Weapons Safety Assessment, Volume 3

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PROTECTIVE DESIGN CENTER
TECHNICAL REPORT

WEAPONS SAFETY ASSESSMENT
Volume 3 of 5 – Review Criteria

Prepared for:
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION –
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR SECURITY AND INCIDENT
RESPONSE
Prepared by:
R. Ward & Associates, Inc.
When separated from Volumes 4 and 5 of the WSA, this volume is DECONTROLLED

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
DISCLAIMER
This information is furnished by the United States Government and is accepted and used by the
recipient with the express understanding that the United States Government makes no
warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability, usability,
or suitability for any particular purpose of the information and data contained in this document,
and the United States Government shall be under no liability whatsoever to any person by
reason of any use made thereof.
FORWARD
Submission of a weapons safety assessment (WSA) is one component of an application by a
licensee or certificate holder (hereafter referred to as “applicant”) to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) for combined enhanced weapons authority and preemption authority. Refer
to 10 CFR 73.181 and DG-50202 for complete details on the application process. Applicants for
stand-alone preemption authority are not required to complete a WSA.
Enhanced weapons, as defined in 10 CFR 73.23, means any short-barreled shotgun, shortbarreled rifle, or machine gun as defined in 27 CFR 478.114. Enhanced weapons do not include
destructive devices as defined at 18 U.S.C. 921(a) (4)5.
This report presents a WSA methodology acceptable to the NRC for an application for
combined enhanced weapons authority and preemption authority; however, it is not exclusive.
Other methodologies based on sound safety, scientific, and engineering principles are also
acceptable.
This report is presented in five volumes. The content of each volume is described below.
•

Volume 1: Template Instructions - This volume provides detailed instructions for
completing the WSA template presented in Volume 2: Template. Section numbering of
the explanations and instructions in this volume correspond to the section numbering of
the template to facilitate ease of navigation between the two volumes.

•

Volume 2: Template – This volume provides a template for information to be included in
the WSA for submittal to NRC.

1

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 73.18, “Authorization for Use of Enhanced
Weapons and Preemption of Firearms Laws” (Unclassified)
2
Draft Regulatory Guide (DG) -5020, “Applying for Enhanced Weapons Authority, Applying for
Preemption Authority, and Accomplishing Firearms Background Checks Under 10 CFR Part 73”
(Unclassified)
3
10 CFR 73.2, “Definitions” (Unclassified)
4
27 CFR Part 478, “Commerce in Firearms and Ammunition” (Unclassified)
5
Title 18 United States Code, Chapter 44, “Gun Control Act of 1968” (Unclassified)

ii

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
•

Volume 3: Review Criteria – This volume describes the criteria that NRC will use in
evaluation of a submitted WSA.

•

Volume 4: Reference Documents – This volume is a collection of digital files that can be
used by the applicant for additional information. The information pertains to weapons,
weapons maintenance, training, and range design and range safety.

•

Volume 5: Sample Template – This volume provides an example of a completed WSA
template for a fictitious site. This is a clarification tool and visual aid to the applicant.

Completion of the template should be accomplished by a team composed of members from
various elements of the applicant’s organization. Examples of elements outside of security and
what they can contribute are as follows:
•

Facility safety office personnel can provide information on chemicals and other
hazardous items on the site.

•

Facility emergency preparedness office personnel can provide information on the
surrounding community.

•

Facility engineering office personnel can provide drawings and maps as well as
construction details for structures containing risk items.

The applicant’s team should include at least one subject matter expert familiar with automatic
and large caliber firearm usage to assist with the selection, risk evaluation, documentation,
planning, training, and possible training range modifications for use of the enhanced weapons.
The information in this report has been determined to be Official Use Only – Security-Related
Information and is to be withheld from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.3901.
However, once site specific information has been placed in the template contained in Volume 2,
the applicant should mark, label, control, store, and transmit the document as safeguards
information or classified information, as appropriate. The applicant should determine, using
applicable guidance, the appropriate sensitivity level of the information and protect it
accordingly.

1

10 CFR 2.390, “Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests For Withholding” (Unclassified)

iii

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
Recent changes to 10CFR73.181 allow U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
licensee/certificate holders to obtain enhanced weapons for use as part of their physical
protection program with NRC approval. Part of the approval process is the submission for
review and approval of a weapons safety assessment (WSA), prepared by the
licensee/certificate holder, which must demonstrate that the use of enhanced weapons will not
cause undue risk considering the on-site and off-site conditions associated with the use of a
specific enhanced weapon system.
As defined in 10CFR73.22, enhanced weapons are weapons registered under the National
Firearms Act, e.g., machineguns, short-barreled shotguns, and short-barreled rifles.
PURPOSE
This volume provides guidance for reviewing an applicant’s WSA based on the template in
Volume 2 of this report.
SENSITIVITY OF INFORMATION
The information in this report has been determined to be Official Use Only – Security-Related
Information and is to be withheld from public disclosure under 10 CFR 2.3903.
Each entity completing a WSA must determine the sensitivity of the information, and protect
accordingly. Early in the WSA process it is recommended to utilize personnel who have been
designated as authorized to identify and mark sensitive unclassified and/or classified
information. When filled out, the template in Volume 2 may be Official Use Only – SecurityRelated Information, safeguards information, or classified information. The applicant should
mark, label, control, store, and transmit Volume 2 as appropriate for the level of
sensitivity/classification of the information.

1

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 73.18, “Authorization for Use of Enhanced
Weapons and Preemption of Firearms Laws” (Unclassified)
2
10 CFR 73.2, “Definitions” (Unclassified)
3
10 CFR 2.390, “Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests For Withholding” (Unclassified)

1

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
WSA REVIEW PROCESS OVERVIEW

The following outlines the WSA review process:
1. The reviewer should utilize three documents:
a. Volume 1: Template Instructions
b. Applicant’s submittal
maps/documentation)

package

(Volume

2:

Template

and

supporting

c. Volume 3: Review Criteria
2. Applicant submittals that are incomplete (i.e., missing information in the template or
supporting documentation, maps, training documentation, etc.) should be returned to the
licensee/certificate holders for completion. Any requests for information not found in the
application should be in the form of a request for additional information (RAI) to the
applicant.
3. For ease of internal tracking of the NRC review, the reviewer should save the Volume 3
Review Criteria as “WSA Vol 3-Facility Name”. (i.e. WSA Vol 3-Browns Ferry). The
filename appears in the footer. The new filename will not change immediately, but will
appear in the footer after a print preview.
4. There are 10 input fields in a summary worksheet in section 2-12 (Table 2-12.1) for the
reviewer to enter the assigned Hazard Ratings. The reviewer should fill out the general
review information in section 2-12 prior to beginning the review.
5. The Volume 2: Template generated Risk Levels are calculated entries used to alert the
applicant to a potential problem or issue. These risk levels are a first level indicator. The
written input associated with various items will, in many cases, lower the associated
“Risk Level”. The reviewer should base their evaluation on all of the information
provided by the applicant.
6. The reviewer should review all of the written input and create a list of additional
questions in the form of a RAI to the applicant, if necessary.
7. The reviewer analyzes the Risk Levels identified by the applicant. As the reviewer
evaluates the applicant’s input, they will evaluate the level of hazard this input poses to
the people, the applicant’s facility and/or the surrounding community and assign a
Hazard Rating to the evaluated input.
8. Completion of the review process is accomplished by totaling the assigned hazard levels
based on the applicant’s WSA submittal package and documenting recommendations.

2

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
9. A final review is performed by the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response and
a safety evaluation report is provided back to the applicant informing them of the results
of the WSA review.

At the beginning of the review take a moment to review the applicant’s input to Vol. 2, Section 211, and Item 52.
As an aid to the applicant and reviewers, certain input fields and sections will generate a risk
level indication. These Risk Level indicators will appear as both a colored numeric field (Green,
Yellow or Red) and a text field.
Risk Level

4

High

These Risk Levels are based on the applicant’s input choices and are explained in Section 2-8
of Volume 1: Template Instructions. Risk Levels should signal the applicant and reviewers
when additional explanation is necessary.
The reviewer should be aware of any “diluting” techniques the applicant may use to lower their
risk level. This may be accomplished by adding lower numbers to input choices that may not be
applicable; to dilute their overall score.
In this document, “Risk Level” will always pertain to an applicant’s input and “Hazard Rating” will
always pertain to the reviewer’s input.
The remainder of this volume provides the reviewer with information to consider when
determining hazard ratings for the items in the completed WSA submittal package.

3

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
2-1: GENERAL INFORMATION
Descriptor

Item
Number
1
Facility Name
2
Submittal Date
3
Physical Address
4
Is this a re-submittal for this facility and weapon?
5
City, State Zip
6
Facility Phone Number
7
Mailing Address
8
City, State, Zip
9
Mailing Address Phone Number
10
Applicant Point of Contact (POC)
11
Position Title of Applicant POC
12
Work Phone Number
13
Alternate Phone Number
14
POC’s E-Mail Address
15
Alternate POC
16
Position Title of Alternate POC
17
Work Phone Number
18
Alternate Phone Number
19
Alternate POC’s E-Mail Address
20
Applicant’s Plant Manager
21
Work phone no
22
Alternate phone no
23
Plant Manager’s E-Mail Address
Table 2-1.1 General Information Item List

Rated or Non-Rated
Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element

For this section the reviewer should:
1. Ensure that Items 1-3 and 5-23 are complete and accurate.
2. If Item 4 is YES, then ensure the reviewer has a copy of the previous submittal
package. The reviewer should pay attention to any Items in the previous
submittal package that were problem areas.
Reviewer scoring: None

Information for the reviewer to consider: None

4

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
2-2: DESIRED WEAPON FOR SUBMISSION
Item
Descriptor
Rated or Non-Rated
Number
Element
24
Select an enhanced weapon category
Rated Element
25
Identify the specific manufacturer, model, and
Non-Rated Element
caliber/gauge of the weapon desired
26
Enter the maximum range (meters)
Non-Rated Element
27
How many of the desired weapons are being requested?
Non-Rated Element
28
How many will normally be deployed?
Non-Rated Element
Table 2-2.1 Desired Weapon Item List
For this section the reviewer should:
1. Ensure that the weapon category matches the weapon desired. If the weapon
selection does not match the weapon category this may be cause to request
additional information from the applicant.
2. Ensure that only one weapon has been selected.
3. Examine the number of weapons requested (Item 27 & 28) and make sure it is
logical for the site. A stipulation may be required to acceptance of the application
to limit the number of weapons allowed.
Reviewer Scoring:
1. The reviewer will assign a Hazard Rating to Item 25, in Table 2-12.1. The rating
will be based on range and rate of fire. A suggested Hazard Rating table (Table 22.2) is provided on page 11.
Information for the reviewer to consider:
The applicant can only request one weapon for approval per form submitted. If the
applicant chooses a weapon not listed in Table A-1 in Appendix A, Volume 4, it is the
applicant’s responsibility to provide all like or similar information for evaluation.
If the reviewer does not have enough information on the weapon specified (Item 25) to
complete review of the WSA, the applicant should be requested to provide additional
information.
Different weapon types have varying characteristics including rate of fire per minute,
ammunition characteristics, and behavior of the weapon system during discharge.

Weapon System Pros and Cons:
5

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
Machine Guns:
As defined in 27CFR478.111, a machine gun is any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot,
or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading,
by a single function of the trigger. The term shall also include the frame or receiver of any such
weapon, any part designed and intended solely and exclusively, or combination of parts
designed and intended, for use in converting a weapon into a machine gun, and any
combination of parts from which a machine gun can be assembled if such parts are in the
possession or under the control of a person.
PROS
1. Highly effective against personnel or material targets.
2. Provides effective suppressive fire.
3. Excellent weapon for fixed firing positions
CONS
1. The first ten to twenty rounds fired from some of the larger machine guns in full
automatic mode allow the machine gunner to pull the “bullet trail” toward the
intended target and this may produce stray rounds.
2. These weapons have long effective ranges (800-1800 meters) and can pose
dangers to people and property far beyond this distance.
3. Most of these weapon systems can be used to patrol the property, but due to the
size, weight and firepower of some of the larger machine guns, they may be
better suited for fixed positions in this application.
4. Have the capability to cause extensive collateral damage.
5. Multiple rounds can penetrate barriers that would effectively stop a single round.
(See Volume 4: References, Appendix C: Ammunition Effects)
NOTE: Any weapon using .50 caliber ammunition should be considered extremely
dangerous. This ammunition is dangerous due to its extremely long range and ability to
penetrate most commonly constructed structures.

1

27 CFR Part 478, “Commerce in Firearms and Ammunition” (Unclassified)

6

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
Short Barreled Shotgun:
As defined in 27CFR478.11, a short-barreled shotgun is a shotgun having one or more barrels
less than 18 inches (457.2mm) in length, and any weapon made from a shotgun, whether by
alteration, modification, or otherwise, if such weapon as modified has an overall length of less
than 26 inches (660.4mm).
PROS
1. Effective against personnel at close range.
2. Provides effective suppressive fire.
3. Can fire multiple projectiles of various sizes.
CONS
1. These weapons are not meant for point targets.
2. These weapons have short effective ranges (50m-150m) depending on the type of
shot. It is not a desirable weapon for long distance engagements.
3. Relatively large and can have a heavy recoil.
4. The size and weight of the ammunition limits both the magazine capacity and the
amount of ammunition carried.
Short Barreled Rifles:
As defined in 27CFR478.11, a short-barreled rifle is a rifle having one or more barrels less than
16 inches (406.4mm) in length, and any weapon made from a rifle, whether by alteration,
modification, or otherwise, if such weapon, as modified, has an overall length of less than 26
inches (660.4mm).
PROS
1. Desirable weapon for short range situations, especially against targets wearing
body armor.
2. Lower threat to the community since most short barreled rifles use shorter range
ammunition. Excellent weapon for use inside a building with frangible ammunition.
The weapon can be used with minimal collateral property damage.
3. Desirable weapons for patrol or close quarters engagements.
CONS
1. Weapon may have a tendency to pull or lift when fired due in part to its weight.
This may increase the number of stray rounds.
2. Not a desirable weapon for long distance engagements.
3. Limited effectiveness against material targets.

Table 2-2.2 Suggested Weapon Hazard Ratings
7

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
Hazard Rating
0

Weapon Type
Weapon/s
Not used for this Rated Element

1

Short Barreled
Shotgun

2

Short Barreled
Rifle

3

Machine Gun

4

Crew served
Machine Guns

5

.50 cal and
other
Specialized
Weapons

HS-10
Mossberg 500
Remington
870MCS
Remington 11-87
XM-26 LSS
SCAR Mark 16
SCAR Mark 17
HK 416
HK G36

Colt Model 635
M249 SAW
M16A2
M16A4
HK 21E/23E
M240B

M2HB
M134 Dillon
Gatling (7.62mm)

The reviewer will determine a hazard rating based on the desired weapon system chosen by the
applicant. It is possible the weapon selected by the applicant will have characteristics from
more than one category of weapons (e.g., a short-barreled machine gun). If a selected weapon
falls into more than one type in Table 2-2.2, the hazard rating determined should be the higher
hazard rating (worst case) based on the characteristics. The reviewer should refer to Volume 4,
Appendix A for more information on the selected weapon system. Information in Appendix A is
not all inclusive due to the number of available weapons on the market and just represents a
sampling of the various types. The reviewer should research information on the internet or
8

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
other sources for the weapon being applied for if it is not in the appendix. One good source on
the internet to view is http://world.guns.ru.
The reviewer will evaluate Items 27 and 28 together. There is no correct answer for these
inputs; each facility may have differing needs for spare weapons on-site, maintenance cycles,
etc. The reviewer should be watching for anomalies in these two responses.
For example: If the applicant is applying for the M2HB .50 cal machine gun and plans to keep
one hundred of these systems on site with seventy five normally in use, this should raise a “red
flag” to the reviewer.
A reasonable answer to these inputs should help assure the reviewer that the applicant has
done due diligence in researching the selected weapon system for their needs.

2-3: Ammunition for Selected Weapon
Item
Number
29

Descriptor

Check all of the ammunition types below that are to be
used with this weapon.
Table 2-3.1 Ammunition for Selected Weapon Item List

Rated or Non-Rated
Element
Rated Element

For this section the reviewer should:
1. Evaluate the ammunition types the applicant plans to use with the selected
weapon system.
2. Examine intended weapon use to make sure it is logical. A stipulation may be
required for acceptance of the application to limit the ammunition types for the
requested weapons.
Reviewer Scoring:
1. The reviewer will assign a Hazard Rating to Item 29 in Table 2-12.1. The rating
will be based on maximum range and ability to penetrate risk items. In the case of
multiple ammunition types being selected, the reviewer should assign the highest
Hazard Rating from the selected Ammunition Types. A suggested Hazard Rating
table (Table 2-3.2) is provided on page 15.
Information for the reviewer to consider :
Other ammunitions can be used with some of the weapons listed but may require
modifications to the weapon system. The applicant should supply adequate information
on alternative ammunitions for the NRC to make an informed decision. If not, the
reviewer should request additional information from the applicant.
If the applicant has entered alternate ammunition in Item 29, the reviewer should first
decide if the ammunition is just a modification of the ammunition in the table; see
examples below:
9

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
•
•
•

Match Grade and Long Range Ammunition is the same ammunition manufactured
to higher standards to perform more consistently.
Vendor naming differences; ammunition vendors try to separate their product from
those of other vendors with innovative naming. Normally the cartridge size will
indicate what is really being sold.
Several weapons in Appendix A can use multiple ammunitions. Volume 4,
Appendix A, Table A-1 lists the most common ammunitions used with the weapon
systems.

Ammunition Types Description:
Ball Ammunition: This is the most common ammunition type. Generally this type of
ammunition will have the longest range of any of the types of ammunition.
Tracer Ammunition: This ammunition is normally used as an aid in training exercises.
Tracer ammunition is sometimes alternated with live ammunition (every 3 rd or 4 th round
in a magazine or belt) to allow the shooter better visibility of the shot. It does not have
the range of ball ammunition.
Frangible Ammunition: This ammunition is used to lessen the collateral damage of a
round. Frangible ammunition may stop an adversary but may not cause massive
damage to the surrounding equipment or structures. Frangible ammunition is designed
to completely fragment on impact with the target. This ammunition is sometimes called
‘no ricochet’, ‘reduced hazard ammunition’ or ‘the advanced energy transfer round’.
Frangible ammunition is being used in many areas as a lead-free alternative to ball
ammunition.
Frangible ammunition is typically used inside buildings or around
expensive equipment. It has a shorter range than ball ammunition.
Plastic Ammunition: This ammunition is used mostly for training purposes where the
firing range is too short for ball ammunition or the range is operating as a lead-free
facility. Plastic ammunition can be purchased in ball and tracer configurations. Plastic
ammunition is also used for riot control since it is considered less-lethal at the proper
distance. It has a much shorter range than ball ammunition.

10

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
Armor Piercing Ammunition: This ammunition is for use against material targets. It is
designed to penetrate materials that a normal ball round would not penetrate. If the
applicant plans to use armor piercing ammunition, special attention should be given to
analyzing potential structural damage (Fuel & Chemical Tanks, Generators, Hazardous
Material Storage cabinets, etc.). An armor piercing round may pass through wood or
concrete block walls depending on their construction.
Hollow Point Ammunition: This ammunition is designed to fragment on contact with a
human target. This fragmentation produces additional damage and bleeding. Due to the
shape of the round, hollow point ammunition tends to tumble in the air after traveling a
short distance. This tumbling has two effects:
1. The round is less accurate at long distances.
2. The round does not have the range of a ball round.
Shotgun Ammunition: This ammunition is primarily for use against personnel. There are
many types of shotgun ammunition available for various purposes. Most typical loads
intended for use against personnel contain buckshot or larger birdshot. Shotgun
ammunition containing slugs and other specialized materials are also effective against
personnel. The effective range for shotgun ammunition varies between 20 and 70
meters. Refer to Appendix B in Volume 4 for additional information.
Other: An additional input area for the applicant was left for any “Other” ammunition
types the applicant wants to use. These could be types like incendiary or Saboted Light
Armor Penetrator (SLAP). The applicant should supply adequate information on “Other”
ammunition types for the NRC to make an informed decision. If not, the NRC should
address additional questions to the applicant.
Hazard Rating
0
1

Ammunition Type
Not used for this Rated Element
Plastic, Frangible, Shotgun Birdshot and Buckshot
Rounds
2
Tracer
3
Hollow Point
4
Ball, Shotgun Slugs
5
Armor Piercing, Specialized Rounds
Table 2-3.2 Suggested Ammunition Type Hazard Ratings
The reviewer should refer to Vol. 4, Appendix A, Table A-1 and Appendix B and C for
appropriate ammunition for a weapon system and ammunition characteristics and
effects.

11

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010

2-4: WEAPONS DEPLOYMENT
Item
Number
30
31
32
33
34

Descriptor

Check all types of deployment for the weapon.
Additional description of weapon deployment …
Create Standard Range Cards.
ROWs discussion
Describe any pertinent training and describe the level of
training.
Table 2-4.1 Ammunition for Selected Weapon Item List

Rated or Non-Rated
Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Rated Element*

For this section the reviewer should:
1. Evaluate the types of deployment for the weapon.
2. Examine the description of the locations for the weapon deployment and the
range cards. A stipulation may be required for acceptance of the application to
limit the use of the requested weapons. Examine how the weapon will be carried,
either by individuals or roving patrol (e.g., “locked in a rack” or “loaded with unchambered round”, etc).
*Reviewer Scoring:
The reviewer will not assign a numerical rating to item 34. The applicant is given
weighted credit (risk reduction factors) for different levels of training in their
assessment of items 38 through 42. The average risk levels are calculated as a
mitigated risk level. Documentation for the training is a required submittal and
should be reviewed.
Information for the reviewer to consider:
Weapon System Uses:
Machine Guns, depending on model and style:
• Can be used as ROWS.
• Can be used from fixed positions.
• Can be used as a patrol weapon.
• Can be used inside facility buildings. (Frangible ammunition recommended.)
• Can be used in many situations and areas of the property.

12

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
Short Barreled Shotguns:
• Not normally used as a ROWS.
• Can be used from fixed positions.
• Can be used as a patrol weapon.
• Can be used inside facility buildings. (Frangible ammunition recommended.)
• Can be used in many situations and areas of the property.
Short Barreled Rifles:
• Not normally used as a ROWS.
• Can be used from fixed positions.
• Can be used as a patrol weapon.
• Can be used inside facility buildings. (Frangible ammunition recommended.)
• Can be used in many situations and areas of the property.
If the applicant checks the box “As a Remotely Operated Weapon System (ROWS) …” for Item
30, then Item 33 should provide additional information on ROWS use.
NOTE: Remotely Operated Weapon Systems (ROWS) should be thoroughly evaluated by the
reviewer. ROWS may be the appropriate system for the applicant’s situation, but the reviewer
should evaluate the ROWS from a weapons safety point of view. (i.e., Can the remote operator
see enough of the situation to make a valid fire/no fire decision? Can the operator see the
entire area surrounding the target?) ROWS are typically used in a limited area and not fired in
all directions and vertical planes (up, down, horizontal).
The best solution for limiting a weapon’s field of fire is to install a mechanical modification
(limiters) to the weapon that restricts the weapon movement to only its intended field of fire.
Another option is to put training and procedures in place to instruct the gunner about the
weapon’s proper field of fire.

13

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010

2-5: MAP INFORMATION
Item
Descriptor
Number
35
Provide any pertinent map comments or explanations:
Table 2-5.1 Map Information Item List

Rated or Non-Rated
Element
Non-Rated Element

For this section the reviewer should:
1. Review the maps and diagrams submitted by the applicant.
Reviewer Scoring: None
Information for the reviewer to consider :
The WSA guidance instructed the applicant to provide maps and facility drawings to
illustrate risk items and support risk mitigations. If the applicant has selected to use a
weapon from a fixed position/s, then a Standard Range Card should have been included
for each fixed position.

2-6: INITIAL AREA DANGER RING
Item
Descriptor
Number
N/A
Initial Area Danger Ring …
Table 2-6.1 Initial Area Danger Ring (IADR) Item List

Rated or Non-Rated
Element
Non-Rated Element

For this section the reviewer should:
1. Review the IADR map submitted by the applicant.
Reviewer Scoring: None
Information for the reviewer to consider:
An IADR is designed to show the maximum potential distance a stray round could travel. The
figure below shows the maximum range of three standard military rounds (ball ammo, see Vol 4,
Appendix B, Table B-1). The reviewer can also refer to Volume 4 - Reference Documents:
Ammo Trajectories.pdf, DA PAM 385-63, and DOE M470.4-3 Protective Force, Section B, II-7.

14

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010

5.56mm. Ammo – 2.14 miles
7.62mm. Ammo – 2.55 miles

Applicant’s facility

.50 cal Ammo. – 4.04 miles

Figure 2-6.1 Maximum Ammunition Ranges for NATO standard ammunition (Ball Type)

15

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
The applicant should have submitted an IADR map.
Maximum Ammunition Range
Initial Area Danger Ring

Applicant’s facility

Figure 2-6.2 Simplified IADR for a single firing point – Map Drawing.
16

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010

2-7: PROPERTY BOUNDARY ASSESSMENT AND ENCROACHMENT ISSUES
Item
Number
36

Descriptor

Enter the % of each type of boundary buffer or
encroachment type that surrounds the facility. These
percentages should equal 100%.
37
Describe any pertinent information pertaining to property
buffer or encroachment areas.
Table 2-7.1 Property Boundary Assessment Item List

Rated or Non-Rated
Element
Rated Element
Non-Rated Element

For this section the reviewer should:
1. Evaluate the buffers and encroachments surrounding the facility.
2. Review any discussion from the applicant’s input to Item 37.
Reviewer scoring:
1. The reviewer will assign a Hazard Rating to Item 36, in Table 2-12.1. The rating
will be based on the total percentage of the facilities’ boundary that is encroached
upon. A suggested Hazard Rating table (Table 2-7.2) is provided below.

Information for the reviewer to consider:
The WSA Volume 2: Template generates a Risk Level and a total % encroachment for Item 36
based on the total percentage of the property boundary that is encroached.
Hazard Rating
Total % of
0
1
2
3
4
5
Table 2-7.2 Suggested Percentage

Boundary Encroachment
0% - 16%
17% - 33%
34% - 50%
51% - 67%
68% - 84%
85% - 100%
Encroachment Hazard Ratings

17

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010

2-8: RISK IDENTIFICATION, EVALUATION and MITIGATION
Item
Number
38
39
40

Descriptor

Chemical and Petroleum/Fuels risks in the IADR …
Key Facilities/areas Inside the Protected Area (PA)
Key Facilities/areas Outside the PA but on the facility’s
property …
41
Key Facilities/areas Outside the Property Boundaries
42
Critical Asset items outside the Property Boundaries
Table 2-8.1 Risk Identification Item List

Rated or Non-Rated
Element
Rated Element
Rated Element
Rated Element
Rated Element
Rated Element

For this section the reviewer should:
1. Evaluate the risk items identified by the applicant.
2. Evaluate the applicant’s justifications for Likelihood of Strike and Consequences
of Strike.
3. Evaluate all maps and diagrams provided to illustrate risk items.
4. Evaluate mitigations taken for each risk item. Training factors are taken into
account, but are not a substitute for physical mitigation measures.
Reviewer Scoring:
1. The reviewer will assign a Hazard Rating to Item 38, in Table 2-12.1. The rating
will be based on the mitigated Risk Level in Item 38 of the Template. If the
applicant has only met the training requirements in 10CFR73 Appendix B, they
should have entered a zero for the reduction factor. This reduction factor also
applies to tables in items 39 through 42. A suggested Hazard Rating table (Table
2-8.2) is provided on page 19.
2. The reviewer will assign a Hazard Rating to Item 39, in Table 2-12.1. The rating
will be based on the mitigated Risk Level in Item 39 of the Template. A
suggested Hazard Rating table (Table 2-8.2) is provided on page 19.
3. The reviewer will assign a Hazard Rating to Item 40, in Table 2-12.1. The rating
will be based on the mitigated Risk Level in Item 40 of the Template. A
suggested Hazard Rating table (Table 2-8.2) is provided on page 19.
4. The reviewer will assign a Hazard Rating to Item 41, in Table 2-12.1. The rating
will be based on the mitigated Risk Level in Item 41 of the Template. A
suggested Hazard Rating table (Table 2-8.3) is provided on page 19.

18

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
5. The reviewer will assign a Hazard Rating to Item 42, in Table 2-12.1. The rating
will be based on the mitigated Risk Level in Item 42 of the template. A suggested
Hazard Rating table (Table 2-8.3) is provided below.
6. The reviewer will assign a Hazard Rating to Items 38 – 42 (Mitigation) in Table 212.1. The rating will be based on review of the types of mitigation identified in
Item 38 through Item 42. A suggested Hazard Rating table (Table 2-8.4) is
provided on page 20.
Information for the reviewer to consider :
For Items 38-42, review the Justification of the Likelihood & Consequence Levels,
Mitigation Taken, Type of Mitigation and any Other Discussion provided for each at Risk
Item. If any of these responses cause the reviewer to have further questions, they
should be conveyed to the applicant in the form of a RAI. There may be risk items that
need stipulations in order to be acceptable to the NRC. The reviewer should also be
aware any manipulation techniques the applicant may try to lower their risk level by
inputting lower risk levels for areas that may not be necessary, thereby lowering the
overall risk average.
Hazard Rating
Mitigated Risk Level
0
≤1
1
>1 but <2
2
≥2 but <2.5
3
≥2.5 but <3
4
≥3 but <4
5
≥4
Table 2-8.2 Suggested Chemicals, PA and OCA Hazard Ratings
Hazard Rating
Mitigated Risk Level
0
≤1
2
>1 but <2
4
≥2 but <2.5
6
≥2.5 but <3
8
≥3 but <4
10
≥4
Table 2-8.3 Suggested Public Hazard Ratings

19

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
Hazard
Rating
0
2

Mitigation Discussion

No mitigating measures are required
All mitigating measures are related to
the existing or enhanced nature of the
target
4
Mitigating measures related to weapon
range are based on positive physical
measures
6
Mitigating measures related to weapon
range are primarily based on positive
physical measures
8
Mitigating measures related to weapon
range are equally divided between
procedural and positive physical
measures
10
Mitigating measures related to weapon
range are primarily procedural
Table 2-8.4 Suggested Mitigation Hazard Ratings

2-9: MITIGATED AREA DANGER RING MAP
Item
Number
43

Descriptor

What is the estimated population density within the
MADR
44
Is the population evenly distributed within the MADR
45
If No, discuss population distribution.
Table 2-9.1 MADR Items List

Rated or Non-Rated
Element
Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element

For this section the reviewer should:
1. Evaluate the applicant’s MADR map.
2. Evaluate the population density within the MADR.
Reviewer Scoring: The reviewer will assign a Hazard Rating to Item 43, in Table 212.1. The rating will be based on the population density within the MADR. A suggested
Hazard Rating table (Table 2-9.2) is provided on page 21.

20

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
Information for the reviewer to consider :
The identification and mitigation of risks by the applicant should support the “shrinking” of the
IADR to the MADR. When reviewing the MADR, correlation between the mitigative measures
and the MADR should be obvious. If no mitigative measures are used other than procedural
measures, then the limits of the MADR may coincide with the IADR. The reviewer should
consider the population density around the applicant’s facility focusing on risk mitigation that
protects highly populated areas.
weapon
range
area in ADR, sq miles

5.56mm
2
12.6

7.62mm
2.5
19.6

.50 cal
4
50.3

0

Population Density
Inside Mitigated ADR
(not including site
personnel)
People/Square Mile
≤2

≤25

≤39

≤101

1

>2 but ≤10

>25 but ≤126

>39 but ≤196

>101 but ≤503

2

>10 but ≤20

>126 but ≤251

>196 but ≤393

>503 but ≤1005

3

>20 but ≤100

>251 but ≤1257

>393 but ≤1963

4

>100 but <500

>1257 but ≤6283

>1963 but ≤9817

5

≥500

≥6283

≥9817

>1005 but ≤5027
>5027 but
≤25133
≥25133

Hazard
Rating

Total Population in Initial ADR

Figure 2-9.2 Population Density table.

21

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
The applicant should have submitted a MADR map. The MADR map may have a reduced
footprint as illustrated in Figure 2-9.3 below.
Maximum Ammunition Range
Initial Area Danger Ring

Mitigated Area Danger Ring
Applicant’s Facility

Figure 2-9.3 MADR Map.
The reviewer should refer to the MADR and any associated maps submitted by the
applicant for Items 43-45.

2-10: TRAINING AND WEAPON MAINTENANCE
22

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
Item
Number
46

Descriptor

Does the applicant have a firearms training range on
their property where the enhanced weapons will be
used?
47
If Yes, will training for this enhanced weapon be on the
facility’s range? If the answer to item 47 is yes, items
47a and 47b must be answered…
47a
Has the local FAA been contacted with regards to the
training range and any requirements for SUA?
47b
Summarize discussion and provide POC information
48
Who uses the on-site firing range?
49
If the existing range will not support training for this
weapon, or if there is no range, have arrangements
been made to train with this weapon at another location?
…
50
What reference materials were used for modifying the
existing training and weapon maintenance plans? …
51
If routine weapon maintenance and/or minor repair will
not be done on site, discuss needed inventory levels to
continue
normal
operations
and
support
repair/maintenance shipping considerations. …
Table 2-10.1 Training and Weapon Maintenance Items

Rated or Non-Rated
Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element**
Non-Rated Element**
Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element

Non-Rated Element
Non-Rated Element

For this section the reviewer should:
1. Examine and make sure that an accepted training regime is proposed; if not,
stipulate what should be used or what needs improvement.
2. Evaluate the applicant’s capability to maintain and train with the selected weapon
system.
3. Evaluate what materials the applicant used as sources for modifying weapon
maintenance and training plans.
4. If the applicant answers YES to Item 46, the reviewer should evaluate the feasibility of
training on the facility’s property.
**Reviewer Scoring: Item 47a is a non-rated element for the purpose of the reviewer
assigning a hazard rating, however, it is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the
information and a point of contact in item 47b if enhanced weapons will be used on the
facility’s range.

23

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
Information for the reviewer to consider :
Machine Guns: These weapons require expansive ranges. An Army machine gun range will
have targets out to 1500 meters (0.93 miles) for .50 cal weapons and 800 meters (0.50 miles)
for smaller caliber weapons and have a width several hundred meters wide downrange. The
land is contoured at these ranges to stop rounds from leaving the range.
Short Barreled Shotguns: These weapons do not require large ranges if the range is designed
properly. The facility may have adequate space to train with these weapons on their existing
range with minimal alterations. (The applicant would have to examine each facility on a site-bysite basis).
Short Barreled Rifles: Many facilities may already be training with these weapons on their own
ranges. The facility may be able to train in full automatic mode at these ranges with minimum
alterations. (The applicant would have to examine each facility on a site-by-site basis).

2-11: RISK ACCEPTABILITY
Item
Number
52

Descriptor

The applicant has reviewed the risks associated with
using this weapon and the selected ammunition(s).
Table 2-11.1 Risk Acceptability Items List

Rated or Non-Rated
Element
Non-Rated Element

For this section the reviewer should:
Check the applicant’s response to Item 52.
Reviewer Scoring: None
Information for the reviewer to consider : None
If the applicant finds the Risks to be not acceptable, the reviewer should consult NRC
management.

24

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010

2-12 Review Information
Date of Review:
Facility:

Applicant:

Weapon Selected:
Review Team Leader:
Review Team Member:
Review Team Member:
Review Team Member:
Review Team Member:

Reviewer Hazard Ratings
ITEM 24 – WEAPON TYPE SELECTED:

Not Scored
COMMENTS:

ITEM 29 - AMMO TYPES SELECTED:

Not Scored

COMMENTS:
ITEM 36 - PERCENT ENCROACHMENT:
COMMENTS
ITEM 38 - CHEMICALS:
COMMENTS
ITEM 39 - INSIDE PA:
COMMENTS
ITEM 40 - OUTSIDE PA BUT IN OCA:
COMMENTS
ITEM 41 - OUTSIDE OCA:
COMMENTS
ITEM 42 - . CRITICAL ASSETS:
COMMENTS
ITEMS 38 – 42- MITIGATION:
COMMENTS
ITEM 43 - POPULATION DENSITY IN MADR:
COMMENTS
Table 2-12.1 Review Team Hazard Ratings

Not Scored
Not Scored
Not Scored
Not Scored
Not Scored
Not Scored
Not Scored
Not Scored

OCA = OWNER CONTROLLED AREA
25

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010

When the reviewer has completed assigning Hazard Ratings to all ten areas, sum the
numbers beside each reviewer rating above. The total should fall between 0 and 65
Review Team Ratings sum =
Using this sum the reviewer determines an overall Hazard Rating for approving
this submittal package.
Sum of Hazard
Ratings
≤10

Reviewer Recommendation

Approve the request subject to stipulations identified.
Recommend that additional mitigating measures be used and
>10 but ≤25
approve the request subject to stipulations identified.
Require that additional mitigating measures be used to lower the
>25 but ≤35
sum of the Hazard ratings and have application resubmitted.
Require that additional mitigating measures be used and/or
>35
different weapon system selected to lower the sum of the Hazard
Ratings and have application resubmitted.
Table 2-12.2 Suggested Interpretation of Sum of Hazard Ratings

NOTE: Applicant will have to submit changes to the Security Plan and Training &
Qualifications Plan for review and approval after receiving authorization to obtain
enhanced weapons from the NRC.

A template safety evaluation report (SER) is included below. The actual SER may vary
from this template.

26

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR SECURITY AND INCIDENT
RESPONSE
RELATED TO 10 CFR PART 73.18
WEAPONS SAFETY ASSESSMENT, ENHANCED WEAPONS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This document is in response to APPLICANT request to use of WEAPON SYSTEM at the XXX
FACILITY. The APPLICANT submitted a completed weapons safety assessment (WSA)
package for this enhanced weapon system in MONTH YEAR.
2.0 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE
2.1 Regulations
Recent changes to 10CFR73.19 allow holders of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
licenses/certificates to obtain enhanced weapons for use are part of their physical protection
program with NRC approval. Part of the approval process is submittal for review and approval
of a WSA, prepared by the applicant/certificate holder, which must demonstrate that the use of
an enhanced weapon, or weapons, at a site will not cause undue risk.
As defined in 10CFR73.2, enhanced weapons are any short-barreled shotgun, short-barreled
rifle, and machine gun. Enhanced weapons do not include destructive devices, including
explosives or weapons greater than .50-caliber.
2.2 Guidance Documents
NRC guidance documentation listed here
3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION
The NRC staff has reviewed the applicant’s WSA submittal package for XXXX Facility. The
NRC used the WSA Volume 3: Review Criteria to evaluate the applicant’s submittal. All
documents provided in the submittal were considered in the evaluation process.

27

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
USACE PDC NRC TR 06-10.3
Draft, Rev. 2, October 2010
3.1 License Conditions
The facility will be allowed an exemption to use the weapon system requested until MONTH
YEAR, to allow completion of planned mitigation actions.
During this time period, the facility should implement training, procedures and other mitigation
efforts to lessen the potential risk/s. If the facility has not implemented all mitigation measures at
the end of this time period, the applicant will submit an updated WSA submittal package and
cease use of the weapon system until NRC reviews the updated package.
Applicant will have to submit changes to the Security Plan and Training & Qualifications
Plan for review and approval.
The facility will not begin using the weapon system at the facility until all responsible
personnel have completed training for the new weapon system.
The facility may only use this weapon system in a manner consistent with the uses discussed in
the WSA submittal and any documentation that accompanied it for review.

4.0 CONCLUSION
The NRC staff finds that APPLICANT’S request for this enhanced weapon system is acceptable
and authorizes the applicant to begin use of the weapon system after all license conditions are
addressed. There is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be
endangered by granting authorization of this enhanced weapon system. Granting the use of
this enhanced weapon system with respect to the current Security Training and Qualifications
Plan, will neither decrease the effectiveness of the XXXX Facility plan nor jeopardize the health
and safety of the public or endanger security operations.

Principal Contributors:
Date:
DISTRIBUTION: (Electronic)

28

OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION