Appendix - Summary of Public Comments regarding Form I-601A

I-601A Public Comments

Summary of Suggestions – As of 9/19/12

Category		Comment and Response		Comment #
Form	Part 1, Information About Applicant, Immigration or Criminal History Records	Comment: In response to the NPRM, many commenters suggested that USCIS allow individuals in removal proceedings to apply for provisional unlawful presence waivers if their removal proceedings have been administratively closed pursuant to ICE’s Prosecutorial Discretion (PD) initiative. Response: DHS has amended the final rule to indicate that an individual in removal proceedings may apply for a provisional unlawful presence waiver if the individual’s removal proceedings were administratively closed on or after November 17, 2011 and have not been re-calendared . DHS is not limiting eligibility solely to individuals whose cases were closed pursuant to the ICE PD initiative. Any alien whose removal proceedings were or will be administratively closed on or after November 17, 2011 and have not since been re-calendared at the time USCIS receives the request for provisional unlawful presence waiver, can apply for a provisional unlawful presence waiver (Form I-601A). If USCIS approves the provisional unlawful presence waiver for an individual whose removal proceedings were administratively closed on or after November 17, 2011, and have not been recalendared, the individual should seek termination of his or her removal proceedings before departing the United States to appear at the immigrant visa interview to avoid possible delays in his or her immigrant visa processing or risk of becoming ineligible for the immigrant visa based on another ground of inadmissibility. USCIS has updated the form and instructions accordingly.	NPRM comments
		Comment: In response to the proposed Form I-601A, several commenters indicated that the section of the form entitled “Immigration or Criminal History Records” is confusing and inaccurate.” Specifically, the commenters believe this section is inaccurate because it indicates that an applicant will be ineligible for a provisional unlawful presence waiver if the applicant answers “Yes” to certain questions relating to other possible grounds of inadmissibility. These commenters also believed the questions were too broad to lead to a firm finding of inadmissibility and that this section should be amended to say that the applicant “may” not be eligible and USCIS “may” deny the application if the applicant answers “Yes” to those questions. These commenters also identified specific inaccuracies and provided suggested edits to revise this section. Response: DHS has incorporated many of the commenters’ suggested edits while rewriting this part of the form to clarify ambiguities and to correct inaccuracies. USCIS revised the form and instructions to clarify that USCIS “may” find an applicant ineligible for a provisional unlawful presence waiver if USCIS determines that there is reason to believe the Department of State may find the applicant ineligible for a ground of inadmissibility other than unlawful presence. Regardless of whether USCIS approves or denies the provisional unlawful presence waiver, an immigrant visa applicant should present evidence of eligibility and any documents needed to establish admissibility to the consular officer at the time of the immigrant visa interview. The approval of a provisional unlawful presence waiver does not guarantee that the consular officer will find the applicant eligible for an immigrant visa. Also, the denial of a provisional unlawful presence waiver does not preclude the applicant from establishing visa eligibility or seeking a waiver after the immigrant visa interview. The purpose of these eligibility questions is not for USCIS to pre-adjudicate immigrant visa eligibility, but to limit the provisional unlawful presence waiver process to individuals whose only potential ground of inadmissibility is based on prior unlawful presence in the United States. All other potential grounds of inadmissibility and/or ineligibility need to be addressed with the consular officer during the immigrant visa interview.	AILA NIJC 0937 1276 2069 3667 3672 3679
		Comment: In response to the proposed Form I-601A, one commenter suggested that the form be enhanced by incorporating a detailed questionnaire, similar to that of Form I-601, aimed at uncovering other potential grounds of inadmissibility. Response: USCIS did not include a detailed questionnaire covering every potential ground of inadmissibility because the Form I-601A may only be used to waive unlawful presence.  The purpose of the section entitled “Immigration or Criminal History Records” is to give applicants an opportunity to explain any possible immigration or criminal history records which USCIS may uncover during routine system and background checks.  USCIS will not make any changes to the form based on this comment.	3629
	Part 2, Information About Immediate Relative Petition and Consular Processing	Comment: In response to the NPRM, many commenters suggested that USCIS allow individuals to cancel or reschedule their immigrant visa interviews in order to seek a provisional unlawful presence waiver. Response: DHS did not adopt this suggestion. Once the National Visa Center (NVC) schedules the immigrant visa interview, the NVC sends the case and supporting paperwork to the appropriate U.S. Embassy or consulate abroad where the applicant’s immigrant visa interview will occur. USCIS and DOS have worked closely together to ensure that the provisional unlawful presence waiver applications are processed before the NVC sends the cases to the U.S. Embassies or consulates. This process ensures that approval of a provisional unlawful presence waiver and scheduling of the immigrant visa interviews for I-601A applicants does not significantly disrupt the consulates’ existing interview schedules. The final rule indicates that USCIS will not approve a provisional unlawful presence waiver for an individual whose immigrant visa interview was scheduled before USCIS received the application for a provisional unlawful presence waiver, even if the consulate or individual cancels or reschedules the immigrant visa interview. USCIS updated the form and instructions to make this clear.	NPRM comments
	Part 3, Information About Qualifying Relative	Comment: In response to the NPRM, many commenters asked DHS to allow eligible applicants to show extreme hardship to a lawful permanent resident (LPR) spouse or parent, if applicable, since the statute authorizes a waiver of unlawful presence based on a showing of extreme hardship to a spouse or parent who is either a U.S. citizen or LPR. Response: DHS has considered these comments but is not adopting the suggested change. As stated in the proposed rule, a primary purpose for creating the provisional unlawful presence waiver process is to reduce the separation of U.S. citizens and their immediate relatives. Focusing on hardship to U.S. citizens is consistent with permissible distinctions that may be drawn between U.S. citizens and aliens. It also is consistent with the Secretary’s authority to administer the immigration laws and determine the most efficient means for effectuating the waiver process. See 77 FR at 19908.	NPRM comments
	Other	Comment: In response to the proposed Form I-601A, one commenter suggested that when USCIS requires an interview for a provisional unlawful presence waiver, USCIS should allow the applicant to choose to either appear at a local USCIS field office for an in-person interview or have a video-conference interview with an adjudicator at a USCIS service center using appropriate technology (i.e. Skype). Response: DHS reviewed the suggestion but did not adopt the suggestions. USCIS does not anticipate that many provisional unlawful presence waiver applicants will require an in-person interview. Also, USCIS does not conduct interviews at the NBC, namely because of the remote locations and the type of benefit requests adjudicated by that center, which are generally paper-based decisions. USCIS also will not conduct video interviews in lieu of in-person interviews when such interviews are required. Therefore, USCIS will not make the suggested change to the form.	3197
Instructions	Who May File Form I-601A?	Comment: In response to the NPRM, several commenters were confused about what it means to have a pending application for adjustment of status and did not understand why this would affect eligibility for a provisional unlawful presence waiver. Response: DHS will not remove the restriction for individuals who have an application for adjustment of status pending with USCIS. Individuals who are eligible to obtain LPR status while inside the United States and intend to pursue LPR status throughthat process do not need the provisional unlawful presence waiver. The provisional unlawful presence waiver is only valid for the purpose of seeking an immigrant visa outside the United States. To avoid confusion, USCIS has updated the form instructions to clarify that this restriction only applies to individuals with a pending Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status.	NPRM comments
		Comment: In response to the NPRM, many commenters suggested that USCIS remove the restriction to the number of times an individual may seek a provisional unlawful presence waiver or modify it to allow filing of one provisional unlawful presence waiver application . Response: DHS considered these comments and has changed the final rule to reflect that an individual will not be precluded from filing a new application for a provisional unlawful presence waiver if the application is based on a new immediate relative petition. However, an individual will not be permitted to file multiple provisional unlawful presence waiver applications to support the same immigrant visa petition. USCIS updated the form and instructions accordingly.	NPRM comments
		Comment: In response to the proposed Form I-601A Instructions, one commenter suggested adding “child” as a qualifying relative for showing extreme hardship. Response: DHS cannot adopt this suggestion because Congress limited the qualifying relationship for purposes of establishing extreme hardship to spouses or parents. USCIS cannot change this statutory requirement.	Email
	General Instructions	Comment: In response to the proposed Form I-601A instructions, one commenter asked DHS to clarify in the Form I-601A instructions how the provisional unlawful presence waiver relates to children who benefit from the the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA). Response: DHS has added language to the Form I-601A instructions to make clear applicants will remain eligible for a provisional unlawful presence waiver as long as the applicants remain “immediate relatives” as defined in the INA, as amended by the CSPA. Thus, an aged-out child may still qualify as an “immediate relative” for purposes of access to the provisional unlawful presence waiver porcess as long as the child is classified as an immediate relative under the INA.	3197
	Specific Instructions	Comment: In response to the proposed Form I-601A Instructions, several commenters suggested adding a sentence in Part 5 of the instructions to explain that applicants may supplement their statements on extreme hardship and factors warranting a favorable exercise of discretion with an attached letter. Response: DHS added the information as requested to the Form I-601A instructions.	AILA NIJC 3667 3679 3672
		Comment: In response to the proposed Form I-601A Instructions, several commenters suggested adding a reminder in the instructions that applicants read the section entitled “Penalties” before the applicant signs the application. Response: USCIS added the reminder on the form and instructions as requested.	AILA NIJC 3667 3679 3672
	What Evidence Should be Submitted With the Application?	Comment: In response to the proposed Form I-601A Instructions, one commenter suggested adding a checklist to assist applicants with information on the types of documents and statement that should be submitted with the provisional unlawful presence waiver application. Response: DHS added a separate section with a checklist as requested.	3000
	Other	Comment: In response to the proposed Form I-601A Instructions, one commenter suggested adding a warning regarding unauthorized practice of immigration law. Response: DHS agrees with this suggestion. In 2011, USCIS started an initiative – the Unauthorized Practice of Immigration Law (UPIL) initiative – to educate the public about potential fraud and scams in the immigration context. USCIS has posted information about the UPIL initiative on its website. DHS encourages applicants to review the information at www.uscis.gov/avoidscams. DHS also has added a link to this website on the form instructions.	3197