Cook Inlet Beluga Whale (CIBW) Economic Survey

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
CIBW NEW SS 041513 Part B revision.docx	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2013-04-18	Available
CIBW SS New 041613 Part A revised.doc	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2013-04-18	Available
bosetti+pearce2003_biodiv_cons.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2012-06-01	Available
CIBW_lew_layton_rowe2010_mre.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2012-06-01	Available
CIBW_richardson_loomis2009_ecol_econ.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2012-06-01	Available
CIBW_loomis+white1996_ecol_econ.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2012-06-01	Available
Appendix.docx	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2012-05-15	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
202282	Follow-up telephone survey	Other-telephone script	Unchanged
202281	Cook Inlet Beluga Whale (CIBW) Economic Survey	Other-survey correspondence	Unchanged

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 0648-0668	ICR Reference No: 201304-0648-005
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 201205-0648-005
Agency/Subagency: DOC/NOAA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Cook Inlet Beluga Whale (CIBW) Economic Survey
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 05/29/2013
	Date Received in OIRA: 04/19/2013
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	05/31/2016	36 Months From Approved
Responses	2,621	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	814	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The Endangered Species Act-listed population of Cook Inlet beluga whales is one of five distinct population segments in United States (U.S.) waters. No empirical estimates of U.S. public values for Cook Inlet beluga whales are currently available, but this information is needed for decision makers to more fully understand the trade-offs involved in evaluating population recovery planning alternatives and to complement other information available about the costs, benefits, and impacts of alternative plans. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) plans to conduct a survey of Alaska households to collect data for estimating the economic benefits associated with changes in extinction risk resulting from protection actions for the Cook Inlet beluga whale. The results from this survey should be useful to NMFS and the public in the future as NMFS and its partners consider various actions under the recovery planning process for Cook Inlet beluga whales. Any future regulatory actions would include analyses of costs and benefits of the proposed measures as well as opportunities for public input.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 16 USC 1531-1544 Name of Law: Endangered Species Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	77 FR 6065	02/07/2012
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	78 FR 23537	04/19/2013
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? Yes

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 2

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Cook Inlet Beluga Whale (CIBW) Economic Survey	NA	The Future of Cook Inlet Beluga Whales - What is your opinion?
Follow-up telephone survey

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	2,621	0	0	2,621	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	814	0	0	814	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This is a new information collection.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $50,000

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 04/19/2013

---