Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

TIM_PSE Survey

Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery

OMB: 2125-0628

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Potential Traffic Incident Management(TIM)/Planned Special Event (PSE) Conference


 






 

 

TIM/PSE Conference

 

FHWA has either co-sponsored or helped to plan several TIM/PSE conferences in the recent past. We are trying to determine if there is interest in holding another TIM/Planned Special Events (PSE) conference, as well as what the conference should look like. With that, The Responder is reaching out to the TIM Network's members for valuable input. Please take a few moments to provide your candid feedback. Thank you!


Top of Form

Shape1 Shape2 Shape3 Shape4 Shape5 Shape6 Shape7 Shape8 Shape9 Shape10 Shape11 Shape12 Shape13  

1.

Would you be interested in attending a TIM/PSE conference?

 

Shape14 Yes

 

Shape15 No


 

 

 


 


 


 


 

2

The proposed date for the conference is late 2014 or 2015. What time of year would be most convenient for you to attend the conference?

 

Shape16 Fall

 

Shape17 Winter

 

Shape18 Spring

 

Shape19 Summer


 

 






 

3

Do you think this conference would work best as a stand-alone conference or before/after a large existing conference, such as the Lifesavers Conference?

 

Shape20 Stand alone

 

Shape21 With another conference


 

 







 

4.

One example of a conference that brings these communities is the Lifesavers Conference. Its attendees are many of the people from agencies who have an interest in TIM. Would you attend a Lifesavers Conference? If not, what conferences are you aware of that bring together representatives from transportation, police, fire, and other emergency services?

 

Shape22


 

 

 

5.

Would you be able to travel to this event?

 

Shape23 Yes

 

Shape24 No


 

 

 

6.

If this conference were held as a stand-alone meeting, for travel purposes, which of the following would be the most convenient?

 

Shape25 Middle of the country

 

Shape26 Mid-sized cities (lower cost than larger metro areas)


 

 

 

7.

If you chose "middle of the country" for the previous question, please let us know which city/cities would be most convenient for you.

 

Shape27 Chicago

 

Shape28 St. Louis

 

Shape29 Dallas/Houston/San Antonio

 

Shape30 Other, please specify

 

     Shape31


 

 

 

8.

If you chose "mid-sized cities" for question #8, please tell us which of the following you would prefer?

 

Shape32 Baltimore

 

Shape33 St. Louis

 

Shape34 Kansas City

 

Shape35 Indianapolis

 

Shape36 Atlanta

 

Shape37 Pittsburgh

 

Shape38 Other, please specify

 

     Shape39


 

 

 

9.

What conference length do you think would be most beneficial?

 

Shape40 One day

 

Shape41 Two full days

 

Shape42 Opening reception/meet and greet evening before, followed by one full day, and ending middle of second day

 

Shape43 Other, please specify

 

     Shape44


 

 

 

10.

New technologies make it easier to allow participation by people who are interested in attending but unable to do so. Are you aware of any conferences that integrate technology when face to face is not an option? For example, where several regions host attendees, who participate in the conference via video conference. Please provide the names of those conferences.

 

Shape45


 

 

 

11.

Please let us know what types of sessions you would be interested in attending.

 

Shape46 TIM/PSE and operations (why they need to work together)

 

Shape47 TIM and MAP-21 (or TIM and reauthorization, depending on when it will be held)

 

Shape48 Getting prepared after SHRP II - once the training is well underway, how will we continue to change the TIM culture

 

Shape49 PSE - national special security events

 

Shape50 Current issues that affect TIM/PSE/Work Zone Management

 

Shape51 Latest TIM/PSE research

 

Shape52 Performance measures

 

Shape53 Legislative updates

 

Shape54 Latest technologies

 

Shape55 Case studies/lessons learned

 

Shape56 Other, please specify

 

     Shape57


 

 

 

12.

In addition to attending presentations, would you also be interested in attending workshops and/or trainings?

Yes If so, what topics interest you?

No

 

Shape58


 

 

 

13.

Would you be interested in exhibiting at this event?

 

Shape59 Yes

 

Shape60 No


 

 

 

14.

Would you be interested in visiting exhibitors/organizations' displays at this event?

 

Shape61 Yes

 

Shape62 No


 

 

 

15.

Would you be interested in poster sessions?

 

Shape63 Yes

 

Shape64 No


 

 

 

16.

Events like these take months to plan and execute, and they rely on the involvement of numerous people. Would you be interested in participating in the planning of this conference? If so, please share what type of involvement you are interested in, as well as provide your name, organization, email address, and phone number. Thank you!

 

Shape65


 

 

 

17.

Additional comments - What does your ideal conference look like? For example, are you most interested in attending lectures and visiting exhibitors, or do you find smaller workshops and training sessions most beneficial to your work?

 

Shape66


 

 

 

18.

Do you have anything else to share that would help us in determining whether to hold this event and, if so, what it should look like?

 

Shape67


 

 Shape68 Shape69

Bottom of Form



 

     

 





File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Authorlaurel radow
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-31

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy