The Alternative Fuel Rule

ICR 201302-3084-003

OMB: 3084-0094

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2013-02-28
ICR Details
3084-0094 201302-3084-003
Historical Active 201003-3084-004
FTC
The Alternative Fuel Rule
Extension without change of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 04/15/2013
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 03/05/2013
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
04/30/2016 36 Months From Approved 04/30/2013
1,509,713 0 1,123,956
52,272 0 38,469
570,813 0 426,250

The Alternative Fuel Rule establishes uniform labeling requirements for non-liquid fuel dispensers and for new alternative fueled vehicles (AFVs). The labeling enables consumers to make informed choices and comparisons among competing non-liquid alternative vehicle fuels and AFVs. The Rule also requires affected entities to keep records to show compliance with the Rule. The primary purpose of the recordkeeping requirements is to preserve evidence of the fuel rating certification from importers, producers, and refiners through the chain of distribution and of each AFV’s estimated cruising range and emission certification standard. Without records of how the fuel rating of the non-liquid alternative fuel was represented when the transfer was made and of how the vehicle's estimated cruising range and emission certification standard were determined for AFVs, it would be impossible to ensure that the required labeling disclosures are accurate and substantiated.

Statute at Large: 106 Stat. 2776 Name of Statute: Energy Policy Act of 1992
  
None

Not associated with rulemaking

  77 FR 73467 12/10/2012
78 FR 14302 03/05/2013
No

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 1,509,713 1,123,956 0 0 385,757 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 52,272 38,469 0 0 13,803 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 570,813 426,250 0 0 144,563 0
No
No
The increased estimate of burden hours is due to a rise in the estimated number of AFVs on the market and in the number of affected entities, and not a function of increased burden per entity. Similarly, the increased estimate of non-labor cost burden is attributable to an increase in the number of Alternative Fueled Vehicles since FTC staff's prior PRA clearance request submission three years ago.

$19,000
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Hampton Newsome 202 326-2889 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
03/05/2013


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy