E - Sample Grantee Report

Attachment E - Sample Grantee Report.pdf

Surveys of State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Governmental Health Agencies

E - Sample Grantee Report

OMB: 0920-0879

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Attachment E - Sample Grantee Report
CODE

BCCEDP Implementation Report

AA

PROGRAM
Andalucia

DATE
10/25/2013

CONSULTANT
Rice

A. SCREENING PROVISION
Table A1. Number of Provider Sites or Clinics

Number of grantees

Graph A1. Provider Site Contracts - Aggregate (n=29)
Provider30
SettingNumber of Grantees
Indiv/Group PCP
20
25
Hospitals
17
Other 20
10
20
15

Graph A2: Provider Site Contracts

10

Indiv/Group PCP
20

17

Hospitals
Indiv/Group PCP
17
Hospitals
Other

10
10
5

20
17
10

Other

0
Indiv/Group PCP
Table A2. Resources for Treatment
Cancer centers
AA
Aggregate
(n=29)

Hospitals

Other

Individual doctors

Yes

Charity care at
hospitals
Yes

Other partners (e.g.
ACS)
No

Fundraising/
Philanthropy groups
Yes

Other

No

Other programs for
indigent
No

14

15

7

7

4

5

11

Other physician
education materials
Yes

Provide continuing
medical education
Yes

Distribute clinical
guidelines
Yes

Provide other PD/PE
No

11

13

26

9

Table A3. Professional Development/Provider Education (PD/PE) Activities
Distribute Provider Education Materials (n=21)
Education outreach
Physician toolkits or
Brochures
visits/ webcasts
programs
AA
No
Yes
No
Aggregate
14
15
12
(n=29)
Table A4. Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement Activities
Academic detailing
AA
Yes
Aggregate
6
(n=29)

Yes

Collecting and monitoring clinical data
Yes

Performance monitoring reports
Yes

13

15

Graphs represent data for all grantees combined. The titles are in a gray bar to denote aggregate data.
Tables represent data for a specific grantee. The titles are in a blue bar to denote grantee-specific data.
Aggregate data are presented only as reference and are not meant for direct comparison.

1

CODE

BCCEDP Implementation Report

PROGRAM
Andalucia

AA

DATE
10/25/2013

CONSULTANT
Rice

B. PATIENT NAVIGATION - Screening Provision & Promotion
Screening
Provision
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Table B1. Patient Navigation Activities
Assessment of patient barriers to screening
Patient education
Assistance with transportation, translation, child/elder care
Assistance with appointment setting
Assistance with identifying payment for screening
Peer support/motivation for screening
Follow-up/Ensure understanding of results
Community outreach for screening
Clinic in-reach for screening

Screening
Promotion
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No

Table B2. Number of Navigators and Sites
Provision
Use patient navigators?
# navigators
# FTEs
# sites/clinics

Promotion

Yes

Yes

4
1
2

2
1
1

Graph B1: Patient Navigation Activities to Support Screening Provision and Promotion - Aggregate
Assessment of patient barriers to screening
Clinic in-reach for screening
Patientfor
education
Community outreach
screening
Follow-up/Ensure
understanding
Assistance with transportation,
translation, child/elder
care of results
Peer support/motivation
screening
Assistance
with appointmentfor
setting
Assistance with identifying payment for screening
Assistance with identifying payment for screening
Assistance with appointment setting
Peer support/motivation
for screening
Assistance with transportation,
translation, child/elder care
Patient
education
Follow-up/Ensure understanding of results
Assessment of patient barriers to screening
Community outreach for screening

9

Screening Promotion
Screening(n=22)
Provision (n=23)
16
14
15
14
14 18
16 15
22
9
11
19
15
17
17
19 15
22
11
15
21
18
23
16
1614
22
14

5

23
21

Screening
Provision
(n=23)
Screening
Promotion
(n=22)

22

22

14

Clinic in-reach for screening
0

22

10

15

15
Number of grantees

20

25

30

Comment Box:

2

CODE

BCCEDP Implementation Report

AA

PROGRAM
Andalucia

DATE
10/25/2013

CONSULTANT
Rice

C. SCREENING PROMOTION
Table C1. Use of Evidence-Based Interventions (EBIs) for Screening Promotion
Small Media

Patient/Client Reminders

Provider
Reminders

Reducing Structural Barriers

Provider Assessment & Feedback

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Small Media

Patient/Client Reminders

Provider
Reminders

Reducing Structural Barriers

Provider Assessment & Feedback

Very easy

Somewhat easy

N/A

Somewhat difficult

N/A

Table C2. Ease of Implementation of EBIs

Graph C1. Grantees Using EBIs - Aggregate (n=29)
30

Number of grantees

25
20

Uses
Small Media
28
22
28 Patient Reminders
Provider Reminders
11
Reducing Structural Barriers
17
22
Provider Assessment & 13
Feedback

15

17
13

10

11

5
0
Small Media

Patient Reminders

Provider Reminders

Reducing Structural Barriers

Provider Assessment & Feedback

Comment Box:

3

BCCEDP Implementation Report

CODE

AA

PROGRAM
Andalucia

DATE
10/25/2013

CONSULTANT
Rice

C1. SMALL MEDIA

Table C1.1. Small Media Partnership Information
More than 10 organizations
Number of partners
Co-Lead
Implementation lead

Table C1.2. Small Media Key Partner
PET Associates
Partner name
Professional Organization
Type of organization
Memo of Understanding (MOU)/Memo of Agreement (MOA)
Type of relationship
After the BCCEDP was funded
When established
African-American, American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Hawaiian/Pacific
Islander, Hispanic/Latino, White, Rural, Urban, Low-income, Employees, Gay,
Primary population served
lesbian, bisexual, transgendered (GLBT), Patients or customers (e.g.,
Medicare/Medicaid subscribers), Physicians and other health care workers,
Uninsured

Graph C1.1. Small Media Use - Aggregate (n=28 grantees reporting small media use)
30
Videos
19
25
Flyers or
26
26
26
20
posters
Brochures,
19
15
17
booklets, or
26
16
15
FAQs
10
11
inserts, or
16
5
questions to
11
0
behinds (tip
17
Videos
Flyers or posters
Brochures, booklets, or Newsletters, inserts, or Checklists or questions to Other leave behinds (tip Electronic media (texts,
media (texts,
15
FAQs
bookmarks
ask providers
sheets, cards)
social media)

Comment Box:

4

CODE

BCCEDP Implementation Report

AA

PROGRAM
Andalucia

DATE
10/25/2013

CONSULTANT
Rice

C2. PATIENT/CLIENT REMINDERS

Table C2.2. Patient/Client Reminders Key Partner
Not provided
Partner name
Advocacy group/ CBO/Community or health coalition
Type of organization
Informal
Type of relationship
After the BCCEDP was funded
When established

Table C2.1. Patient/Client Reminders Partner Information
Between 2-5 organizations
Number of partners
My BCCEDP
Implementation lead

Primary population served

African-American, Asian, Hispanic/Latino, White, Rural, Urban, Low-income,
Uninsured

Table C2.3. Use of Patient/Client Reminders
In Use?

Reminder Type

Sites Using
this Type

Mailed postcards, letters of greeting cards

Yes

Individual physician's office, FQHC, My BCCEDP program

Telephone calls, texts, or emails

Yes

Individual physician's office, FQHC, My BCCEDP program

Graph C2.1. Patient/Client Reminder Use - Aggregate (n=22 grantees reporting
patient/client reminder use)

30
Mailed
postcards,
letters of
25
greeting cards
calls, texts, or

Comment Box:

18
12

20

15

10
18
12

5

0
Mailed postcards, letters of greeting cards

Telephone calls, texts, or emails

5

BCCEDP Implementation Report

CODE

AA

PROGRAM
Andalucia

DATE
10/25/2013

CONSULTANT
Rice

C3. PROVIDER REMINDERS
Table C3.1. Provider Reminders Partnership Information
Number of partners
N/A
Implementation lead
N/A

Table C3.2. Provider Reminders Key Partner
Partner name
Type of organization
Type of relationship
When established
Primary population served

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A

6


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleBC Survey Tables-Examples for OMB1.xlsx
Authorwss1
File Modified2013-10-25
File Created2013-10-25

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy