Appendix L_IPV_Workplace_OMB_Package_10_21_07

Appendix L_IPV_Workplace_OMB_Package_10_21_07.doc

Program Effectiveness Evaluation of a Workplace Intervention for Intimate Partner Violence

Appendix L_IPV_Workplace_OMB_Package_10_21_07

OMB: 0920-0789

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf




Appendix L. Constructs included in Employee and Manager Surveys




Construct

Included in



Purpose of construct

Employee Survey

Manager Survey

Training

Manager Receipt of DV Training


  • Use as a grouping variable (trained vs. untrained managers; self-initiated vs. coerced training)

Manager Perceptions of Supervisor’s Support for Trainings


  • Potential use as an instrumental variable (if it is an independent predictor of likelihood of taking the DV training)

Manager Receipt of Other Trainings


  • Potential use as an instrumental variable (if it is an independent predictor of likelihood of taking the DV training)

Background

Demographics (gender, age, race, marital/intimate partner status, parental status, educational attainment)

  • Assess selection bias/sample representativeness

  • Assess comparability between manager and employee groups (and serve as control variables in outcome models to adjust for group differences)

  • Victimization substudy (predicting victimization)

Employment

Employment History/Stability

  • Assess comparability between manager and employee groups (and serve as control variables in outcome models to adjust for group differences)

  • Victimization substudy (examining impact of previous victimization on job stability)

Unit/Division

  • Assess selection bias/sample representativeness

Job type


  • Assess comparability between employee groups (and serve as control variables in outcome models to adjust for group differences)

Benefits


  • Assess comparability between employee groups (and serve as control variables in outcome models to adjust for group differences)

Job Retention

  • Baseline measures will be used to assess comparability between manager and employee groups (and serve as control variables in outcome models to adjust for group differences)

  • Follow-up measures will serve as outcome variables

  • Victimization substudy (consequences of victimization)

Absenteeism

  • Baseline measures will be used to assess comparability between manager and employee groups (and serve as control variables in outcome models to adjust for group differences)

  • Follow-up measures will serve as outcome variables

  • Victimization substudy (consequences of victimization)

Productivity/Presenteeism

  • Baseline measures will be used to assess comparability between manager and employee groups (and serve as control variables in outcome models to adjust for group differences)

  • Follow-up measures will serve as outcome variables

  • Victimization substudy (consequences of victimization)

  • Manager measures have potential use as an instrumental variable (if it is an independent predictor of likelihood of taking the DV training)

Employee-Manager Interaction

  • Both employee and manager measures have potential use as instrumental variables (both the extent to which a manager interacts with his/her employees and the extent to which a manager interacts with his/her supervisor could predict likelihood of taking the manager training)

  • Assess comparability between manager and employee groups (and serve as control variables in outcome models to adjust for group differences)

Perceptions of Manager Interest in Personal Life

  • Baseline measure will be used to assess comparability between manager and employee groups (and serve as control variables in outcome models to adjust for group differences)

  • Follow-up measure will serve as an intermediate outcome

Approval and Compliance with Manager’s Supervisor


  • Potential use as an instrumental variable (if it is an independent predictor of likelihood of taking the DV training)

Manager Interaction and Similarity to Employees


  • Potential use as an instrumental variable (if it is an independent predictor of likelihood of taking the DV training)

Manager Stress and Workload


  • Potential use as an instrumental variable (if it is an independent predictor of likelihood of taking the DV training)

Health

Health-Related Quality of Life

  • Baseline measures will be used to assess comparability between manager and employee groups (and serve as control variables in outcome models to adjust for group differences)

  • Follow-up measures will serve as outcome variables

  • Victimization substudy (consequences of victimization)

Health Care Utilization

  • Baseline measures will be used to assess comparability between manager and employee groups (and serve as control variables in outcome models to adjust for group differences)

  • Follow-up measures will serve as outcome variables

  • Victimization substudy (consequences of victimization)

Experiences

IPV Victimization

  • Baseline measures will be used to assess comparability between manager and employee groups (and serve as control variables in outcome models to adjust for group differences)

  • Follow-up measures will serve as outcome variables

  • Victimization substudy (identification of victims)

Perceived Impact of Victimization on Work


  • Victimization substudy (consequences of victimization)

Utilization of Company DV Resources

  • Follow-up measures will serve as intermediate outcomes

  • Victimization substudy (resource utilization among victims)

Satisfaction with Company DV Resources

  • Victimization substudy (resource utilization among victims)

Hypothetical Use of Company DV Resources

  • Follow-up measures will serve as intermediate outcomes

Domestic Violence and the Workplace

Awareness of Company DV Program

  • Follow-up measures will serve as intermediate outcomes


Attitudes toward Domestic Violence as a Workplace Issue

  • Follow-up measures will serve as intermediate outcomes


Perception of manager’s attitudes toward domestic violence as a workplace issue

  • Follow-up measures will serve as intermediate outcomes


Relative Importance of Domestic Violence as a Workplace Issue


  • Follow-up measures will serve as intermediate outcomes


Knowledge of DV and the Company’s DV Program


  • Follow-up measures will serve as intermediate outcomes


Confidence in Responding to DV


  • Follow-up measures will serve as intermediate outcomes


Employee DV Referrals


  • Follow-up measures will serve as intermediate outcomes


Satisfaction with Resources Used


  • Follow-up measures will serve as intermediate outcomes




File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleAppendix A
Authortmckay
Last Modified Byfmc7
File Modified2007-10-30
File Created2007-10-30

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy