SURVEY OF EFFECTIVENESS OF INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT FOR BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
1. What type of IDBR proposal did you submit?
Type A Innovation
Type B Bridging
2. What year was the award made?
3. What was the duration of the award?
2 years
3 years
4 years
5 years
4. Was this a Career award?
Yes
No
5. At what type of institution are you employed?
Ph.D. Granting
Primarily Undergraduate (PUI)
Minority Serving (MSI
Private Research Institute
Other
If other, please specify type:
6. What is your current position at your institute?
Research Professor
Assistant Professor
Associate Professor
Full Professor
Other
If other, please specify position:
7. Please select the instrument category that best describes the type of instrumentation to be developed.
Microscopy
Imaging
Microfluidics
Bio Sensor
Other
If other, please specify:
8. Please choose the size of award made to your institution.
< $100,000
$100,000 - $250,000
$251,000 - $500,000
$501,000 - $750,000
> $750,000
9. Is the instrument development integrated into undergraduate or graduate level course work?
Yes, undergraduate
Yes, graduate
Yes, both
No
10. Is the instrument use integrated into undergraduate or graduate level course work?
Yes, undergraduate
Yes, graduate
Yes, both
No
11. What was the number of undergraduate students trained in your laboratory, or co-PI’s laboratory, as a result of this award?
0
1-5
6-10
> 10
12. What was the number of graduate students trained in your laboratory, or co-PI’s laboratory, as a result of this award?
0
1-5
6-10
> 10
13. What was the number of postdoctoral fellows trained in your laboratory, or co-PI’s laboratory, as a result of this award?
0
1-5
6-10
> 10
14. What was the number of peer-reviewed publications resulting from this award?
0
1-3
4-6
7-9
=> 10
15. To what degree were you able to complete the instrument as described in the proposal?
0-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-99%
100%
16. How many scientists (please count one/project), outside of those named in your proposal, had access to the developed instrument in order to conduct research?
0
1-5
6-10
> 10
17. Have you sought out other support mechanisms to further disseminate or commercialize the developed instrument?
No
Type B IDBR
SBIR
STTR
Other
If other, please specify:
18. Have you identified a partner for further development or future commercialization?
Yes, for development
Yes, for commercialization
No
19. Have you successfully commercialized the instrument?
Yes
No
20. Do you have plans to commercialize the instrument in the future?
Yes
No
21. Did you apply for any patents as a result of this award?
Yes
No
22. Were any patents issued as a result of this award?
Yes
No
23. What do you find to be the barriers to further dissemination or commercialization? (Choose as many as applicable)
Lack of success in developing the proposed instrument
I don’t see this as a goal
Insufficient time
Insufficient support and resources from my institution
Insufficient funds
I am not aware of the availability of resources to achieve this aim
Other
If other, please specify:
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
| Author | rfleisch |
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
| File Created | 2021-01-31 |