2a - 60 day FRN

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES

75352

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2013 / Notices

or refuse the terms of the Brightest
Flashlight EULA.
The proposed consent order contains
provisions designed to prevent
respondents from engaging in similar
acts or practices in the future.
Specifically, Part I prohibits respondent
from misrepresenting (1) the extent to
which ‘‘covered information’’ is
collected, used, disclosed, or shared and
(2) the extent to which users may
exercise control over the collection, use,
disclosure, or sharing of ‘‘covered
information’’ collected from or about
them, their computers or devices, or
their online activities. ‘‘Covered
information’’ is defined as ‘‘(a) a first
and last name; (b) a home or other
physical address, including street name
and name of city or town; (c) an email
address or other online contact
information, such as an instant
messaging user identifier or a screen
name; (d) a telephone number; (e) a
Social Security number; (f) a driver’s
license or other state-issued
identification number; (g) a financial
institution account number; (h) credit or
debit card information; (i) a persistent
identifier, such as a customer number
held in a ‘‘cookie,’’ a static Internet
Protocol (‘‘IP’’) address, a mobile device
ID, or processor serial number; (j)
precise geolocation data of an
individual or mobile device, including
but not limited to GPS-based, WiFibased, or cell-based location
information (‘‘geolocation
information’’); (k) an authentication
credential, such as a username and
password; or (l) any other
communications or content stored on a
consumer’s mobile device.’’
Part II requires respondents to give
users of their mobile applications a clear
and prominent notice and to obtain
express affirmative consent prior to
collecting their geolocation information.
Part III requires respondents to delete
any ‘‘covered information’’ in their
possession, custody, or control that they
collected from users of the Brightest
Flashlight App prior to the entry of the
order.
Parts IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII of the
proposed order require respondent to
keep copies of relevant advertisements
and materials substantiating claims
made in the advertisements; to provide
copies of the order to its personnel; to
notify the Commission of changes in
corporate structure that might affect
compliance obligations under the order;
and to file compliance reports with the
Commission. Part IX provides that the
order will terminate after twenty (20)
years, with certain exceptions.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:00 Dec 10, 2013

Jkt 232001

proposed order. It is not intended to
constitute an official interpretation of
the complaint or the proposed order, or
to modify the proposed order’s terms in
any way.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–29531 Filed 12–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–14–0739]

Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–7570 or send
comments to Kim Lane, 1600 Clifton
Road, MS D–74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or
send an email to [email protected].
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
CDC Oral Health Management
Information System (OMB No. 0920–
0739, exp. 4/30/2014)—Revision—
National Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Public Health Promotion
(NCDDPHP), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).

PO 00000

Frm 00024

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Background and Brief Description
The CDC works with state health
departments to improve the oral health
of the nation. Targeted efforts include
building and/or maintaining effective
public health capacity for the
implementation, evaluation, and
dissemination of best practices in oral
disease prevention and advancement of
oral health. Through a cooperative
agreement program (Program
Announcement DP13–1307), CDC will
provide funding to 21 states over a fiveyear period. New cooperative
agreements went into effect in
September 2013 and build on previous
funded collaborations involving CDC
and state programs. Of the 21 awardees,
3 are funded at the Basic level
(Component 1, infrastructure) and 18
are funded at the Enhanced level
(Component 2) which includes
additional activities. The cooperative
agreement funding will be used to
strengthen state-based oral health
infrastructure and capacity, implement
and expand evidence-based
interventions that increase communityclinical linkages, such as school-based
dental sealant programs; increase and
maintain environmental systems level
changes that support healthy behaviors,
such as community water fluoridation;
implement strategies that improve the
delivery of targeted clinical preventive
services; and promote beneficial health
systems changes. CDC funding will also
help states reduce health disparities
among high-risk populations including,
but not limited to, those of lower socioeconomic status, rural populations,
Hispanic, African American and other
ethnic groups.
CDC is currently approved to collect
annual progress and activity reports
from state-based oral health programs.
An electronic reporting system has been
in place since 2007 and was enhanced
in 2008 to capture information about
grantees’ success stories and
environmental scanning activities. The
information collected in the
management information system (MIS)
improved CDC’s ability to disseminate
information about successful public
health approaches that can be replicated
or adapted for use in other states.
CDC plans to implement changes to
the existing information collection.
Through a Revision request, CDC will
increase the number of awardees from
20 to 21; describe changes in the MIS
platform and data elements that will
align the monitoring and evaluation
framework for oral health awardees with
the framework used for a number of
other programs in the National Center
for Chronic Disease Prevention and

E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM

11DEN1

75353

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2013 / Notices
Health Promotion (NCCDPHP); and
implement a revised method of
estimating burden. For awardees funded
at the Basic level, the estimated burden
for the initial data entry needed to
populate the system is 6 hours.
Thereafter, the estimated burden for
system maintenance and annual
reporting is 3 hours. For awardees
funded at the Enhanced level, the
estimated burden for the initial data
entry needed to populate the system is
13 hours. Thereafter, the estimated
burden for system maintenance and
annual reporting is 9 hours. The revised

as well as state oral health performance
activities including programmatic and
financial information. CDC will use the
information collected to monitor
awardee activities and to provide any
technical assistance or follow-up
support that may be needed.
Participation in the progress reporting
system is a condition of award for
funded state oral health programs. All
information will be collected
electronically and there are no costs to
respondents other than their time. OMB
approval is requested for three years.

method provides a more accurate
depiction of burden per respondent in
comparison to the method presented in
previous requests for OMB approval,
which was based on a long-term average
burden per response. There is no change
in the frequency of reporting. Reports
will be submitted to CDC annually, but
states may enter updates into the MIS at
any time.
The MIS will provide a central
repository of information, such as the
work plans of the state oral health
programs (their goals, objectives,
performance milestones and indicators),

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of
respondents
Program Awardees Basic Level .......
Program Awardees Enhanced Level
Total ...........................................

6
3
13
9

6
9
78
162

...........................................................

........................

........................

........................

255

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection: Public
Comment Request
Health Resources and Services
Administration, HHS.

AGENCY:

Notice.

In compliance with the
requirement for opportunity for public
comment on proposed data collection
projects (Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995), the
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA) announces
plans to submit an Information
Collection Request (ICR), described
below, to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Prior to submitting the
ICR to OMB, HRSA seeks comments
from the public regarding the burden
estimate, below, or any other aspect of
the ICR.

SUMMARY:

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Total burden
(in hours)

1
1
1
1

BILLING CODE 4163–18–P

17:00 Dec 10, 2013

Average
burden per
response
(in hours)

1
3
6
18

[FR Doc. 2013–29515 Filed 12–10–13; 8:45 am]

VerDate Mar<15>2010

Number of
responses per
respondent

Initial MIS Population .......................
Annual Progress Report ...................
Initial MIS Population .......................
Annual Progress Report ...................

Kimberly S. Lane,
Deputy Director, Office of Scientific Integrity,
Office of the Associate Director for Science,
Office of the Director, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.

ACTION:

Number of
respondents

Form name

Jkt 232001

Comments on this Information
Collection Request must be received
within 60 days of this notice.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments to
[email protected] or mail the HRSA
Information Collection Clearance
Officer, Room 10–29, Parklawn
Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville,
MD 20857.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and draft
instruments, email [email protected]
or call the HRSA Information Collection
Clearance Officer at (301) 443–1984.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: When
submitting comments or requesting
information, please include the
information request collection title for
reference.
Information Collection Request Title:
Questionnaire and Data Collection
Testing, Evaluation, and Research for
the Health Resources and Services
Administration.
OMB No.: 0915-xxxx—New.
Abstract: HRSA conducts cognitive
interviews, focus groups, usability tests,
field tests/pilot interviews, and
experimental research in laboratory and
field settings, both for applied
questionnaire development and
evaluation, as well as more basic
research on response errors in surveys.
HRSA staff use various techniques to
evaluate interviewer administered, selfadministered, telephone, Computer
DATES:

PO 00000

Frm 00025

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI),
Computer Assisted Self-Interviewing
(CASI), Audio Computer-Assisted SelfInterviewing (ACASI), and web-based
questionnaires.
The most common questionnaire
evaluation method is the cognitive
interview. The interview structure
consists of respondents first answering
a draft survey question and then
providing textual information to reveal
the processes involved in answering the
test question. Specifically, cognitive
interview respondents are asked to
describe how and why they answered
the question as they did. Through the
interviewing process, various types of
question-response problems that would
not normally be identified in a
traditional survey interview, such as
interpretive errors and recall accuracy,
are uncovered. By conducting a
comparative analysis of cognitive
interviews, it is also possible to
determine whether particular
interpretive patterns occur within
particular sub-groups of the population.
Interviews are generally conducted in
small rounds of 20 to 30 interviews;
ideally, the questionnaire is re-worked
between rounds, and revisions are
tested iteratively until interviews yield
relatively few new insights.
Cognitive interviewing is inexpensive
and provides useful data on
questionnaire performance while
minimizing respondent burden.
Cognitive interviewing offers a detailed
depiction of meanings and processes

E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM

11DEN1