Grand Teton National Park (GRTE) Visitor Use Survey

Programmatic Review and Clearance Process for NPS-Sponsored Public Surveys

GRTE_MWC_Post_Survey_1-29-2014

Grand Teton National Park (GRTE) Visitor Use Survey

OMB: 1024-0224

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK VISITOR STUDY – Post Survey

NOTE TO OMB REVIEWER:

For the purposes of this review and submission the justifications for each question or section of questions is highlighted in a shaded text box above each question. These text boxes will not be printed on the final version of the surveys. The Topic Areas noted are consistent with the currently approved pool questions for the NPS Programmatic Review Process (1024-0224 – Current Expiration Date: 8-31-2014).


This questionnaire will be administered on-site by interviewers using computer tablet to administer the questionnaires. Only one questionnaire per group will be collected. This is an effort to limit the individual respondent burden.


OMB Control Number: 1024-0224

Expiration Date: 8/31/2014



Surveyor’s Use Only: Survey #: ___ GPS Track #: __ Date: _/_/_ Time: __:__a/p Location: ____





GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK VISITOR STUDY – Part 2


TOPIC AREA 3: ACT3



  1. Which of the following activities did you take part in during this visit to the Moose-Wilson corridor of Grand Teton National Park? Please mark all that apply.

Viewing the scenery

Viewing wildlife

Scenic driving

Hiking or walking

Camping

Cycling

Climbing

Horseback riding

Fishing

Swimming

Boating, rafting or floating river

Visiting a visitor center

Attending ranger talk or program

Commercial guided trip

Other activity: __________________________________________________________________





TOPIC AREA 6: EVALSERV3



  1. What did you like best about your visit within the Moose-Wilson corridor today?





TOPIC AREA 6: EVALSERV2



  1. What did you like least about your visit within the Moose-Wilson corridor today?





TOPIC AREA 4: PREF1



  1. Visitors have different expectations and experiences while visiting the Moose-Wilson corridor. Please indicate how your experience of each of the following items during your visit compared with your expectations. Please mark only one response for each item.



How did your experience compare to your expectations?

Opportunity…

I had no expectation

A lot less than expected

Less than expected

About as expected

More than expected

A lot more than expected

To learn about the history and cultural significance of the area

To learn about the plants and wildlife of the area

To learn about nature conservation and preservation values

To view the scenic beauty

To experience a sense of connection with nature

To experience the diversity of the natural world

To experience the rustic, narrow, winding, slow traveling and historic character of the road

To view wildlife

To photograph wildlife

To experience wildlife in nature

To experience wildlife to have a memorable story to tell other people

To enjoy the natural quiet and sounds of nature

To experience tranquility and contemplativeness in nature

To experience solitude

To experience psychological renewal

To experience an improved sense of wellbeing

To experience a feeling of calmness or peace

To experience a positive change in mood and emotion

To grow and develop spiritually

To be in touch with my spiritual values

To think about your personal values

To give my mind a rest

To get away from the usual demands of life

To get away from the noise back home

To escape from answering emails, texts, or phone calls

To get away from an information overload

To get some exercise

To improve my physical health

To experience physical renewal

To experience a sense of adventure or challenge

To experience excitement

To test my abilities


To spend time with family/friends


To bring my family closer together

To share this place with my family/friends



TOPIC AREA 6: OPMGMT7



  1. How much of a problem were each of the following potential issues for you within the Moose-Wilson corridor today?




Not a Problem

Small Problem

Big Problem

Don’t Know/No Opinion

Amount of information provided by the park to properly prepare for a visit to the area

Availability of information provided at the park entrance stations

Number of signs with information about the natural and cultural history of the area

Number of signs describing areas of interest along the road

Number of park rangers or park staff present

Ease of locating trailheads

Amount of available parking at the trailheads

Number of signs warning drivers about roadway conditions

Frequency of vehicle speed enforcement

Amount of room to adequately pull your vehicle off the road to view areas of interest

Conditions of roadway

Number of vehicles stopped along the roadside

Amount of roadside vegetation damage

Number of commercial groups

Number of people driving recklessly or carelessly

Number of bicyclists riding recklessly or carelessly

Number of vehicles on the roadway

Number of bicyclists on the roadway

Availability of safe locations for bicycling

Amount of awareness of bicyclists on the roadway

Amount of awareness of pedestrians on the roadway

Amount of awareness of vehicles on the roadway

Level of safety for vehicles, pedestrians and bicyclists to travel the roadway at the same time

Number of visitors you experienced at your destination

Visitors acting inappropriately around wildlife

Visitors getting too close to wildlife

Visitors noticeably disturbing wildlife

Visitors observing wildlife from an unsafe distance

Amount of noise from aircraft

Amount of noise from vehicles

Amount of noise from other visitors

Other: _____________________________


TOPIC AREA 6: OPMGMT1



  1. What aspects of the Moose-Wilson corridor do you hope will continue into the future?






TOPIC AREA 6: OPMGMT2



  1. What could the managers at Grand Teton National Park do to improve visitor experiences as they plan for the future of the Moose-Wilson corridor?





TOPIC AREA 6: OPMGMT2



  1. What could the managers at Grand Teton National Park do to improve the protection and preservation of the resources here as they plan for the future of the Moose-Wilson corridor?





Grand Teton National Park and Pennsylvania State University thank you for your assistance.














PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT: The National Park Service is authorized by 16 U.S.C. 1a-7 to collect this information. This information will be used by park managers to understand existing social conditions, visitor experiences, and visitor perspectives about potential problems in the Moose-Wilson area of Grand Teton National Park. Response to this request is voluntary. No action may be taken against you for refusing to supply the information requested. The permanent data will be anonymous. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.


BURDEN ESTIMATE Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 8 minutes per response. Direct comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to: Peter Newman, Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Management, Pennsylvania State University; [email protected] (email); or Phadrea Ponds, NPS Information Collection Coordinator, Fort Collins, CO; [email protected] (email).



51


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorDerrick
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-27

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy