Increasing Adoption of Cost-effective Rollover Protective Structures (CROPS) by Farmers and Manufacturers

ICR 201004-0920-010

OMB: 0920-0854

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supplementary Document
2010-06-17
Supporting Statement B
2010-03-08
Supplementary Document
2010-03-08
Supplementary Document
2010-03-08
Supplementary Document
2010-03-08
Supplementary Document
2010-03-08
Supplementary Document
2010-03-08
Supplementary Document
2010-03-08
Supplementary Document
2010-03-08
Supplementary Document
2010-03-08
Supporting Statement A
2010-03-08
ICR Details
0920-0854 201004-0920-010
Historical Active
HHS/CDC
Increasing Adoption of Cost-effective Rollover Protective Structures (CROPS) by Farmers and Manufacturers
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Approved with change 06/21/2010
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 04/23/2010
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
06/30/2013 36 Months From Approved
800 0 0
753 0 0
0 0 0

Agricultural tractor overturn deaths have been identified as a problem since the 1920s, and today the leading cause of agricultural occupational deaths in the United States (Hard et al, 2002). The Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI), Bureau of Labor Statistics, most recent data indicate the agriculture, forestry and fishing sector had the third highest number of fatalities and the highest rate of fatalities workers of any industrial sector. The average rate is 3.6 deaths per 100,000 workers; approximately 200 per year, and 1/3 of all occupational fatalities in the agricultural production sector. The majority could have been prevented with the use of a rollover protective structure (ROPS), which have been proven to be an effective engineering intervention; cost-effective roll over protective structures (CROPS). Installing ROPS on retrofittable tractors would reduce rollovers fatalities by more than 80% and nonfatal injuries by about 53% (Myers & Pana-Cryan, 2000). However, barriers continue to exist preventing the large scale adoption of ROPS on tractors, such as financial (cost), and other influential barriers (Hallman, 2005). NIOSH surveillance has indicated there are 4.7 million tractors and 1.7 million in the US without ROPS. NIOSH has developed, designed and conducted testing for CROPS, but has yet to get it into the field (Owusu-Edusei & Biddle, 2007a; Owusu-Edusei & Biddle, 2007b; Owusu-Edusei, 2008). This exploratory research effort is to conduct a demonstration project of how to install the CROPS, identify barriers; adoption approaches to encourage retrofit of tractors with CROPS, utilizing stakeholder's input. With the assistance of state partners, the study population has been identified, from this group a subset of farmers will receive CROPS, install the CROPS and provide an initial assessment of their perception of the utility and value of the device and allow others to observe the retrofit process.

US Code: 29 USC 669 Name of Law: Occupational Safety and Health Act
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  74 FR 181 09/21/2009
75 FR 46 03/10/2010
Yes

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 800 0 0 800 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 753 0 0 753 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
This is a new data collection.

$72,662
Yes Part B of Supporting Statement
Yes
No
Uncollected
No
Uncollected
Thelma Sims 4046394771

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
04/23/2010


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy