Table 1. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PROGRAM SCHOOLS (N = 1006)
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION |
|
Mean school enrollment |
924 |
|
|
School type |
Percent |
Public |
85 |
Private (day) |
13 |
Boarding |
2 |
|
|
Locale |
Percent |
Urban |
27 |
Suburban |
33 |
Rural |
41 |
|
|
Racial composition: |
Percent |
White |
64 |
Black |
12 |
Hispanic |
10 |
Asian |
3 |
Native American |
2 |
|
|
Percent qualifying for free/reduced price lunch |
31 |
Table 2. OVERVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION (N = 376)
IMPLEMENTATION |
|
|
Which students saw video/completed screening forms? |
Video |
Screening |
Entire student body |
21% |
19% |
Only certain classes or grades |
79 |
81 |
Total |
100 |
100 |
|
|
|
Settings in which video viewed/screenings completed: |
|
|
Classroom |
79% |
78% |
Special Assembly |
10 |
9 |
Nurse/counselor’s office |
2 |
5 |
Other |
7 |
6 |
Total |
100 |
100 |
Table 3. RATINGS OF AND REACTIONS TO THE SOS PROGRAM (N = 376)
MATERIALS: |
M |
SD |
% Very or Somewhat Effective |
Student Screening form |
3.33 |
.74 |
88 |
Student scoring and interpretation sheet |
3.41 |
.69 |
91 |
Videotape |
3.74 |
.51 |
98 |
Video discussion guide |
3.45 |
.64 |
93 |
Parent version of the screening form |
3.04 |
.85 |
89 |
Educational materials |
3.63 |
.52 |
98 |
Color posters |
3.45 |
.66 |
93 |
Usefulness of Procedure Manual* |
3.62 |
.56 |
96 |
|
|
|
|
RATING ASPECTS OF “FRIENDS FOR LIFE: PREVENTING TEEN SUICIDE” VIDEO: |
M |
SD |
% Excellent or Good |
Real life stories about suicide and depression |
3.76 |
.50 |
97 |
Commentary by professionals |
3.53 |
.61 |
94 |
Dramatizations |
3.29 |
.75 |
85 |
Overall quality |
3.56 |
.58 |
96 |
|
|
|
|
REACTIONS TO PROGRAM: |
M |
SD |
% Very or Somewhat Positive |
Reactions of teachers and staff |
4.46 |
.74 |
90 |
Reactions of students |
4.19 |
.75 |
87 |
Reactions of parents |
3.73 |
.81 |
59 |
*Note: Number in column 3 is percent rating Procedure Manual as “very or somewhat useful.”
M = Mean
SD = Standard deviation
Table 4. INDICATIONS OF PROGRAM EFFICACY: NUMBERS OF STUDENTS SEEKING COUNSELING 1 MONTH FOLLOWING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM (N = 233)
|
30 Days Following Program |
Average Per Month Over Past Year |
Percent increase in help-seeking |
||||
Average number of students seeking counseling for depression/suicidality |
9.59 |
3.91 |
+145 |
||||
– % female |
.71 |
.71 |
-- |
||||
– % accompanied by friend |
.19 |
.21 |
-- |
||||
|
|||||||
Average number of students seeking counseling on behalf of friend |
3.79 |
2.25 |
+68 |
||||
– % female |
.81 |
.71 |
-- |
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
M |
SE |
95% Conf Interval |
|
|||
DIFFERENCE (PAST YR —> 30 DAYS) – SELF |
5.68 |
.68 |
4.33, 7.02 |
|
|||
DIFFERENCE (PAST YR —> 30 DAYS) – FRIEND |
1.55 |
.28 |
.99, 2.10 |
|
M = Mean
SE = Standard error
Table 5. EVALUATING COSTS AND BENEFITS OF THE PROGRAM: 1 MONTH POSTSCREEN (N = 233)
PROGRAM EFFICACY: |
M |
SD |
% Somewhat or Very True |
Increased help-seeking |
2.93 |
.93 |
75 |
Increased help-seeking on behalf of friends |
2.89 |
.88 |
73 |
Improved communication: |
|
|
|
Among students |
3.54 |
.50 |
98 |
Between students and parents |
2.93 |
.76 |
76 |
Between students and school personnel |
3.40 |
.70 |
94 |
Brought students in need to school’s attention |
3.29 |
.72 |
90 |
|
|
|
|
BURDEN: |
M |
SD |
% Somewhat or Very True |
Created difficulties because of large numbers of students seeking help |
1.50 |
.79 |
11 |
Took too much time |
1.72 |
.82 |
18 |
Resistance from administrators |
1.35 |
.76 |
10 |
Teachers supportive |
3.51 |
.66 |
95 |
|
|
|
|
SAFETY: |
M |
SD |
% Somewhat or Very True |
Program had an adverse effect on depressed youth |
1.21 |
.46 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
OVERALL EVALUATION: |
M |
SD |
% Somewhat or Very Helpful |
How helpful overall for students? |
3.49 |
.66 |
92 |
M = Mean
SD = Standard deviation
Table 6. EVALUATING COSTS AND BENEFITS OF THE PROGRAM : 3 MONTH POSTSCREEN (N = 177)
PANEL A.
PROGRAM EFFICACY: |
M |
SD |
% Somewhat or Very True |
Increased help-seeking |
2.86 |
.90 |
73 |
Increased help-seeking on behalf of friends |
2.86 |
.81 |
72 |
Improved communication: |
|
|
|
Among students |
3.37 |
.66 |
94 |
Between students and parents |
2.75 |
.70 |
69 |
Between students and school personnel |
3.31 |
.63 |
93 |
Brought students in need to school’s attention |
3.32 |
.75 |
88 |
|
|
|
|
SAFETY: |
M |
SD |
% Somewhat or Very True |
Program had an adverse effect on depressed youth |
1.30 |
.52 |
<2 |
|
|
|
|
OVERALL EVALUATION: |
M |
SD |
% Somewhat or Very Helpful |
How helpful overall for students? |
3.43 |
.70 |
89 |
PANEL B.
|
M |
SE |
95% Conf Interval |
Average number of students seeking counseling for depression/suicidality (3 MONTHS) |
9.74 |
1.19 |
7.36, 12.12 |
Average number of students seeking counseling on behalf of friend (3 MONTHS) |
2.78 |
.50 |
1.78, 3.78 |
M = Mean
SD = Standard deviation
SE = Standard error
Table 7. LEVELS OF DEPRESSION AND SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR BY GRADE, RACE, AND SEX (N = 35,651).
|
% DEPRESSED |
% THOUGHT ABOUT SUICIDE / EVER |
% ATTEMPTED SUICIDE / PAST YR |
% ATTEMPTED SUICIDE / EVER |
OVERALL |
14.8 |
16.9 |
5.0 |
10.7 |
|
||||
GRADE |
|
|
|
|
8th |
9.3 |
12.4 |
3.6 |
6.8 |
9th |
13.7 |
16.6 |
5.4 |
10.3 |
10th |
15.5 |
17.8 |
5.4 |
11.4 |
11th |
16.1 |
17.3 |
4.7 |
11.2 |
12th |
16.1 |
15.7 |
3.7 |
10.6 |
|
||||
RACE |
|
|
|
|
WHITE |
14.8 |
16.2 |
4.3 |
9.7 |
BLACK |
11.5 |
15.0 |
4.5 |
9.6 |
HISPANIC |
14.1 |
17.6 |
6.5 |
12.9 |
ASIAN |
12.1 |
13.9 |
5.0 |
9.4 |
AMER INDIAN |
21.9 |
29.1 |
14.1 |
23.9 |
MULTIRACIAL |
20.5 |
23.6 |
8.6 |
17.3 |
OTHER |
18.2 |
21.0 |
7.6 |
15.0 |
|
||||
SEX |
|
|
|
|
FEMALE |
19.2 |
21.0 |
6.8 |
14.4 |
MALE |
10.0 |
12.2 |
3.1 |
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 8. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ALCOHOL USE AND SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR. (N = 35,651)
|
% THOUGHT ABOUT SUICIDE / EVER |
% ATTEMPTED SUICIDE / PAST YR |
% ATTEMPTED SUICIDE / EVER |
HEAVY ALCOHOL USE/PAST YR |
|
|
|
NO |
12.9 |
3.3 |
10.6 |
YES |
26.3 |
9.0 |
45.1 |
|
|
|
|
DRINKING WHEN DOWN/PAST YR |
|
|
|
NO |
12.8 |
3.2 |
7.6 |
YES |
45.3 |
18.2 |
32.9 |
File Type | application/msword |
File Title | Table 1 |
Author | Robert Aseltine |
Last Modified By | LBUCHANAN |
File Modified | 2011-02-02 |
File Created | 2011-02-02 |