Segment name/ID: __________________________________
9. Was Accident on Federal land, other than the Outer Continental
Shelf (OCS)?
 Yes  No
10. Location of Accident: (select only one)




Totally contained on Operator-controlled property
Originated on Operator-controlled property, but then flowed
or migrated off the property



Pipeline right-of-way

11. Area of Accident (as found): (select only one)




/_

/

In State waters
 Specify: State: / / /
Area: ___________________
Block/Tract #: /___/___/___/___/
Nearest County/Parish: ________________

/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/___/
7. Pipeline/Facility name: _______________________________

/_

14. Origin of Accident:



On the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)
 Specify: Area: ___________________
Block #: /___/___/___/___/

15. Area of Accident: (select only one)

 Shoreline/Bank crossing or shore approach
 Below water, pipe buried or jetted below seabed
 Below water, pipe on or above seabed
 Splash Zone of riser
 Portion of riser outside of Splash Zone, including riser bend
 Platform

Tank, including attached appurtenances
Underground  Specify:
 Under soil

 Under a building
 Under pavement
 Exposed due to excavation
 In underground enclosed space (e.g., vault)
 Other ____________________________


Depth-of-Cover (in): / _ /,/ _ _/ _ /_
Aboveground  Specify:

/

 Typical aboveground facility piping or appurtenance
 Overhead crossing
 In or spanning an open ditch
 Inside a building
 Inside other enclosed space
 Other ____________________________
 Transition Area  Specify:  Soil/air interface  Wall
sleeve  Pipe support or other close contact area
 Other _________________________
12. Did Accident occur in a crossing?:  Yes  No
If Yes, specify type below:
 Bridge crossing  Specify:  Cased  Uncased



Railroad crossing



 Cased
Road crossing



 Cased
Water crossing

 (select all that apply)
 Uncased
 Bored/drilled
(select all that apply)

 Uncased
 Bored/drilled

Specify:  Cased
 Uncased
Name of body of water, if commonly known:
_____________________________________
Approx. water depth (ft) at the point of the Accident:



/ _ /,/_

/_

/_

/

(select only one of the following)






Shoreline/Bank crossing
Below water, pipe in bored/drilled crossing
Below water, pipe buried below bottom (NOT in
bored/drilled crossing)
Below water, pipe on or above bottom

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 3 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART C – ADDITIONAL FACILITY INFORMATION
1. Is the pipeline or facility:
 Interstate
 Intrastate
2. Part of system involved in Accident: (select only one)
 Onshore Breakout Tank or Storage Vessel, Including Attached Appurtenances 








 Atmospheric or Low Pressure
 Pressurized

Onshore Terminal/Tank Farm Equipment and Piping
Onshore Equipment and Piping Associated with Belowground Storage
Onshore Pump/Meter Station Equipment and Piping
Onshore Pipeline, Including Valve Sites
Offshore Platform/Deepwater Port, Including Platform-mounted Equipment and Piping
Offshore Pipeline, Including Riser and Riser Bend

3. Item involved in Accident: (select only one)



Pipe



Specify:

 Pipe Body

3.a Nominal diameter of pipe (in):

/

3.b Wall thickness (in):

/___/___/

/



 Pipe Seam

/./

/

/./___/___/___/

3.c SMYS (Specified Minimum Yield Strength) of pipe (psi):

/

/

/

/,/

/___/___/

3.d Pipe specification: _____________________________
3.e Pipe Seam

 Specify:  Longitudinal ERW - High Frequency
 Longitudinal ERW - Low Frequency
 Longitudinal ERW – Unknown Frequency
 Spiral Welded ERW
 Spiral Welded SAW
 Lap Welded
 Seamless

 Single SAW
 DSAW

 Flash Welded
 Continuous Welded
 Furnace Butt Welded

 Spiral Welded DSAW
 Other ________________________

3.f Pipe manufacturer: _______________________________
3.g Year of manufacture: /
/
/
/
/
3.h Pipeline coating type at point of Accident
 Fusion Bonded Epoxy
 Specify:

 Coal Tar
 Asphalt
 Polyolefin
 Extruded Polyethylene  Field Applied Epoxy  Cold Applied Tape  Paint
 Composite
 None
 Other _______________________________
 Weld, including heat-affected zone  Specify:  Pipe Girth Weld  Other Butt Weld  Fillet Weld  Other_____________
 Valve
 Mainline  Specify:  Butterfly  Check  Gate  Plug  Ball  Globe
 Other __________________________
3.i Mainline valve manufacturer: ______________________________
3.j Year of manufacture: /
/
/
/
/
















 Relief Valve
 Auxiliary or Other Valve
Pump
Meter/Prover
Scraper/Pig Trap
Sump/Separator
Repair Sleeve or Clamp
Hot Tap Equipment
Stopple Fitting
Flange
Relief Line
Auxiliary Piping (e.g. drain lines)
Tubing
Instrumentation
Tank/Vessel  Specify:  Single Bottom System

 Double Bottom System
 Tank Shell
 Chime
 Roof Drain System
 Mixer
 Pressure Vessel Head or Wall
 Other ________________________________

 Roof/Roof Seal
 Appurtenance

Other ___________________________________

4. Year item involved in Accident was installed:

/

/

/

/

/

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 4 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

5. Material involved in Accident: (select only one)
 Carbon Steel
 Material other than Carbon Steel  Specify: ____________________________________________
6. Type of Accident involved: (select only one)
 Mechanical Puncture  Approx. size: /__/__/__/__/./__/in. (axial) by /__/__/__/__/./__/in. (circumferential)

 Crack
 Connection Failure
 Seal or Packing
 Other
 Select Type:  Pinhole
Select
Orientation:

Circumferential

Longitudinal

Other
________________________________

Approx. size: /__/__/__/__/./__/ in. (widest opening) by /__/__/__/__/__/./__/in. (length circumferentially or axially)



Leak




Overfill or Overflow
Other  Describe: _______________________________________________________________________________________

Rupture

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 5 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART D – ADDITIONAL CONSEQUENCE INFORMATION
1. Wildlife impact:
 Yes  No
1.a If Yes, specify all that apply:

Deleted - If yes, estimated
number of cubic yards.

 Fish/aquatic
 Birds
 Terrestrial
2. Soil contamination:

 Yes  No

3. Long term impact assessment performed or planned:

 Yes  No

4. Anticipated remediation:  Yes  No (not needed)
4.a If Yes, specify all that apply:

 Surface water
5. Water contamination:

 Groundwater  Soil  Vegetation  Wildlife
 Yes  (Complete 5.a – 5.c below)
 No

5.a Specify all that apply:

 Ocean/Seawater
 Surface
 Groundwater
 Drinking water 

(Select one or both)

 Private Well  Public Water Intake

5.b Estimated amount released in or reaching water:

/

/

/

/,/

/

/___/./___/___/ Barrels

5.c Name of body of water, if commonly known: __________________________________________
6. At the location of this Accident, had the pipeline segment or facility been identified as one that “could affect” a High Consequence Area
(HCA) as determined in the Operator’s Integrity Management Program?
 Yes  No
7. Did the released commodity reach or occur in one or more High Consequence Area (HCA)?
 Yes
 No
7.a If Yes, specify HCA type(s): (select all that apply)



Commercially Navigable Waterway
Was this HCA identified in the “could affect” determination for this Accident site in the Operator’s Integrity Management Program?
 Yes  No



High Population Area
Was this HCA identified in the “could affect” determination for this Accident site in the Operator’s Integrity Management Program?
 Yes  No



Other Populated Area
Was this HCA identified in the “could affect” determination for this Accident site in the Operator’s Integrity Management Program?
 Yes  No



Unusually Sensitive Area (USA) – Drinking Water
Was this HCA identified in the “could affect” determination for this Accident site in the Operator’s Integrity Management Program?
 Yes  No



Unusually Sensitive Area (USA) – Ecological
Was this HCA identified in the “could affect” determination for this Accident site in the Operator’s Integrity Management Program?
 Yes  No

8. Estimated cost to Operator:
8.a Estimated cost of public and non-Operator private property damage
paid/reimbursed by the Operator

$/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

8.b Estimated cost of commodity lost

$/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

8.c Estimated cost of Operator’s property damage & repairs

$/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

/

8.d Estimated cost of Operator’s emergency response

$/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

8.e Estimated cost of Operator’s environmental remediation

$/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

8.f Estimated other costs

$/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

Describe ___________________________________________________
8.g Estimated total costs (sum of above)

$/

/

/

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 6 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART E – ADDITIONAL OPERATING INFORMATION
1. Estimated pressure at the point and time of the Accident (psig):

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

2. Maximum Operating Pressure (MOP) at the point and time of the Accident (psig) :

/

/

/,/

/

/

/

3. Describe the pressure on the system or facility relating to the Accident: (select only one)
 Pressure did not exceed MOP
 Pressure exceeded MOP, but did not exceed 110% of MOP
 Pressure exceeded 110% of MOP
4. Not including pressure reductions required by PHMSA regulations (such as for repairs and pipe movement), was the system or facility
relating to the Accident operating under an established pressure restriction with pressure limits below those normally allowed by the MOP?

 No
 Yes  (Complete 4.a and 4.b below)
4.a Did the pressure exceed this established pressure restriction?

 Yes

 No

4.b Was this pressure restriction mandated by PHMSA or the State?

 PHMSA

 State

 Not mandated

5. Was “Onshore Pipeline, Including Valve Sites” OR “Offshore Pipeline, Including Riser and Riser Bend” selected in PART C, Question 2?

 No
 Yes 

(Complete 5.a – 5.f below)

5.a Type of upstream valve used to initially isolate release source:

 Manual

 Automatic

 Remotely Controlled

5.b Type of downstream valve used to initially isolate release source:

 Manual  Automatic
 Check Valve

 Remotely Controlled

5.c Length of segment initially isolated between valves (ft):

/

/

/

/,/___/___/___/

5.d Is the pipeline configured to accommodate internal inspection tools?




Yes
No  Which physical features limit tool accommodation? (select all that apply)








Changes in line pipe diameter
Presence of unsuitable mainline valves
Tight or mitered pipe bends
Other passage restrictions (i.e. unbarred tee’s, projecting instrumentation, etc.)
Extra thick pipe wall (applicable only for magnetic flux leakage internal inspection tools)
Other  Describe:__________________________________________________________________

5.e For this pipeline, are there operational factors which significantly complicate the execution of an internal inspection tool run?




No
Yes

 Which operational factors complicate execution?






(select all that apply)

Excessive debris or scale, wax, or other wall build-up
Low operating pressure(s)
Low flow or absence of flow
Incompatible commodity
Other  Describe:__________________________________________________________________

5.f Function of pipeline system: (select only one)
 > 20% SMYS Regulated Trunkline/Transmission
 ≤ 20% SMYS Regulated Trunkline/Transmission
 ≤ 20% SMYS “Unregulated” Trunkline/Transmission

 > 20% SMYS Regulated Gathering
 ≤ 20% SMYS Regulated Gathering
 ≤ 20% SMYS “Unregulated” Gathering

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 7 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

6. Was a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA)-based system in place on the pipeline or facility involved in the Accident?
 No
 Yes  6.a Was it operating at the time of the Accident?
 Yes
 No
6.b Was it fully functional at the time of the Accident?
 Yes
 No
6.c Did SCADA-based information (such as alarm(s), alert(s), event(s), and/or volume calculations) assist with the
 Yes
 No
detection of the Accident?
6.d Did SCADA-based information (such as alarm(s), alert(s), event(s), and/or volume calculations) assist with the
 Yes
 No
confirmation of the Accident?
7. Was a CPM leak detection system in place on the pipeline or facility involved in the Accident?




No
Yes



7.a Was it operating at the time of the Accident?

 Yes

 No

7.b Was it fully functional at the time of the Accident?
 Yes
 No
7.c Did CPM leak detection system information (such as alarm(s), alert(s), event(s), and/or volume calculations) assist
with the detection of the Accident?
 Yes
 No
7.d Did CPM leak detection system information (such as alarm(s), alert(s), event(s), and/or volume calculations) assist
 Yes
 No
with the confirmation of the Accident?
8. How was the Accident initially identified for the Operator? (select only one)

 CPM leak detection system or SCADA-based information (such as alarm(s), alert(s), event(s), and/or volume calculations)
 Static Shut-in Test or Other Pressure or Leak Test
 Controller
 Local Operating Personnel, including contractors
 Air Patrol
 Ground Patrol by Operator or its contractor
 Notification from Public
 Notification from Emergency Responder
 Notification from Third Party that caused the Accident
 Other _________________________________________________
8.a If “Controller”, “Local Operating Personnel, including contractors”, “Air Patrol”, or “Ground Patrol by Operator or its contractor” is
selected in Question 8, specify the following: (select only one)

 Operator employee

 Contractor working for the Operator

9. Was an investigation initiated into whether or not the controller(s) or control room issues were the cause of or a contributing factor to the
Accident? (select only one)



Yes, but the investigation of the control room and/or controller actions has not yet been completed by the Operator (Supplemental
Report required)
 No, the facility was not monitored by a controller(s) at the time of the Accident
 No, the Operator did not find that an investigation of the controller(s) actions or control room issues was necessary due to:
(provide an explanation for why the Operator did not investigate)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 Yes, specify investigation result(s): (select all that apply)
 Investigation reviewed work schedule rotations, continuous hours of service (while working for the Operator) and other
factors associated with fatigue
 Investigation did NOT review work schedule rotations, continuous hours of service (while working for the Operator) and
other factors associated with fatigue (provide an explanation for why not)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
 Investigation identified no control room issues
 Investigation identified no controller issues
 Investigation identified incorrect controller action or controller error
 Investigation identified that fatigue may have affected the controller(s) involved or impacted the involved controller(s)
response
 Investigation identified incorrect procedures
 Investigation identified incorrect control room equipment operation
 Investigation identified maintenance activities that affected control room operations, procedures, and/or controller
response
 Investigation identified areas other than those above  Describe: ___________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 8 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART F – DRUG & ALCOHOL TESTING INFORMATION
1. As a result of this Accident, were any Operator employees tested under the post-accident drug and alcohol testing requirements of DOT’s
Drug & Alcohol Testing regulations?

 No
 Yes 



1.a Specify how many were tested:

/

/

/

1.b Specify how many failed:

/

/

/

2. As a result of this Accident, were any Operator contractor employees tested under the post-accident drug and alcohol testing requirements
of DOT’s Drug & Alcohol Testing regulations?

 No
 Yes 

2.a Specify how many were tested:

 2.b

Specify how many failed:

/

/

/

/

/

/

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 9 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART G – APPARENT CAUSE

Select only one box from PART G in the shaded column on the left representing the
APPARENT Cause of the Accident, and answer the questions on the right. Describe
secondary, contributing, or root causes of the Accident in the narrative (PART H).

G1 - Corrosion Failure – only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


External Corrosion

1. Results of visual examination:
Listed as "cause of corrosion" on current
 Localized Pitting  General Corrosion
form. Deleted - Cathodic protection
 Other _______________________________________________

disrupted & stress corrosion cracking
2. Type of corrosion: (select all that apply)
 Galvanic  Atmospheric  Stray Current  Microbiological  Selective Seam
 Other ________________________________________________
3. The type(s) of corrosion selected in Question 2 is based on the following: (select all that
apply)
 Field examination
 Determined by metallurgical analysis
 Other _____________________________________________________________
4. Was the failed item buried under the ground?
 Yes 4.a Was failed item considered to be under cathodic protection at the time of
the Accident?
 Yes  Year protection started: / / / / /

 No

4.b Was shielding, tenting, or disbonding of coating evident at the point of
the Accident?
 Yes  No
4.c Has one or more Cathodic Protection Survey been conducted at
the point of the Accident?
 Yes, CP Annual Survey  Most recent year conducted:
/ / /

 Yes, Close Interval Survey  Most recent year conducted:
 Yes, Other CP Survey  Most recent year conducted:
 No
 No 

4.d Was the failed item externally coated or painted?

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

 Yes  No

5. Was there observable damage to the coating or paint in the vicinity of the corrosion?
 Yes  No



Internal Corrosion

6. Results of visual examination:
 Localized Pitting
 General Corrosion
 Not cut open
 Other _______________________________________________
7. Cause of corrosion: (select all that apply)
 Corrosive Commodity  Water drop-out/Acid  Microbiological
 Other ________________________________________________

 Erosion

8. The cause(s) of corrosion selected in Question 7 is based on the following: (select all that
apply)
 Field examination
 Determined by metallurgical analysis
 Other _____________________________________________
9. Location of corrosion: (select all that apply)
 Low point in pipe  Elbow
 Other_____________________________________
10. Was the commodity treated with corrosion inhibitors or biocides?
11. Was the interior coated or lined with protective coating?

 Yes  No

 Yes  No

12. Were cleaning/dewatering pigs (or other operations) routinely utilized?
 Not applicable - Not mainline pipe
 Yes
 No
13. Were corrosion coupons routinely utilized?
 Not applicable - Not mainline pipe
 Yes

 No

Complete the following if any Corrosion Failure sub-cause is selected AND the “Item Involved in Accident” (from PART C, Question 3) is
Tank/Vessel.
14. List the year of the most recent inspections:
14.a API Std 653 Out-of-Service Inspection
14.b API Std 653 In-Service Inspection

/
/

/
/

/
/

/
/

/
/

 No Out-of-Service Inspection completed
 No In-Service Inspection completed

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 10 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

Complete the following if any Corrosion Failure sub-cause is selected AND the “Item Involved in Accident” (from PART C, Question 3) is
Pipe or Weld.
15. Has one or more internal inspection tool collected data at the point of the Accident?
 Yes  No
15.a. If Yes, for each tool used, select type of internal inspection tool and indicate most recent year run:

 Magnetic Flux Leakage Tool
 Ultrasonic
 Geometry
 Caliper
 Crack
 Hard Spot
 Combination Tool
 Transverse Field/Triaxial
 Other __________________________

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

15 & 15a are similar to Part C
3f & g on the current form.

16. Has one or more hydrotest or other pressure test been conducted since original construction at the point of the Accident?
 Yes  Most recent year tested: / / / / /
Test pressure (psig): /
/
/
/
/
/

 No

17. Has one or more Direct Assessment been conducted on this segment?
 Yes, and an investigative dig was conducted at the point of the Accident

 Yes, but the point of the Accident was not identified as a dig site
 No

 Most recent year conducted:
 Most recent year conducted:

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

18. Has one or more non-destructive examination been conducted at the point of the Accident since January 1, 2002?
 Yes  No
18.a If Yes, for each examination conducted since January 1, 2002, select type of non-destructive examination and indicate most recent
year the examination was conducted:

 Radiography
 Guided Wave Ultrasonic
 Handheld Ultrasonic Tool
 Wet Magnetic Particle Test
 Dry Magnetic Particle Test
 Other __________________________

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

G2 - Natural Force Damage - only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


 Earthquake  Subsidence  Landslide  Other ____________________

Earth Movement, NOT due to
Heavy Rains/Floods

1. Specify:



Heavy Rains/Floods

2. Specify:

 Washout/Scouring  Flotation  Mudslide  Other _________________



Lightning

3. Specify:

 Direct hit



Temperature

4. Specify:

 Thermal Stress
 Frozen Components



High Winds



Other Natural Force Damage

Separate item on current form.
 Secondary impact such as resulting nearby fires
 Frost Heave
 Other ________________________________

5. Describe: _________________________________________________

Complete the following if any Natural Force Damage sub-cause is selected.
6. Were the natural forces causing the Accident generated in conjunction with an extreme weather event?
6.a If Yes, specify: (select all that apply)

 Yes

 No

 Hurricane
 Tropical Storm
 Tornado
 Other ______________________________

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 11 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

G3 – Excavation Damage - only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


Excavation Damage by Operator
(First Party)



Excavation Damage by Operator’s
Contractor (Second Party)



Excavation Damage by Third Party



Previous Damage due to Excavation
Activity

Complete Questions 1-5 ONLY IF the “Item Involved in Accident” (from PART C,
Question 3) is Pipe or Weld.
1. Has one or more internal inspection tool collected data at the point of the Accident?
 Yes  No

New to "Excavation
Damage" cause category
but similar questions
appear on current liquid
accident form.

1.a If Yes, for each tool used, select type of internal inspection tool and indicate most
recent year run:

 Magnetic Flux Leakage
 Ultrasonic
 Geometry
 Caliper
 Crack
 Hard Spot
 Combination Tool
 Transverse Field/Triaxial
 Other _____________________

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

2. Do you have reason to believe that the internal inspection was completed BEFORE the
damage was sustained?  Yes  No
3. Has one or more hydrotest or other pressure test been conducted since original construction
at the point of the Accident?

 Yes Most recent year tested:
Test pressure (psig):

/
/

/
/

/
/, /

/

/
/

/

/

 No
4. Has one or more Direct Assessment been conducted on the pipeline segment?

 Yes, and an investigative dig was conducted at the point of the Accident
 Most recent year conducted: / / / / /
 Yes, but the point of the Accident was not identified as a dig site
 Most recent year conducted: / / / / /
 No
5. Has one or more non-destructive examination been conducted at the point of the Accident
since January 1, 2002?
 Yes  No
5.a If Yes, for each examination conducted since January 1, 2002, select type of nondestructive examination and indicate most recent year the examination was conducted:

 Radiography
 Guided Wave Ultrasonic
 Handheld Ultrasonic Tool
 Wet Magnetic Particle Test
 Dry Magnetic Particle Test
 Other __________________________
Complete the following if Excavation Damage by Third Party is selected as the sub-cause.
6. Did the Operator get prior notification of the excavation activity?
6.a If Yes, Notification received from: (select all that apply)

 Yes  No
 One-Call System

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Date of notification was
removed.

 Excavator

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

/
/

 Contractor

 Landowner

Page 12 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

Complete the following mandatory CGA-DIRT Program questions if any Excavation Damage sub-cause is selected.
7. Do you want PHMSA to upload the following information to CGA-DIRT (www.cga-dirt.com)?

Yes

 No

8. Right-of-Way where event occurred: (select all that apply)

 Public  Specify:  City Street  State Highway  County Road  Interstate Highway  Other
 Private  Specify:  Private Landowner  Private Business  Private Easement
 Pipeline Property/Easement
The CGA-DIRT section (#s7-17) is new
 Power/Transmission Line
to the form although some items similar
 Railroad
to the CGA-DIRT questions appear on
 Dedicated Public Utility Easement
 Federal Land
the current form.
 Data not collected
 Unknown/Other
9. Type of excavator: (select only one)

 Contractor
 Railroad

 County
 State

 Developer
 Utility

 Farmer
 Municipality
 Data not collected

 Occupant
 Unknown/Other

10. Type of excavation equipment: (select only one)

 Auger
 Explosives
 Probing Device

 Backhoe/Trackhoe
 Farm Equipment
 Trencher

 Boring
 Grader/Scraper
 Vacuum Equipment

 Drilling
 Directional Drilling
 Hand Tools
 Milling Equipment
 Data not collected  Unknown/Other

11. Type of work performed: (select only one)

 Agriculture
 Drainage
 Grading
 Natural Gas
 Sewer (Sanitary/Storm)
 Telecommunications
 Data not collected

 Cable TV
 Curb/Sidewalk
 Driveway
 Electric
 Irrigation
 Landscaping
 Pole
 Public Transit Authority
 Site Development
 Steam
Traffic Signal
 Traffic Sign
 Unknown/Other

12. Was the One-Call Center notified?

 Yes

 Building Construction
 Engineering/Surveying
 Liquid Pipeline
 Railroad Maintenance
 Storm Drain/Culvert
 Water

 Building Demolition
 Fencing
 Milling
 Road Work
Street Light
 Waterway Improvement

 No

12.a If Yes, specify ticket number: /__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/__/
12.b If this is a State where more than a single One-Call Center exists, list the name of the One-Call Center notified:
_____________________________________________________________

 Contract Locator

 Data not collected

 Unknown/Other

14. Were facility locate marks visible in the area of excavation?

 No

 Yes

 Data not collected

 Unknown/Other

15. Were facilities marked correctly?

 No

 Yes

 Data not collected

 Unknown/Other

 No

 Yes

 Data not collected

 Unknown/Other

13. Type of Locator:

 Utility Owner

16. Did the damage cause an interruption in service?
16.a If Yes, specify duration of the interruption:

/___/___/___/___/ hours

(This CGA-DIRT section continued on next page with Question 17.)

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 13 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

17. Description of the CGA-DIRT Root Cause (select only the one predominant first level CGA-DIRT Root Cause and then, where available
as a choice, the one predominant second level CGA-DIRT Root Cause as well):



One-Call Notification Practices Not Sufficient: (select only one)

 No notification made to the One-Call Center
 Notification to One-Call Center made, but not sufficient
 Wrong information provided




Locating Practices Not Sufficient: (select only one)

 Facility could not be found/located
 Facility marking or location not sufficient
 Facility was not located or marked
 Incorrect facility records/maps
Excavation Practices Not Sufficient: (select only one)

 Excavation practices not sufficient (other)
 Failure to maintain clearance
 Failure to maintain the marks
 Failure to support exposed facilities
 Failure to use hand tools where required
 Failure to verify location by test-hole (pot-holing)
 Improper backfilling


One-Call Notification Center Error



Abandoned Facility



Deteriorated Facility



Previous Damage



Data Not Collected

 Other / None of the Above (explain)_____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 14 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

G4 - Other Outside Force Damage - only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


Nearby Industrial, Man-made, or
Other Fire/Explosion as Primary
Cause of Accident



Damage by Car, Truck, or Other
Motorized Vehicle/Equipment NOT
Engaged in Excavation

1. Vehicle/Equipment operated by: (select only one)
 Operator
 Operator’s Contractor



Damage by Boats, Barges, Drilling
Rigs, or Other Maritime Equipment or
Vessels Set Adrift or Which Have
Otherwise Lost Their Mooring

2. Select one or more of the following IF an extreme weather event was a factor:
 Hurricane
 Tropical Storm
 Tornado
 Heavy Rains/Flood
 Other ______________________________



Routine or Normal Fishing or Other
Maritime Activity NOT Engaged in
Excavation



Electrical Arcing from Other
Equipment or Facility



Previous Mechanical Damage NOT
Related to Excavation

 Third Party

Complete Questions 3-7 ONLY IF the “Item Involved in Accident” (from PART C,
Question 3) is Pipe or Weld.
3. Has one or more internal inspection tool collected data at the point of the Accident?
 Yes  No
3.a If Yes, for each tool used, select type of internal inspection tool and indicate most
recent year run:

New to "Other Outside Force
Damage" cause category but
similar questions appear on
current form.

 Magnetic Flux Leakage
 Ultrasonic
 Geometry
 Caliper
 Crack
 Hard Spot
 Combination Tool
 Transverse Field/Triaxial
 Other _____________________

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

4. Do you have reason to believe that the internal inspection was completed BEFORE the
damage was sustained?  Yes  No
5. Has one or more hydrotest or other pressure test been conducted since original construction
at the point of the Accident?

 Yes Most recent year tested:
Test pressure (psig):

/
/

/
/

/
/, /

/

/
/

/

/

 No
6. Has one or more Direct Assessment been conducted on the pipeline segment?

 Yes, and an investigative dig was conducted at the point of the Accident
 Most recent year conducted: / / / / /
 Yes, but the point of the Accident was not identified as a dig site
 Most recent year conducted: / / / / /
 No
(This section continued on next page with Question 7.)

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 15 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

7. Has one or more non-destructive examination been conducted at the point of the Accident
since January 1, 2002?
 Yes  No
7.a If Yes, for each examination conducted since January 1, 2002, select type of nondestructive examination and indicate most recent year the examination was conducted:
 Radiography
/
/
/
/
/

 Guided Wave Ultrasonic
 Handheld Ultrasonic Tool
 Wet Magnetic Particle Test
 Dry Magnetic Particle Test
 Other __________________________

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/



Intentional Damage

8. Specify:



Other Outside Force Damage

9. Describe: _________________________________________________________

 Vandalism
 Terrorism
 Theft of transported commodity  Theft of equipment
 Other ________________________________________

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 16 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

Listed as "Material and Welds"
on current form.
Use this section to report material failures ONLY IF the “Item Involved in
Accident” (from PART C, Question 3) is “Pipe” or “Weld.”

G5 - Material Failure of Pipe or Weld

Only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column
1. The sub-cause selected below is based on the following: (select all that apply)

 Field Examination

 Determined by Metallurgical Analysis

 Other Analysis__________________________

 Sub-cause is Tentative or Suspected; Still Under Investigation


Construction-, Installation-, or
Fabrication-related



Original Manufacturing-related
(NOT girth weld or other welds
formed in the field)



Environmental Cracking-related

(Supplemental Report required)

2. List contributing factors: (select all that apply)
 Fatigue- or Vibration-related:
 Mechanically-induced prior to installation (such as during transport of pipe)
 Mechanical Vibration
 Pressure-related
 Thermal
 Other __________________________________
 Mechanical Stress
 Other __________________________________
3. Specify:  Stress Corrosion Cracking
 Sulfide Stress Cracking
 Hydrogen Stress Cracking
 Other ______________________________

Complete the following if any Material Failure of Pipe or Weld sub-cause is selected.
4. Additional factors: (select all that apply)  Dent  Gouge  Pipe Bend
 Lamination
 Buckle
 Wrinkle
 Misalignment
 Other __________________________________

 Arc Burn  Crack
 Burnt Steel

5. Has one or more internal inspection tool collected data at the point of the Accident?

 Lack of Fusion

 Yes  No

5.a If Yes, for each tool used, select type of internal inspection tool and indicate most recent year run:

 Magnetic Flux Leakage Tool
 Ultrasonic
 Geometry
 Caliper
 Crack
 Hard Spot
 Combination Tool
 Transverse Field/Triaxial
 Other __________________________

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

6. Has one or more hydrotest or other pressure test been conducted since original construction at the point of the Accident?
 Yes  Most recent year tested: / / / / /
Test pressure (psig): /
/
/,/
/
/
/

 No

7. Has one or more Direct Assessment been conducted on the pipeline segment?
 Yes, and an investigative dig was conducted at the point of the Accident

 Yes, but the point of the Accident was not identified as a dig site
 No




Most recent year conducted:

/

/

/

/

/

Most recent year conducted:

/

/

/

/

/

8. Has one or more non-destructive examination(s) been conducted at the point of the Accident since January 1, 2002?
 Yes  No
8.a If Yes, for each examination conducted since January 1, 2002, select type of non-destructive examination and indicate most recent
year the examination was conducted:

 Radiography
 Guided Wave Ultrasonic
 Handheld Ultrasonic Tool
 Wet Magnetic Particle Test
 Dry Magnetic Particle Test
 Other ________________________________

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

/
/
/
/
/
/

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 17 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

G6 - Equipment Failure - only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


Malfunction of Control/Relief
Equipment

1. Specify: (select all that apply)
 Control Valve
 Instrumentation
 SCADA
 Communications  Block Valve
 Check Valve
 Relief Valve
 Power Failure
 Stopple/Control Fitting
 ESD System Failure
 Other ________________________________________________________



Pump or Pump-related Equipment

2. Specify:  Seal/Packing Failure  Body Failure  Crack in Body
 Appurtenance Failure
 Other _________________________________________________________



Threaded Connection/Coupling
Failure

3. Specify:

 Pipe Nipple
 Valve Threads
 Mechanical Coupling
 Threaded Pipe Collar  Threaded Fitting
 Other ________________________________________________________



Non-threaded Connection Failure

4. Specify:

 O-Ring
 Gasket
 Seal (NOT pump seal) or Packing
 Other ________________________________________________________



Defective or Loose Tubing or Fitting



Failure of Equipment Body (except
Pump), Tank Plate, or other Material



Other Equipment Failure

Replaced "Seal Failure" on current liquid form.

5. Describe: ___________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

Complete the following if any Equipment Failure sub-cause is selected.
6. Additional factors that contributed to the equipment failure: (select all that apply)
 Excessive vibration

 Overpressurization
 No support or loss of support
 Manufacturing defect
 Loss of electricity
 Improper installation
 Mismatched items (different manufacturer for tubing and tubing fittings)
 Dissimilar metals
 Breakdown of soft goods due to compatibility issues with transported commodity
 Valve vault or valve can contributed to the release
 Alarm/status failure
 Misalignment
 Thermal stress
 Other _______________________________________________________

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 18 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

G7 - Incorrect Operation - only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


Damage by Operator or Operator’s
Contractor NOT Related to
Excavation and NOT due to
Motorized Vehicle/Equipment
Damage



Tank, Vessel, or Sump/Separator
Allowed or Caused to Overfill or
Overflow



Valve Left or Placed in Wrong
Position, but NOT Resulting in a
Tank, Vessel, or Sump/Separator
Overflow or Facility Overpressure

1. Specify:

 Valve misalignment
 Incorrect reference data/calculation
 Miscommunication
 Inadequate monitoring
 Other ____________________________________

 Pipeline or Equipment
Overpressured



Equipment Not Installed Properly



Wrong Equipment Specified or
Installed



Other Incorrect Operation

2. Describe: __________________________________________________

Complete the following if any Incorrect Operation sub-cause is selected.

Items 3-5.a are new; however, on the

3. Was this Accident related to: (select all that apply)
current form, "inadequate procedure" &
 Inadequate procedure
"failure to follow procedure" appear as a
 No procedure established
type of incorrect operation.
 Failure to follow procedure
 Other: ______________________________________________________
4. What category type was the activity that caused the Accident:
 Construction
 Commissioning
 Decommissioning
 Right-of-Way activities
 Routine maintenance
 Other maintenance
 Normal operating conditions
 Non-routine operating conditions (abnormal operations or emergencies)
5. Was the task(s) that led to the Accident identified as a covered task in your Operator Qualification Program?  Yes

 No

5.a If Yes, were the individuals performing the task(s) qualified for the task(s)?

 Yes, they were qualified for the task(s)
 No, but they were performing the task(s) under the direction and observation of a qualified individual
 No, they were not qualified for the task(s) nor were they performing the task(s) under the direction and observation of a
qualified individual

G8 – Other Accident Cause - only one sub-cause can be picked from shaded left-hand column


Miscellaneous



Unknown

1. Describe:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
2. Specify:

 Investigation complete, cause of Accident unknown
 Still under investigation, cause of Accident to be determined*
(*Supplemental Report required)

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 19 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted

PART H – NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCIDENT

(Attach additional sheets as necessary)

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PART I – PREPARER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

Signature section appears on the first
page on the current form.

Preparer's Name (type or print)

Preparer’s Telephone Number

Preparer's Title (type or print)

Preparer's E-mail Address
Authorized Signature

Preparer’s Facsimile Number
Date

Authorized Signature Telephone Number

Authorized Signature’s Name (type or print)
Authorized Signature’s E-mail Address

Authorized Signature’s Title (type or print)

Form PHMSA F 7000-1 (Rev. xx-2009 )

Page 20 of 20

Reproduction of this form is permitted


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleNOTICE: This report is required by 49 CFR Part 195
AuthorDebbie
File Modified2009-12-15
File Created2009-12-11

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy