1651 0085 042013

1651 0085 042013.doc

Administrative Rulings

OMB: 1651-0085

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Supporting Statement

Administrative Rulings

1651-0085

A. Justification

  1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statue and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.


The collection of information in 19 CFR Part 177 is necessary in order to enable Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to respond to requests by importers and other interested persons for the issuance of administrative rulings. These rulings pertain to the interpretation of applicable laws related to prospective and current transactions involving classification, marking, and country of origin. The collection of information in Part 177 of the CBP Regulations is also necessary to enable CBP to make proper decisions regarding the issuance of binding rulings that modify or revoke prior CBP binding rulings. This collection of information is authorized by 19 USC 66, 1202, (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States). The application to obtain an administrative ruling is accessible at: https://apps.cbp.gov/erulings.

.

This collection of information applies to the importing and trade community who are familiar with import procedures and with the CBP regulations.


2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

The information is to be used by CBP employees for the purposes of rendering an administrative ruling.


3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.

Respondents may apply online at: https://apps.cbp.gov/erulings. Approximately 30 percent of applications are submitted electronically.


For respondents who do not want to submit their request using the website, they may send a letter to CBP requesting a ruling via United States Postal Service (USPS). 19 CFR 177.2 provides guidance on the information that should be included in the letter and the address where to send it.


4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.


This information is not duplicated in any other place or any other form.


5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.


This information collection does not have an impact on small businesses or other small entities.

6. Describe consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently.


Failure to collect this information would have no consequences to the Federal Government, however it would limit the public’s ability to receive advanced rulings from CBP.


7. Explain any special circumstances.


This information is collected in a manner consistent with the guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


  1. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.

Public comments were solicited through two Federal Register notices published on November 6, 2012 (Volume 77, Page 66626) on which no comments were received, and on January 9 (Volume 78, Page 1878) on which no comments have been received.


9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


There is no offer of a monetary or material value for this information collection.


10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.

There are no assurances of confidentiality provided to the respondents of this information collection. A PIA for the Automated Commercial System (ACS) dated December 2, 2008, and a SORN for ACS/ACE, dated December 19, 2008 (Vol. 73, Page 77759) will be included in this ICR.

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

There are no questions of a sensitive nature.


12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information.


INFORMATION

COLLECTION

TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS


NO. OF

RESPONDENTS

NO. OF RESPONSES PER RESPONDENT


TOTAL

RESPONSES


TIME PER

RESPONSE


Administrative

Rulings


120,000


12,000


1


12,000


10 hours


Appeals


8,000


200


1

200


40 hours


TOTAL


128,000


12,200



12,200



Public Cost

The estimated cost to the respondents is $12,800,000. This is based on the estimated burden hours (128,000) multiplied (x) the average hourly rate ($100.00).

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information.


There are no record keeping, capital, start-up or maintenance costs associated with this information collection.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal Government. Also provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.


The estimated annual cost to the Federal Government associated with the review of these records is $9,000,000. This is based on the number of responses (12,200) that must be reviewed (x) the time to review request and write a ruling (15 hours) = 183,000 hours (x) the average hourly rate ($50.00) = $9,150,000.


15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 12 or 13.


There has been no increase or decrease in the estimated annual burden hours previously reported for this information collection and there are no changes to the information collected.


16. For collection of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation, and publication.


This information collection will not be published for statistical purposes.


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date, explain the reasons that displaying the expiration date would be inappropriate.

CBP will display the expiration date for OMB approval of this information collection.

18. “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions.”

CBP does not request an exception to the certification of this information collection.


  1. Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods


No statistical methods were employed.







4


File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSupporting Statement
AuthorPreferred Customer
Last Modified Bytyrone.huff
File Modified2013-04-02
File Created2013-04-02

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy