This emergency
approval is for six months. If ED continues the use of this
collection they must submit the package under the full PRA
process.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
03/31/2014
6 Months From Approved
07/31/2015
53,198
0
53,198
4,707,785
0
4,712,193
0
0
0
Title I, Part A (Title I) of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as amended
by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, and its regulations
contain several existing provisions that require State educational
agencies (SEAs), local educational agencies (LEAs), and schools to
collect and disseminate information. The Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) covers these activities, which are currently approved by OMB
under control number 1810-0581 through July 2015. In addition, in
2011, ED invited each SEA to request flexibility on behalf of
itself, its LEAs, and schools, in order to better focus on
improving student academic achievement and increasing the quality
of instruction (ESEA flexibility). The opportunity for SEAs to
request ESEA flexibility also included activities covered by the
PRA. Those information collection activities consisted of the
information an SEA must develop and submit to ED to request this
flexibility, information that an SEA provided in an Accountability
Addendum, and the information an SEA that receives ESEA flexibility
must annually report to ED. Approvals of ESEA flexibility requests
have occurred in several iterations: Window 1, for which SEAs
submitted requests in November 2011; Window 2, for which SEAs
submitted requests in February 2012; Window 3, for which SEAs
submitted requests in September 2012; and Window 4, for which SEAs
submitted requests in spring 2013. Generally, ED approved the
requests of SEAs that requested ESEA flexibility in Windows 1 and 2
through the end of the 20132014 school year. ED is now inviting the
35 Window 1 and Window 2 SEAs to request renewal of their
approvals, which will generally be accomplished through a two-year
extension of the waivers granted through ESEA flexibility, through
the end of the 20152016 school year. An SEA that requests renewal
of ESEA flexibility must submit an updated ESEA flexibility request
describing how it will continue to meet the requirements of ESEA
flexibility. The purpose of this submission is to obtain approval
for the resubmission activities covered by the PRA. These
activities include an SEAs addressing each of the required items
described in the ESEA flexibility renewal guidance, providing
narrative responses within its currently approved ESEA flexibility
request and attaching any new documentation or evidence where
appropriate, and submitting the amended request to ED. In addition,
an SEA must submit a completed ESEA flexibility renewal request
form indicating where changes have been made in its ESEA
flexibility request. The SEA may also choose, but is not required,
to amend its request to make changes necessary to improve
implementation going forward or to reflect more accurately
implementation activities that have already occurred.
To avoid harm to the
public ED needs emergency clearance in order to act now so that
Window 1 and Window 2 SEAs may smoothly plan to continue
implementing their ambitious reform plans after the current waivers
expire. Following normal clearance timelines would delay EDs
approval of ESEA flexibility renewals into summer 2014, which would
be considerably past the time that SEAs and LEAs begin planning for
the 20142015 school year and therefore very disruptive to this
planning. To avoid this disruption, SEAs and LEAs need to know as
soon as possible whether they will operate under ESEA flexibility
or NCLB requirements in the 20142015 school year. Moreover, ED
needed a full year of ESEA flexibility implementation in order to
plan effectively for a meaningful renewal process. Therefore, it
was not possible to begin the renewal process sooner because it
would not have been as well informed by the first year of ESEA
flexibility implementation as it is under the current
timeline.
ED expects that the ESEA
flexibility renewal process will be less burdensome than the
initial request process.
$1,214,285
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Todd Stephenson 202
205-1645
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.