Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Experience of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries with ESRD: Impact of the ESRD Prospective Payment System (PPS) and ESRD Quality Incentive Program (QIP)
Evaluation of Patient
Satisfaction and Experience of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries with
ESRD: Impact of the ESRD Prospective Payment System (PPS) and ESRD
Quality Incentive Program (QIP)
New
collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
Approved
consistent with the following terms of clearance; following
completion of the evaluation CMS will provide OMB with a
description of the response rates achieved, and describe the
results of their non-coverage bias analysis and nonresponse bias
analysis.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
08/31/2016
36 Months From Approved
2,540
0
0
662
0
0
0
0
0
The Medicare Improvements for Patients
and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) directed the Secretary of HHS to
implement a payment system under which providers or renal dialysis
facilities receive a single payment for renal dialysis services in
lieu of any other payment. The end-stage renal disease (ESRD)
prospective payment system (PPS or "bundled payment") combines
composite rate dialysis services with separately billable services
under a single payment adjusted to reflect patient differences in
resource needs or case-mix. MIPPA also stipulated the development
of quality incentives for the ESRD program, known as the ESRD
Quality Incentive Program (QIP). The ESRD QIP reduces ESRD payments
by up to 2.0 percent for dialysis providers and facilities that
fail to meet or exceed a specified performance score. The Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is planning a qualitative
and quantitative evaluation of the impact of the recently
implemented ESRD PPS/QIP on beneficiary satisfaction and experience
of care. To support its review of the legislative impact on
satisfaction and care, CMS will conduct two separate data
collection efforts: one with ESRD beneficiaries and one with
stakeholders in the renal care community. The quantitative data
collection effort for this study will include 2,500 telephone
interviews with 2,500 ESRD beneficiaries. CMS will assess
beneficiary experiences using the current version of the In-Center
Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and
Systems (ICH-CAHPS) Survey. The qualitative data collection effort
for this study will include interviews of 40 key stakeholder
professionals in the renal care community. The focus of these
interviews will include an assessment of whether there are missing
domains or topics in the current ICH-CAHPS Survey (to support
future modifications to the survey instrument).
PL:
Pub.L. 92 - 603 2991 Name of Law: Chronic Renal Disease
Considered to Constitute Disability
Subsequent to the publication
of the 60-day Federal Register notice (77 FR 27777), the annual
burden hours have decreased from 1,287 to 662. Early cognitive
interview findings of the ESRD Beneficiary Survey submitted during
the 60 day notice exhibited respondent complaints that the survey
was too long and some participants had to hang up early because
they were feeling sick. Medicare beneficiaries with end stage renal
disease (ESRD) are very sick and unable to remain cognitively aware
for 30 minutes. The ESRD Beneficiary Survey was significantly
shortened so that the time necessary to interview a single
participant was reduced from 30 to 15 minutes.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.