0539_Att H1_National SECAP II Table Shells

0539_Att H1_National SECAP II Table Shells.doc

Estimating the Capacity for National and State-Level Colorectal Cancer Screening through a Survey of Endoscopic Capacity (SECAPII) formerly known as "National Survey of Endoscopic Capacity" (SECAP)

0539_Att H1_National SECAP II Table Shells

OMB: 0920-0539

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Attachment H1 – Table 1

Number of eligible facilities in the universe and sample, by region and urban/rural

Region

Urban

Rural

Total

Universe

Northeast




South




Midwest




West




Total




Sample

Northeast




South




Midwest




West




Total






Attachment H1 – Table 2

Surveys and response rate, by region and urban/rural


Urban

Rural

Total

Region




Northeast




South




Midwest




West




Total








Attachment H1 – Table 3

Percentage of all flexible sigmoidoscopies and colonoscopies performed,
by physician specialty, by facility type
(standard errors in parentheses)


ASC

Hospital

Physician Practice

Total

Flexible sigmoidoscopy

Gastroenterologist





Primary Care Provider





Internist





Family practitioner/ General practitioner





Surgeon





General surgeon





Colorectal surgeon





Non-physician endoscopist





Other





Total





Colonoscopy

Gastroenterologist





Primary Care Provider





Internist





Family practitioner/ General practitioner





Surgeon





General surgeon





Colorectal surgeon





Non-physician endoscopist





Other





Total







Attachment H1 – Table 4

Type of lower GI equipment owned, by region
(standard errors in parentheses)


Colonoscopes

Flexible sigmoidoscopes

Video monitors

Other

Mean per Facility

Northeast





South





Midwest





West





Total in Region

Northeast





South





Midwest





West






Attachment H1 – Table 5

Procedures currently being performed by urban/rural
(standard errors in parentheses)


Flexible Sigmoidoscopy

Colonoscopy


Urban

Rural

Urban

Rural

Percent of facilities that perform the procedure





Mean number of procedures performed per week per facility *





Percent of procedures performed for screening*





Percent of procedures that are incomplete*





Mean number of procedures possible per week per facility*





Number of facilities





*Among those facilities that perform the procedure


Attachment H1 – Table 6

Measures to address increased need for flexible sigmoidoscopy
and colonoscopy, by urban/rural
(standard errors in parentheses)


Flexible Sigmoidoscopy

Colonoscopy


Urban

Rural

Urban

Rural

Increase proportion of work day allocated to procedures





Modify block scheduling





Use patient navigators or reminder calls to decrease cancellations and “no shows”





Increase physician staff





Increase/hire non-physician endoscopists to perform procedures





Increase nursing staff to assist with procedures





Increase ancillary staff to help with room turnover





Increase staff or physicians to monitor the sedation or anesthesia





Establish a larger screening unit/more procedure rooms





Establish additional prep and/or recovery areas





Purchase or lease more equipment





Other





Not applicable, not planning to perform more procedures





Number of facilities







Attachment H1 – Table 7

Average room time typically scheduled for flexible sigmoidoscopy
and colonoscopy by facility type


Flexible Sigmoidoscopy*

Colonoscopy*


Mean

Standard error

Mean

Standard error

ASCs





Hospitals





Physician practices





*Among those facilities that perform the procedure



Attachment H1 – Table 8

Typical waiting time for various endoscopy procedures for State and the nation


Percent of facilities

Standard Error

Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy*

1-2 weeks



3-4 weeks



1 – 2 months



3 – 4 months



5 – 6 months



More than 6 months



Screening colonoscopy*

1-2 weeks



3-4 weeks



1 – 2 months



3 – 4 months



5 – 6 months



More than 6 months



Follow-up colonoscopy*

1-2 weeks



3-4 weeks



1 – 2 months



3 – 4 months



5 – 6 months



More than 6 months



* Among those facilities that perform procedure








Attachment H1 – Table 9

Estimated number of facilities that provide
endoscopies by region


Flexible

sigmoidoscopy

Colonoscopy

Any endoscopy

Region

Northeast




South




Midwest




West




Total







Attachment H1 – Table 10

Potential volume, current volume, and unused capacity for flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy, by region – annual number of procedures
(standard errors in parentheses)


Flexible Sigmoidoscopy

Colonoscopy

Potential Volume

Current Volume

Unused Capacity

Potential Volume

Current Volume

Unused Capacity

Region

Northeast













South













Midwest













West













Total

















File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleTable 2-1
AuthorBattelle
Last Modified ByManninen, Diane L
File Modified2009-11-25
File Created2009-11-25

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy