30 Day FR Notice

29568

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices

respondent to complete the survey the
total burden is 9,600 respondents x 5
minutes = 48,000 minutes, or 800 hours
per year.
Title: Aviation Security Customer
Satisfaction Performance Measurement
Passenger Survey.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
OMB Control Number: 1652–0013.
Forms(s): Aviation Security Customer
Satisfaction Performance Measurement
Passenger Survey.
Affected Public: Airline Travelers.
Abstract: This airport survey
represents an important part of TSA’s
efforts to collect data on customer
satisfaction with TSA’s aviation security
procedures.
Number of Respondents: 9,600.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An
estimated 800 hours annually.
Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on May 20,
2010.
Joanna Johnson,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2010–12603 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Extension of Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review:
Aircraft Operator Security

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1

AGENCY: Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 30-day notice.
SUMMARY: This notice announces that
the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) has forwarded the
Information Collection Request (ICR),
OMB control number 1652–0003,
abstracted below to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval of an extension of
the currently approved collection under
the Paperwork Reduction Act. The ICR
describes the nature of the information
collection and its expected burden. TSA
published a Federal Register notice,
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments, of the following collection of
information on March 16, 2010. 75 FR
12559. The collection requires aircraft
operators to adopt and implement a
TSA-approved security program. These
programs require aircraft operators to
maintain and update records to ensure
compliance with security provisions
outlined in 49 CFR part 1544.
DATES: Send your comments by June 25,
2010. A comment to OMB is most

VerDate Mar<15>2010

15:16 May 25, 2010

Jkt 220001

effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to Desk Officer, Department of
Homeland Security/TSA, and sent via
electronic mail to
[email protected] or faxed
to (202) 395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joanna Johnson, TSA Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) Officer, Office of
Information Technology (OIT), TSA–11,
Transportation Security Administration,
601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA
20598–6011; telephone (571) 227–3651;
e-mail [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation is
available at http://www.reginfo.gov.
Therefore, in preparation for OMB
review and approval of the following
information collection, TSA is soliciting
comments to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Information Collection Requirement
1652–0003; Security Programs for
Aircraft Operators, 49 CFR part 1544.
TSA is seeking to renew its OMB
control number, 1652–0003, Aircraft
Operator Security. TSA uses the
information collected to determine
compliance with 49 CFR part 1544 and
to ensure the freedom of movement for
people and commerce by monitoring
aircraft operator security procedures.
TSA has implemented aircraft operator
security standards at 49 CFR part 1544
to require all aircraft operators to which

PO 00000

Frm 00062

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

this part applies to adopt and
implement a security program. These
TSA-approved security programs
establish procedures that aircraft
operators must carry out to protect
persons and property traveling on
flights provided by the aircraft operator
against acts of criminal violence, aircraft
piracy, and the introduction of
explosives, incendiaries, or weapons
aboard an aircraft.
This information collection is
mandatory for aircraft operators. As part
of their security programs, affected
aircraft operators are required to
maintain and update, as necessary,
records of compliance with the security
program provisions set forth in 49 CFR
part 1544, including compliance with
applicable Security Directives. This
regulation also requires affected aircraft
operators to make their security
programs and associated records
available for inspection and copying by
TSA to ensure transportation security
and regulatory compliance.
The information TSA collects
includes identifying information on
aircraft operators’ flight crews and
passengers. The requirement
encompasses vetting of the entire flight
crew, other aircraft operator personnel,
and all passengers. The passenger watch
list checks currently conducted by
aircraft operators will soon be taken
over by TSA’s Secure Flight program.
Under this program, TSA will conduct
the checks for the aircraft operators,
which will reduce their burden as
described in this ICR. (See OMB control
number 1652–0046).
Aircraft operators are required to
provide this information via electronic
means. Aircraft operators with limited
electronic systems may need to modify
their current systems or generate a new
computer system in order to submit the
requested information but are not
restricted to these means.
Part 1544 also requires aircraft
operators to ensure that flight crew
members and employees with
unescorted access authority or who
perform screening, checked baggage, or
cargo functions submit to and receive a
criminal history records check (CHRC).
As part of the CHRC process, the
individual must provide identifying
information, including fingerprints.
Additionally, aircraft operators must
maintain these records and make them
available to TSA for inspection and
copying upon request.
Part 1544 also governs recordkeeping
requirements for aircraft operators
holding a full All-Cargo Standard
Security Program; however, their hour
burden has been separately reported
under OMB control number 1652–0040.

E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM

26MYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices
Title: Aircraft Operator Security.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
OMB Control Number: 1652–0003.
Forms(s): N/A.
Affected Public: Aircraft Operators.
Abstract: 49 CFR part 1544 requires
aircraft operators to maintain, update,
and comply with TSA-approved
comprehensive security programs to
ensure the freedom of movement for
people and commerce by monitoring
aircraft operator security procedures.
These programs and related records are
subject to TSA inspection.
Number of Respondents: 796.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An
estimated 1,841,130 hours annually.
Issued in Arlington, Virginia on May 20,
2010.
Joanna Johnson,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2010–12609 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0262]

Certificate of Alternative Compliance
for the Offshore Supply Vessel
JANSON R. GRAHAM
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice.

AGENCY:
ACTION:

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces
that a Certificate of Alternative
Compliance was issued for the offshore
supply vessel JANSON R. GRAHAM as
required by 33 U.S.C. 1605(c) and 33
CFR 81.18.
DATES: The Certificate of Alternative
Compliance was issued on March 31,
2010.

The docket for this notice is
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility (M–30),
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet by going
to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0262 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
LTJG Christine Dimitroff, District Eight,
Prevention Branch, U.S. Coast Guard,
telephone 504–671–2176. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1

ADDRESSES:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

15:16 May 25, 2010

Jkt 220001

material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.

29569

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Federal Emergency Management
Agency

Background and Purpose

[Docket ID FEMA–2010–0031]

A Certificate of Alternative
Compliance, as allowed under Title 33,
Code of Federal Regulation, Parts 81 and
89, has been issued for the offshore
supply vessel JANSON R. GRAHAM,
O.N. 1222117. Full compliance with 72
COLREGS and Inland Rules Act would
hinder the vessel’s ability to maneuver
within close proximity of offshore
platforms. The forward masthead light
may be located on the top forward
portion of the pilothouse 6.2 meters
above the hull. Placing the forward
masthead light at the height required by
Annex I, paragraph 2(a) of the 72
COLREGS and Annex I, Section 84.03(a)
of the Inland rules Act would result in
a masthead light location highly
susceptible to damage when working in
close proximity to offshore platforms.
Additionally, the horizontal distance
between the forward and aft masthead
lights may be 2.489 meters. Placing the
aft masthead light at the horizontal
distance from the forward masthead
light as required by Annex I, paragraph
3(a) of the 72 COLREGS and Annex I,
Section 84.05(a) of the Inland Rules Act
would result in an aft masthead light
location directly over the aft cargo deck
where it would interfere with loading
and unloading operations.
The Certificate of Alternative
Compliance allows for the vertical
placement of the forward masthead light
to deviate from requirements set forth in
Annex I, paragraph 2(a) of 72 COLREGS
and Annex I, Section 84.03(a) of the
Inland Rules Act. In addition the
Certificate of Alternative Compliance
allows for the horizontal separation of
the forward and aft masthead lights to
deviate from the requirements of Annex
I, paragraph 3(a) of 72 COLREGS and
Annex I, Section 84.05(a) of the Inland
Rules Act.

Recovery Policy RP9526.1, Hazard
Mitigation Funding Under Section 406
(Stafford Act)

Dated: 15 April 2010.
J. W. Johnson,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Chief,
Inspections and Investigations Branch By
Direction of the Commander Eighth Coast
Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010–12602 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P

PO 00000

Frm 00063

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

AGENCY: Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
SUMMARY: This document provides
notice of the final Recovery Policy
RP9526.1, Hazard Mitigation Funding
Under Section 406 (Stafford Act), which
is being issued by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA).
DATES: This policy is effective March 30,
2010.
ADDRESSES: This final policy is available
online at http://www.regulations.gov
under docket ID FEMA–2010–0031 and
on FEMA’s Web site at http://
www.fema.gov. You may also view a
hard copy of the final policy at the
Office of Chief Counsel, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Room
835, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC
20472–3100.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lu
Juana Richardson, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, via e-mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
policy provides guidance on the
appropriate use of hazard mitigation
discretionary funding available under
Section 406 of the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act (Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C.
5172. This will ensure national
consistency in the use of Section 406
mitigation funds and promote measures
that reduce future loss to life and
property, protect the Federal investment
in public infrastructure and ultimately
help build disaster-resistant
communities.
FEMA has revised this policy to
reflect the alignment of benefit cost
analysis methodologies between the
Mitigation and Recovery Directorates. In
order to achieve consistency across
program areas and to maximize FEMA’s
ability to support and encourage costeffective hazard mitigation, the Public
Assistance Division has adopted the
Mitigation Directorate’s Benefit Cost
Analysis (BCA) methodology for Section
406 hazard mitigation projects.
Previously, the only benefits considered
in the BCA were damage to the facility

E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM

26MYN1