Logic Model for Evaluation

Attachment F. Logic Model for NPHII evaluation.docx

Surveys of State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Governmental Health Agencies

Logic Model for Evaluation

OMB: 0920-0879

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Shape1 Shape19 Shape40 Shape41 Shape39 Shape38 Shape18 Shape12 Shape35 Shape36 Shape37 Shape21 Shape33 Shape3 Shape2 Shape5 Shape26 Shape25 Shape23 Shape17 Shape34 Shape4 Shape29 Shape32 Shape27 Shape28 Shape6 Shape31 Shape7 Shape30 Shape24 Shape20 Shape22 Shape11 Shape10 Shape9 Shape16 Shape15 Shape8 Shape13 Shape14

Activities

Increased use of PM/QI across the agency

Increased ability to meet national public health standards

Increased use of data for decision-making

Increased efficiency and improved effectiveness of PH agency services and programs

Readiness Efforts Implemented

  • Prerequisites completed

  • Gaps identified

  • Plans for addressing deficiencies in place



Infrastructure and Capacity in Place


  • PM offices staffed

  • Staff trained and proficient in relevant competencies

  • PM system developed and implemented

  • Efforts to enhance QI culture in place

  • Cross-jurisdictional support provided



Implement Projects to Improve Efficiency and Effectiveness


  • Identify areas needing improvement

  • Apply QI tools, techniques and approaches

  • Document progress


Engage in Accreditation Readiness Activities


  • Complete prerequisites

  • Complete a self-assessment

  • Address deficiencies related to national public health standards


Build Capacity and Infrastructure for Performance Management

  • Hire Performance Improvement Manager (PIM)

  • Establish and/or staff PM offices

  • Participate in training

  • Receive TA/CBA

  • Develop and implement a performance management system

  • Implement efforts to enhance QI culture

  • Support cross-jurisdictional accreditation and PM efforts

QI Projects Implemented

  • QI Tools used

  • Measureable progress documented



NPHII funding and guidance

PIM Network

Project Officers

Capacity Building/technical assistance (CBA/TA) (APHA, ASTHO, CDC, NACCHO, NNPHI, PHF)

Performance Management (PM) & Quality Improvement (QI) Models & Tools

National Performance Standards

Grantee Agency PH Leadership

Grantee experience & expertise in PM/QI

State/local resources for PM/QI

Outputs

External Forces: Public Health (PH) agency priorities; PH agency prior experience with PM; PH agency leadership support and leadership change; local, state, national political and economic environment; healthcare reform; PHAB; PH system partners capacity and priorities; PH agency diversity in size, structure, and population served

Spread of 10 ES based standards, PM, and QI across PH agencies

Evaluation

Improved public health outcomes

Fully functional PH agencies that achieve optimal performance standards

PH agencies have a culture of quality

Increased performance management capacity



Long Term Outcomes

Intermediate Outcomes: Improved Quality

Short Term Outcomes: Improved Capacity

Inputs

Attachment F. Logic Model for NPHII Evaluation

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorAmanda Bliss
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-31

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy