Research Plan for an Evaluation of the Section 202 Demonstration Planning Grant Program

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
202 DPG OMB 83-I.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-07-26	Available
Demonstration Planning Grant OMB Final 6.14.10 PartB.pdf	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2010-07-26	Available
Demonstration Planning Grant OMB Final 6.14.10 Part A.pdf	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2010-07-26	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
193939	Evaluation of the Section 202 Demonstration Planning Grant Program	Other-Telephone Survey	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 2528-0262	ICR Reference No: 201007-2528-003
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: HUD/PD&R	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Research Plan for an Evaluation of the Section 202 Demonstration Planning Grant Program
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 12/01/2010
	Date Received in OIRA: 08/04/2010
Terms of Clearance: HUD acknowledges the limitations of purposive sampling and that it will not be able to generalize the results of this study to the broader universe of Section 202 Demonstration Planning Grant Program recipients.

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	12/31/2013	36 Months From Approved
Responses	100	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	101	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: This request is for the clearance of semi-structured telephone interview survey instruments designed to collect information on the Demonstration Planning Grant (DPG) evaluation. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the DPG program to help sponsors start construction on Section 202 projects within the required 18-month time-frame. The survey component of the evaluation will solicit information from three groups: HUD field office staff that administer the Section 202 and DPG programs; recipients of DPG funds and non-recipients of DPG funds. Seventy (70) DPG recipients and 30 non-recipients will be surveyed. Although the overall study includes interviews of HUD field office staff OMB clearance is not required for that portion of the study. The research questions seek to understand the implementation of the DPG program from the perspectives of both Section 202 sponsors and HUD field office staff.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 91 - 609 84 Name of Law: Research & Development Programs
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking	75 FR 87	05/06/2010

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	75 FR 24963	05/06/2010
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	75 FR 46957	08/04/2010
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Evaluation of the Section 202 Demonstration Planning Grant Program

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	100	0	0	100	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	101	0	0	101	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This is a new collection.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $50,775

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 08/04/2010

---