2010 Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR)

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
2010 SDR OMB 83-I Form rev.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-09-08	Available
2010 SDR OMB Support Statement Attachment 3.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-09-08	Available
Attachment 7.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-09-08	Available
Changes in the 2010 SDR Questionnaire.docx	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-08-04	Available
Changes in the 2010 SDR Methodology.docx	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-08-04	Available
Proposed 2010 SDR Mailing Materials.docx	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-08-04	Available
NSF Act of 1950.docx	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-08-04	Available
Incentive Plans in the 2008 SESTAT Surveys Jan 27 2009.doc	Justification for No Material/Nonsubstantive Change	Uploaded 2009-02-02	Available
2010 SDR OMB Support Statementrev per OMB Part B.docx	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2010-09-08	Available
2010 SDR OMB Support Statementrev per OMB Part A.docx	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2010-09-08	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
32960	2006 Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR)	Other-Survey	Removed
194119	2010 Survey of Doctorate Recipients	Other-Survey	New
185031	2008 Survey of Doctorate Recipients	Other-Survey	Removed

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 3145-0020	ICR Reference No: 201008-3145-001
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 200902-3145-001
Agency/Subagency: NSF	Agency Tracking No:
Title: 2010 Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR)
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 09/09/2010
	Date Received in OIRA: 08/04/2010
Terms of Clearance: OMB looks forward to any proposal for incentives use to be forwarded timely and with adequate justifiation. In addition, OMB looks forward to a report about how SRS has addressed the recently discovered problems with its race and ethnicity tabulations from the SDR.

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	07/31/2013	36 Months From Approved	08/31/2011
Responses	35,600	0	70,610
Time Burden (Hours)	14,833	0	30,317
Cost Burden (Dollars)	1,677,472	0	0

---

Abstract: The data collected in this survey will enable NSF to partially fulfill the Congressional mandate to serve as a clearing house for information on the doctoral level scientific and technical population of the U.S. This information allows for policy and planning activities by officials of government, private industry and academic institutions.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 42 USC 1861 et seq. Name of Law: National Science Foundation Act of 1950
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	75 FR 8408	02/24/2010
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	75 FR 29366	05/25/2010
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
2010 Survey of Doctorate Recipients
2006 Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR)
2008 Survey of Doctorate Recipients

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	35,600	70,610	0	-35,010	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	14,833	30,317	0	-15,484	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	1,677,472	0	0	1,677,472	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Reduction Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Short Statement: The 2010 SDR will include a slightly larger sample size (from 42,600 in 2008 to 44,500 in 2010) to accommodate the additional subsample added to the ISDR panel. The change in burden hours from the 2008 SDR reflects the increase in the total SDR sample size.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? Uncollected

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 08/04/2010

---