DHS Office of Emergency Communications
2007 SCIP and 2013 Revised SCIP Crosswalk
The following crosswalk outlines the major sections in the 2007 Statewide Communication Interoperability Plan (SCIP) and contrasts them with the major sections in the 2013 Revised SCIP.
2007 SCIP |
2013 Revised SCIP |
Changes |
||
Section Title |
Purpose |
Section Title |
Purpose |
|
Overall Intent: To serve as the operational blueprint for the conceptualization, implementation, and usage of Statewide interoperable communications. |
Overall Intent: To provide the strategic direction and alignment for those responsible for emergency communications at the State, regional, local, and tribal levels. To be the mechanism with which States can explain to their leadership and elected officials the vision for emergency communications in the State and demonstrate the need for funding. |
The 2013 Revised SCIP builds on successes in the 2007 SCIP to refine a tool for States to coordinate the future of statewide interoperable and emergency communications and demonstrate the vision to leadership. It focuses primarily on the State's strategic vision of emergency communications rather than current capabilities. It is streamlined to 20 to 30 pages for ease of use and clarity by reducing non-critical sections background information. |
||
1. Introduction |
Provides a general introduction to the statewide plan and presents the factors driving its creation. |
1. Introduction |
Communicates the three- to five-year strategic goals for emergency communications in the State, including enough context to understand the strategy without significant familiarity with the State's emergency communications landscape. |
|
2. Background |
Describes the events that have occurred, the processes, and the people involved in developing the statewide plan. |
N/A |
N/A |
|
N/A |
N/A |
2. Purpose |
Provides a purpose statement for and defines ownership of the SCIP. |
|
2.1 State Overview |
Included detailed background information to provide a picture of the state landscape, particularly as it relates to emergency communications. Includes current multi-agency coordination, regions/jurisdictions descriptions, operational plans, etc. |
3. State Interoperable and Emergency Communications Overview |
Provides a brief overview of the State's current and future emergency communications environment, as well as an explanation of SCIP ownership and development process. |
|
2.2 Participating Agencies and POCs |
Identifies agencies that helped develop the SCIP. |
N/A |
N/A |
|
2.3 Statewide Plan POC |
Identify statewide plan coordinator; specify if the POC is a full-time coordinator or not. |
|||
2.4 Scope and Timeframe |
Defines the scope and high-level timeframe for completing milestone initiatives. |
N/A |
N/A |
|
3. Methodology |
Summarizes the process used to encourage cross-jurisdictional and cross disciplinary participation in developing the statewide plan. Addresses the method used for incorporating other plans and sustaining participation once plan is completed. |
N/A |
N/A |
|
N/A |
N/A |
4. Vision and Mission |
Includes a vision statement for the future of emergency communications operability and interoperability at all levels within the State. Includes a mission statement that describes how the State will achieve its vision. |
|
4. Current Statewide Assessment |
Describes current status of communications and interoperability statewide. |
5. Strategic Goals and Initiatives |
Specific criteria will guide the development of strategic goals (to define the big-picture direction) and initiatives (to define specific activities to achieve goals) for interoperable and emergency communications in the State. |
|
4.1 Governance Structure |
Defines governance structures currently in place to oversee communications interoperability. |
5.1 Governance |
Updated criteria focus on strengthening SIECs/SIGBs, the SWIC role, intra-State regional governance, engagement of SWIC and SIEC/SIGB with FirstNet, and engaging end users in initiatives. |
|
4.2 Technology |
Identifies and describes all the communications systems and equipment currently operating in the State. |
5.2 SOPs |
Updated criteria focus on consistently documenting how statewide communications resources should be used, maintaining a SOP development process, and ensuring SOPs are NIMS/ICS-compliant. |
|
4.3 SOPs |
Identifies existing SOPs. |
5.3 Technology |
Updated SCIP criteria focus on creating an ongoing process to update documentation of emergency communications, executing a plan to ensure access to operable and interoperable emergency communications for all jurisdictions/disciplines, documenting plans for development, maintenance, and/or upgrades to technology services. |
|
4.4 Training and Exercises Plan |
Describes current State plan for training and exercising. |
5.4 Training and Exercises |
Updated criteria focus on evaluating strengths and weaknesses via exercises, establishing a statewide training process, and increasing training and exercise participation levels. |
|
4.5 Usage |
Describes policies and/or steps taken to encourage adoption and utilization of interoperable technologies, SOPs, training, and exercises and the frequency with which they are used. |
5.5 Usage |
Updated criteria focus on developing a usage inventory of current systems and maintaining a schedule for systematic use of interoperable systems, strategic equipment, and channels to ensure routine proficiency. |
|
N/A |
N/A |
5.6 Information Sharing and Outreach |
Updated criteria focus on establishing a comprehensive outreach and information sharing program to engage stakeholders. |
|
N/A |
N/A |
5.7 Life Cycle Funding |
Updated criteria focus on establishing a plan for achieving sustainable funding for the full lifecycle of communications system expenditures and the SWIC position. |
|
5. Strategy |
Describes the vision, mission, goals, and initiatives for interoperability statewide in a single section. Includes compliance with NIMS and a process for how the plan will be regularly reviewed and updated. |
6. Implementation Plan |
Defines how the State will conduct action planning, identify measures of success, manage progress, and conduct strategic plan reviews to ensure the SCIP is maintained and goals and initiatives are accomplished. |
|
6. Implementation |
Describes the approach for implementing the statewide plan’s strategic initiatives. |
|||
7. Funding |
Describes the budget needed to implement and sustain the statewide plan. |
N/A |
N/A |
|
N/A |
N/A |
7. Reference Materials |
Provides a location for States to insert supporting documentation into their SCIP instead of including the full document as an appendix. |
|
8. Close |
Concludes with a summary and next steps. |
N/A |
N/A |
|
SCIP Implementation Report (IR) |
Provided an annual update on a State’s progress in achieving the initiatives and strategic vision identified in the SCIP. It included long narratives for each subsection of the SCIP, and tracked all goals and initiatives. States noted status updates as "Planned," "In Progress," or "Completed." |
SCIP Annual Progress Report (APR) |
The Annual Progress Report is designed as a tool for States to develop a single annual report that can be used for Federal and State reporting requirements. It demonstrates accomplishments and challenges in completing strategic goals and initiatives. Its development will eventually be facilitated through use of an Online Tool, allowing SWICs to note annual changes in the Online Tool rather than create a new report each year. |
|
April 2013
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | OEC |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-27 |