PRA Supporting Statement for Rule 17a-2 v 2011 (4)

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
Supporting Statement
for the Information Collection Submission
“Rule 17a-2”
A.

Justification

1.

Necessity of Information Collection
a.

Background

Congress granted broad rulemaking authority to the Commission in Sections 9(a)(2), 10(b),
and 15(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) to combat manipulative
abuses in whatever form they may take. In exercising its authority, the Commission has focused on
the market activities of persons participating in a securities offering and determined that securities
offerings present special opportunities for manipulation that require specific regulatory attention.
Rule 17a-2, which requires records be kept when underwriters engage in stabilizing and certain
aftermarket activities, dates back to 1939, but took much of its current form in 1983 when the
Commission adopted amendments which placed the recordkeeping burden on the manager of the
underwriting syndicate or group. On December 20, 1996, the Commission adopted Regulation M
which governs the activities of underwriters, issuers, selling security holders, and others in
connection with a securities offering generally and also harmonized Rule 17a-2 with Regulation M.
Regulation M significantly eased regulatory burdens on offering participants by eliminating the
trading restrictions for underwriters of actively traded securities; reducing the scope of coverage for
other securities; reducing restrictions on issuer plans; providing a more flexible framework for
stabilizing transactions; and deregulating rights offerings.
Rule 17a-2 and Rule 104 of Regulation M work together to regulate underwriters engaging
in syndicate covering, stabilization, and penalty bid transactions. A person subject to Rule 104 is
required, among other things, to keep the information and make the notification required by 17a-2.
Rule 17a-2 requires managers of underwriting syndicates or groups to keep certain records when
they engage in syndicate covering, stabilizing, or penalty bid transactions. Rule 17a-2 also requires
that members of the underwriting syndicate or group who engage in those activities to notify the
manager of the syndicate or group, who must then make the records required in the rule.
b.

Information Collection Requirements

Rule 17a-2 requires managing underwriters to keep records of syndicate covering
transactions and penalty bids, in addition to stabilizing information. The records must reflect the
name and class of securities, the price, date, and time for each stabilizing purchase or syndicate
covering transaction and whether any penalties were assessed, the names and addresses of the
syndicate group members, and their respective commitments. Members of syndicates must notify
the manager of their syndicate if they engage in these activities as well. If the manager receives this

notification, the manager must then make the same records required as if they engaged in the
activity themselves.
The Commission believes that this recordkeeping requirement imposes little, if any,
additional burden as underwriters already are required to keep detailed syndicate account records.
The information is required to be maintained in a separate file, for a period of three years, the first
two in an accessible place.
2.

Purpose and Use of the Information Collection

The records required pursuant to Rule 17a-2 are used by the Commission in examinations or
investigations of underwriting activities and to review aftermarket activity.
3.

Consideration Given to Information Technology

Improvements in telecommunication and data processing technology reduce regulatory
burdens that might otherwise result from Rule 17a-2. The Commission is not aware of any
technical or legal obstacles to reducing the burden through the use of improved information
technology.
4.

Duplication

The information required by each of the rules described herein does not duplicate that
required by any other federal regulation. At the time Regulation M and related amendments to Rule
17a-2 were proposed, the Commission solicited and received comments without receiving any
reference to federal regulations that may duplicate the requirements mandated by Rule 17a-2. The
Commission continues to believe that there is no duplication of the information required by the rules
described herein.
5.

Effect on Small Entities

The information requirements of Rule 17a-2 apply equally to all entities, regardless of the
entity's size. Although Rule 17a-2 requires additional records concerning stabilizing bids, penalty
bids, and syndicate covering transactions, the Commission believes this imposes little, if any,
additional burden because underwriters already are required to keep detailed syndicate account
records. Further, the Commission believes that broker-dealers that act as distribution participants
(and are thus subject to the rule) are unlikely to qualify as small entities. The majority of the
recordkeeping burden in Rule 17a-2 lies with the manager of an underwriting syndicate which, due
to the capital requirements necessary to maintain such a role, is unlikely to be a role an entity that
could qualify as a small entity could retain.
6.

Consequences of Not Conducting Collection

Rule 17a-2 requires managing underwriters to keep records of syndicate covering
transactions and penalty bids, in addition to stabilizing information. The information is collected as

each transaction warrants and therefore there is no way to require less frequent collection without
undermining the purposes of the rule.
7.

Inconsistencies With Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.8(d)

The collection of information requested in the rules described herein is conducted in a
manner consistent with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.8(d).
8.

Consultations Outside the Agency

The Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on this
collection of information was published on March 9, 2011 (76 FR 13001). No comments were
received.
9.

Payment or Gift
The respondents receive no payments or gifts.

10.

Confidentiality
No assurance of confidentiality is provided.

11.

Sensitive Questions
No questions of a sensitive nature are asked.

12.

Burden of Information Collection

The Commission estimates that creating and maintaining records pursuant to this rule
requires five hours per offering, however, most of the records required pursuant to this rule are
already retained as a matter of practice. In 2010, there were 745 underwritten offerings. Thus, there
are 745 respondents and the recordkeeping required under the rule would require an estimated 3,725
hours annually for all respondents (five hours times 745 respondents).
The Commission estimates that a typical employee of a broker-dealer charged to ensure
compliance with Commission regulations receives annual compensation of $118,496. This
compensation is the equivalent of $56.97 per hour ($118,496 divided by 2,080 payroll hours per
year). Based on that estimate, the Commission estimates that the annual salary cost to comply with
Rule 17a-2 is $212,213.25 ($56.97 per hour times 3,725 hours).
13.

Costs to Respondents

It is not anticipated that respondents will have to incur any capital and start up cost to
comply with the rule nor is it anticipated that the respondents will have to incur any additional
operational or maintenance cost (other than provided for in item no. 12) to comply with the rule.

14.

Costs to Federal Government

The government does not experience significant costs based on the recordkeeping required
pursuant to Rule 17a-2. The information collected by the respondents is normally reviewed only
pursuant to an investigation, not as a matter of routine.
15.

Changes in Burden

The decrease in burden hours overall is due to a decrease in the amount of firm commitment
offerings in 2010 from the underwritten offering calculation used in prior years. The decrease in
total annualized cost burden is also due to a decrease in the amount of firm commitment offerings in
2010 from the underwritten offering calculation used in prior years. There are no other changes in
the burden.
16.

Information Collection Planned for Statistical Purposes
Not applicable. There are no plans to require the publication of these records in the future.

17.

Display of OMB Approval Date

The Commission is not seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB
approval.
18.

Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
This collection complies with the requirements in 5 CFR 1320.9.

B.

Collections of Information Employing Statistical Methods
This collection does not involve statistical methods.