Defining Target Levels for Ecosystem Targets: A Socio-Ecological Approach

ICR 201106-0648-013

OMB: 0648-0641

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Form and Instruction
New
Supporting Statement A
2012-01-05
Supporting Statement B
2012-01-05
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
0648-0641 201106-0648-013
Historical Active
DOC/NOAA
Defining Target Levels for Ecosystem Targets: A Socio-Ecological Approach
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Approved with change 01/05/2012
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 08/05/2011
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
01/31/2015 36 Months From Approved
1,000 0 0
250 0 0
0 0 0

Ecological indicators can include measures like the mean trophic level of an ecosystem's set of apex predator, consumer and primary producer species, or the relative biodiversity present in an ecosystem. Such indicators can facilitate Ecosystem-based Management, when targets for indicators exist. Because targets are an expression of the desired state of the ecosystem, establishing targets must include both ecological understanding and societal values. This project will develop a unique approach for identifying scientifically rigorous ecosystem targets that explicitly considers social perspectives. For this reason, the Northwest Fisheries Science Center seeks to conduct social norm analyses which involve a survey of Puget Sound community stakeholders. Stakeholders will be asked, via telephone survey, a series of general questions regarding their views on the Puget Sound environment and the desirability of a range of potential ecosystem conditions for the Puget Sound. A random digit dial phone survey will be conducted. Respondents will be asked to respond to statements regarding their perceptions of the health of the Puget Sound. Demographic and employment information will be collected so that responses can be organized based on a stakeholder typology. This survey is essential because data on social norms, values and beliefs in the Puget Sound region are sparse; yet, they are critical to the development of sound ecosystem health targets.

US Code: 16 USC 1801 et seq. Name of Law: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
   US Code: 42 USC 4321-4347 Name of Law: Environmental Protection Act
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  76 FR 12942 03/09/2011
76 FR 47142 08/04/2011
Yes

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
NOAA - Puget Sound Coastal Restoration Survey NA NOAA - Puget Sound Coastal Restoration Survey

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 1,000 0 0 1,000 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 250 0 0 250 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Miscellaneous Actions
No
This is a new, one-time information collection.

$139,000
Yes Part B of Supporting Statement
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Karma Norman 206 302-2418

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
08/05/2011


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy