1845-0065_Supporting Statement_30-day_12092011

1845-0065_Supporting Statement_30-day_12092011.docx

Federal Family Education Loan, Direct Loan and Perkins Loan Total Permanent Disability Discharge Form

OMB: 1845-0065

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Information Collection for the Federal Family Education Loan Program, Federal Perkins Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, and Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grant Program

Discharge Application: Total and Permanent Disability (OMB No. 1845-0065)

A. Justification

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.

The Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), established the Federal Perkins (Perkins) Loan Program, the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program and the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program under Title IV, Parts B, D, and E. Section 437(a) of the HEA authorizes the discharge of a borrower’s obligation to repay his or her FFEL Program loan(s) if the borrower is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death, has lasted for a continuous period of not less than 60 months, or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 60 months. Section 455(a)(1) of the HEA extends this loan discharge provision to Direct Loan Program borrowers, and section 464(c)(1)(F) of the HEA authorizes total and permanent disability loan discharges in the Perkins Loan Program, in accordance with the same eligibility requirements described in section 437(a) of the HEA.

The regulations related to total and permanent disability loan discharges are contained in 34 CFR 682.402(c) for the FFEL Program, in 34 CFR 685.212 and 34 CFR 685.213 for the Direct Loan Program, and in 34 CFR 674.61(b) for the Perkins Loan Program. These regulations require borrowers who seek disability discharges of their FFEL, Direct Loan, or Perkins loans to provide their loan holders with certain information in writing. The Discharge Application: Total and Permanent Disability (TPD Discharge Application) is the means by which a borrower who seeks a total and permanent disability loan discharge provides this information, which is required to determine the borrower’s eligibility for loan discharge. Although borrowers initially submit the completed discharge application to their individual loan holders, the final determination of discharge eligibility is made by the U.S. Department of Education (the Department).

Final regulations published on June 23, 2008 (73 FR 35472) for the Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education (TEACH) Grant Program established regulations for the TEACH Grant Program in 34 CFR 686. In accordance with 34 CFR 686.42(b), a TEACH Grant recipient’s teaching service obligation is discharged if the recipient is totally and permanent disabled in accordance with the same definition that applies to borrowers in the FFEL, Direct Loan, and Perkins Loan programs, and if the recipient satisfies the eligibility requirements for a total and permanent disability discharge in 34 CFR 685.213. A totally and permanently disabled TEACH Grant recipient applies for a discharge of his or her TEACH Grant service obligation by submitting a completed TPD Discharge Application to the Department.

The Department is requesting a revision of the currently approved collection. We are making only one minor change to the currently approved form. Specifically, we are removing language that requires individuals who are submitting discharge applications to more than one entity (for example, borrowers with multiple loan holders) to provide an original signature on each discharge application. This reflects a recent policy change that eliminated the requirement for an original signature from the discharge applicant on each discharge form that the applicant submits. Photocopies of the original signed discharge application. There are no other changes to the currently approved collection.

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

The information collected on this form has been used by loan holders and the Department to determine whether a borrower or TEACH Grant recipient meets the eligibility criteria for a total and permanent disability discharge of his or her loan(s) or TEACH Grant service obligation, and it will continue to be used for this purpose.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration given to using technology to reduce burden.

This collection does not involve the use of technological processes such as electronic submission of responses. The TPD Discharge Application requires a signature from both the discharge applicant and the physician who certifies the applicant’s disability. In addition, the physician must provide additional information (sometimes including attached documentation) related to the applicant’s disabling condition. The United States Postal Service, or some other mail delivery service, provides the only currently feasible means for loan holders to send the disability discharge application to borrowers, and for borrowers and TEACH Grant recipients to return the completed discharge application and any supporting documents.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above

A review of procedures indicates that current requirements avoid duplication. There is no information available from other sources that can be used to determine a borrower’s or TEACH Grant recipient’s eligibility for a total and permanent disability discharge.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities (Item 8b of IC Data Part 2), describe any methods used to minimize burden.

No small businesses are affected by this information collection.

6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

If a borrower or TEACH Grant recipient did not complete a TPD Discharge Application, the Department would not have the information needed to determine whether the individual meets the eligibility requirements for a total and permanent disability discharge. A borrower or TEACH Grant recipient will be required to complete a discharge application only one time.

7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:

  • Requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

  • Requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

  • Requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

  • Requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

  • In connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study;

  • Requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

  • That includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

  • Requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.

The collection of this information will be conducted in a manner that does not involve any of the above conditions.

8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency’s notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.

Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.

Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.

The Department worked closely with the National Council of Higher Education Loan Programs (NCHELP) in developing the currently approved discharge form. In addition, the currently approved form reflects input provided by the public during the two public comment periods of the last clearance of this collection.

In response to a request for comments during the initial 60-day comment period that was published in the Federal Register on September 8, 2011 (76 FR 55654), the Department received comments from the following five commenters: MFY Legal Services; Legal Services NYC; National Consumer Law Center (NCLC); The Institute for College Access & Success (TICAS); and NCHELP. TICAS did not provide separate comments, but endorsed the comments that were submitted by NCLC.

The Department has made several changes to the Discharge Application: Total and Permanent Disability in response to the comments received during the 60-day comment period. The comments that were received and the Department’s responses to the comments are contained in separate documents included with this submission.

9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.

No payments or gifts will be provided to respondents.

10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.

The discharge form includes a Privacy Act Notice that (1) informs the discharge applicant of the statutory authority for the information collection, (2) explains that disclosure of the information is voluntary, but is required in order to determine the applicant’s eligibility for a discharge, and (3) identifies the third parties to whom the information may be disclosed, and explains the circumstances under which such disclosures may occur.

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

The TPD Discharge Application requires the physician who completes the physician’s certification section to provide information about the applicant’s disabling condition. This information may be considered sensitive, but it is needed in order for loan holders and the Department to determine whether a borrower or TEACH Grant recipient meets the statutory definition of totally and permanently disabled.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should :

  • Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

  • If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in item 16 of IC Data Part 1.

  • Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14.

The total estimated annual reporting hour burden for this information collection is approximately 15,000 hours. The burden estimate for this application was calculated as follows:



Estimated annual number of respondents: 30,000

Number of responses per applicant: x 1

Hours per response: x 0.5 hours (30 minutes)

Annual hour burden: 15,000 hours

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)

  • The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.

  • If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.

  • Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.

Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost: 0

Total Annual Costs (O&M): 0

______

Total Annualized Costs Requested: 0


There are no capital/startup costs to respondents, nor are there any annual costs to respondents associated with operating or maintaining systems or purchasing services.


There is an estimated annual cost to respondents of $13,200.00 associated with postage. This estimate was calculated by multiplying the estimated number of respondents (30,000) by the cost of postage required to return a loan discharge application ($0.44).

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

The cost to the federal government is minimal for cancellation requests for the FFEL and Perkins programs as the loan holders distribute and collect the form. However, for the Direct Loan Program and the TEACH Grant Program, there is an estimated annual cost to the Federal Government of $27,000.00 for printing, mailing, and processing the form.

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments to #16f of the IC Data Part 1 Form.

There are no program changes or adjustments.

16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

The results of this information collection will not be published.

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

The Department is not seeking this approval.

18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification of Paperwork Reduction Act.

The Department is not requesting any exceptions to the Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions.

B. Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods

This collection of information will not employ any statistical methods.

3


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleSUPPORTING STATEMENT
AuthorBrian L. Smith
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-31

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy