"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

HH Demo

"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

OMB: 2535-0114

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

HUD Master Models Healthy Homes Demonstration Program

HH Healthy Homes Demonstration Program

Purpose: To demonstrate better and more cost effective methodologies for reducing housing related environmental health and safety hazards in very low and low-income households with children under age of six.


Need Statement


Very low and low-income populations, especially households with children under the age of six, are at risk of housing related environmental health and safety hazards.


There is a need to develop, demonstrate, and promote cost effective preventive interventions to correct multiple safety and health hazards in the home.


There is a need to standardize the measurement of outcomes resulting from interventions and their impact on the health and safety of children under age six, especially children in very low and low-income households.


Activities and Outputs

Business opportunities - Other – Businesses

Businesses

Business opportunities - Other – Dollars

Dollars

Business opportunities - Section 3 – Businesses

Businesses

Business opportunities - Section 3 – Dollars

Dollars

Community participants meetings for input/feedback – Meeting

Meetings

Community participants meetings for input/feedback – Persons

Persons

Coordination with Weatherization Programs

Households

Education-community – Persons

Persons

Education-community – Sessions

Sessions

Education-household members

Persons

Education-medical establishment – Persons

Persons

Education-medical establishment – Sessions

Sessions

Employment opportunities-Other – Available jobs

Available jobs

Employment opportunities-Other – Persons

Persons

Employment opportunities-Section 3 – Available jobs

Available jobs

Employment opportunities-Section 3 – Persons

Persons

Households recruited

Households

Households recruited - children 6-17

Persons

Households recruited - children under age six

Persons

Housing assessment

Households

Mitigate asthma triggers-cockroaches-children 6-17

IPM Interventions

Mitigate asthma triggers-cockroaches-children under six

IPM Interventions

Mitigate asthma triggers-dust mite-children 6-17

IPM Interventions

Mitigate asthma triggers-dust mite-children under six

IPM Interventions

Mitigate asthma triggers-mold-children 6-17

Interventions

Mitigate asthma triggers-mold-children under six

Interventions

Mitigate asthma triggers-other-children 6-17

Interventions

Mitigate asthma triggers-other-under six

Interventions

Mitigate asthma triggers-rodents-children 6-17

IPM Interventions

Mitigate asthma triggers-rodents-children under six

IPM Interventions

Outreach materials disseminated-English

Materials

Outreach materials disseminated-LEP

LEP Materials

Outreach-distributing materials to targeted population

Persons

Partnerships with non-profits established

Partnerships

Referrals to medical establishment

Referrals

Resources leveraged-dollar value of labor & materials

Dollars

Resources leveraged-dollars

Dollars

Safety interventions-burn prevention-children 6-17

Interventions

Safety interventions-burn prevention-children under six

Interventions

Safety interventions-child proof locks-children under six

Interventions

Safety interventions-fall prevention-handrails-gates--children 6-17

Interventions

Safety interventions-fall prevention-handrails-gates-children under six

Interventions

Safety interventions-smoke/CO detectors-children 6-17

Interventions

Safety interventions-smoke/CO detectors-children under six

Interventions

Safety interventions-smoking cessation

Interventions

Safety interventions-window guards-children 6-17

Interventions

Safety interventions-window guards-children under six

Interventions

Temporary relocation for families

Families

Temporary relocation for individuals

Persons

Training Opportunities - Other

Persons

Training Opportunities-Section 3

Persons

Other

Other

Outcomes and Indicators


Business opportunities - Other – Businesses

Businesses

Business opportunities - Other – Dollars

Dollars

Business opportunities - Section 3 – Businesses

Businesses

Business opportunities - Section 3 – Dollars

Dollars

Employment opportunities - Other – Available jobs

Available jobs

Employment opportunities - Other – Persons

Persons

Employment opportunities - Section 3 – Available jobs

Available jobs

Employment opportunities - Section 3 – Persons

Persons

Hazard assessment methods implemented-reduced costs

Dollars

Hazard reduction protocols implemented-reduced costs

Dollars

Improvements in health measures-incidence/severity-asthma

Reduced asthma

Improvements in health measures-incidence/severity-blood lead level

Reduced levels

New/improved tool-resident understanding of housing health hazards

Tool

Reduction in blood lead levels

Children

Reduction in household smoking-quit smoking

Persons

Reduction in housing related health hazards-improved health

Households

Reduction in housing related health hazards-improved safety

Households

Reduction-incidence/severity-asthma – ER visits

ER visits

Reduction-incidence/severity-asthma – Hospitalization days

Hospitalization days

Reduction-incidence/severity-asthma – Other

Other

Reduction-incidence/severity-asthma exacerbation

Physician visits

Training Opportunities-Other

Persons

Training Opportunities-Section 3

Persons

Other

Other





Measurement Tools


A. Tools to Track Outputs and Outcomes


Bank accounts

Construction log

Database

Enforcement log

Financial aid log

Intake log

Interviews

Mgt. Info. System-automated

Mgt. Info. System-manual

Outcome scale(s)

Phone log

Plans

Pre-post tests

Post tests

Program specific form(s)

Questionnaire

Recruitment log

Survey

Technical assistance log

Time sheets

Other


B. Where Data are Maintained


Agency database

Centralized database

Individual case records

Local precinct

Public database

School

Specialized database

Tax Assessor database

Training center

Other


C. Source of Data


Audit report

Business licenses

Certificate of Occupancy

Code violation reports

Counseling reports

Employment records

Engineering reports

Environmental reports

Escrow accounts

Financial reports

GED certification/diploma

Health records

HMIS

Inspection results

Lease agreements

Legal documents

Loan monitoring reports

Mortgage documents

Payment vouchers

Permits issued

Placements

Progress reports

Referrals

Sale documents

Site reports

Statistics

Tax assessments

Testing results

Waiting lists

Work plan reports

Other


D. Frequency of Data Collection


Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Quarterly

Biannually

Annually

Upon incident

Other



E. Process of Collection and Reporting


Computer spreadsheets

Flat file database

Manual tallies

Relational database

Statistical database

Other




Evaluation Process – These are standard requirements that HUD will expect every program manager receiving a grant to do as part of their project management.

  • An evaluation process will be part of the on-going management of the program.

  • Comparisons will be made between projected and actual numbers for both outputs and outcomes.

  • Deviations from projected outputs and outcomes will be documented and explained.

  • Analysis of data to determine the relationship of outputs to outcomes; what outputs produce which outcomes.


HUD Will Use The Following Management Questions To Evaluate Your Program


  1. How many persons are participating in the program?

  2. How many persons under age six are participating in the program?

  3. Did the project achieve its demonstration objectives?

  4. If your program implemented new technologies for reducing housing related environmental health and safety hazards in very low and low-income households with children under age of six, identify the technology, and impact achieved.

  5. Did your program identify more cost effective practices for reducing housing related environmental health and safety hazards in very low and low-income households with children under age of six?

  6. What is the value of each of the cost effective practices implemented during this demonstration program?

  7. What cost savings were realized as a result of conducting the demonstration?

  8. If the approved project protocol changed as a result of field experience, explain any difference in the initial approved demonstration protocol resulting from actual project experience?

  9. What activities, if any, significantly changed during project implementation?

  10. What new practices would you incorporate into your program as a result of this demonstration project?

  11. What is the likelihood that your project will result in improved field methods of intervention/remediation?

  12. Has the community adopted Healthy Homes principles when undertaking rehabilitation or construction projects? If yes, please explain in narrative and indicate the number of units affected since implementation.





Carter-Richmond Methodology


The above Management Questions developed for your program are based on the Carter-Richmond Methodology1. A description of the Carter-Richmond Methodology appears in the General Section of the NOFA.


1© The Accountable Agency – How to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Public and Private Programs,” Reginald Carter, ISBN Number 9780978724924.


File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorHUD
Last Modified ByHUD User
File Modified2014-11-25
File Created2014-11-25

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy