PRA Supporting Statement burden and cost calculations |
|
|
|
|
This workbook contains justification for the numbers calculated for each regulation's PRA Supporting Statement. |
|
|
|
|
Please refer to the Assumptions/Notes section below for general reasoning behind the calculations as well as exceptions to any methods used. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions/Notes |
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|
|
|
1) CFPB burden is for those depository institutions with over $10 billion in assets and their depository affiliates, as well as half of the FTC's burden net that which is attributed to the FTC for motor vehicle dealers. Dodd-Frank carves-out a specific section of motor vehicle dealers from the FTC for CFPB regulatory authority, however due to the calculation difficulty of carving out this smaller section, the FTC has attributed all burden attributed to motor vehicle dealers to themselves. |
|
|
|
|
2) Whenever an agency did not have a complete burden and cost estimate analysis for any particular regulation, the Fed's burden and cost numbers were used, except for the OTS where the OCC's estimates were used where possible. |
|
|
|
|
3) When the original agency's number of respondents for a particular line item was less than the total affected by the regulation, CFPB's affected number of respondents for that line item was calculated using the ratio of that number/total affected * the total number transferring to the CFPB. |
|
|
|
|
4) Line items from different agencies' supporting statements were kept as close as possible to their original breakdown, with some assumptions made if breaking them up would still keep the accuracy of the numbers and would fit well with line items from other agencies. |
|
|
|
|
5) The one-time changes in previous agencies' supporting statements were not accounted for in the CFPB's burden acquisition, since presumably the firms have already implemented these changes. The CFPB only assumed each agency's respective portion of ongoing burden. With respect to the FTC, however, since the FTC annualizes the one-time burden over the three-year clearance of the Supporting Statement, the CFPB did take half of their one-time burden for the one-time changes in the FTC's Supporting Statements. |
|
|
|
|
6) The restatement process caused some forms associated with certain regulations to change, and the one-time burden calculated for these changes reflected in the PRA Supporting Statement is only for those entities for which the CFPB has enforcement authority. This burden is new burden and was not assumed during the restatement process. |
|
|
|
|
7) The one-time costs for firms were estimated using the same cost structure as their previous regulatory agency used for any ongoing burden costs imposed on firms. The exception is for the FTC, since they used multiple cost structures for different burden items, a standard cost structure was used for them, taken from the estimates used by the FTC for TILA burden costs. |
|
|
|
|
8) Estimates for non-labor costs and costs to government were estimated by taking the appropriate portion from the other agencies' supporting statements based on the CFPB's burden assumed from each respective agency who calculated these costs. |
|
|
|
|
ECOA |
|
|
|
|
9) For the one-time burden change: This includes all depository entities with over $10B in assets and all of their depository affiliates and consumer finance related non-depository affiliates, which are those entities which the CFPB has enforcement authority. For those entities under both the enforcement authority of the CFPB and the FTC, the CFPB and FTC are splitting the burden. |
|
|
|
|
10) For the 1022 burden: This includes all institutions changing to the CFPB as described above, in addition to all those entities changing enforcement authorities from the OTS. For those entities under both the enforcement authority of the CFPB and the FTC, this burden is the full amount created by the changes in forms. |
|
|
|
|
11) The one-time burden changes were estimated to be four hours per form, per firm, as the changes are relatively minor and simple. This estimate is an extrapolation from previous one-time estimates that the Fed has done. |
|
|
|
|
TILA |
|
|
|
|
12) The one-time burden changes were estimated to be four hours per form, per firm, as the changes are relatively minor and simple. This estimate is an extrapolation from previous one-time estimates that the Fed has done. |
|
|
|
|
FCRA |
|
|
|
|
13) The one-time burden changes were estimated to be two hours per form, per firm, as the changes are relatively minor and simple, and with a total of eleven forms changing, there should be increased efficiency with making multiple changes of the same thing. This estimate is an extrapolation from previous one-time estimates that the Fed has done. |
|
|
|
|
RESPA |
|
|
|
|
14) Modified Annual Escrow from 21,110 to 20,100 frequency of responses, so that the responses per annum add up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instutions >$10B |
Affiliates |
Total |
|
Fed |
21 |
4 |
25 |
|
FDIC |
23 |
18 |
41 |
|
OCC |
60 |
26 |
86 |
|
NCUA |
3 |
|
3 |
Fed |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCC |
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCUA |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FTC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CFPB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Costs |
Non-labor Costs |
CFPB split |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Costs |
Non-labor Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated number of respondents |
CFPB carve-out |
Estimated annual frequency |
Estimated response time (hours) |
Estimated annual burden hours |
|
|
|
|
Respondents |
CFPB carve-out |
Annual frequency |
Time (hours) |
Estimated annual burden hours |
|
|
|
|
Respondents - OCC |
Respondents - OTS |
Total OCC & OTS |
CFPB carve-out |
Frequency |
Time (hours) |
Estimated annual burden hours |
|
|
|
|
Respondents |
CFPB carve-out |
Frequency |
Time (hours) |
Estimated annual burden hours |
No cost to respondents; No cost to gov't |
|
|
|
|
Respondents |
Auto dealer carve-out |
New estimated number of respondents |
FTC half + auto-dealers |
CFPB half |
Frequency |
Estimated response time (hr) |
Time annualized over 3 years |
Auto dealer carve-out burden (hr) |
FTC burden (hr) |
CFPB estimated total annual burden (hr) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated number of respondents |
Estimated annual frequency |
Estimated response time (hours) |
Estimated annual burden hours |
|
|
Negative information notice (Section 217) |
30,000 |
25 |
1 |
0.25 |
6 |
$271 |
|
|
Banks |
5,104 |
41 |
1 |
40 |
1,640 |
$101,106 |
|
|
Separate Notice - Ongoing |
90 |
39 |
129 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
$434 |
|
|
Develop program |
5,245 |
3 |
1 |
25 |
75 |
$3,255 |
|
|
128 (Free Annual File Disclosures) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliate marketing opt-out notice (Section 214) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frivolous or Irrelevant Dispute Notices |
100,100 |
805 |
1 |
0.23 |
188 |
$18,020 |
|
|
Consolidated Notice - Ongoing |
270 |
116 |
386 |
15 |
1 |
1 |
15 |
$651 |
|
|
Preparing annual report |
5,245 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
12 |
$521 |
|
|
|
New annual file disclosure requests - '07 |
26,690,000 |
|
26,690,000 |
13,345,000 |
13,345,000 |
1 |
|
|
- |
155,500 |
155,500 |
$2,595,000 |
$8,390,000 |
$4,195,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Institutions |
2,619 |
25 |
1 |
18 |
450 |
$19,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated, but not perpetual opt out notices |
135 |
58 |
193 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
$347 |
|
|
Training |
5,245 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
$260 |
|
|
|
CRAs have to remove adveritsing until after consumer has obtained requested annual file disclosure -'09 |
3 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
12 |
- |
24 |
12 |
$710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Response |
638,380 |
6,094 |
1 |
0.083 |
508 |
$10,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Opt-out - Consolidated notices |
406,125 |
145,109 |
551,234 |
2,049 |
1 |
0.017 |
34 |
$1,482 |
|
|
Developing policies and procedures to assess the validity of changes of addresses |
5,245 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
12 |
$521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red flags (Sections 114 and 315)[2] |
1,172 |
25 |
1 |
41 |
1,025 |
$44,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Opt-out - Not consolidated notices |
135,375 |
48,370 |
183,745 |
6,828 |
1 |
0.067 |
455 |
$19,756 |
|
|
Developing policies and procedures to respond to notices of address discrepancies |
5,245 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
12 |
$521 |
|
|
131 (FACT Act Affiliate Marketing Rule ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-based pricing (Section 311) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GLBA entities under the FACT Act Affiliate Marketing Rule |
220,356 |
20 |
220,336 |
110,188 |
110,168 |
1 |
14 |
4.67 |
93 |
514,211 |
514,117 |
$16,977,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice to consumers (on-going) |
18,173 |
25 |
12 |
5 |
1,500 |
$65,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furnisher duties (Section 312) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GLBA entities under the FACT Act Affiliate Marketing Rule |
3,350 |
1,838 |
1,512 |
2,594 |
756 |
1 |
14 |
4.67 |
8,577 |
12,105 |
3,528 |
$149,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy & procedures |
1,172 |
25 |
1 |
40 |
1,000 |
$43,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irrelevant dispute notices |
611,966 |
13,054 |
1 |
0.23 |
3,046 |
$132,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 (Prescreen Opt-Out Disclosure Rule) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prescreen Opt-Out Disclosure Rule |
750 |
225 |
525 |
488 |
262 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
450 |
976 |
524 |
$131,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 (Procedures to Enhance the Accuracy and Integrity of Information Furnished to Consumer Reporting Agencies) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660.3 rqmt to implement written policies to ensure accurate info, related training - Initial |
6,133 |
1,840 |
4,293 |
3,986 |
2,147 |
1 |
24 |
8.00 |
14,720 |
31,888 |
17,176 |
$704,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660.3 rqmt to implement written policies to ensure accurate info, related training - Recurring |
6,133 |
1,840 |
4,293 |
3,986 |
2,147 |
1 |
4 |
1.33 |
2,453 |
5,315 |
2,863 |
$117,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660.4 rqmts to amend procedures to handle complaints directly from cnsumers - Initial |
6,133 |
1,840 |
4,293 |
3,986 |
2,147 |
1 |
8 |
2.67 |
4,907 |
10,629 |
5,725 |
$234,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660.4 implementation of rqmt to notify consumers that a dispute is frivolous - Initial |
6,133 |
1,840 |
4,293 |
3,986 |
2,147 |
1 |
8 |
2.67 |
4,907 |
10,629 |
5,725 |
$234,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time to prepare a sec.660.4 notice of frivolous or irrelevant dispute - Ongoing |
21,720 |
217 |
21,503 |
10,968 |
10,752 |
1 |
0.233 |
0.233 |
51 |
2,559 |
2,509 |
$46,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 (Fair Credit Reporting Risk-Based Pricing Regulations) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional one-time burden to implement proposed amendments |
199,500 |
117,631 |
81,869 |
158,566 |
40,934 |
1 |
32 |
10.67 |
1,254,731 |
1,691,371 |
436,629 |
$18,753,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial cost to implement changes |
199,500 |
117,631 |
81,869 |
158,566 |
40,934 |
1 |
220 |
73.33 |
8,626,273 |
11,628,173 |
3,001,827 |
$51,716,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time form changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time form changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time form changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time form changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-time form changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H Forms |
|
25 |
7 |
2 |
350 |
$15,190 |
|
|
H Forms |
|
41 |
7 |
2 |
574 |
$35,387 |
|
|
H Forms |
|
|
|
86 |
7 |
2 |
1,204 |
$52,254 |
|
|
H Forms |
|
3 |
7 |
2 |
42 |
$1,823 |
|
|
|
H Forms |
199,500 |
117,631 |
81,869 |
158,566 |
40,934 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
1,646,834 |
2,219,924 |
573,076 |
$17,822,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Form |
|
25 |
1 |
2 |
50 |
$2,170 |
|
|
M Form |
|
41 |
1 |
2 |
82 |
$5,055 |
|
|
M Form |
|
|
|
86 |
1 |
2 |
172 |
$7,465 |
|
|
M Form |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
$260 |
|
|
|
M Form |
6,133 |
1,840 |
4,293 |
3,987 |
2,146 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3,680 |
7,974 |
4,292 |
$133,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I, K, N Forms |
|
|
3 |
2 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
I, K, N Forms |
|
|
3 |
2 |
- |
$- |
|
|
I, K, N Forms |
|
|
|
|
3 |
2 |
0 |
$0 |
|
|
I, K, N Forms |
|
|
3 |
2 |
- |
$- |
|
|
|
I, K, N Forms |
379 |
|
379 |
190 |
189 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
- |
1,140 |
1,134 |
$35,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
7,935 |
$333,004 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
2,484 |
$159,568 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,898 |
$82,388 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
165 |
$7,161 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,724,637 |
$109,651,676 |
|
$4,195,000 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
4,737,120 |
$110,233,798 |
$4,195,000 |
Ongoing |
|
|
|
|
7,535 |
$315,644 |
|
|
Ongoing |
|
|
|
|
1,828 |
$119,126 |
|
|
Ongoing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
522 |
$22,670 |
|
|
Ongoing |
|
|
|
|
117 |
$5,078 |
|
|
|
Ongoing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,146,135 |
$91,660,263 |
|
|
|
|
Ongoing |
|
|
|
4,156,138 |
$92,122,781 |
|
One-time |
|
|
|
|
400 |
$17,360 |
|
|
One-time |
|
|
|
|
656 |
$40,442 |
|
|
One-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1376 |
$59,718 |
|
|
One-time |
|
|
|
|
48 |
$2,083 |
|
|
|
One-time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
578,502 |
$17,991,412 |
|
|
|
|
One-time |
|
|
|
580,982 |
$18,111,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry before CFPB |
|
|
|
19,017,312 |
$425,885,806 |
|
*Cost estimates for Fed in the SS are stated to be $16 for Office Support and $49 for Financial Managers, although they clearly used $17 and $50 in their analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|