INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS
NATIONAL WOMEN’S BUSINESS COUNCIL, WASHINGTON, DC
Focus Group Protocols
Note: A common set of questions will be asked of all focus groups. Our approach is to lead the focus groups from the general to the specific. For each of the questions stated below, the moderator will lead the group from general perceptions about the IP process to more specific perceptions about the IP process as it applies to women entrepreneurs. We propose to follow up with probing the real barriers facing women entrepreneurs and how to overcome those barriers.
The protocols are divided into two sections:
The first section will probe the issues raised in the RFQ.
The second section will probe the specific issues raised by the Quantitative Analysis.
Introduction by Moderator
Describe the scope of the focus group study:
Six focus groups will be conducted, two each with the following audiences:
Women entrepreneurs who have successfully applied for and received patents or trademarks,
Women entrepreneurs who have applied for but have not received a patent or trademark;
Women entrepreneurs who have no knowledge of patents or trademarks and are not aware that they should or could apply.
The purpose of the focus groups is to probe in-depth the following questions:
What are the perceived barriers facing women entrepreneurs surrounding protecting their IP?
What are the actual barriers?
How do we address these barriers?
What are the long term effects on businesses that receive patents and successfully market their IP?
Introduction of Participants by First Name
Ask each participant what she does as an entrepreneur.
Protocols Section 1: Issues Raised in the RFQ
Questions raised in the RFQ |
Lead-in Question |
Follow-on Questions |
Introductions |
|
|
What are the perceived barriers facing women entrepreneurs surrounding protecting their IP? |
Have you ever applied for a patent or trademark? If so, what are your perceptions of the process? |
|
What are the actual barriers? |
Please describe your actual experience with the IP process. |
|
How do we address these barriers? |
What suggestions would you offer to improve the process for women entrepreneurs? |
|
What are the long term effects on businesses that receive patents and successfully market their IP? |
Do you know of specific case histories of women entrepreneurs who received a patent or trademark and built a business upon it? |
|
Closing comments
|
|
|
Protocols Section 2: Issues Raised by the Quantitative Study
Observations from the Quantitative Analysis |
Lead-in Question |
Follow-on Questions |
Our quantitative analysis shows that “there is no statistically measurable difference in the proportion of successful women Trademark applicants and successful men Trademark applicants. The analysis shows no bias in the processing of trademark applications.” |
Is this conclusion in synch with your perception? If it is not, why is that so? |
|
“U.S. based women demonstrate increasing leadership in patent and trademark activities.” |
Do you agree with this observation? Why? |
|
“There is a surge of innovation by women in some of the emerging high-tech industries.” |
Do you agree with this statement? If not, why? |
|
“The number of patents granted to women is increasing at an accelerating pace.”
|
Why is there a noticeable jump in patent activity in the midst of a continuing, prolonged recession? |
|
Our quantitative analysis shows that “19.77% of all patents by men were unassigned as compared to 29.41% for women.” |
Why do you think this is so? |
|
“The ratio of successful women patent applicants to successful men patent applicants varies from a low of 73.36% in 1986 to a high of 93.57% in 2002.”
|
What factors influence this trend? |
|
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Nazeer Ahmed |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-30 |