Hart-Scott-Rodino (Premerger notification) Rules and Report Form

ICR 201307-3084-001

OMB: 3084-0005

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Form
Unchanged
Justification for No Material/Nonsubstantive Change
2013-07-10
ICR Details
3084-0005 201307-3084-001
Historical Active 201106-3084-002
FTC
Hart-Scott-Rodino (Premerger notification) Rules and Report Form
No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Approved without change 08/19/2013
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 07/11/2013
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
08/31/2014 08/31/2014 08/31/2014
1,471 0 1,470
53,759 0 53,756
0 0 0

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has amended the premerger notification rules to provide a framework for the withdrawal of a premerger notification filing under the Hart Scott Rodino Act. The final rulemaking sets forth the procedure for voluntarily withdrawing an HSR filing, establishes when an HSR filing will be automatically withdrawn if a filing publicly announcing the termination of a transaction is made with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and rules promulgated under that act, and sets forth the procedure for resubmitting a filing after a withdrawal without incurring an additional filing fee. The rule amendments formalize the existing informal procedure for parties to voluntarily withdraw and resubmit their filings. Consequently, the amendments do not change the burden with respect to transactions for which the filings are voluntarily withdrawn under §803.12(a). Calculating the burden for the auto-withdrawal amendments in §803.12(b) requires an analysis of two potential scenarios. In one scenario, a filing is automatically withdrawn and the acquiring person utilizes the two-day resubmission process under §803.12(c). In that case, no additional transaction is generated as the acquiring person simply restarts the waiting period on the same transaction. In the second scenario, the parties to a terminated transaction for which the filing is automatically withdrawn do not utilize the two-day resubmission process under §803.12(c) but later decide to move forward with the transaction. In that case, a new filing would be required. Both of these scenarios are rare, as it is very unlikely that a transaction for which the HSR filing is automatically withdrawn during the merger review process (due to the parties' SEC filing indicating that the transaction has been terminated) would be subsequently restarted. Based on past experience, this would occur approximately once every fifteen years. If the parties to such a transaction do not utilize the two-day resubmission process, the rule change would require non-index HSR filings for, on average, a small fraction of a single transaction per year. The currently cleared estimate for a single non-index filing is 37 hours. FTC staff believes that this new filing would require the same work and diligence as any new non-index filing. Based on an average of 37 hours for one transaction, applied to an historical frequency of once every fifteen years, this amounts to an annual average of 3 hours, rounded up.

PL: Pub.L. 94 - 435 90 Stat. 1390 Name of Law: Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976
   US Code: 15 USC 18a Name of Law: Clayton Act
  
None

3084-AA91 Final or interim final rulemaking 76 FR 42471 07/19/2011

No

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 1,471 1,470 0 1 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 53,759 53,756 0 3 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yes
Changing Regulations
No
Assuming an average of 37 hours for an non-index filing transaction of this nature, applied to a traditional frequency of once every fifteen years, this amounts to an annual increment of 3 hours.

$5,215,715
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Robert Jones 202 326-3100 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
07/11/2013


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy