60-Day FRN

Preclearance FRN 79 FR 39412.pdf

Respiratory Protection Standard (29 CFR 1910.134)

60-Day FRN

OMB: 1218-0099

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
39412

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 132 / Thursday, July 10, 2014 / Notices

Web site at http://edis.usitc.gov,
elaborates upon the Commission’s rules
with respect to electronic filing.
Additional written submissions to the
Commission, including requests
pursuant to section 201.12 of the
Commission’s rules, shall not be
accepted unless good cause is shown for
accepting such submissions, or unless
the submission is pursuant to a specific
request by a Commissioner or
Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,
each document filed by a party to the
reviews must be served on all other
parties to the reviews (as identified by
either the public or BPI service list), and
a certificate of service must be timely
filed. The Secretary will not accept a
document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: June 27, 2014.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–16122 Filed 7–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2011–0027]

Respiratory Protection Standard;
Extension of the Office of Management
and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of
Information Collection (Paperwork)
Requirements
AGENCY:

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public
comments concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the
information collection requirements
specified by the Respiratory Protection
Standard (29 CFR 1910.134).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
September 8, 2014.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the

VerDate Mar<15>2010

18:38 Jul 09, 2014

Jkt 232001

instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit a
copy of your comments and attachments
to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
OSHA–2011–0027, U.S. Department of
Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Room N–2625, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express
mail, messenger, and courier service)
are accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and the OSHA
docket number (OSHA–2011–0027) for
the Information Collection Request
(ICR). All comments, including any
personal information you provide, are
placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov.
For further information on submitting
comments see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the section of
this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download from the Web site. All
submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of
the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theda Kenney or Todd Owen,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed

PO 00000

Frm 00049

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

and continuing information collection
requirements in accord with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA–95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This
program ensures that information is in
the desired format, reporting burden
(time and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection
by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the Act
or for developing information regarding
the causes and prevention of
occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act
also requires that OSHA obtain such
information with minimum burden
upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to
reduce to the maximum extent feasible
unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
The Respiratory Protection Standard
(29 CFR 1910.134; hereafter, ‘‘the
Standard’’) contains information
collection requirements that require
employers to: develop a written
respirator program; conduct worker
medical evaluations and provide followup medical evaluations to determine the
worker’s ability to use a respirator;
provide the physician or other licensed
healthcare professional with
information about the worker’s
respirator and the conditions under
which the worker will use the
respirator; and administer fit tests for
workers who will use negative- or
positive-pressure, tight-fitting
facepieces. In addition, employers must
ensure that workers store emergency-use
respirators in compartments clearly
marked as containing emergency-use
respirators. For respirators maintained
for emergency use, employers must
label or tag the respirator with a
certificate stating the date of the
inspection, the name of the individual
who did the inspection, the findings of
the inspection, required remedial
action, and the identity of the respirator.
The Standard also requires employers
to ensure that cylinders used to supply
breathing air to respirators have a
certificate of analysis from the supplier
stating that the breathing air meets the
requirements for Type 1—Grade D
breathing air; such certification assures
employers that the purchased breathing
air is safe. Compressors used to supply
breathing air to respirators must have a
tag containing the most recent change
date and the signature of the individual
authorized by the employer to perform
the change. Employers must maintain

E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM

10JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 132 / Thursday, July 10, 2014 / Notices
this tag at the compressor. These tags
provide assurance that the compressors
are functioning properly.

IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on this Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions

II. Special Issues for Comment

You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal; (2) by
facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other
material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number (Docket
No. OSHA–2011–0027) for the ICR. You
may supplement electronic submissions
by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or facsimile submission, you
must submit them to the OSHA Docket
Office (see the section of this notice
titled ADDRESSES). The additional
materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the
Agency can attach them to your
comments.
Because of security procedures, the
use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of
comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the
delivery of materials by hand, express
delivery, messenger, or courier service,
please contact the OSHA Docket Office
at (202) 693–2350, (TTY (877) 889–
5627).
Comments and submissions are
posted without change at http://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions commenters about submitting
personal information such as social
security numbers and date of birth.
Although all submissions are listed in
the http://www.regulations.gov index,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download from this Web site.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the http://
www.regulations.gov Web site to submit
comments and access the docket is
available at the Web site’s ‘‘User Tips’’
link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office
for information about materials not
available from the Web site, and for
assistance in using the Internet to locate
docket submissions.

OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

III. Proposed Actions
OSHA is requesting that OMB extend
its approval of the information
collection requirements contained in the
Respiratory Protection Standard (29 CFR
1910.134). The Agency is requesting an
adjustment decrease in the number of
burden hours from 6,801,711 hours to
6,643,220 hours, a total decrease of
158,491 burden hours. This decrease is
based on updated data showing a
decrease in the number of covered
establishments. In addition, OSHA is
requesting an adjustment increase of
$3,265,756 in operation and
maintenance costs (from $185,578,935
to $188,844,691) associated with
increased estimated costs for employee
medical exams, fit-testing materials and
fit-tests. The Agency will summarize the
comments submitted in response to this
notice and will include this summary in
the request to OMB.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Respiratory Protection Standard
(29 CFR 1910.134).
OMB Control Number: 1218–0099.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits.
Number of Respondents: 610,213.
Frequency of Responses: Initially;
annually; on occasion.
Total Responses: 21,447,539.
Average Time per Response: Varies
from 5 minutes (.08 hour) to mark a
storage compartment or protective cover
to 8 hours for large employers to gather
and prepare information to develop a
written plan.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
6,643,220.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $188,844,691.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

18:38 Jul 09, 2014

Jkt 232001

V. Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health,
directed the preparation of this notice.
The authority for this notice is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44

PO 00000

Frm 00050

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

39413

U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of
Labor’s Order No. 1–2012 (77 FR 3912).
Signed at Washington, DC on July 7, 2014.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2014–16144 Filed 7–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
Hearing
[Docket No. 40–9075–MLA; ASLBP No. 10–
898–02–MLA–BD01]

In The Matter of Powertech USA, INC.
(Dewey-Burdock In Situ Uranium
Recovery Facility)
July 3, 2014.
Before Administrative Judges: William J.
Froehlich, Chairman, Dr. Richard F. Cole, Dr.
Mark O. Barnett.

Notice of Opportunity To Make Oral
and Written Limited Appearance
Statements
This Atomic Safety and Licensing
Board hereby gives notice that it will
accept oral and written limited
appearance statements from members of
the public regarding the application of
Powertech, USA, Inc. (Powertech) to the
United States Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) for a license to
construct and operate an in-situ leach
uranium recovery facility in Custer and
Fall River Counties, South Dakota. Two
sessions to hear oral limited appearance
statements will be held on August 18,
2014, in Hot Springs, South Dakota.
I. Background and Scope of Proceeding
On January 5, 2010, the NRC
published a notice in the Federal
Register that any interested person
could file a challenge to Powertech’s
application to construct and operate an
in-situ leach uranium recovery facility
and could request an adjudicatory
hearing thereon.1 In response to that
Notice, two groups, the Oglala Sioux
Tribe and the Consolidated Intervenors,
challenged Powertech’s application and
requested a hearing.2 On March 12,
2010, this Board was established to
handle the matter and to preside over
1 75 FR 467 (January 5, 2010) (ADAMS Accession
No. ML100060051).
2 Consolidated Request for Hearing and Petition
for Leave to Intervene (March 8, 2010) (ADAMS
Accession No. ML100680010); Petition to Intervene
and Request for Hearing of the Oglala Sioux Tribe
(Apr. 6, 2010) (ADAMS Accession No.
ML100960645).

E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM

10JYN1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleOSHA-2011-0027-0004.pdf
File Modified2014-09-16
File Created2014-09-16

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy