Certification and In-use Testing of Motor Vehicles: Revisions to Reduce Emissions of Greenhouse Gasses (Proposed Rule)

ICR 200910-2060-002

OMB: 2060-0104

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2009-09-17
ICR Details
2060-0104 200910-2060-002
Historical Inactive 200810-2060-008
EPA/OAR 0783.56
Certification and In-use Testing of Motor Vehicles: Revisions to Reduce Emissions of Greenhouse Gasses (Proposed Rule)
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Comment filed on proposed rule and continue 02/19/2010
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 10/01/2009
This information collection request is not approved at this time. The agency must resubmit this request at the time of final rulemaking, as required by 5 CFR 1320.11(h).
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
08/31/2012 08/31/2012 08/31/2012
1,926 0 1,926
645,259 0 645,259
19,713,085 0 19,713,085

The Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration are jointly proposing Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards changes designed to decrease emissions of greenhouse gasses (GHG). This ICR deals with EPA's portion of the proposal, which concerns EPA's motor vehicle and engine certification and in-use testing programs, covered by the ICR 0783 series. Note that only 33 of the 53 respondents covered by the Certification IC are affected by this proposal; the rest are exempted as small businesses. Small businesses are already excluded from the IUVP IC. None of the other ICs are affected.

US Code: 42 USC 7401 et seq Name of Law: Clean Air Act of 1990
  
None

2060-AP58 Proposed rulemaking 74 FR 49454 09/28/2009

No

Yes
Changing Regulations
No
The proposed rule has three information collection cost increases. First, there are new CO2 emissions standards and new compliance standards for nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions. The CO2 and CH4 standards will require no new testing, only the reporting of data available from the existing required EPA city and highway tests in a new format, whereas the N2O standard may require the addition of new analyzer equipment for some manufacturers. Second, the manufacturer's in-use vehicle program (IUVP) will add a highway test to the current FTP test requirements, so that the information will be available to test in-use compliance with the new standards. This proposal will also require that the selected vehicles be tested for compliance with the N2O standard, entailing possible associated capital costs to install N2O analyzers. Third, there will be new reporting and recordkeeping burdens. The largest of these will be startup costs for reprogramming computer systems to report the new information EPA requires in the necessary formats; this having been accomplished, reporting will be done within the existing Verify information system. New reporting elements include a GHG compliance plan, analogous to the pre-model year report already supplied to NHTSA; and averaging, banking and trading accounting, analogous to ABT in the current Tier 2 program, but with some unique, optional credit provisions. The "annual" costs to the federal government above includes startup costs.

$345,685
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
No
Uncollected
Lynn Sohacki 734 214-4851 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
10/01/2009


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy