Form Approved
OMB No. 0990-0379
Exp. Date 08/31/2017
Pre-Award & Debriefing Satisfaction Survey
Your firm submitted an offer for Solicitation No. from procurement office . Please provide us with your feedback on the acquisition process. Your answers will help us
assess our performance and identify our strengths and weaknesses. The survey should take no
Please submit your response within the next thirty days to: [insert agency contact information here].
Please
rate your
level
of satisfaction
on a scale
of 1 to 5, with
5 being
“Very
Satisfied”
and 1 being
“Very
Dissatisfied”
Very |
|
|
|
Very |
|
||
Satisfied |
|
|
|
Dissatisfied |
|||
Requirements Development Process - How satisfied were you: |
|||||||
1. |
With the agency’s vendor engagement methods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e.g., RFIs, draft RFP, pre-award conferences) in fostering early communication and exchange before receipt of proposals? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
2. |
That the exchange offered by any industry day(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
offered valuable information that improved your |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
|
understanding of the agency’s requirements? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
With the agency’s understanding of your firm’s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
marketplace? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
With the clarity of the final requirements? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
5. |
That the agency kept vendors informed about any delays in the solicitation process (considering both the initial release and any subsequent delays)? |
6. |
That the solicitation included clear proposal submission instructions that sufficiently guided offerors or respondents in preparing proposals or responses to requests for information? |
7. |
That the government chose an appropriate contract type? |
8. |
That the government chose an appropriate source selection methodology? |
9. That the agency answered questions regarding the solicitation in such a way that it helped you to prepare the proposal? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
10. With the opportunity to propose unique and innovative solutions (i.e., the solicitation promoted innovation)? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
11. With the clarity of the solicitation’s evaluation criteria? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
12. With the amount of time the agency gave to submit a proposal? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
13. That the solicitation’s evaluation criteria allowed for the best selection among competing proposals? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
Award Execution and Debriefings- How satisfied were you: |
||||||
14. With the agency’s resolution of issues/concerns related to the contracting process? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
15. With the robustness of the agency’s debriefing (i.e., it allowed you to understand how to improve on similar efforts in the future)? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
16. How satisfied were you with your overall experience on this acquisition? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
17. Please provide any additional comments: |
|
|||||
18. Are you a small business? |
Yes |
No |
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0990-0379 . The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, OS/OCIO/PRA, 200 Independence Ave., S.W., Suite 336-E, Washington D.C. 20201, Attention: PRA Reports Clearance Officer
As you recently worked with the procurement office on solicitation # in making an award, please evaluate your experience.
|
being “Very Dissatisfied” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very Satisfied |
|
|
|
Very Dissatisfied |
|
|
Planning - How satisfied were you: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. With the acquisition milestone schedule? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
|
2. With the procurement office’s ability to keep you informed of any changes to the acquisition milestone schedule? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
|
3. With the procurement office’s assistance in the Acquisition Plan process, which allowed you to better understand and participate in the procurement? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
|
4. With the procurement office’s engagement with industry early in the acquisition process? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
|
Communication - How satisfied were you: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
With the procurement office’s responsiveness to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
your questions (communicating in a clear, |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
|
courteous, timely, and professional manner)? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
With the procurement office’s effectiveness in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resolving any issues or delays encountered during |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
|
the acquisition process? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
With your understanding on how - and to whom – you should elevate problems for resolution? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
8. |
With early communications describing the roles and responsibilities of the procurement office and of your office (program office)? |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
9. |
How satisfied were you with the overall support provided by the procurement office in |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
|
the acquisition process? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please provide any additional comments:
Were you part of an IPT (Integrated Procurement
Team)? Yes No
Reminder: After one year, or completion of performance, work with your Contracting Officer (CO) to evaluate the contract awardee’s performance in CPARS
As you recently worked with program office on solicitation # , please evaluate your experience.
Please
rate your
level
of satisfaction
on a scale
of 1 to 5, with
5 being
“Very
Satisfied”
and 1 being
“Very
Dissatisfied”
Planning - How satisfied were you:
That the program office conducted meaningful
Very Satisfied
Very Dissatisfied N/A
market research? 5 4 3 2 1 N/A
With the program office’s ability to provide any
necessary documents allowing for the timely completion of the acquisition package?
That the program office allotted adequate time for
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
a successful procurement? 5 4 3 2 1 N/A
That the program office allotted adequate
resources to allow for a successful procurement? 5 4 3 2 1 N/A
Communication - How satisfied were you:
With the clarity and effectiveness of the program
office’s communication of their needs and time constraints?
With the program office’s responsiveness to your questions (communicating in a clear, courteous, timely, and professional manner)?
With my understanding on how - and to whom – you should elevate problems for resolution in the program office?
With the program office’s technical expertise in
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
5 4 3 2 1 N/A
evaluating proposals? 5 4 3 2 1 N/A
support provided by the program office in the acquisition process?
Please provide any additional comments:
Reminder:
After
one
year,
or completion
of performance,
work
with
your
Contracting
Officer’s
Representative
(COR)
to evaluate
the contract
awardee’s
performance
in CPARS.
For awards made using Government-wide |
Very |
|
|
|
Very |
N/A |
Acquisition Contracts (GWACs) or GSA Schedules |
Satisfied |
|
|
|
Dissatisfied |
|
1. Please rate your overall satisfaction with the contract vehicle based upon the outcomes you |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
N/A |
have experienced so far |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Which
of the
following
criteria
played
a role
in your
selection
of this contract
vehicle
(check
all that
apply):
D Saves Time D Flexibility D Ease of Use D Familiarity
D Vendor Access
D Ability to meet small business goals D Ability to meet sustainability goals D Complies with agency policy
File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
Author | Windows User |
File Modified | 0000-00-00 |
File Created | 2021-01-25 |