Agricultural Chemical Useage Vegetable Statistical Methodology

0218 - Agricultural Chemical Use - Vegetable Methodology.pdf

Agricultural Resource Management, Chemical Use, and Post-harvest Chemical Use Surveys

Agricultural Chemical Useage Vegetable Statistical Methodology

OMB: 0535-0218

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
Survey & Estimation Procedures
Statistical Methodology
Name of Survey: Vegetable Chemical Usage
Name of Summary: Agricultural Chemical Usage 2010 Vegetable Crops Summary:
(Access at USDA-NASS Quick Stats 2.0: http://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/. See Program: Survey,
Sector: Environmental, Groups: Vegetables, Commodity: Vegetable Crop)
To access the strawberry data go under Program, click “Survey”, under Sector, click
“Environmental”, under Group, click “Fruit & Tree Nuts”, under Commodity, click “Strawberries”

Data Collection Period: September 2010 to January 2011
Sample Size, Sampling Frames and Methods: There were 4,193 samples drawn from the
NASS List Sampling Frame for the Vegetable Chemical Usage Survey. This extensive sampling
frame covers all types of farms and accounts for about 90 percent of all land in farms in the
United States. Samples were selected from States with the largest production for the selected
vegetable crops. The sample design for the Vegetable Chemical Use Survey (VCUS) uses a
Multivariate Probability Proportional to Size (MPPS) design. The probability of being selected
for the sample was based on the percentage of acreage for a given crop that a grower had on a
State’s list frame. The maximum of these probabilities was selected to draw the sample. The
general idea is to assure that the total acreage of all targeted vegetable crops that a grower has on
the list frame was included when determining a grower’s probability of selection.
Data collection for the survey occurred during the months of September 2010 through January
2011. The ARMS Phase II survey is a list sampling frame only survey. The operator of the
sampled farm was personally interviewed to obtain information on chemical applications made
to each targeted vegetable crop on the farm.
Modes of Data Collection: Personal interview
Selected Terms and Definitions:
Active Ingredient: The specific pesticide ingredient which kills or controls the target pest(s) or
other target material(s), or otherwise results in the pesticide effect(s). All pesticide-use estimates
in report are at the active ingredient level; one or more active ingredients are present in known
amounts in the pesticide products reported in survey.
Estimates of active ingredient use were reported in a single unit of equivalence, per ingredient.
For salt, ester, or amine active ingredients, estimates were reported in the parent acid equivalents.
For example, the acid derivatives glyphosate isopropylamine salt and 2,4-D, 2-ethylhexyl ester
were reported in the glyphosate and 2,4-D equivalents, respectively. For copper compounds,
estimates were reported in the metallic copper equivalent.

Active Ingredient Code: A unique code assigned to each active ingredient upon registration
with the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Pesticide Programs, to facilitate pesticide
regulation.
Area Applied, Percent: Percent of total planted acres which received one or more applications
of a specific fertilizer nutrient or pesticide active ingredient. (In Quick Stats: Treated, Measured
as Percent of Area Planted)
Avoidance: A strategy in which the detrimental effects of pests on crops are mitigated or
eliminated solely through various cultural practices. Avoidance is one of four classes of pestmanagement practices for which data are included in report.
Beneficial Insects: Insects (small invertebrate animals, mostly of arthropod classes Insecta and
Arachnida), which are collected and introduced onto crop acres because of their value in
biological control as predators on harmful insects and parasites.
Chemigation: Application of agricultural chemicals, including pesticide products, by injection
into irrigation water.
Crop Year: The period starting immediately after harvest of the previous year’s crop and
ending at harvest of the current year’s crop.
Farm: Any place from which $1,000 or more of agricultural products were produced and sold,
or normally would have been sold, during the year. Government payments are included in sales.
Fertilizer: A soil-enriching agricultural input which contains one or more plant nutrients. Data
for three primary macronutrients nitrogen (N), phosphate (P), potash (K), and the secondary
macronutrient sulfur (S) are included in report.
Fungi: Various organisms of the kingdom Fungi, which obtain nutrients by decomposing plant
or other organic life. This pest group includes mushrooms, molds, mildews, smuts, rusts, and
yeasts. Fungal infestations have the potential to reduce crop production and/or lower the grade
quality of the host crop.
Mechanism of Action (MOA): The method or biological pathway by which the pesticide or
active ingredient kills or controls the target pest(s) or other target material(s).
Monitoring: A strategy involving the observance or detection of pests through systematic
sampling, counting, or other forms of scouting. Monitoring may include prediction of pest
population levels through the observance of environmental factors such as weather or soil and
crop quality. Monitoring is one of four classes of pest-management practices for which data are
included in report.

Nematodes: Unsegmented, parasitic worms of the phylum Nematoda. Prominent animal pest of
wheat and other field crops with the potential to be highly destructive, lowering crop production
and grade quality significantly.
Number of Applications: The average number of times a treated acre received a specific
fertilizer nutrient or pesticide active ingredient. (In Quick Stats: Applications, Measured in
Number)
Pesticide: Defined by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as “(1)
any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling or
mitigating any pest, (2) any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a plant
regulator, defoliant, or desiccant, and (3) any nitrogen stabilizer…”(Title 7, U.S. Code, 136).
Under FIFRA, pesticides are registered and regulated through the Environmental Protection
Agency’s Office of Pesticide Programs. Four classes of pesticides are included in report: (1)
herbicides targeting weeds, (2) insecticides targeting insects (3) fungicides targeting fungi, and
(4) other chemicals targeting all other pests or other materials (including extraneous crop
foliage).
Pheromone: A chemical substance produced by an insect which serves as a stimulus to other
individuals of the same species for one or more behavioral responses.
Prevention: A strategy in which a pest population is kept from infesting a crop or field, by
taking various preceding actions. Prevention is one of four classes of pest-management practices
for which data are included in report.
Rate per Application: Ratio indicating pounds (lbs) of a fertilizer primary nutrient or pesticide
active ingredient applied, per single application, per planted acre. (In Quick Stats: Applications,
Measured in Lb/Acre/Application)
Rate per Crop Year: Ratio indicating pounds (lbs) of a fertilizer primary nutrient or pesticide
active ingredient applied, counting all applications per crop year, per planted acre. (In Quick
Stats: Applications, Measured in Lb/Acre/Year)
Suppression: A strategy which involves the control or reduction of existing pest populations in
order to mitigate crop damage. May include physical or biological controls, or management of
resistance build-up through pesticide rotation. Suppression is one of four classes of pest
management practices for which data is included in report.
Data Review and Estimation Procedures: Chemical usage estimates were verified through the
cooperative efforts of the USDA-NASS Environmental and Demographics Section and ProgramState Field Offices. The initial review of Program-State level pesticide product usage data, as
well as the conversion of pesticide product usage data to the equivalent active ingredient levels
for publication, was accomplished through the use of NASS-maintained chemical use databases
which contain both product recommended use ranges and active ingredient concentrations per
product. Review and finalization of all data proceeded with assessment of reasonableness and
consistency at the record, State, and U.S. levels.

The reported application rate data is not forced or adjusted to fall within the label rates (or edit
limits) and we do not edit out an application just because the label does not approve it for a crop.
The data reflects what growers used, only misreported data is fixed. If the field office and
headquarter survey statisticians determine that the reported data was correct then no adjustment
were to the data. However, these decisions are based on concrete evidence such as enumerator
notes, respondent re-contacts, comments by Extension specialists, etc.
Estimates of the total amount of active ingredient applied are based on the acreage estimates
published in the annual NASS report Vegetables - 2010 Summary [ISSN: 0884-6413] released
on January 27, 2011. Please note that the estimates for total amounts of an active ingredient will
not be revised even if there are subsequent revisions to acreage for a given crop.
Indications were published if five or more reports were received and summarized for a given
variable and if the indication was greater than or equal to one half of the pre-determined
rounding unit for that variable. Distribution and reliability measures were published if 30 or
more reports were received and summarized for a given variable.
Reliability: Estimates were subject to sampling variability; sampling variability was measured
by the coefficient of variation (cv), expressed as a percent of the estimate. Coefficients of
variation differed considerably by variable, chemical, and crop. The narrower the numerical
range of responses per variable, and the larger the number of positive responses per variable, the
smaller the sampling variability. For these reasons, cv’s were generally lower for active
ingredient Rate of Application estimates, and for estimates associated with the most often
reported active ingredients (application rates reported almost always fell within the
manufacturer’s relatively narrow recommended usage range, and a relatively large number of
reports were received for the most widely used active ingredients).
Estimates were additionally subject to non-sampling errors during the survey process. These
errors include reporting, recording, editing, and imputation errors. Steps are taken to minimize
the impact of these errors, such as comprehensive interviewer training, validation and
verification of processing systems, detailed computer edits, and the analysis tool. Re-contact
with respondents is done on an as needed basis.
Revision Policy: Estimates are final at first publication, and are not subject to revision.


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleSurvey & Estimation Procedures
AuthorFarmDo
File Modified2011-07-27
File Created2011-07-27

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy