Evaluation of the Adult and Dislocated Worker Program in the Workforce Investment Act

ICR 201101-1205-001

OMB: 1205-0482

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supplementary Document
2011-09-20
Supplementary Document
2011-09-20
Supplementary Document
2011-09-20
Supplementary Document
2011-07-13
Supplementary Document
2011-07-13
Supporting Statement A
2011-09-22
Supplementary Document
2011-06-23
Supporting Statement B
2011-09-20
ICR Details
1205-0482 201101-1205-001
Historical Active
DOL/ETA
Evaluation of the Adult and Dislocated Worker Program in the Workforce Investment Act
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Approved with change 09/23/2011
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 07/18/2011
The agency will characterize the methodology and results of the evaluation appropriately and state any relevant limitations to the evaluation results and conclusions. In addition, OMB notes that the agency recruited respondents for the evaluation without having first consulted with OMB or having obtained OMB PRA clearance, which is a violation of the PRA.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
09/30/2014 36 Months From Approved
67,228 0 0
31,751 0 0
0 0 0

To determine whether the adult and dislocated worker services funded by Title I of the WIA are effective, ETA is undertaking the WIA Random Assignment Impact Evaluation of the Adult and Dislocated Worker Programs. The evaluation will address the following research questions: • Does access to WIA intensive and training services-both individually and combined-lead adults and dislocated workers to achieve better educational, employment, earnings, and self-sufficiency outcomes than they would achieve in the absence of access to those services? • Does the effectiveness of WIA vary by population subgroup? Is there variation by sex, age, race/ethnicity, unemployment insurance (UI) receipt, education level, previous employment history, adult and dislocated worker status, and veteran and disability status? • How does the implementation of WIA vary by Local Workforce Investment Area (LWIA)? Does the effectiveness of WIA vary by how it is implemented? To what extent do implementation differences explain variations in WIA's effectiveness? • Do the benefits from WIA services exceed program costs? Do the benefits of intensive services exceed their costs? Do the benefits of training exceed its costs? Do the benefits exceed the costs for adults? Do they for dislocated workers?

US Code: 29 USC 49(c) Name of Law: The Workforce Investment Act
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  75 FR 69126 11/10/2010
76 FR 42139 07/18/2011
No

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 67,228 0 0 67,228 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 31,751 0 0 31,751 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
This is a new information collection.

$2,913,880
Yes Part B of Supporting Statement
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Bonnie Naradzay 202-693-3675 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
07/18/2011


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy