B - Summary of changes

SLAITS 2013 NSCNC_OMB_revised QRE_attach B.docx

State and Local Area Integrated Telephone Survey (SLAITS)

B - Summary of changes

OMB: 0920-0406

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf











Attachment B: Changes made to NSCNC Questionnaire Content






Table 1: Deleted Questions


Question/Description

Reason for Deletion

L8 How often SC contacts nonresident siblings

Combined with L7 into new question L7

P2 SC’s mom’s ethnicity

Redundant with child’s & caregiver’s ethnicity & race

P3 SC’s mom’s race

P10 SC contact w/mom

Combined with P9 into new question P9

P12 SC mom ever care for SC overnight

Combined with P11 into new question P11

P13 How well R gets along w/SC mom

Combined with P31 into new question P36

P16 R ever ask SC mom to spend more time

Low priority; somewhat redundant with P36

P17 R ever refused SC mom visit

P19 SC’s dad’s ethnicity

Redundant with child’s & caregiver’s ethnicity & race

P20 SC’s dad’s race

P28 SC contact w/dad

Combined with P27 into new question P27

P30 SC dad ever care for SC overnight

Combined with P29 into new question P29

P31 How well R gets along w/SC dad

Combined with P13 into new question P36

P34 R ever ask SC dad to spend more time

Low priority; somewhat redundant with P36

P35 R ever refused SC dad visit

F2 Child support agreement w/mom or w/dad

Low priority; redundant with F5

F8 How heard about TANF

Limited utility due to legitimate skip; low priority

C2I Ease obtain educ re: child special needs

Respondent confusion

C2J Ease obtain educ re: legal issues

Respondent confusion; redundant with C2D

C2M Ease obtain info re: medical care

Respondent confusion

C2N Ease obtain overview of programs/svcs

Respondent confusion

C3 Where learn about svcs

Difficult/lengthy to process; respondent confusion

C4 How much R knew re: child background

Redundant with C1

CC2A Supervision: where child is

Low priority


CC2B Supervision: who child is with

CC2C Supervision: child arrives at home

CC2D Supervision: child finished homework

CC2E Supervision: control child’s free time

CC2F Supervision: child’s money

CC2G Supervision: child does chores

CC2H Supervision: child without sitter

WB1 How SC feels re: living w/R

Respondent confusion; limited variability; validity concern

WB5 Type of school

Limited variability; redundant with NSCH data

WB8E Child care: sitter related to R

Limited analytic utility due to legitimate skip; low priority

WB8F Child care: sitter related to spouse

WB8G Child care: sitter lives w/R

WB8I Child care: other sitter related to SC

WB8J Child care: other sitter related to R/Sp

Continued next page



Table 1 continued


Question/Description

Reason for Deletion

R7 How it’s going caring for SC

Respondent confusion; low priority

R8A Getting help: someone to watch SC

Low priority; nearly 50% missing on item A and limited variability on item B


R8B Get help: a ride to the doctor

R8C Get help: family/friends check on sick SC

R8D Get help: someone to talk w/re: problems

R8E Get help: family/friends lend cash

R9 R feels trapped by parenting responsibility

These items offended some respondents; validity concern

R10 Caring for SC more work than pleasure

R12 R self-rating caregiver quality

Validity concern; low variability: 0 negative responses

R13A Depression scale: So sad

We replaced this 6-item validated scale of depression with a 2-item validated scale of depression (R13NEWA and R13NEWB)

R13B Depression scale: nervous

R13C Depression scale: restless/fidgety

R13D Depression scale: hopeless

R13E Depression scale: everything an effort

R13F Depression scale: worthless

R14B Confident can help SC grow

We retained some of the R14 positive well-being measures and deleted others; B showed low response variability, and C, E, and G were cognitively difficult for some respondents; D and H were of lower priority than the R14 items we kept.

R14C Know steps when receiving poor svcs

R14D Family life is under control

R14E Tell pros my thoughts re: svcs

R14G I try to find needed svcs

R14H Focus on good as well as problems

S5_STATE Confirm state to fill insurance program name

Redundant with State previously confirmed in NSCH

S16 Paying lower rent due to subsidy

Limited response variability

D6 Respondent’s Spouse/partner’s ethnicity

Redundant with Respondent’s ethnicity

D7 Respondent’s Spouse/partner’s race

Redundant with Respondent’s race

D8 SC transracial w/Respondent’s spouse/p

Redundant with D5

R21A Most challenging re: care for SC

Limited analytic utility and time-consuming to collect due to verbatim response for all cases

R21B Most rewarding re: care for SC



In addition to these deletions, combinations and replacements shown in Table 1, a number of minor content changes were made to improve questionnaire flow or reduce respondent or interviewer confusion. Those content changes are listed below.




  1. H9 (Respondent relationship to the child) is now asked about both the respondent (H9.1) and the respondent’s spouse/partner (H9.2); additionally, the category ADOPTIVE PARENT has been added, with the restriction that if this option is chosen, the interviewer should probe for an additional, pre-adoptive relationship and mark all that apply. Additionally, for H9.1 and H9.2, categories “MATERNAL AUNT/UNCLE” and “PATERNAL AUNT/UNCLE” have been combined into “AUNT/UNCLE” and category “GREAT-GRANDPARENT” has been added.



  1. P1 (and similar question for fathers, P18): the definitions of mother and father have been moved from question text to READ IF NECESSARY help text.



  1. P6/P24: To avoid seeming to ask the same question twice, the question text here has been revised to WAS THERE A DIFFERENT REASON WHY [SC] DIDN’T LIVE WITH [HIS/HER] [MOTHER/FATHER] ORIGINALLY? Yes responses will get the original P6 or P24 question, while others will skip over P6/P24.



  1. P22: Verb tense was changed from “has” to “had” in three places for cases in which the father is deceased, to reduce the risk of sounding insensitive.



  1. F1: “FROM [SC]’s PARENT OR PARENTS” has been added to the end of the first sentence in this question, and the second sentence (and response option list) has been re-ordered to improve question flow and comprehension as: HAVE CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS FOR [SC] BEEN AGREED TO INFORMALLY, AGREED TO IN WRITING, AWARDED TO YOU BY A COURT OR JUDGE, OR DO YOU NOT HAVE AN AGREEMENT OF ANY KIND?



  1. F4 has had SOCIAL SECURITY SURVIVOR BENEFITS, ADOPTION ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS added to the question text.



  1. F5: response option 3 has been updated to FOSTER CARE OR ADOPTION PAYMENT/STIPEND



  1. F10, F11 and F12 are being moved to just after F5 to improve questionnaire flow.



  1. C2F: OBTAIN has been changed to FIND, PARENT/GRANDPARENT SUPPORT GROUP has been changed to A PARENT OR GRANDPARENT SUPPORT GROUP, and help text has been added: A GROUP OF GRANDPARENTS WHO MEET TOGETHER TO SHARE THEIR EXPERIENCES AND ADVICE ABOUT RAISING THEIR GRANDCHILDREN.



  1. S1 and S2 are moved to just before S9 in order to ask about child’s insurance first, then caregiver’s insurance. The transition text that begins S1 is now used to begin S3. Also, help text has been added to S2: IT CAN BE YOU OR YOUR SPOUSE’S INSURANCE, and interviewers are instructed to MARK ALL THAT APPLY.



  1. S18_CONF: YOUR INCOME changed to THE TOTAL INCOME OF ALL FAMILY MEMBERS.



Page 9 of 9

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorBramlett, Matthew (CDC/OSELS/NCHS)
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-02-01

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy