Evaluation of Response to Intervention Practices for Elementary School Reading (Site Recruitment)

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
Responses to OMB questions Evaluation RtI Practices 23 July 2010.docx	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-08-12	Available
201003-1850-006.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-08-12	Available
Appendix.1.Project.Description.IES.Evaluation.RtI.Practices 4.14.10.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-04-14	Available
Appendix.7.District.Letter.Adj.Comparison.IES.Evaluation.RtI.Practices 4.14.10.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-04-14	Available
Appendix.3.District.Letter.Mature.IES.Evaluation.RtI.Practices 4.14.10.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-04-14	Available
Appendix.2.Nominator.Letter.IES.Evaluation.RtI.Practices 4.14.10.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-04-14	Available
OMB Part B IES Evaluation RtI Practices.doc	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2010-03-30	Available
OMB Part A IES Evaluation RtI Practices.doc	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2010-03-30	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
192392	District Protocol for Obtaining District Information	Other-District Protocol for obtaining information	New
192391	Screening Call with Principals and District Nominated RtI Comparison Schools	Other-Phone Screening Checklist	New
192390	District Checklist	Other-District Checklist	New
192389	School-Level Screening Checklist and Mature School List	Other-Screening Checklist	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1850-0872	ICR Reference No: 201003-1850-006
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: ED/IES	Agency Tracking No: 4223
Title: Evaluation of Response to Intervention Practices for Elementary School Reading (Site Recruitment)
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 08/13/2010
	Date Received in OIRA: 04/20/2010
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	08/31/2013	36 Months From Approved
Responses	345	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	333	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The Evaluation of Response to Intervention (RtI) Practices for Elementary School Reading will inform the National Assessment of IDEA 2004, and the choices of districts and schools, by studying the implementation and impact of practices to identify and intervene early with struggling readers, and when needed, determine students’ eligibility for special education. The Department seeks clearance for the site recruitment materials. A subsequent OMB package will seek approval for instruments to collect data for an in-depth study of RtI design, implementation, and impact in sites operating mature RtI programs.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 108 - 446 664b Name of Law: Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	75 FR 5770	02/04/2010
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	75 FR 20581	04/20/2010
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 4

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
District Checklist
Screening Call with Principals and District Nominated RtI Comparison Schools
District Protocol for Obtaining District Information
School-Level Screening Checklist and Mature School List

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	345	0	0	345	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	333	0	0	333	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This is a new collection.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $983,662

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 04/20/2010

---