Eval Tables

sos report_aseltine_sept2002 eval tables.doc

An Outcome Evaluation of the SOS Signs of Suicide Prevention Program

Eval Tables

OMB: 0720-0047

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Table 1. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PROGRAM SCHOOLS (N = 1006)





DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION


Mean school enrollment


924







School type


Percent


Public


85


Private (day)


13


Boarding


2







Locale


Percent


Urban


27


Suburban


33


Rural


41







Racial composition:


Percent


White


64


Black


12


Hispanic


10


Asian


3


Native American


2







Percent qualifying for free/reduced price lunch


31



Table 2. OVERVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION (N = 376)





IMPLEMENTATION



Which students saw video/completed

screening forms?

Video

Screening

Entire student body

21%

19%

Only certain classes or grades

79

81

Total

100

100





Settings in which video viewed/screenings

completed:



Classroom

79%

78%

Special Assembly

10

9

Nurse/counselor’s office

2

5

Other

7

6

Total

100

100


Table 3. RATINGS OF AND REACTIONS TO THE SOS PROGRAM (N = 376)




MATERIALS:


M


SD

% Very or Somewhat Effective

Student Screening form

3.33

.74

88

Student scoring and interpretation sheet

3.41

.69

91

Videotape

3.74

.51

98

Video discussion guide

3.45

.64

93

Parent version of the screening form

3.04

.85

89

Educational materials

3.63

.52

98

Color posters

3.45

.66

93

Usefulness of Procedure Manual*

3.62

.56

96





RATING ASPECTS OF “FRIENDS FOR LIFE: PREVENTING TEEN SUICIDE” VIDEO:


M


SD


% Excellent or Good

Real life stories about suicide and depression

3.76

.50

97

Commentary by professionals

3.53

.61

94

Dramatizations

3.29

.75

85

Overall quality

3.56

.58

96






REACTIONS TO PROGRAM:


M


SD

% Very or Somewhat Positive

Reactions of teachers and staff

4.46

.74

90

Reactions of students

4.19

.75

87

Reactions of parents

3.73

.81

59


*Note: Number in column 3 is percent rating Procedure Manual as “very or somewhat useful.”


M = Mean

SD = Standard deviation

Table 4. INDICATIONS OF PROGRAM EFFICACY: NUMBERS OF STUDENTS SEEKING COUNSELING 1 MONTH FOLLOWING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM (N = 233)



30 Days Following Program

Average Per Month Over Past Year

Percent increase in help-seeking

Average number of students seeking counseling for depression/suicidality

9.59

3.91

+145

% female

.71

.71

--

% accompanied by friend

.19

.21

--


Average number of students seeking counseling on behalf of friend

3.79

2.25

+68

% female

.81

.71

--






M

SE

95% Conf Interval


DIFFERENCE (PAST YR —> 30 DAYS) – SELF

5.68

.68

4.33, 7.02


DIFFERENCE (PAST YR —> 30 DAYS) – FRIEND

1.55

.28

.99, 2.10




M = Mean

SE = Standard error

Table 5. EVALUATING COSTS AND BENEFITS OF THE PROGRAM: 1 MONTH POSTSCREEN (N = 233)



PROGRAM EFFICACY:


M


SD

% Somewhat or Very True

Increased help-seeking

2.93

.93

75

Increased help-seeking on behalf of friends

2.89

.88

73

Improved communication:




Among students

3.54

.50

98

Between students and parents

2.93

.76

76

Between students and school personnel

3.40

.70

94

Brought students in need to school’s attention

3.29

.72

90






BURDEN:


M


SD

% Somewhat or Very True

Created difficulties because of large numbers of students seeking help

1.50

.79

11

Took too much time

1.72

.82

18

Resistance from administrators

1.35

.76

10

Teachers supportive

3.51

.66

95






SAFETY:


M


SD

% Somewhat or Very True

Program had an adverse effect on depressed youth

1.21

.46

1







OVERALL EVALUATION:


M


SD

% Somewhat or Very Helpful

How helpful overall for students?

3.49

.66

92


M = Mean

SD = Standard deviation

Table 6. EVALUATING COSTS AND BENEFITS OF THE PROGRAM : 3 MONTH POSTSCREEN (N = 177)


PANEL A.


PROGRAM EFFICACY:


M


SD

% Somewhat or Very True

Increased help-seeking

2.86

.90

73

Increased help-seeking on behalf of friends

2.86

.81

72

Improved communication:




Among students

3.37

.66

94

Between students and parents

2.75

.70

69

Between students and school personnel

3.31

.63

93

Brought students in need to school’s attention

3.32

.75

88






SAFETY:


M


SD

% Somewhat or Very True

Program had an adverse effect on depressed youth

1.30

.52

<2







OVERALL EVALUATION:


M


SD

% Somewhat or Very Helpful

How helpful overall for students?

3.43

.70

89



PANEL B.


M

SE

95% Conf Interval

Average number of students seeking counseling for depression/suicidality (3 MONTHS)

9.74

1.19

7.36, 12.12

Average number of students seeking counseling on behalf of friend (3 MONTHS)

2.78

.50

1.78, 3.78


M = Mean

SD = Standard deviation

SE = Standard error

Table 7. LEVELS OF DEPRESSION AND SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR BY GRADE, RACE, AND SEX (N = 35,651).





% DEPRESSED

%

THOUGHT ABOUT SUICIDE / EVER

% ATTEMPTED SUICIDE / PAST YR

% ATTEMPTED SUICIDE / EVER

OVERALL

14.8

16.9

5.0

10.7


GRADE





8th

9.3

12.4

3.6

6.8

9th

13.7

16.6

5.4

10.3

10th

15.5

17.8

5.4

11.4

11th

16.1

17.3

4.7

11.2

12th

16.1

15.7

3.7

10.6


RACE





WHITE

14.8

16.2

4.3

9.7

BLACK

11.5

15.0

4.5

9.6

HISPANIC

14.1

17.6

6.5

12.9

ASIAN

12.1

13.9

5.0

9.4

AMER INDIAN

21.9

29.1

14.1

23.9

MULTIRACIAL

20.5

23.6

8.6

17.3

OTHER

18.2

21.0

7.6

15.0


SEX





FEMALE

19.2

21.0

6.8

14.4

MALE

10.0

12.2

3.1

6.7








Table 8. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ALCOHOL USE AND SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR. (N = 35,651)






%

THOUGHT ABOUT SUICIDE / EVER

% ATTEMPTED SUICIDE / PAST YR

% ATTEMPTED SUICIDE / EVER

HEAVY ALCOHOL USE/PAST YR




NO

12.9

3.3

10.6

YES

26.3

9.0

45.1





DRINKING WHEN DOWN/PAST YR




NO

12.8

3.2

7.6

YES

45.3

18.2

32.9


File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleTable 1
AuthorRobert Aseltine
Last Modified ByLBUCHANAN
File Modified2011-02-02
File Created2011-02-02

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy