A Study of Feedback in Teacher Evaluation Systems

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
A Study of Feedback in Teacher Evaluation Systems	Form	Modified	Available
CE OMB 1850_0903 Memo about Survey Revisions.docx	Justification for No Material/Nonsubstantive Change	Uploaded 2014-09-24	Available
1850-0903 change sheet Document.pdf	Justification for No Material/Nonsubstantive Change	Uploaded 2014-09-24	Available
1850-0903 KAttach A ESRA.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2014-09-24	Available
Response to OIRA and RMO comments on ED-2013-ICCD-0089-0004 A Study of F .docx	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2014-02-20	Available
CE 4 8 1B OMB Submission Supporting Statement B.docx	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2014-02-20	Available
KCE 4 8 1 Attachment G Email Invitations.docx	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2013-10-25	Available
KCE 4 8 1 Attachment F Affidavit of Nondisclosure.pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2013-10-25	Available
KCE 4 8 1 Attachment E Teacher Full Study Consent Form.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2013-10-25	Available
KCE 4 8 1 Attachment D Teacher Pilot Study Consent Form.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2013-10-25	Available
CE 4 8 1A OMB Submission Supporting Statement A.docx	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2014-02-20	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
209192	A Study of Feedback in Teacher Evaluation Systems	Form	Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1850-0903	ICR Reference No: 201409-1850-001
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 201311-1850-001
Agency/Subagency: ED/IES	Agency Tracking No: 1987.01
Title: A Study of Feedback in Teacher Evaluation Systems
Type of Information Collection: No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 10/29/2014
	Date Received in OIRA: 09/24/2014
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	02/28/2017	02/28/2017	02/28/2017
Responses	5,802	0	5,802
Time Burden (Hours)	2,106	0	2,106
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: This study will collect information in teacher evaluation systems in states in the Central Region. The study will collect information about (1) how teachers perceive the feedback they receive including its utility, accuracy and credibility; (2) how teachers respond to feedback, including their access to learning opportunities related to feedback received; and (3) how teacher responsiveness to feedback relates to their performance in the classroom. The study will examine data from a teacher survey and data from evaluations of teacher performance in districts that are implementing teacher evaluation systems during the 2012-14 school year, researchers will piolot the teacher survey. The study will be implemented during the 2014-15 school year.The findings will be used by state and district leaders to prioritize needs both at the state and district level for training and guidance on providing feedback as part of teacher evaluation systems, and also for informing the state and districts of additional data collection needed to further understand feedback characteristics. This study will result in a report intended for district and state leaders who are responsible for selecting, developing, and implementing teacher evaluation systems and overseeing support for teachers professional growth and effectiveness.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 107 - 279 174 Name of Law: Education Science Reform Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	78 FR 41386	07/10/2013
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	78 FR 66344	11/05/2013
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
A Study of Feedback in Teacher Evaluation Systems	n/a, n/a, n/a, n/a, n/a	Principal Survey ,   Interview ,   Colorado Evaluation ,   Missouri Evaluation ,   Kansas Evaluation

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	5,802	5,802	0	0	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	2,106	2,106	0	0	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $129,417

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 09/24/2014

---