Download:
pdf |
pdf1219-0082
Supporting Statement
30 CFR §77.1901 - Records of Preshift and Onshift Inspections of Slope and Shaft Areas.
(Pertains to slope and shaft sinking operations at coal mines.)
A. Justification
1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or
administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of
each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.
Section 103(h) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act), 30 U.S.C. §
813, authorizes MSHA to collect information necessary to carryout its duty in protecting
the safety and health of miners. The sinking of slopes and shafts is a particularly
hazardous operation where conditions change drastically in short periods of time.
Explosive methane and other harmful gases can be expected to infiltrate the work
environment at any time. The working environment is typically a confined area in close
proximity to moving equipment. Accordingly, 30 CFR 77.1901 requires operators to
conduct examinations of slope and shaft areas for hazardous conditions, including tests
for methane and oxygen deficiency, within 90 minutes before each shift, once during
each shift, and before and after blasting. The surface area surrounding each slope and
shaft is also required to be inspected for hazards.
The standard also requires that a record be kept of the results of the inspections. The
record includes a description of any hazardous condition found and the corrective
action taken to abate it. The record is necessary to ensure that the inspections and tests
are conducted in a timely fashion and that corrective action is taken when hazardous
conditions are identified, thereby ensuring a safe working environment for the slope
and shaft sinking employees. The record is maintained at the mine site for the duration
of the operation.
2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new
collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current
collection.
The records are used by slope and shaft supervisors and employees, State mine
inspectors, and Federal mine inspectors. The records show that the examinations and
tests were conducted and give insight into the hazardous conditions that have been
encountered and those that may be encountered. The records of inspections greatly
assist those who use them in making decisions that will ultimately affect the safety and
October 2009
1
1219-0082
health of slope and shaft sinking employees.
3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for
adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to
reduce burden.
No improved information technology has been identified that would reduce the
burden, however in order to comply with the Government Paperwork Elimination Act,
and 30 CFR 77.1901(f), mine operators may retain the records of preshift and onshift
inspections of slope and shaft areas in whatever method they choose, which may
include utilizing computer technology.
4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already
available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.
Generally, this information exists only as a result of the Federal requirement. Some
States have a similar requirement, however many do not. A universal system,
therefore, remains a necessity. Where States do require similar records, the application
of such records would satisfy MSHA requirements.
5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities (Item 5 of OMB
Form 83-I), describe any methods used to minimize burden.
This information collection does not have a significant impact on small businesses or
other small entities. However, MSHA has made available on our web-site various
sources of information such as our “Program Policy and Procedures Manual, Volume
V” and a power point presentation on our “Single Source Page for Health Standards”.
These provide tips and general information on various topics, including slopes and
shaft areas.
6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted
or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.
A reduction in the frequency of examinations and tests could allow unsafe conditions to
develop, jeopardizing the safety of the slope and shaft sinking employees. Section
101(a)(9) of the Mine Act prohibits any regulatory action that would reduce the
protection afforded miners by an existing standard.
7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a
manner:
October 2009
2
1219-0082
!
requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;
!
requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer
than 30 days after receipt of it;
!
requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;
!
requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract,
grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;
!
in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable
results that can be generalized to the universe of study;
!
requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved
by OMB;
!
that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in
statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are
consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other
agencies for compatible confidential use; or
!
requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information
unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's
confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.
In accordance with 30 CFR 77.1901 (a) and (f), records of preshift and onshift
inspections made of slope and shaft areas must be maintained for the duration of the
slope or shaft sinking operation. However, MSHA is not aware of any slope or shaft
sinking operation that has taken more than 3 years to complete. The collection of this
information is otherwise consistent with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5
8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the data and page number of publication in the Federal
Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information
collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that
notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address
comments received on cost and hour burden.
Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of
data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting
format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.
Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who
must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years -- even if the collection of information
activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in
a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.
October 2009
3
1219-0082
MSHA published a 60-day preclearance Federal Register notice on August 12, 2009
(Volume 74, Number 154, pages 40612-40613), soliciting public comments regarding the
extension of this information collection. One favorable comment from the United Mine
Workers of America supporting MSHA’s safety standards was received.
9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of
contractors or grantees.
MSHA does not provide payments or gifts to respondents.
10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance
in statute, regulation, or agency policy.
There are no records requiring confidentiality.
11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior
and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This
justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific
uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons form whom the information
is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.
There are no questions of a sensitive nature.
12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:
!
Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an
explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not
conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates.
Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour
burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or
complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the
variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual
business practices.
!
If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden
estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.
!
Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of
information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting
out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here.
Instead, this cost should be included in Item 13.
MSHA's records show that there are about 35 slope and shaft sinking operations
ongoing on coal mine property at any given time. The average coal mine works 220
October 2009
4
1219-0082
days per year and 1.54 shifts per day. Inspections are conducted prior to and during
each shift and before and after blasting which, when combined, take an average of 1
hour per shift to conduct and 15 minutes (0.25 hour) per shift to record. MSHA does
not track or record the length of time or the number of shifts worked in the completing
of a shaft or slope project. However, this estimate of burden hours conservatively
estimates that shaft or slope projects are consistent with the mining activities.
Inspections:
35 slopes and shafts x 220 days per
year x 1.54 shifts per day x 1 hour
= 11,858 hours
Recordkeeping:
35 slopes and shafts x 220 days per
year x 1.54 shifts per day x 0.25 hour
Total Hour Burden
= 2,965 hours
= 14,823 hours
Hour Burden Cost
Based on data from the U.S. Coal Mine Salaries, Wages, & Benefits - 2007 Survey
Results, MSHA estimates that the 2009 hourly wage rate for supervisory/professional/
technical employees at slope and shaft sinking operations at coal mines to be $75.02 per
hour, and $24.50 per hour for clerical. Accordingly, the hour burden cost is estimated to
be:
11,858 hours x $75.02 per hour
2,965 hours x $24.50 per hour
Total Hour Burden Cost
=
=
=
$889,587
$ 72,643
$962,230
13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from
the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)
!
The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost
component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and
maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account
costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information.
Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and
technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the
time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other
items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software;
monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.
!
If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens
October 2009
5
1219-0082
and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out
information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing
cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10),
utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or
regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information
collection, as appropriate.
!
Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions
thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with
requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to
provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual
business or private practices.
MSHA does not anticipate that shaft and slope sinking operators will incur any costs
other than those described in Item 12.
14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the
method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses
(such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have
been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from
Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.
Because the review of records of preshift and onshift inspections of slope and shaft
areas is just one aspect of the inspections required under Section 103(a) of the Mine Act,
MSHA believes that this burden is minimal and has assigned no federal cost burden for
this specific information collection.
15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reporting in Items 13 or 14 of the
OMB Form 83-I.
Presently, the coal industry is relatively stable and because of this the rate of
development of slopes and shafts has had no appreciable change. Therefore, there has
been no change in the number of Respondents, Responses, Hours, and Cost.
Respondents: Remains at 35
Responses: Remains at 11,858
Hours: Remains at 14,823
Cost: Remains at $0
16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation, and
publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule
October 2009
6
1219-0082
for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information,
completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.
MSHA has no plans to publish the information obtained through this information
collection.
17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information
collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.
There are no forms associated with this collection.
18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19, "Certification for
Paperwork Reduction Act Submission," of OMB 83-I.
There are no certification exceptions identified with this information collection.
October 2009
7
1219-0082
B.
Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods
The agency should be prepared to justify its decision not to use statistical methods in any case where
such methods might reduce burden or improve accuracy of results. When Item 17 on the Form OMB
83-I is checked "Yes," the following documentation should be included in the Supporting Statement to
the extent that it applies to the methods proposed:
1.
Describe (including a numerical estimate) the potential respondent universe and any sampling
or other respondent selection methods to be used. Data on the number of entities (e.g.,
establishments, State and local government units, households, or persons) in the universe covered by
the collection and in the corresponding sample are to be provided in tabular form for the universe as a
whole and for each of the strata in the proposed sample. Indicate expected response rates for the
collection as a whole. If the collection had been conducted previously, include the actual response
rate achieved during the last collection.
The collection of this information does not employ statistical methods.
2.
Describe the procedures for the collection of information including:
!
Statistical methodology for stratification and sample selection,
!
Estimation procedure,
!
Degree of accuracy needed for the purpose described in the justification,
!
Unusual problems requiring specialized sampling procedures, and
!
Any use of periodic (less frequently than annual) data collection cycles to reduce
burden.
3.
Describe methods to maximize response rates and to deal with issues of non-response. The
accuracy and reliability of information collected must be shown to be adequate for intended uses. For
collections based on sampling, a special justification must be provided for any collection that will not
yield "reliable" data that can be generalized to the universe studied.
4.
Describe any tests of procedures or methods to be undertaken. Testing is encouraged as an
effective means of refining collections of information to minimize burden and improve utility. Tests
must be approved if they call for answers to identical questions from 10 or more respondents. A
proposed test or set of tests may be submitted for approval separately or in combination with the main
collection of information.
5.
Provide the name and telephone number of individuals consulted on statistical aspects of the
design and the name of the agency unit, contractor(s), grantee(s), or other person(s) who will actually
collect and/or analyze the information for the agency.
October 2009
8
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | Supporting Statement |
File Modified | 2009-10-28 |
File Created | 2009-10-28 |