Open Letter to States With Permits that appear to qualify as Alternatives to NICS Checks

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
27 CFR 478.102.htm	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2011-01-31	Available
1140-0089 update justification12-18-13.doc	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2014-03-25	Available
Open Letter to Permit States.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2007-10-09	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
12881	Open Letter to States With Permits that appear to qualify as Alternatives to NICS Checks		Unchanged

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1140-0089	ICR Reference No: 201403-1140-007
Status: Historical Inactive	Previous ICR Reference No: 201101-1140-014
Agency/Subagency: DOJ/ATF	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Open Letter to States With Permits that appear to qualify as Alternatives to NICS Checks
Type of Information Collection: Extension without change of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Withdrawn and continue	Conclusion Date: 06/25/2014
	Date Received in OIRA: 03/25/2014
Terms of Clearance: ATF advises this collection is no longer necessary. ATF should submit a discontinuation request by the end of this month.

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	03/31/2014	36 Months From Approved	06/30/2014
Responses	21	0	21
Time Burden (Hours)	21	0	21
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: Under 18 USC 922(t)(3), ATF requests permission to send a letter to the 21 States with permits that currently qualify as (NICS) alternatives, asking the States to send a written response to ATF explaining how their State licensing authorities comply with the minimum requirements for qualifying permits under the Brady law and and its implementing regulation. These questions are necessary to ensure ATF only allows permits that meet the statutory and regulatory requirements qualify as alternatives to NICS checks.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 18 USC 922(t) Name of Law: The Brady Law
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	78 FR 77493	12/23/2013
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	79 FR 10561	02/25/2014
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Open Letter to States With Permits that appear to qualify as Alternatives to NICS Checks

---

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $0

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 03/25/2014

---