Statement 2011

Statement 2011.doc

Canadian Border Boat Landing Permit

OMB: 1651-0108

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Supporting Statement

Canadian Border Boat Landing Permit (CBP Form I-68)

1651-0108



A. Justification

  1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statue and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.


The Canadian Border Boat Landing Permit (CBP Form I-68) allows participants entering the United States along the northern border by small pleasure boats less than 5 tons to telephonically report their arrival without having to appear in person for an inspection by a CBP officer. United States citizens, Lawful Permanent Residents of the United States, Canadian citizens, Landed Commonwealth Residents of Canada, and Landed Residents of Canada who are nationals of Visa Waiver Program countries listed in 8 CFR 217.2(a) are eligible to participate.


The information collected on CBP Form I-68 allows people who enter the United States from Canada by small pleasure boats to be inspected only once during the boating season, rather than each time they make an entry. This information collection is provided for by 8 CFR 235.1(e) and Section 235 of Immigration and Nationality Act. CBP Form I-68 is accessible at http://forms.cbp.gov/pdf/CBP_Form_I68.pdf


2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

The information collected on CBP Form I-68 allows certain persons who enter the United States from Canada by small craft to be inspected only once during the navigational season, rather than each time they enter.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.


CBP is currently working on a web-based system that will allow small vessel operators to file a “float plan” in advance of departure and arrival to the United States. The system will allow small boat operators to comply without burdensome reporting requirements as the participants will be able to apply on line, record travel in advance of departure and call-in the arrival. In the future, it will provide enrollees with the ability to call-in, text, or use the web to report arrival and obtain CBP clearance.


Implementation of this system will require an NPRM and Final Rule, so CBP anticipates that this system will be in use by late 2013.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.


This information is not duplicated in any other place or any other form.


5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.


This information collection does not have an impact on small businesses or other small entities.


6. Describe consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently.


This collection of information enables people to visit the immediate shore area for the duration of the boating season without having to travel to the nearest CBP office for inspection.


7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:


  • requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

  • requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

  • requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

  • requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

  • in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;

  • requiring the use of statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

  • that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

  • requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


This information is collected in a manner consistent with the guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.

Public comments were solicited through a 60-day FRN published on October 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Page 61508) on which no comments were received, and a 30-day FRN published on January 18, 2011 (Volume 76, Page 2917) on which no comments have been received.


9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


There is no offer of a monetary or material value for this information collection.


  1. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


A SORN for this collection was published on April 21, 2006, (FR 71, Page 20708) will be included in this ICR. A PIA dated April 20, 2006, will also be included.


11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

There are no questions of a sensitive nature.






12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information.



INFORMATION COLLECTION

TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS

NO. OF

RESPONDENTS

NO. OF RESPONSES PER RESPONDENT


TOTAL

RESPONSES


TIME PER

RESPONSE


I-68


11,288


68,000


1


68,000


10 minutes

(.166 hours)


Public Cost

The estimated annual of the burden is $1,498,319.


This is based on the number of burden hours (11,288) multiplied (x) the estimated average hourly rate ($36.35) = $410,319.


In addition, respondents pay $1,088,000 in fees as a result of a $16 filing fee. This is calculated by the number of responses (68,000) multiplied (x) the filing fee ($16) = $1,088,000.


13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information.


There are no record keeping, capital, start-up or maintenance costs associated with this information collection.


14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal Government. Also provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.


There are no costs to the Government for this collection of information because CBP collects a fee to cover its costs.


15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 12 or 13.


There has been no increase or decrease in the estimated annual burden hours previously reported for this information collection. There are no changes to this collection of information.


16. For collection of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation, and publication.


This information collection will not be published for statistical purposes.


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date, explain the reasons that displaying the expiration date would be inappropriate.

CBP will display the expiration date for OMB approval of this information collection.

18. “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions.”


CBP does not request an exception to the certification of this information collection.


B. Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods


No statistical methods were employed.

File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSupporting Statement
AuthorPreferred Customer
Last Modified ByAuthorized User
File Modified2011-01-18
File Created2011-01-11

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy