FERC-725A, [RM09-25, Final Rule] Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Bulk-Power System

ICR 201012-1902-005

OMB: 1902-0244

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2011-01-07
Supplementary Document
2011-01-04
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
1902-0244 201012-1902-005
Historical Active 201011-1902-005
FERC FERC-725A
FERC-725A, [RM09-25, Final Rule] Mandatory Reliability Standards for the Bulk-Power System
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 02/24/2011
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 01/07/2011
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for 3 years. Upon resubmission, in the supporting statement burden change explanation, the agency should distinguish in the supporting statement burden changes specific to the rulemaking (here only 2,415 hours) against aggregate burden changes for the overall collection when periodic updates to the number of respondents drive the change(here 444,716 hours).
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
02/28/2014 36 Months From Approved 03/31/2013
1,940 0 1,439
1,728,581 0 1,281,450
126,725 0 134,766,955

FERC implemented the Electricity Modernization Act of 2005 which added a new section 215 to the Federal Power Act. FERC approved 83 of 107 proposed Reliability Standards, including six of the eight regional differences, and the Glossary of Terms Used in Reliability Standards as developed by the North American Electric Reliability Council, on behalf of its wholly-owned subsidiary, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). FERC certified NERC as the Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) responsible for developing and enforcing mandatory reliability standards. Bulk-Power System means facilities and control systems necessary for operating an interconnected electric energy transmission network and electric energy from generating facilities needed to maintain transmission system reliability. In Docket RM09-25-000 (Final Rule) the Commission approves two new Reliability Standards, PER-004-2 and PER-005-1 governing training. These standards replace currently effective Reliability Standards PER-002-0 and PER-004-1 approved by the Commission in Order No. 693. Rather than creating entirely new training requirements, the Reliability Standard PER-005-1 instead modifies and improves the existing Reliability Standards governing personnel training. This rulemaking does not impose entirely new burdens on the affected entities. For example, the currently effective training Reliability Standard, PER-002-0, requires transmission operators and balancing authorities to create training program objectives, develop a plan for the initial and continued training, and maintain training records. Similarly, approved training Reliability Standard, PER-005-1, which supersedes PER-002-0, requires transmission operators, balancing authorities and reliability coordinators to establish a training program (using a systematic approach to training), verify the trainee’s capabilities to perform task for which they receive training, and maintain training records. Accordingly, the recordkeeping requirements imposed by approved Reliability Standard PER-005-1, are more specific but not necessarily more expansive than previously effective Reliability Standard PER-002-0’s recordkeeping requirements. However, approved Reliability Standard PER-005-1 does enlarge the scope of the affected entities to include reliability coordinators. These recordkeeping requirements are necessary to ensure an effective training program is in place and occurring.

PL: Pub.L. 109 - 58 1211 Name of Law: Energy Policy Act
  
None

1902-AD76 Final or interim final rulemaking 75 FR 72664 11/26/2010

Yes

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
FERC-725A, Mandatory Reliability Standards for Bulk-Power System

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 1,940 1,439 0 0 501 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 1,728,581 1,281,450 0 2,415 444,716 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 126,725 134,766,955 0 0 -134,640,230 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
Personnel training is important to ensuring the reliability of the Bulk-Power System, as recognized in Order No. 693 and the Blackout Report. NERC states that the proposed Reliability Standards “are a significant improvement over the existing Reliability Standards” and recommends Commission approval of the standards as a “significant step in strengthening the quality of operator training programs as necessary for the reliability of the [B]ulk-[P]ower [S]ystem.” (NERC Petition at 5). In addition to increasing the burden (by 2,415 hrs.) due to the approved reliability standards, the Commission is also increasing the burden (by 444,716 hrs.) due to a reevaluation of the total number of respondents under FERC-725A. In Order 693, issued March 16, 2007, the Commission estimate 1,439 entities would have to comply. As of November 16, 2010, the NERC Registry included a total of 1,940 entities that are subject to FERC-725A. In this supporting statement, the Commission is also adjusting the burden in line with this new estimate of applicable entities. Finally, the Commission is also standardizing the manner in which it addresses the cost burden in ROCIS/Reginfo. Only those costs not associated with burden hours will be reported in ROCIS. In terms of this collection, it means only the costs for the record storage facilities will be reported in ROCIS/Reginfo. The supporting statement will continue to detail all the costs.

$484,087
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Daniel Phillips 2025026387 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
01/07/2011


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy