Attachment_B_60_Day_FRN_ADHD

Attachment_B_60_Day_FRN_ADHD.pdf

Longitudinal follow-up of Youth with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder identified in Community Settings: Examining Health Status, Correlates, and Effects associated with treatment for ADHD

Attachment_B_60_Day_FRN_ADHD

OMB: 0920-0747

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
48749

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 184 / Thursday, September 24, 2009 / Notices
Dated: September 21, 2009.
Sarah Glavin,
Project Clearance Liaison, NICHD, National
Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. E9–23125 Filed 9–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–0920–0747]

Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–5960 and
send comments to Maryam I. Daneshvar,
CDC Acting Reports Clearance Officer,
1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta,
GA 30333 or send an e-mail to
[email protected].
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
Longitudinal follow-up of Youth with
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
identified in Community Settings:
Examining Health Status, Correlates,
and Effects associated with treatment for
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
[OMB #0920–0747 exp. 7/31/1010]—
Revision—National Center on Birth
Defects and Developmental Disabilities
(NCBDDD), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
This project will collect data from
proxy respondents and youths with and
without ADHD. This program addresses
the Healthy People 2010 focus area of
Mental Health and Mental Disorders,
and describes the prevalence, incidence,
long-term outcomes, treatment(s), select
co-morbid conditions, secondary
conditions, and health risk behavior of
youth with ADHD relative to youth
without ADHD.
The National Center on Birth Defects
and Developmental Disabilities at CDC
promotes the health of children with
developmental disorders. As part of
these efforts, two contracts were
awarded in FY 2007–2010 to follow up
a sample of children originally enrolled
in community-based epidemiological

research on ADHD among elementaryaged youth, known as the Project to
Learn about ADHD in Youth (PLAY
Study Collaborative), which informed
community-based prevalence, rates of
comorbidity, and rates of health risk
behaviors among elementary-age youth
with and without ADHD as determined
by a rigorous case definition developed
by the principal investigators and in
collaboration with CDC scientists.
The purpose of the longitudinal
follow-up program is to study the longterm outcomes and health status for
children with Attention-Deficit/
Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
identified and treated in community
settings through a systematic follow-up
of the subjects who participated in the
PLAY Study Collaborative. There is a
considerable interest in the long-term
outcomes of youth with ADHD as well
as the effects of treatment, lack of
treatment, and quality of care in average
US communities, emphasizing the
public health importance of
longitudinal research in this area.
Given the lack of detailed information
about longitudinal development in
children with and without ADHD, there
is need to continue assessing the
children into older adolescence. This
program extends data collection for two
additional waves.
Minor changes to the assessment
instruments are planned in order to
include age appropriate assessment of
treatment and health risk behaviors in
older adolescents, such as
understanding motor vehicle operation
and dating behavior.
There are no costs to the respondents
other than their time.

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES

Survey instruments (by type of respondent)
Parent:
ADHD Communication and Knowledge ...................................................
ADHD Treatment, Cost, and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire ...............
ADHD Treatment Questionnaire ...............................................................
Brief Impairment Scale .............................................................................
Critical School Events (Middle School) ....................................................
Critical School Events (High School) .......................................................
Demographic Survey ................................................................................
Health Risk Behavior Survey (Middle School) 11–13 years ....................
Health Risk Behavior Survey High School, 14+ years ............................
Parent-Child Relationship Inventory .........................................................
Parents’ Mental Health Questionnaire ......................................................
Quarterly update form ..............................................................................
Social Isolation/Support ............................................................................
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) .......................................
Vanderbilt Parent Rating Scale ................................................................
Child:
Brief Sensation Seeking Scale .................................................................
Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships .............................................
Health Risk Behavior Survey (Middle School) 11–13 years ....................
Health Risk Behavior Survey (High School)14+ years ............................

VerDate Nov<24>2008

16:27 Sep 23, 2009

Jkt 217001

PO 00000

Frm 00041

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Number of
responses/
respondent

Avg. burden/
response in
hours

Total burden
(in hours)

190
190
190
190
37
153
190
37
153
190
178
190
178
190
190

1
1
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
2
2

10/60
10/60
7/60
4/60
4/60
4/60
5/60
18/60
22/60
15/60
5/60
1/60
2/60
3/60
10/60

32
32
67
13
5
20
16
14
71
48
15
10
6
19
63

190
153
37
153

1
1
1
1

1/60
10/60
30/60
45/60

3
26
19
115

E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM

24SEN1

48750

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 184 / Thursday, September 24, 2009 / Notices
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued
Avg. burden/
response in
hours

Total burden
(in hours)

MARSH—Self Description Questionnaire v I, 7–12 years .......................
MARSH—Self Description Questionnaire v II, 13–15 years ....................
MARSH—Self Description Questionnaire v III 16+ years ........................
Pediatric Quality of Life Child (8–12) .......................................................
Pediatric Quality of Life Teen (13+) .........................................................
Youth Demographic Survey, 16+ years ...................................................
Teacher:
Teacher Survey ........................................................................................

15
90
85
15
175
85

1
1
1
1
1
1

15/60
20/60
20/60
5/60
5/60
1/60

4
30
28
1
15
1

949

1

10/60

158

Total ...................................................................................................

1317

........................

........................

831

Dated: September 17, 2009.
Maryam I. Daneshvar,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9–23027 Filed 9–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day-09–09AC]

Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to [email protected]. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC or by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written
comments should be received within 30
days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Occupational Injuries and Illnesses
Among Emergency Medical Services
(EMS) Workers: A NEISS–Work
Telephone Interview Survey—New—
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES

Number of
responses/
respondent

Number of
respondents

Survey instruments (by type of respondent)

Background and Brief Description
Studies have reported that EMS
workers have higher rates of non-fatal

injuries and illnesses as compared to the
general worker population. As EMS
professionals are tasked with protecting
the health of the public and treating
urgent medical needs, it follows that
understanding and preventing injuries
and illnesses among EMS workers will
have a benefit reaching beyond the
workers to the general public.
As mandated in the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 (Pub.L
91–596), the mission of NIOSH is to
conduct research and investigations on
occupational safety and health. Related
to this mission, the purpose of this
project is to conduct research that will
provide a detailed description of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses
incurred by EMS workers. The project
will use two related data sources. The
first source is data abstracted from
medical records of EMS workers treated
in a nationally stratified sample of
emergency departments. These data are
routinely collected by the occupational
supplement to the National Electronic
Injury Surveillance System (NEISS–
Work). The second data source, for
which NIOSH is seeking OMB approval,
is responses to telephone interview
surveys of the injured and ill EMS
workers identified within NEISS–Work.
The proposed telephone interview
surveys will supplement NEISS–Work
data with an extensive description of
EMS worker injuries and illnesses,
including worker characteristics, injury
types, injury circumstances, injury
outcomes, and use of personal
protective equipment. Previous reports
describing occupational injuries and
illnesses to EMS workers provide
limited details on specific regions or
sub-segments of the population. As
compared to these earlier studies, the

scope of the telephone interview data
will be broader as it includes sampled
cases nationwide and has no limitations
in regards to type of employment (i.e.,
volunteer versus career). Results from
the telephone interviews will be
weighted and reported as national
estimates.
The sample size for the telephone
interview survey is estimated to be
approximately 175 EMS workers
annually for the proposed four year
duration of the study. This estimate is
based on the number of EMS workers
identified in previous years of NEISS–
Work data and a 50% response rate that
is comparable to the rate of previously
conducted National Electronic Injury
Surveillance System telephone
interview studies. Each telephone
interview will take approximately 20
minutes to complete, resulting in an
annualized burden estimate of 58 hours.
This project is a collaborative effort
between the Division of Safety Research
in the NIOSH and the Office of
Emergency Medical Services in the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration. Both agencies have a
strong interest in improving
surveillance of EMS worker injuries and
illnesses to provide the information
necessary for effectively targeting and
implementing prevention efforts and,
consequently, reducing occupational
injuries and illnesses among EMS
workers.
There is no cost to respondents other
than their time. The total estimated
annualized burden hours are 58.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours

Number of
respondents

Type of respondents

EMS workers ...............................................................................................................................

VerDate Nov<24>2008

16:27 Sep 23, 2009

Jkt 217001

PO 00000

Frm 00042

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM

175

24SEN1

Number of responses per
respondent
1

Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
20/60


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleDocument
SubjectExtracted Pages
AuthorU.S. Government Printing Office
File Modified2009-12-05
File Created2009-12-05

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy