NAHMS-269 Feedlot 2011 Fecal Collection Record

National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS); Feedlot 2011 Study

NAHMS-269

National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS) Feedlot 2011 Study

OMB: 0579-0079

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

FEEDLOT 2011

Fecal Collection Record


Form Approved

OMB Number 0579-0079

Expires: 6/30/2013



State FIPS

Operation #

Kit #

Interviewer’s initials

Date collected

2 digits

4 digits

3 digits

Initials

mm/dd/yy


INSTRUCTIONS:

Collect fresh fecal samples from three randomly selected pens with the cattle closest to slaughter weight. For each pen, complete the data on both pages. Send the samples along with the YELLOW copy of the submission record to the lab. Send the WHITE copy of the form to your NAHMS Coordinator as soon as possible.



Pen 1

Pen 2

Pen 3


Feedlot pen ID





Number of beef heifers

head

head

head


Number of beef steers

head

head

head


Number of beef bulls

head

head

head


Number of beef cows

(had 1+ full-term calves)

head

head

head


Number of dairy breed animals

head

head

head


Square feet in pen

sq ft

sq ft

sq ft


Initial average weight per head upon entry to the pen (estimate pounds if necessary)

lb

lb

lb


Average current weight per head in pen

lb

lb

lb


Days on feed to date

days

days

days


Predicted remaining days on feed until slaughter

days

days

days


Were these animal vaccinated for E. coli

(Epitopix SRP®, Econiche®)?

If YES, how many injections have been given?

Yes No


#

Yes No


#

Yes No


#


Were these animals vaccinated for Salmonella (Salmonella Newport SRP®)?

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No


Was the pen mass treated with

injectable antibiotic?

If YES, write in the product name

and date administered

Yes No DK

Yes No DK

Yes No DK


Were the animals dewormed?

Yes No DK

Yes No DK

Yes No DK


Number of sick animals in pen

treated since arrival

head

head

head


Number of animals from pen

that died since arrival

head

head

head


Distance shipped from source to feedlot (in miles)

If pen is not from a single source, enter “multiple.”

miles

miles

miles


Were these animals born in a single herd?

Yes No DK

Yes No DK

Yes No DK


Is the cattle drinking water chlorinated?

Yes No DK

Yes No DK

Yes No DK




U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS)

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0579-xxxx. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 1.75 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collected.

NAHMS-269

2011


Feedlot 2011 Fecal Collection Record Page 2



Pen 1

Pen 2

Pen 3


Feedlot pen ID








Antibiotics in feed or water since arrival

Date first fed

Date last fed*

Date first fed

Date last fed*

Date first fed

Date last fed*


Amprolium (Corid)








Bacitracin (BMD®)








Bambermycins (Gainpro)








Chlortetracycline

(Aureomycin® 100, CTC, Pennchlor)








Chlortetracycline/sulfamethazine

(Aureo-S 700®)








Decoquinate (Deccox)








Laidlomycin (Cattlyst®)








Lasalocid (Bovatec)








Monensin (Rumensin®, Vita Ferm®)








Neomycin (Neo-Terramycin)








Oxytetracycline (OTC, Terramycin®)








Sulfachlorpyridazine (Vetisulid)








Sulfadimethoxine

(Albon®, Di-Methox, Sulfasol)








Sulfamethazine/sulfadimethoxine

(Pennchlor-S, Sulmet®)








Sulfaquinoxaline (Sul-Q-Nox)








Tetracycline (Tetrasol, TC-Vet 324®)








Tylosin (Tylan®)








Virginiamycin (V-Max®)








*If still feeding, enter today’s date.




Feedlot 2011 Fecal Collection Record Page 3


Ingredients fed in last 7 days [Answer questions under concentrates; for all others, check all that apply for each pen.]



Pen 1

Pen 2

Pen 3


Feedlot pen ID





Concentrates





What is the percentage of concentrate in the ration?
(dry matter basis)

%

%

%


How is the grain processed?

(If 0% above, leave blank. Otherwise:

1 = steam flaked; 2 = dry roll; 3 = cracked; 4 = ground high moisture; 5 = unprocessed whole grain; 6 = other

code

code

code


Barley





Brewer’s grains/malt (wet)





Brewer’s grains/malt (dry)





Corn





Distiller grains (wet)





Distiller grains (dry)





Grain sorghum (milo)





Whole wheat





Wheat fines/mids





Other concentrates (specify in column)





Additives





Beta-agonist (OptaFlexx, Zilmax®)





Probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus)





Proteins





Canola meal





Chicken waste





Cotton seed–whole





Cotton seed meal





Soybean meal





Urea





Other proteins (specify in column)





Roughage





Alfalfa, clover, or sorghum hay





Corn silage





Cotton seed hulls





Alfalfa, clover, or sorghum silage





Other roughage (specify in column)





Other by-products





Beet pulp





Corn gluten





Potato waste





Seaweed extract (Tasco-14)





Tallow





Other (specify in column)





Feedlot 2011

Fecal Submission Record



State FIPS

Operation #

Kit #

Interviewer’s initials

Date collected

2 digits

4 digits

3 digits

Initials

mm/dd/yy




Pen 1

Pen 2

Pen 3

Feedlot pen ID




Total bagged samples submitted to ARS






Total time to collect samples, do paperwork, and prepare boxes for shipping ________ minutes



SEND WHITE COPY OF THIS PAGE, along with the first page of data to:

Your NAHMS Coordinator



SEND YELLOW COPY OF THIS PAGE, along with the 75 yellow-labeled bags to:

Dr. Paula Cray

USDA, ARS, Russell Research Center

950 College Station Rd, Rm 509

Athens, GA 30605



File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Authoraberry
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-02-01

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy