Comment filed on
proposed rule; agency to address comments at final rule stage.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
06/30/2011
36 Months From Approved
06/30/2011
74
0
74
120,102
0
120,102
0
0
0
The FERC Form No. 2 is a financial and
operating report for natural gas rate regulation for major pipeline
owners. Major is defined as companies having combined gas sold
for resale and gas transported or stored for a fee that exceeds 50
million Dth in each of the three previous calendar years. Under the
FERC Form No. 2, the Commission investigates, collects and records
data and prescribes rules and regulations concerning accounts,
records and memoranda as necessary to administer the Natural Gas
Act (NGA). The Commission is empowered to prescribe a system of
accounts for jurisdictional gas pipelines and after notice and
opportunity for hearing, may determine the accounts in which
particular outlays the receipts will be entered, charged or
credited.
The American Gas Association
(AGA) filed a petition for review in the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit arguing that the
Commission erred by not addressing the concerns raised by Chairman
Wellinghoff (then Commissioner) in his partial dissent to Order No
710-A. The court agreed and remanded the matter back to the
Commission for further proceedings. Following the courts remand,
AGA filed a motion requesting that the Commission issue a Notice
proposing revisions to FERC Form Nos. 2, 2-A and 3-Q, to add
additional details as initially proposed by AGA in the rulemaking
proceeding and that were the subject of Chairman Wellinghoffs
partial dissent. Comments in support of AGAs motion were filed by
Kansas Corporation Commission and by Independent Oil & Gas
Association of West Virginia, Inc. The information maintained and
collected under the requirements of Part 260 is essential to the
Commissions oversight duties. The data now reported in the forms
does not provide sufficient information to the Commission and the
public to permit an evaluation of the filers jurisdictional rates.
Since the triennial restatement of rates requirement was abolished
and pipelines are no longer required to submit this information,
the need for current and relevant data is greater than in the past.
The information collection proposed in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking would increase the forms usefulness to both the public
and the Commission. Without this information, it is difficult for
the Commission and the public to perform an assessment of pipeline
costs, and thereby help to ensure that rates are just and
reasonable.
$174,518
No
No
No
Uncollected
No
Uncollected
Brian Holmes 202
219-2618
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.